Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 1 SLAC HEP Budget Meeting Summary Discussion Charts S. M. Kahn, D. B. MacFarlane, R. Alva SLAC Rev 5 – Preliminary

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 2 Outline of Presentation *Statement of SLAC PPA Vision and Near-Term Priorities for Operating Programs, and New Projects. –Addresses Laboratory role, strengths and strategic goals and program objectives. *Scenario A, (B, C) –B&R Reallocation Summary Sheet –High Level Summary – Detailed year-by-year breakouts –Summary Budget Spreadsheet *Backup Material on Individual Programs –ATLAS, EXO-200 and EXO, LSST, JDEM, SuperB, Theory, Accelerator Development, ILC SRF, PEP-II D&D, Detector R&D Test Beam.

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 3 SLAC Vision for Particle Physics and Astrophysics *Maintain a leading role at the Energy Frontier through enhanced participation in ATLAS, the current LHC machine, and their planned upgrades, and through leadership of R&D for the ILC and associated detector concepts. *Become the lead laboratory within the DOE-SC complex for particle astrophysics and cosmology, and for non-accelerator physics generally. (KIPAC, FGST, LSST, JDEM, EXO, GeODM, AGIS, CMB). *Maintain strong partnerships at the Intensity Frontier through facilitating US participation in an international SuperB Project, and through supporting the design and development of the Project X facility. *Become the lead laboratory within the DOE-SC complex for electron accelerator research. Play a stewardship role for accelerator physics across disciplines within the Office of Science. Develop key innovations and technologies for future high-gradient accelerators.

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 4 SLAC Near-Term Priorities for Particle Physics and Astrophysics: Operating Programs *Continue to facilitate the optimal exploitation and preservation of the BaBar dataset. –Support necessary computing infrastructure through the completion of the intense and steady analysis phases –Facilitate transition into the archival phase, and ensure that the BaBar data remain accessible to a broad community. *Operate the LAT for FGST, and continue to spearhead scientific discovery with this unique particle astrophysics observatory. –Support the operations, software development, and instrument support functions of the LAT, as performed by the ISOC. –Maintain a vigorous LAT-based scientific analysis program at SLAC. *Play a significant role in ATLAS and LHC accelerator commissioning, initial science analyses, and computing support. *Maintain world-leading accelerator-science program –World-leading programs in beam physics theory, advanced computation, and accelerator design.

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 5 SLAC Near-Term Priorities for Particle Physics and Astrophysics: Operating Programs *Maintain a crucial, enabling role in technology development for the ILC. –L-band rf. –Electron source. –Final focus and IR design. *Lead high-gradient X-band research in the US. –Establish the fundamental limits to acceleration gradient and the optimal design of rf structures. *Maintain world-leading theoretical programs in particle physics and particle astrophysics and cosmology. *Plan and execute the orderly D&D of the BaBar detector and the PEP-II facility.

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 6 SLAC Near-Term Priorities for Particle Physics and Astrophysics: New Programs *Bring LSST into development as a joint NSF-DOE project. –Lead the design and development of the LSST camera. –Participate in the data management, with particular emphasis on new tools for handling and querying the extremely large database. –Shepherd the involvement of the HEP community in this exciting dark energy experiment. *Play a major role in the upgrade of the ATLAS detector and the LHC –ATLAS Phase 1: Insertable B-layer project. –ATLAS Phase 2: Tracker and TDAQ upgrades. –Enhancement of ATLAS computing at SLAC. –Extend LHC contributions to include fabrication of upgrade collimators, development of PS2 design, and LLRF and feedback improvements. *Construct and operate FACET for forefront experiments in beam-driven plasma wakefield acceleration. *Participate in JDEM construction, development, and science analyses. –Provision of warm electronics for one or more of the focal plane instruments. –Possible role in fine guiding. –Participation in weak lensing and strong lensing science investigations.

