© Ima K.U. Student Emerging Internet Protocols A Comparison of A vs. B 1 January 2000 Ima K.U. Student Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Economics of stub network multihoming and link load balancing INTERIM RESULTS AND NEXT STEPS Henna Warma Aalto University - COMNET December, 7 th 2011.

Advertisements

1 Toward a Modeling Theory for Predictable Complex Software Designs by Levent Yilmaz Auburn Modeling and Simulation Laboratory Department of Computer Science.

© Ima K.U. Student 01 January 2013Abbreviated Paper Title1 Abbreviated Paper Name [lastname1 lastname2 lastname3 2001] Ima K.U. Student Department of Electrical.

Reconfigurable weblabs based on the IEEE1451 Std. Ricardo Costa - Gustavo Alves - Mário Zenha.

© Ima K.U. Student Abbreviated Paper Title [Author1-last-name 4-digit year] © 2000–Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000 Ima K.U. Student Department of Electrical.

© Manasa Quantifying Metrics for Resilient and Survivable Networks EECS 801 Graduate Reading © 2008–Manasa K 6 June 2008 Manasa K Department of Electrical.

© Manasa Resilience of Flooding Protocol – A Case Study EECS 801 Graduate Reading © 2008–Manasa K Aug Manasa K Department of Electrical Engineering.

Internet Research Needs a Critical Perspective Towards Models –Sally Floyd –IMA Workshop, January 2004.

Special Session PDCS’2000 Interworking of Diffserv, RSVP and MPLS for achieving QoS in the Internet Junaid Ahmed Zubairi Department of Mathematics and.

TCP/IP history Skills: none IT concepts: Internetwork This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial- Share Alike 3.0 License.

StandardsDIS W4 RJK1 Distributed Information Systems Standards Bob Kummerfeld Department of Computer Science.

PRODUCT PROPOSAL Director of Internet Services DataSource, Inc.

© Rui Wang Cycle-Oriented Distributed Preconfiguration Ring-like Speed with Mesh-like Capacity for Self-planning Network Restoration 1 Sep Rui Wang.

Licentiate Seminar: On Measurement and Analysis of Internet Backbone Traffic Wolfgang John Department of Computer Science and Engineering Chalmers University.

© 2007 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.ICND1 v1.0—1-1 Building a Simple Network Understanding the Host-to-Host Communications Model.

AGENT RESPONSIBILITIES 1)Keep license current 2)Learn REA system 3)Follow REA rules and regulations 4)Pay for any licensing requirements 5)Pay and maintain;

Connecting Networks © 2004 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Exploring How TCP/IP Works INTRO v2.0—4-1.

Introduction to Mechanical Drafting and CADD

August 19, August 19, 2015August 19, 2015August 19, 2015 Azusa, CA Sheldon X. Liang Ph. D. CS 470 Software Engineering I Azusa Pacific University,

Signal Strength based Communication in Wireless Sensor Networks (Sensor Network Estimation) Imran S. Ansari EE 242 Digital Communications and Coding (Fall.

Strengths and weakness for industrial applications

1 Introduction to Internet Network Management Mi-Jung Choi Dept. of Computer Science KNU

CIS 1310 – HTML & CSS 1 Introduction to the Internet.

Liam Newcombe BCS Data Centre Specialist Group Secretary Modelling Data Centre Energy Efficiency and Cost.

IEEE Globecom 2010 Tan Le Yong Liu Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Polytechnic Institute of NYU Opportunistic Overlay Multicast in Wireless.

Man and Superman Human Limitations, innovation and emergence in resource competition Robert Savit University of Michigan.

Internet and Intranet RMUTT, Course Outline 1 st half –Internet overview –TCP/IP protocol –Applications in TCP/IP network 2 nd half –JSP programming.

1 A Dynamical Redirection Approach to Enhancing Mobile IP with Fault Tolerance in Cellular Systems Jenn-Wei Lin, Jichiang Tsai, and Chin-Yu Huang IEEE.

Flock Inspired Area Coverage Using Wireless Boid-like Sensor Agents Colin Chibaya Rhodes University Computer Science Department Grahamstown,

Emergent Robustness in Software Systems through Decentralized Adaptation: an Ecologically-Inspired ALife Approach Franck Fleurey, Benoit Baudry, Benoit.

National Institute of Science & Technology Technical Seminar Presentation-2004 Presented By: Subhasis Choudhury [EE ] ZigBee Technology By Subhasis.

National Ecological Observatory Network

Relay Placement Problem in Smart Grid Deployment Wei-Lun Wang and Quincy Wu Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Chi Nan.

Initial thoughts about existence in the Web Philoweb 2011 Thessaloniki, 5/10/2011 Michalis Vafopoulos vafopoulos.org.

The Internet The History and Future of the Internet.

1 A Novel Time and Frequency Synchronization Scheme for OFDM Systems Ching-Yu Wang Graduate Institute of Communication Engineering National Chi Nan University.

A Grid-enabled Multi-server Network Game Architecture Tianqi Wang, Cho-Li Wang, Francis C.M.Lau Department of Computer Science and Information Systems.

Chapter 8 - Internet: The Early Years Many Independent Networks The Proliferation Of LANS Facts About LANs –Engineers have devised many LAN technologies.

On/Off Operation of Carbon Capture Systems in the Dynamic Electric Grid On/Off Operation of Carbon Capture Systems in the Dynamic Electric Grid Rochelle.

