Project Status Update R09230: Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems A. Benjamin Wager (ME) B. Michael Skube (ME)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Georgia Tech Aerial Robotics Dr. Daniel P Schrage Jeong Hur Fidencio Tapia Suresh K Kannan SUCCEED Poster Session 6 March 1997.
Advertisements

ODS3F –Observation and Detection Systems For Forest Fire Monitoring
Daniel Graves –Project Lead James Reepmeyer – Lead Engineer Brian Smaszcz– Airframe Design Alex Funiciello – Airfoil Design Michael Hardbarger – Control.
Team 6: Autonomous Aerial Vehicle Team Members Department of Mechanical Engineering: Ken Anderson, Arielle Duen, Eric Milo, Ernandes Nascimento and Matthew.
Cory Fulkerson (Project Manager) - Mechanical Engineer John Graham - Computer Engineer Clayton Hooks - Electrical Engineer O’Raphael Okoro - Electrical.
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P08210/11 – Ruggedization of a Data Recorder for a Forklift Truck Shadle Stewart ME Rick Chadwick ME.
Vertical Launch UAV Project Plan. ∞ Construct an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a camera payload ∞ UAV must autonomously navigate with real-time video.
GPS Vehicle Tracking/Payload Release System For Small UAV Project Team
INNOCON Innovative solutions to the modern real time Arial surveillance challenges.
Daniel Graves (ME). Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems  Primary Customer: RIT College of Imaging Science ○ Currently.
Inertial Measurement Unit “IMU” (Analog Devices ADIS16350) - Tri-axis gyroscope ± 75°/s, ± 150°/s, ± 300°/s settings - Tri-axis accelerometer ± 10 g measurement.
P09233 Flight Parameter Measurements Michael Skube & James Hunt P09233
P09233 Flight Parameter Measurements Michael Skube P09233
EDGE™ Preliminary Project Overview P09123 – MAV Platform Team Members: Joe Hozdic (Lead)Ming Chow Aaron NashBrian David Giovanni Sorrentino.
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P08110 – UAV Based Digital Imaging System David Eells (Mechanical Engineering)
AT 209 Introduction to Civil Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P08043 – Magnet Centering Device Aaaron Burger (Mechanical Engineer)
Project Status Update II R09230: Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems A. Benjamin Wager (ME) B. Michael Skube (ME)
EDGE™ Project Status Update PYYNNN – Project Title Here DPM Student Presenter 1 (Dept) DPM Student Presenter 2 (Dept) DPM Student Presenter 3 (Dept) USE.
P09233 Flight Parameter Measurements Michael Skube P09233
EDGE™ Project P09122: MAV Control System Erik Bellandi - ME Ben Wager - ME Garrett Argenna - ME Tahar Allag - EE Michael Pepen - EE Stephen Nichols - CE.
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P08110 – UAV Based Digital Imaging System David Eells (Mechanical Engineering)
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P08210/11 – Ruggedization of a Data Recorder for a Forklift Truck Shadle Stewart ME Rick Chadwick ME.
EDGE™ MAV Control System - P Management Review (MSD I) Erik Bellandi – Project Manager Ben Wager – Lead Engineer Garrett Argenna – Mechanical Engineering.
EDGE™ Project Status Update P09141 – Thermal Heater Control System Anthony Berwin (Mechanical Engineer)
EDGE™ Final Project Plan P09123 – MAV Platform Structure Joe Hozdic (Mechanical Engineering)
Project Status Update R10004: OS/OA Low Energy Printing Mechanical Engineers: Dean Culver Shawn Hoskins Derek Meinke Tim Salter.
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P09452 Compressor Part Fabrication and ReVamp Snehapriya Rao (ME) Ed Budriss (ME) Alex Scarangella (ME) Edward Wolf (CE)
PROJECT ICARUS by Noah Michael, Student Project Manager & Dr. Nikos Mourtos, Faculty Project Manager AE 170A/B Course Instructor.
EDGE™ Final Project Presentation P09141 – Satellite Thermal Heater Controller Anthony Berwin (Mechanical Engineer)
EDGE™ Project Status Update P09141 – Satellite Thermal Heater Control System Anthony Berwin (Mechanical Engineer)
Image Processing of Video on Unmanned Aircraft Video processing on-board Unmanned Aircraft Aims to develop image acquisition, processing and transmission.