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 7 SLAC Near-Term Priorities for Particle Physics and Astrophysics: New Programs *Develop and construct a ton-scale version of EXO for the initial suite of mid-scale experiments at DUSEL. –Complete operation and testing of EXO-200. –Perform the necessary R&D and engineering for full-EXO. *Facilitate a significant US role in SuperB in Italy. –Provide components from PEP-II to reduce the cost of SuperB construction. –Play a leadership role in the machine design and construction. –Develop and coordinate participation in the SuperB detector collaboration. *Participate in Project-X R&D with contributions to rf power systems. *Perform state of the art experiments in laser dielectric acceleration. *Develop high power X-band rf sources to optimally exploit high gradient structures. *Initiate and maintain R&D efforts to a enable a SLAC leadership role in longer-range programs: –SiD, GeODM, and AGIS

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 8 SLAC HEP Budget Meeting Update Modified Scenarios B and C S. M. Kahn, D. B. MacFarlane, R. Alva SLAC

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 9 Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 9 Modified Scenario B *High Level Impacts –Maintains present core research staffing levels with no need for reductions through attrition. –BABAR D&D as planned; PEP-II D&D delayed until –LSST ramp-up, assume $1.5 M (FY10) and $3M (FY12) of PED funding. –EXO concept only developed at the 200 kg level. –Reduced electron research program due to BABAR falloff; reduced SuperB involvement, & small ongoing ILC detector R&D studies. –Continue growth of ATLAS, leading to SLAC role on ATLAS Phase 1 IBL and TDAQ ATLAS upgrades with BNL as lead; continue effort on LHC accelerator commissioning and upgrades. –Accelerator science program as planned. –Develop test beam and X-band rf source proposals for future funding consideration. –Project X & JDEM warm electronics role commensurate with additional funding from lead labs and/or other agencies

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 10 Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 10 Modified Scenario B *Strategic Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed? –Maintain leadership in current electron accelerator physics, but future direction in doubt without clear path for SuperB and ILC physics programs. –Establish SLAC as the lead laboratory in particle astrophysics and cosmology for DOE-SC, although prospects for development of future underground program unclear. –Continue leadership role at the Energy Frontier through an enhanced role in ATLAS and ongoing development of the ILC. –Play a stewardship role for accelerator physics across disciplines within the Office of Science. Develop key innovations and technologies for future high-gradient accelerators. *What major accomplishments have been or will be achieved? –BABAR Intensive and Steady analysis supported. –FGST support and science exploitation. –LSST executed as a major DOE contribution to the project. –Enhanced ATLAS role enabled, including upgrade contribution. –FACET implementation and development of acc science novel concepts. *Significant issues and concerns –No provision for full EXO as part of initial suite of DUSEL experiments. –No provision for US contribution to SuperB if project proceeds on projected timescale. –No provision for industrialization of SC RF 1.3 GHz sources

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 11 Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 11 Modified Scenario B *High level impacts –No further attrition in core staff. ATLAS growth continues, electron reduced and reduced Super B involvement; some attrition in Theory. *Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed? –As previously noted. *What accomplishments have been or will be achieved? –In addition to previously noted, LSST CD-1, R&D for full EXO and SuperB concept development. –FACET starts construction and acc science ramps-up according to plan. –JDEM warm electronics and Project X role commensurate with external funding. *Significant issues and concerns –Accelerated FACET construction funded from stimulus package will be challenging. 2009

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 12 Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 12 Modified Scenario B *High level impacts –Reduction of 4 FTEs in B Factory Ops; BABAR D&D continues as planned, but not yet able to start of PEP-II D&D –Project line: LSST ramp-up assumes ~$1.5 M of PED funding in 2010, with FACET construction ending. –PED funding for ATLAS phase 1 upgrade with BNL as lead. *Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed? –As previously noted. *What accomplishments have been or will be achieved? –BABAR Intensive analysis winds down and transitions to Steady analysis. –ATLAS IBL design effort achieves CD-1. –LSST proceeds to CD-2. –Finish FACET construction, ramp-up PWFA and laser accelerator science as planned. –JDEM warm electronics and Project X role commensurate with external funding. *Significant issues and concerns –Some competition for people and resources among construction projects. 2010

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 13 Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 13 Modified Scenario B *High level impacts –Another 4 FTE reduction in B Factory Ops; BABAR D&D and PEP-II maintenance at ~$6.5M, but resources are insufficient to start PEP-II D&D until –Project line increases by ~$7M due to: LSST ramp-up (assuming $3M of PED funding for FY2011), the first full l year of FACET operations, and an additional $1M investment to replace aging KIPAC computing equipment. –Construction funding for ATLAS phase 1 upgrade with BNL as lead. –Continue planned Accelerator Science growth. *Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed? –As previously noted. –Moving ATLAS phase 1 upgrade and LSST projects through CD reviews into the construction phase. *What accomplishments have been or will be achieved? –As previously noted. –BABAR Steady analysis ongoing. *Significant issues and concerns –Phasing of new initiative development schedules. 2011