UNIT 2 LESSON 1 CS PRINCIPLES. OBJECTIVES Students will be able to: Read about societal challenges of the Internet and relate to personal experiences.

The Beauty and Joy of Computing Lecture #15 Internet I UC Berkeley EECS Lecturer Gerald Friedland

Barrier Coverage in Camera Sensor Networks ACM MobiHoc 2011 Yi Wang Guohong Cao Department of Computer Science and Engineering The Pennsylvania State University.

Complete Optimal Deployment Patterns for Full-Coverage and k-Connectivity (k ≦ 6) Wireless Sensor Networks Xiaole Bai, Dong Xuan, Ten H. Lai, Ziqiu Yun,

A Cluster Based On-demand Multi- Channel MAC Protocol for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Network Cheng Li1, Pu Wang1, Hsiao-Hwa Chen2, and Mohsen Guizani3.

A Protocol for Tracking Mobile Targets using Sensor Networks H. Yang and B. Sikdar Department of Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering Rensselaer.

Dale Roberts Department of Computer and Information Science, School of Science, IUPUI Dale Roberts, Lecturer Computer Science, IUPUI

Draft-lendl-speermint- background-02 Thanks to Alex for presenting! IETF 73, November 2008Otmar Lendl.

Midterm/Final Presentation Project Name Students: [Name1], [Name2] Supervisor: [SV Name] Context: Project [A/B/Special] Semester: Winter/Spring, Year Date:

SOURCE:2014 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING AUTHER: MINGLIU LIU, DESHI LI, HAILI MAO SPEAKER: JIAN-MING HONG.

Who am I? ● Michael Richardson ● ● ● Director, Consumer Desktop Desktop Development – working on an ubuntu-based* virtual.

Introduction Objectives Chapter 1 Upon completion you will be able to:

Two Dimensional Highly Associative Level-Two Cache Design

Basic Communications Model Standards are needed at all Layers

Networking vs. Timesharing

Universal Serial Bus S.HIMABINDU

Introduction to Internet Network Management

of Dynamic NFV-Policies

Research Topic Approval Presentation --- Instructions

Replace This Text with the Title of the Research Project

Measures to Improve Power Quality in Distribution System

Rui Wu, Jose Painumkal, Sergiu M. Dascalu, Frederick C. Harris, Jr

A. P. Shah Institute of Technology

Emerging Internet Protocols A Comparison of A vs. B

המחלקה להנדסת חשמל ומחשבים תשע"ט (2019)

THE INTERNET MOTION SENSOR: A Distributed Blackhole Monitoring System

1 مقايسه دانشگاه صنعتی شريف و دانشگاه برکلی در رشته‌های مهندسی و علوم کامپيوتر نيما احمدی پور اناری دانشکده مهندسی کامپيوتر دانشگاه صنعتی شريف جهت ارائه.

PPT1: Basics of software engineering

An Analytic Comparison of RPS Video Repair

Synthesizing Controllers for Multi-Lane Traffic Maneuvers

Presentation transcript:

© Ima K.U. Student Emerging Internet Protocols A Comparison of A vs. B 1 January 2000 Ima K.U. Student Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science EECS 780 Term Paper Presentation

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B2 Protocol A vs. Protocol B Abstract Protocols A and B are emerging as the leading competitors to provide future Internet connectivity. This paper compares the strengths and weaknesses of A and B in the context of their evolution from the widely deployed protocol H. Protocol A rules and Protocol B sucks, but is backed by powerful economic interests.

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B3 Protocol A vs. Protocol B Outline Background: Protocol H Emerging proposal A Emerging proposal B Comparison: A vs. B Conclusion and future outlook

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B4 Protocol A vs. Protocol B Background: Protocol H Background: Protocol H Emerging proposal A Emerging proposal B Comparison: A vs. B Conclusion and future outlook

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B5 Protocol H Internet Legacy Protocol H –developed for ARPANET Only available protocol until now

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B6 Protocol A vs. Protocol B Emerging Protocol A Background: Protocol H Emerging proposal A Emerging proposal B Comparison: A vs. B Conclusion and future outlook

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B7 Protocol A vs. Protocol B Emerging Protocol A History –IETF standards track RFC Characteristics –simple –open –free –performs well

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B8 Protocol A vs. Protocol B Emerging Protocol B Background: Protocol H Emerging proposal A Emerging proposal B Comparison: A vs. B Conclusion and future outlook

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B9 Protocol A vs. Protocol B Emerging Protocol B History –Developed by Monopolies Я Us Characteristics –complex –proprietary –expensive licensing –performs poorly

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B10 Protocol A vs. Protocol B Comparison: A vs. B Background: Protocol H Emerging proposal A Emerging proposal B Comparison: A vs. B Conclusion and future outlook

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B11 Protocol A vs. Protocol B Comparison: A vs. B A rules –performs well over entire range of parameters B sucks –performs poorly at best parameter x performance A B

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B12 Protocol A vs. Protocol B Conclusion and Future Outlook Background: Protocol H Emerging proposal A Emerging proposal B Comparison: A vs. B Conclusion and future outlook

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B13 Protocol A vs. Protocol B Conclusion and Future Outlook A sucks –but is being pushed by Monopolies Я Us B rules –but doesn’t come packaged with consumer PCs Which will win?

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B14 Acknowledgements Thanks to Uri Student for helpful comments

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B15 References

© Ima K.U. Student 1 January 2000Protocol A. vs. B16 End of Foils