Project Status Update R10004: OS/OA Low Energy Printing Mechanical Engineers: Dean Culver Shawn Hoskins Derek Meinke Tim Salter.
AAE 451 SPRING 2007 SYSTEMS REQUIREMENTS REVIEW TEAM 4: Kevin Kwan Dan Pothala Mohammad A. Rahim Nicole Risley Sara Tassan John Thornton Sean Woock Alvin.
EDGE™ Project Status Update P09121 – MAV Airframe P09122 – MAV Control System P09123 – MAV Platform Structure Aaron Nash (Mechanical Engineering) Erik.
Redesign of a Submersible Autonomous Data Collection and Transmission System (S.A.D.C.A.T.S.) Group Members: Matthew Rhoads BS ME (Lead) - Ballast, Hull.
Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems P09232 – Airframe B Team Lead: Joshua Wagner.
P09651 – Visible Spectrum Imaging System Lead: Dave Lewis Brian Russell Aditi Khare.
P09561 – Visible Spectrum Imaging System: Project Update Dave Lewis Steve Sweet Joanna Dobeck Lenny Calabrese Jason Thibado Darrell Draper Customer: Dr.
EDGE™ MAV Control System - P09122 Final Project Review Erik Bellandi – Project Manager Ben Wager – Lead Engineer Garrett Argenna – Mechanical Engineering.
Christopher Barrett (ME) Daniel Graves (ME). Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems Primary Customer: ○ Currently.
April 26, Team Information Designation Ongo-03 Members Advisors Dr. J. Lamont, Prof. R. Patterson, Dr. Rajagopalan, Dr. J. Basart ClientSpace Systems.
Team Phoenix March 15, Project Goal Our team will develop an air vehicle that will not only navigate a course autonomously while providing real.
Sponsored by Wegmans P Automation/Improvement of Packaging on the Cookie Line Stephanie Rager Bruno Coelho.
Project Status Update R09220 – Competitive FSAE Autosports Systems Aaron Heyman (IE) Shijo George (ME) Stephanie Malinowski (ME) Alex Sandy (ME) Greg Wall.
Unmanned aerial systems, what they are and what is available? Professor Sandor M Veres University of Sheffield.
COBXXXX EXPERIMENTAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE AND CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR UAVS Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos,
UK Aerial Robotics Team UK IDEA Laboratory Workforce Development: The UK Aerial Robotics Team and the PAX River Student UAV Competition Dale McClure (Matt.
A White Paper on the potential for a small scale airborne system for Threat assessment, Characterization, Monitoring, and Tactical feed-back for deployment.
PROJECT STATUS UPDATE P10661-AERIAL IMAGING Dale Turley (Mechanical Engineering)
Team 3 Ashwin Shankar Upsham Dawra Samit Sura Joe Katz.
Abstract Each July, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International holds an annual International Aerial Robotics Competition (IARC), with major.
MSD 1 WEEK 6 SYSTEM DESIGN REVIEW Team Rochester Institute of Technology College of Engineering P /2/
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P08210/11 – Ruggedization of a Data Recorder for a Forklift Truck Shadle Stewart ME Rick Chadwick ME.
Project Kick Off R09233: Flight Parameter Measurements Michael Skube (ME)
EDGE™ Final Project Plan Presentation P09001 – RFID Reader & Active Tag Philip Davenport (Industrial and Systems Engineering)
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
P07122: Autonomous Quadcopter Jason Enslin – EE: Team Leader, Circuit Design/Testing Glenn Kitchell – CE: Programming, Software Design Richard Nichols.
EDGE™ Preliminary Project Plan P09102 – METEOR Stage Separation System JJ Guerrette (ME)
EDGE™ Concept Level Project Plan P09103 Rocket Self-Destruction Device Chris Natoli (ME)
Dr. Marcos Esterman Faculty Guide W. Casolara Project Leader
AY: – Track Project Lead Airframe A Matt Greco P09231
Concept Level Project Plan P08008 – ArcWorks Process Improvement
R09560 – Open Architecture, Open Source Aerial Imaging Systems
Concept Level Project Plan P08453 – Turbomachinery Flow Visualization
Project Readiness Review P10029 – Air Muscle Artificial Limb
Project Status Update P09023 – Air Muscle Artificial Limb Next Generation Jim Breunig (ME)
Dr. Victor M. Mwongera PhD in Aerospace Engineering
Project Status Update PYYNNN – Project Title Here
Final Project Plan P09004 – Eye Movement Tracking Device
Presentation transcript:

Project Status Update R09230: Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems A. Benjamin Wager (ME) B. Michael Skube (ME) C. Matthew Greco (ME) D. James Hunt (ME) E. Stephen Sweet (ME) F. Joshua Wagner (ME)

Project Status Update Project Family Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems Family Number R09230 Start Term 2008-2 planned academic quarter for MSD1 End Term 2013-3 planned academic quarter for MSD2 Faculty Guide Dr. Jason Kolodziej (ME) Faculty Consultant Dr. Agamemnon Crassidis (ME) – Possible Consultant Dr. Mark Kempski (ME) – Possible Consultant Dr. P. Venkataraman (ME) – Possible Consultant Primary Customer R09560 - Open Architecture, Open Source Aerial Imaging Systems Law Enforcement Agencies (Marijuana Eradication)

Mission Statement Product Description /Project Overview The Unmanned Aerial Vehicle family of projects is intended to create an open source, open architecture platform to hold imaging systems for research projects and law enforcement. Key Business Goals/Project Deliverables The primary business goals of this product are to Create a product that is more cost effective than existing solutions. Create a stable, easily controlled aerial platform. Create an open source UAV platform that can carry and control an imaging system. Primary Market / Project Opportunities The primary market for the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle is the RIT College of Imaging Science. It is intended as a tool to facilitate imaging research, and to enhance their image capturing abilities. Secondary Market / Project Opportunities The secondary market for the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle is Public Safety Officials. Primarily for Law Enforcement to increase their response capabilities, and decrease their reliance on manned aircraft, thus decreasing their aerial costs. This can also be used by fire departments to track wildfires or realtors who sell large tracts of land. Stakeholders Stakeholders in the design of our product include the following: R09560 - Open Architecture, Open Source Aerial Imaging Systems College of Imaging Science Law Enforcement Agencies Fire Departments Realtors / Appraisers The Communities in which our law enforcement customers reside

Identify Customer Needs Conducted Interviews Police Departments Mr. Anand Badgujar Det. Steve McLoud Accident Reconstructionists John Desch Associates Real Estate Agents Mr. Len DiPaolo Fire Departments Mr. Dave Wardall Customs and Border Patrol Mr. Don Lyos Past Senior Design Teams P08110 – UAV Digital Imaging System: Interface between R/C aircraft and mounted imaging system P07122 – Modular, Scalable, Autonomous Flight Vehicle: Autonomous aircraft to carry a payload P07301 – Vehicle Data Acquisition DAQ Subsystem: Data processing and transmission P06003 – Schweizer 1-26 Flight Simulator: Flight control systems with intuitive user interface P06010 – Constant Surveillance UAV: Autonomous vehicle control and GPS waypoint navigation

Concept Development Identify Customer Needs - Interpret Needs Statements: Minimize vibrations for clear images/video Ability to loiter over one particular area High top speed to arrive at destination quickly Airspeed Altitude Pitch Heading GPS Position Oblique angle of image (could be calculated from other measurements) Control engine speed Control flaps, rudder, etc. Pass along measured flight data Remote control of the plane Autonomous flight via offboard computing Autonomous flight via onboard computing Aircraft must survive several rough landings Protect payload in the event of a crash Easily assembled/disassembled or collapsed to fit in an SUV or truck Carry a sufficient amount of imaging equipment Easily interchange different imaging systems

Affinity Diagram Flight Characteristics Controls Take Off / Landing Autonomous Patrol RC Control Preprogrammed Flight Route Third Party Pilot / Data Collection Pre-Programmable Flight Characteristics Loiter Fast Stable Short Flight Time Long Flight Time Take Off / Landing Conventional Landing Net On Roof Thrown / Parachute VTOL Data Collection Third Party Pilot / Data Collection 3D Mesh Imaging Capability Real Time Site Data Report Photo Information (scale, angle) GPS Camera Down-looking Camera Wide Angle Lens Still Pictures Video Straight Down Camera Angle Angled Camera Airframe Easy / No Assembly Needed Able to Disassemble Small Package Modular / Removable Wings