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 14 Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 14 SLAC Modified Scenario B detail

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 15 Modified Scenario C *High Level Impacts –Expands Scenario B to include full-scale EXO and significant US role in SuperB. Begin full EXO in FY2013, as part of the initial suite of experiments at DUSEL, with PED in FY , construction start in FY2013 and SLAC as lead. Begin SuperB as a new construction project starting in FY2012, with PED in 2011, assuming investment in detector and accelerator by US community with SLAC as lead. –Exploit core data management capability developed for BABAR to enable enhanced ATLAS Analysis Facility. –Assume funding to construct test beam for detector R&D program (2009 and 2010), –Assume successful competition for accelerator development funding X-band rf sources, $9M over 5 years to develop viable rf source. TT60 High Radiation Test Facility, $1M to provide beam dump and window by end of CY

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 16 Modified Scenario C *Strategic Priorities: What Scientific objectives and targets are being addressed? –A program at this level is commensurate with the full vision we articulated for PPA at SLAC. *What Major accomplishments have been or will be achieved? –Enhanced ATLAS role enabled, including major upgrade contribution. –BABAR Intensive and Steady State analysis supported; D&D completed in a timely way. –SLAC and US community provide crucial leadership for SuperB project in Italy, with BABAR and PEP-II components and major new hardware contributions. –FGST support and science exploitation. –LSST executed as a major DOE contribution to the project. –FACET implementation and development of Acc Science novel concepts. –Full EXO developed as a major component of the initial program at DUSEL. *Significant issues and concerns: –Phasing of various construction remains a significant challenge

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 17 Modified Scenario C *High level impacts –Expand the scope of FACET to include the double sail boat configuration. –Initial $0.75M funding for test beam facility based on proposal *Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed? –Continue development of full EXO and SuperB for consideration in later years. *What accomplishments have been or will be achieved? –FACET construction accelerated. –Test beam design completed and construction started. *Significant i ssues and concerns –FACET cost estimates yet to be baselined and confirmed Scenario B +

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 18 Modified Scenario C *High level impacts –Remaining $0.75M funding for test beam facility based on proposal *Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed? –Moving full EXO R&D forward and continuing to develop US role on SuperB. *What accomplishments have been or will be achieved? –Complete test beam and begin operations. –Begin new accelerator development projects. *Significant issues and concerns –Potential competition for resources as multiple construction projects ramp-up Scenario B +

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 19 Modified Scenario C *High level impacts –PED funding for full EXO ~$1.9M for 2011 assuming construction starts in FY13. –PED funding for SuperB $2.4M for the detector and $3.3M for the collider, assuming construction starts in FY12. –Strengthen data analysis capability with the ATLAS Analysis facility: $1.5M for equipment and $1.2M operational support, ramping to 7 FTEs in –Additional $1M (non-core) for general accelerator development. *Priorities: What scientific objectives and targets are being addressed? –Moving full EXO and SuperB from development into construction. *What accomplishments have been or will be achieved? –EXO and SuperB proceed to CD-1. –Begin development of ATLAS Analysis Facility. –Continue accelerator development projects. *Significant issues and concerns –Aggressive program for current workforce Scenario B +

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 20 SLAC Modified Scenario C

Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 21 Budget Briefing with OHEP Staff: March 3, 2009 Page 21 What is next with the budget *As previously mentioned, with the exception of FACET the 2009 and 2010 budgets are very consistent with current level of spending. Thus what you should expect is : –Minor or no changes to your budget. –But there will be some major re-bucketing in the “DOE - HEP B&R codes”, that may mean new charge numbers for your group. –Potentially more granularity in our tracking by project, particularly in KIPAC. –Please support these changes working with your Financial Planner. *Mid Year Check-Point –We have already started our Mid year checkpoint, during this and next month. One of the Financial Planners will be meeting with you to review your budget and current level of spending –This is a good time to correct spending trends to avoid overspending, but also to ensure that the right people and services get charged to the correct accounts. Your financial planner will be working with you. *Specifically if you are new to owning a budget. –There is an overview training that should answer most of your questions, about finance and budget management. You are encouraged to attend. –The training will be held at Kavli 3rd Floor Conference Room, next Wednesday (3/25) from 10:00-11:30 am. –You can sign-in via SLAC web.