Review of Appendix 27, 27A, & 27B FA-002-089. Background In AY 07-08 the following changes to Appendix 16 were approved: – elimination of the reconsideration.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Reappointment, Promotion & Continuous Appointment (Tenure) Process and Issues.
Advertisements

Tenure is awarded when the candidate successfully demonstrates meritorious performance in teaching, research/scholarly/creative accomplishment and service.
Conflict of Interest in Assignment of Course Material FA
Biennial Review 1. Timeframe: August 1, 2011 – July 30, 2013.
Post Tenure Review Handbook-Master.pdfhttp:// Handbook-Master.pdf.
Proposed Revisions to Section 5 (Review & Evaluation of Faculty Performance) of the Faculty Handbook Spring, T&P Oversight Committee Office.
 Policy released on June 14, 2013  Currently on public comment period  Effective July 1, 2013, subject to change  Applies ONLY to classroom teaching.
Program Viability Study Program Review Red Deer College ACCC Symposium February 2004.
Fixed-Term Faculty Committee Chair Jean DeSaix. Committee Charge (from Resolution ) monitors implementation of policies and recommendations concerning.
October 10, 2007 The New Appendix J Areas of Performance Section IX Effective Approved by General Faculty Vote May 2007.
Review of Appendix 16 FA Purpose –Review Appendix 16 for compliance with the Collective Bargaining Agreement Changes –Compliance –Removing.
Process for conducting a vote of confidence in a Dean FA
The Pathway to Success Goal IV Strengthen and Leverage Programs of Strength and Promise.
Faculty Affairs presents:.  Conditions of Appointment  Lecturer Evaluation Process  Reappointment  Entitlements  Order of Assignment  Salary  New.
2015 UTIA P&T Workshop. UTK Faculty Handbook….  Section Faculty Review & Evaluation p 18  Section Probationary Period p 21 UTK Manual.
The New Appendix J Areas of Performance Section IX Effective Approved by General Faculty Vote May 2007 Fall 2008 RTP Workshop Presentation.
Promotion and Tenure Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
Negotiations Committee Special Meeting Annual Report Ratification.
Strategies for Faculty Evaluation ABE BITOK DEAN OF ACADEMICS DINÉ COLLEGE.
Jane Patton, President, ASCCC Lisa Legohn, LA Trade Tech.
ARTICLE X, DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION PROCEDURES GOVERNING TENURE, PROMOTION, AND CONTRACT RENEWAL contract, unchanged for
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
Report to the Faculty Senate April 14, 2009 Bryan L. Spangelo, Chair.
Review of Appendix 16 for Compliance with the Collective Bargaining Agreement FA
Process for conducting a vote of confidence Cal Poly, Pomona Academic Senate.
Academic Program Review Committee Report Faculty Senate meeting November 11, 2008.
The Non-Tenure Track Faculty Reclassification Project: Specialized Faculty Susannah C. Miller Director, Faculty Relations
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #7July 14, 2015  PANEL: What do Department Chairs Look for in a Dossier?  Review Clinical Statement of.
DOSSIER PREPARATION MENTORING PROGRAM Session #6 July 8, 2014  Review Clinical Statement of Endeavors  Review Supporting Materials Peer Evaluations of.
Professional Development Plans Colleen Mullery Sr. Associate Vice President, Faculty Affairs & Human Resources.
AP Academic Program Assessment Plan for Psychology and Sociology Second Reading.
FA Minority Reports in the RTP Process. Resources Proponent Proponent CFA Representative CFA Representative Academic Affair Representative Academic.
P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE AUGUST 26, 2016 SUE OTT ROWLANDS, PROVOST.
Retention, Tenure and Promotion Appendix J August 26, 2016 Colleen Mullery Sr. Associate Vice President, Faculty Affairs & Human Resources.
Reappointment, Tenure and Promotion (RTP) Processes and Procedures
Academic Year UNC Asheville
Tenure Procedure Northwest Vista College
Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE
ARC Retention, Tenure and Promotion From Paper to Electronic
4/30/2014 RTP Information Updated Summer 2016 ( )
University Manual FA FA FA
RTP For new faculty A brief introduction.
الوحدة 20 مهارات التواصل مع الآخرين
Initiator Faculty Affairs Liaison Approver Senior Administrator
Tricia Runzel, Faculty Affairs
Tenure Policies Q & A Session
Mid-Cycle Review Process
UW CES Extended Term and Promotion
Provost’s Merit Pay Initiative
Counselor Evaluation Policy
Donna Kragt: HLC Liaison April 11, 2017
University Bylaws Committee
Review of Interim Policy Regarding Appointment of Principal Investigators FA
OUHSC Graduate College Program Review Overview and Timeline
University of Massachusetts Amherst Faculty Search Activities Guide
REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE
Faculty Affairs Committee
Kazmer Promotion: UMass Process
UNIVERSITY RETENTION, TENURE, & PROMOTION POLICY
Faculty Leadership Institute, June 17, 2017, Sacramento Sheraton
Mid-Term or Promotion Evaluation
Faculty Consulting Department Head Meeting
Apportionment for 2013/2014 CRAO committee gathered data on faculty numbers in their college as of fall Faculty were counted if they: Held a full.
Mid-Term or Promotion Evaluation
Fort Valley State University
UTIA Mid-Cycle Review Process
Faculty Affairs Committee
FA Review and Clarification of Appendix 15A
Presentation transcript:

Review of Appendix 27, 27A, & 27B FA

Background In AY the following changes to Appendix 16 were approved: – elimination of the reconsideration steps of RTP process at the department and the dean review levels. –Increase in applicant response time to comments at any level to 10 days. Academic Affairs in consultation with the EC modified Appendix 27 (RTP Forms) in compliance with the changes.

Background Appendix 27A (Periodic Review Forms) assumes that post tenure and periodic reviews of probationary faculty is an RTP process. Appendix 27A (Periodic Review Forms) assumes that post tenure and periodic reviews of probationary faculty is an RTP process. Departments may or may not use DRTPC for periodic review of faculty members

Recommendations Pages 2, 9 and 16 of Appendix 27 be changed to comply with approved changes to Appendix 16. Changes to appendix 27A are recommended to: –Indicate that periodic review of faculty is not an RTP action. –Periodic review of the faculty members shall be conducted by a peer review committee which may or may not be the DRTP committee. The committee will be referred to as Periodic Review Committee. –Distinct criteria for periodic review must be established by the department. The criteria may or may not be the same as the RTP criteria.

Recommendations No changes to Appendix 27 A (Part time faculty evaluation) is recommended.