University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Assessment & Instructional Technology for College Level.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Co-Teaching as a Methodology in Teacher Preparation
Advertisements

Initiative on K-12 Teacher Preparation Natasha Speer, Univ. of Maine Tim Scott and Omah Williams, Texas A & M Noah Finkelstein, Univ. Colorado-Boulder.
Some impressions from the school visits and the conference -No systematic report 1 st Some general wisdom 2 nd Key analysis questions of the project Conference.
National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT DEM Leo G. Adap. PREPARING STUDENTS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY SKILLS.
Understanding your District’s Plan Colleen Miller, Director of Leadership Development.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
Problem Based Lessons. Training Objectives 1. Develop a clear understanding of problem-based learning and clarify vocabulary issues, such as problem vs.
N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE SITE2000 Feb 9, 2000 San Diego Mission Valley 1 HPC Technologies & PreService Teacher.
N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE PITAC Transforming Learning Workshop - SDSC - July 17, Using IT in Formal Education.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Principles & Standards for School Mathematics & Group Presentation Overview NCTM, 2000.
NLII Mapping the Learning Space New Orleans, LA Colleen Carmean NLII Fellow Information Technology Director, ASU West Editor, MERLOT Faculty Development.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Session Materials  Wiki
N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Educause 99, October 29, 1999, Long Beach CA Building a faculty community to support.
December, 2003 Prepare. Inspire. Connect. Redesign of the Advanced Placement Program  (AP  ) Biology Course, Examination, and Teacher.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
The University of Arkansas GK-12 KIDS (K-12, I, Do, Science) Program Changing Graduate Training to Include a Responsibility for K-12 Science and Math Education.
Project Learning Tree Project Learning Tree is an award-winning environmental education program designed for teachers and other educators, parents, and.
COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE SESSION STEM Education: Communication Tools and Collaboration Opportunities May 20, /20/11Superintendents Community of Practice.
Universal Design for Learning in the College Classroom Abstract This Faculty Learning Community (FLC) integrated components of Universal Design for Learning.
ICLCS Institute for Chemistry Literacy through Computational Simulation Thom H. Dunning, Jr., Edee Norman Wiziecki, National Center for Supercomputing.
Using Electronic Portfolios to Assess Learning at IUPUI. Trudy Banta, et. al. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis 2007.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
Electronic Portfolios Preparing Our Students for the 21 st Century The Future.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
© 2011 Partners Harvard Medical International Strategic Plan for Teaching, Learning and Assessment Program Teaching, Learning, and Assessment Center Strategic.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Learning Initiatives to Improve Undergraduate Education at a Research-Oriented Institution Robin R. Rastani * and Michel A. Wattiaux Department of Dairy.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Plenary Session 7: Technologies and Principles of Learning in Support of Teaching Delwyn L. Harnisch University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Pathways from On-campus to Distance Learning of Computational.
Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Maria Scannapieco, Ph.D. Professor & Director Center for Child Welfare UTA SSW National Resource.
This project is funded by the National Science Foundation (Award no ). Mobilizing STEM is housed within the Wisconsin.
The NCATE Journey Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University AACTE/NCATE Orientation - Spring 2008.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Connecting the dots from “Hand Outs” to Research- based Pedagogy: the SERC Pedagogic Service Sean Fox, Ellen Iverson, Cathy Manduca Science Education Resource.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Opportunity Structures for Preparation and Inspiration (OSPrI): Case Studies of 8 “Exemplar” Inclusive STEM-focused High Schools This work was conducted.
TACIB May 5, TACIB GOALS This model serves as the basis for the TACIB project and its research questions: a)What are the effects of a dual language.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
National Learning Infrastructure Initiative Transformative Assessment Project.
C4EO – Ways of Working Heather Rushton, Planning and Performance 1.
Fostering Sustained Impact: Lessons Learned from Geoscience Faculty Workshops Ellen Roscoe Iverson, Cathryn A. Manduca, Science Education Resource Center,
Education Transform Resources
Assessment and Evaluation Feedback to Teams Summer 2015.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Presenter: Mazinza Ndala Tel:
Nevada STEM Program Recognition Rubric K-12 Program Definitions Exploratory The Exploratory STEM program describes a school program that has intermittent.
1 Vanderbilt University Name: Vanderbilt TAR Fellows Program Persons responsible: Thomas R. Harris, Derek Bruff, Jean Alley Time Commitment: Introductory.
Bringing it All Together Focus on Curriculum Development & Instructional Delivery Focus on Instructional Practices Focus on Instructional Alignment Where.
Teaching and Learning with Technology
A Productive Partnership
Mgt Project Portfolio Management and the PMO Module 8 - Fundamentals of the Program Management Office Dr. Alan C. Maltz Howe School of Technology.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Project Learning Tree Project Learning Tree is an education program designed for teachers and others working with youth from pre-school through 12th grade.
Surface energy modification for biomedical material by corona streamer plasma processing to mitigate bacterial adhesion Ibrahim Al-Hamarneh Patrick.
Digital library for Earth System Education Teaching Boxes
JET Education Services: Innovations in Teacher Support and Curriculum Development Presentation to the Care and Support for Teaching and Learning Regional.
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Assessment & Instructional Technology for College Level STEM Instructors NISE FLAGILT Field-Tested Learning Assessment Guide Eileen Lewis, UC Berkeley Institute on Learning Technology Jean-Pierre Bayard, CSUS National Institute for Science Education Click on the Buttons College Level 1