Objective Tree Inexpensive - Cheaper than currently fielded systems Easy to Fly - for targeted end user groups Stable - Low maintenance cost Economic Objective Sustainable - Long life between maintenance and replacement Time - Complete sub projects in 22 weeks & quick assembly of vehicle if portable Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems Objective Tree Technological Objective Resource Objective Rugged - Simple but powerful technology Small User Groups - Small operator and maintenance staff Raw Materials - Funding and material source Unmanned - Use of technology to automate flight Scope Objective Open Source - Develop all aspects for in house production Team Integration - Both UAV sub groups and Imaging team Marketable - Public Safety and Research Usage

Hierarchy of Needs Fast, stable aircraft Minimize vibrations for clear images/video Ability to loiter over one particular area High top speed to arrive at destination quickly Ability to measure flight parameters Airspeed Altitude Pitch Heading GPS Position Oblique angle of image (could be calculated from other measurements) Ability to control the aircraft and the payload Interface with the imaging system to pass along commands Control engine speed Control flaps, rudder, etc. Communication between the aircraft and user Pass along measured flight data Remote control of the plane Autonomous flight via offboard computing Autonomous flight via onboard computing Structural integrity and features Aircraft must survive several rough landings Protect payload in the event of a crash Easily assembled/disassembled or collapsed to fit in an SUV or truck Payload Carry a sufficient amount of imaging equipment Easily interchange different imaging systems

Customer Requirements House of Quality Customer Requirements Customer Weights Weight Airspeed Energy Consumption Controls Maintenance Survivability Fast 3 9   1 Stable Long Flight Time Cheap Easy to Fly Raw Score 120 66 99 171 48 Relative Weight 21 % 12 % 17 % 30 % 08 %

Track Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV Airframe Design initial Balsa plane scalable, anticipate future changes in camera Select Single Design, Build Multiple,(Airfoil/material/engine/lift capacity), use foam & fiberglass Finalize design, use of composites, crashworthy Tweak, Light Advanced Materials, build final planes Communications Short Range Communication, R/C controls, Forward looking camera data Wireless test rig DAQ, Signal Processing (Borrow R/C from Measurements/Controls I) Build Home Base & Transmitter, non line of sight Hands off Tracking, Long Range, Reduce Time Delay, Large Bandwidth, (2yrs) Measurements Pressure/Temp Sensors, Test rig for measurements, GPS, Fuel, Accelerometers Test Rig - Integrated Balsa Plane, on board data processing Propulsion Reverse Engineer Motor, generator/power source Open Source Motor Build Payload/ Special Ops Trainer A/C + Camera Module Bays, Hard points Camera bay for Balsa Plane, Incorporate Fuel Battery, Integrate forward Looking camera Landing Gear (extra strength), Recovery System Finalize and Integrate, Test Final design to design specs Controls/ Dynamics Model R/C Plane Dynamics, EoM, wind tunnel Output Controlled Signal to Servo, Use Wireless test rig to control servos Integrate into plane, semi-autonomous, self stabilizing Stable, fully autonomous Interface Flight Simulator Model UAV, Use actual flight data in simulator Route Mapping Integrate into airplane, VR goggles (user friendly), HUD

Preliminary Schedule Graphical Representation of Rough Schedule

Module Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV Airframe 5 Mechanical 1 Industrial 6 Mechanical 2 Industrial Communications 1 Mechanical 2 Electrical 2 Computer 2 Software 1 Electrical 3 Computer 3 Electrical 1 Software Propulsion - 4 Mechanical Measurements 3 Mechanical 1 Computer Payload / Special Ops Controls / Dynamics 2 Mechanical 1 Computer/Software Interface 3 Software

Future Plan Where do we go from here? Further specification of individual discipline specialties and requirements. Reexamine individual projects’ complexity and time constraints Separation of phase segments into annual cycles Analysis of budgetary needs and constraints

Considerations Competitions –SAE Heavy Lift –AMA Heavy Lift •FAA Regulations –Classification –Altitude Restrictions

Questions?