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE What is NISE ? Click here to return: The N ational I nstitute for S cience E ducation was funded in 1995 for five years as a cooperative agreement. NSF directed the Institute to "address the totality of the [science] education enterprise, to assess its effectiveness, and examine what new activities need to be established, what activities are no longer needed, and what new approaches will enhance science education." NISE is based at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Washington, DC, through its partnership with the National Center for Improving Science Education. The NISE's vision is that all students leave the educational system with an ability to make informed decisions about STEM-related matters that they encounter in their daily lives. In this vision, all stakeholders in STEM education engage in active, contextual learning to acquire both a strong foundation in STEM and the ability to enhance that foundation as lifelong learners. The N ational I nstitute for S cience E ducation was funded in 1995 for five years as a cooperative agreement. NSF directed the Institute to "address the totality of the [science] education enterprise, to assess its effectiveness, and examine what new activities need to be established, what activities are no longer needed, and what new approaches will enhance science education." NISE is based at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and Washington, DC, through its partnership with the National Center for Improving Science Education. The NISE's vision is that all students leave the educational system with an ability to make informed decisions about STEM-related matters that they encounter in their daily lives. In this vision, all stakeholders in STEM education engage in active, contextual learning to acquire both a strong foundation in STEM and the ability to enhance that foundation as lifelong learners. Funded by the National Science Foundation:

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE College Level 1 Team Click here to return: Introductory college-level science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) courses act as curriculum "pressure points"—they shape student career trajectories and influence attitudes toward science. The College Level One (CL-1) Team aims to enhance the quality of teaching and learning in these introductory STEM courses. Its research identifies and validates effective practices in these courses, and the team works with the Interacting with Professional Audiences Team to disseminate this information to key audiences. CL-1 activities are based on an annual Institute that focuses on a single key issue affecting college STEM courses. The Institute brings together several NISE Fellows to identify an agenda that helps address critical aspects of the issue of interest and to develop materials of value to college STEM instructors and administrators. Introductory college-level science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) courses act as curriculum "pressure points"—they shape student career trajectories and influence attitudes toward science. The College Level One (CL-1) Team aims to enhance the quality of teaching and learning in these introductory STEM courses. Its research identifies and validates effective practices in these courses, and the team works with the Interacting with Professional Audiences Team to disseminate this information to key audiences. CL-1 activities are based on an annual Institute that focuses on a single key issue affecting college STEM courses. The Institute brings together several NISE Fellows to identify an agenda that helps address critical aspects of the issue of interest and to develop materials of value to college STEM instructors and administrators.

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE The Institute on Learning Technology The NISE brought together a group of folks with experience in teaching, computer –based technology and assessment in order to create a resource for instructors teaching in STEM. - Specific mission is to Bridge the Chasm between educational research and STEM instruction Marco Molinaro UC-Berk. Flora McMartin UC-Berk. John Jungck Beloit Coll Steve Ehrmann TLT Susan Millar UW-Mad Jean-Pierre Bayard CSUS NISEFLAGILTBEGIN

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Goals of the ILT To develop a web site and other products that will enable STEM instructors to: Understand why they should use how to use them and how to overcome frequently encountered obstacle. Shape the powerful emerging technologies in learning tools that better prepare college students for the 21st century Provide all their students more experience with, and a better appreciation for STEM as a living enterprise. PROBLEMS ACTIVITIES OUTCOMES Click on Buttons Learning Technologies NISEFLAGILTBEGIN

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Problems Click here to return: The STEM Instructors usually face a set of challenges that motivate them to consider other learning methods.. The ILT is interested in documenting these problems because they represent a unifying platform where instructors visiting our site will recognize specific aspects of their own learning environment. PROBLEMS ACTIVITIES OUTCOMES Click on Buttons Learning Technologies

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Activities Click here to return: Technology for technology's sake is not of interest to us. The ILT seeks to feature activities that are expressly designed to enhance learning, with preference for those that are student-centered and where the use of computer-based technology has a clear and measurable effect on learning. PROBLEMS ACTIVITIES OUTCOMES Click on Buttons Learning Technologies

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Learning Technologies Click here to return: The focus of this research effort is on the instructional use of computer-based technology ranging from to high- performance computing. In all cases, the use of technology has to be incorporated in activities supportive of national principles of good teaching practices. PROBLEMS ACTIVITIES OUTCOMES Click on Buttons Learning Technologies

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Outcomes Click here to return: How do you know it works? The culture of educational institutions is one where traditions are golden and changes are difficult to implement. For learning technologies to appeal to reform-ready STEM instructors, one needs to provide clear evidence of enhanced student learning. PROBLEMS ACTIVITIES OUTCOMES Click on Buttons Learning Technologies

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE ILT Research Methodology Data Gathering Phase Analysis of data Dissemination of products  Develop a set of potential cases through phone interviews  Use criteria to select some 10 practices for full case studies  Interview the selected bricoleurs, administrators, students, and support personnel  Develop a set of potential cases through phone interviews  Use criteria to select some 10 practices for full case studies  Interview the selected bricoleurs, administrators, students, and support personnel  Transcribe interviews  Write case studies  Use software to elicit common themes  Use the phone interviews to create short vignettes  Transcribe interviews  Write case studies  Use software to elicit common themes  Use the phone interviews to create short vignettes NISEFLAGILTBEGIN

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Goals of the FLAG NISEFLAGILTBEGIN To offer a readily accessible, up-to-date resource of classroom-tested assessment tools for instructors who have an interest in sharing and implementing new approaches to evaluating student learning, attitudes and performance. Techniques and tools are developed, tested and refined in real classrooms / laboratories at colleges and universities, and reviewed by an experienced Editorial Board of recognized experts. K. Patricia Cross UC- Berkeley Eileen L. Lewis UC- Berkeley Elaine Seymour Univ. of Colorado Dorothy Gabel Indiana Univ. Terry Millar UW-Madison Gloria Rogers Rose Hulman BOARDBOARD

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE FLAG Content Matching your Goals to CATS Classroom Assessment Techniques (CATS) Searchable Tools Resources NISEFLAGILTBEGIN GOALS to CATS CATS SEARCH TOOLS RESOURCES Click on Buttons

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Matching Goals to CATS Click here to return: Reflect on your course goals Attitudinal Survey Concept Tests Concept Maps Conceptual Diagnostic Tests Interviews Performance Assessments Portfolios SALG (Student Assessment of Learning Gains) Scoring Rubrics Weekly Reports

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Classroom Assessment Techniques CATS Click here to return: Description Limitations Suggestions for Use Variations Pros & Cons Author’s Story Overview Purpose Teaching Goals Step-by-Step Analysis Theory & Research Links Sources Features of each CAT

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Searchable Tools Click here to return:  Discipline (chemistry, engineering)  Purpose (knowledge, skills, attitude)  Specific Technique (Conceptual Diagnostic)  Download  html  pdf  Word 6/ Mac  Word 97, WordPerfect 7/ PC

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Resources Click here to return:  Annotated bibliography that describes assessment practices in SMET courses  Related web sites on assessment practices  Consulting with someone at the NISE on assessment practices in my own course(s).  A comprehensive list of experts

University of Wisconsin-Madison N ATIONAL P ARTNERSHIP FOR A DVANCED C OMPUTATIONAL I NFRASTRUCTURE Future of ILT & FLAG ILT with a UC Berkeley and CSUS connection Update and generate cases & vignettes as technology changes A national moderated forum on technology ILT partners up with NPACI & NSF Training workshops FLAG has moved to the University of New Mexico under Michael Zeilik – Collaboration with NISE Funding through NSF is pending NISEFLAGILTBEGIN