CIVIL RIGHTS DATA COLLECTION National Forum: PPI Committee: 2011 MIS Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
South Dakota Accountability System – Year 2 School Performance Index Guyla Ness September 10, 2013.
Advertisements

The Equity Health of Our Nation’s Schools: College and Career Readiness OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
Community College Technical Center MIS Race/Ethnicity (R/E) Final Guidance for i mplementing OMB Race/Ethnicity.
Significant Disproportionality: Information and Expectations Oregon Department of Education Dianna Carrizales & Sara Berscheit.
Data Collection An overview of how data are collected and used in Washington state.
Feeder Student Data File Instructions for Filtering & Usage Guidelines.
ESEA Directors Institute 2014ESEA Directors Institute 2014 Civil Rights Data CollectionCivil Rights Data Collection Thursday, October 9, 2014Thursday,
An Introduction to the Individual Student Enrollment System ISES Segment 2 Department of Public Instruction Spring 2008.
1 Utah Performance Assessment System for Students U-PASS Accountability Plan Judy W. Park Assessment & Accountability Director Utah State Office of Education.
Reporting Race/Ethnicity Data PRESENTATION INFO HERE.
Reporting of Race and Ethnicity Data at NCES Marilyn M. Seastrom, Ph.D FCSM Statistical Policy Conference December 2012, Washington, DC.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction September.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction September.
Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) SY Schedule Update Current Status: About 6 and 1/2 weeks behind schedule What does this mean? ◦ Pilot occurs.
Maryland Public Schools: #1 in the Nation AGAIN in 2010 Data Driven Decisions: Separating Fact from Fiction in Building Early Care and Education Systems.
NCES Forum July 2010 Kathy Gosa Kansas State Department of Education Using Forum Products to Establish a Solid SLDS Framework.
CEDS Standard Update.
: Universe Collection Civil Rights Data Collection.
Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) How to Access Data on Your District Moratorium-Model Code Training and Strategy Session Portland, OR - August 10.
1 Sex/Gender and Minority Inclusion in NIH Clinical Research What Investigators Need to Know! Presenter: Miriam F. Kelty, PhD, National Institute on Aging,
Monitoring Significant Disproportionality in Special Education Systems Performance Review & Improvement Fall Training 2011.
Oregon’s K-12 ELL/SPED students: Data & outcomes.
1 Results for Students with Disabilities and School Year Data Report for the RSE-TASC Statewide Meeting May 2010.
HHS Data Standards for Race, Ethnicity, Sex, Primary Language and Disability Status Rashida Dorsey, PhD, MPH Department of Health and Human Services Office.
10/17/2015 State Board of Education 1 ANNUAL REPORT ON GIFTED AND TALENTED EDUCATION Academic Year
ND Topical Call Subgrantee Monitoring Tools: Meeting the Civil Rights Obligations to Students (Call 1) January 14, 2015.
1.Welcome (10 minutes) 2.Federal Focus School Update (20 minutes) 3.Upcoming Sessions (30 Minutes) 4.Break (15 minutes) 5.Accountability Update (75 minutes)
Implications of the new federal requirements for schools. July 2009 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
ISES UPDATES April 16, Topics for Session Review of the Fall 2007 CD/YE Collection Changes in WSLS ISES Data CD/YE Element Changes October 1 Supplement.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Education Data Update March 2009.
Title I Part D Subpart 2 Are You Feeling Neglected or Delinquent??? November 2011 Don McCrone, N&D Liaison PDE – Division of Federal Programs Joe Hiznay,
1 Civil Rights Data Collection. 2 The CRDC is a mandatory data collection administrated by the US Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights Authorized.
MIS SUMMER DATA CONFERENCE (Common Core of Data)
CEDS Update What is CEDS? Who and How? Version 2 Update and Scope Public Comments Version 3.
Kentucky Continuous Monitoring Process Spring 2012.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Proposed Changes to the Title I, Part D, Federal Data Collection As of June 28, 2012.
Using Data to Develop Your School’s Single Plan Parent Institute December 7, 2005 Presenter: Reyna Corral, Categorical Coordinator.
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Common Education Data Standards (CEDS) and ED Facts …What’s Next Jack Buckley, Commissioner – NCES Ross Santy, Director – ED Fact s U.S. Department of.
Lakeview Enrollment Presentation Board of Education Meeting September 16, 2014.
Faculty Demographics Faculty Demographics Table 8 Faculty Demographics Prof. Ed. Faculty in Initial Teacher Preparation Programs*
Spring ABOUT THE CHKS  SPONSOR California Department of Education  Anonymous, voluntary, confidential student self- report, comprehensive health.
2012 National Extension and Research Administrative Officers’ Conference May 22, 2012 “ Your Got IT! Navigating Title VI and VII Data Requirements for.
State Board of Education Achievement and Graduation Requirements Committee October 19, 2015.
Lakeview Enrollment Presentation Board of Education Meeting October 13, 2015.
1 Ross Santy Director, Performance Information Management Service U.S. Department of Education EDFacts Consolidating and Using K-12 Performance Data within.
Simple Solution. Brighter Futures. PEIMS FALL CONFERENCE ECDS 2016 – 2017 UPDATE September 7, 2016 ESC Region 11.
Office Of Civil Rights Data Collection (OCR / CRDC)
Indiana (8 Counties, Southeastern)
Lakeview Enrollment Presentation
Texas Academic Performance Report TAPR)
First-Time, First-Year Minority Enrollees in U. S
Minority Applicants to U.S. Dental Schools, 1990 to 2017 (1 of 3)
Michigan School Report Card Update
Kentucky School for the Blind
Consolidated district performance report (CDPR)
Minority Applicants to U.S. Dental Schools, 1990 to 2016 (1 of 3)
First-Time, First-Year Minority Enrollees in U. S
Welcome to today’s Webinar We will begin shortly
Minority Applicants to U.S. Dental Schools, 1990 to 2018 (1 of 3)
Conference on School Security Measures and Sources of Inequality
Enrollees by URM and Non-URM Status in U. S
Total Faculty by Race and Ethnicity,
Module 1: Overview December 1 Child Count.
New Reporting Requirements for Race and Ethnicity Effective
Enrollees by URM and Non-URM Status in U. S
TSDS Classroom Roster Collection
Director of ESEA Programs
Presentation transcript:

CIVIL RIGHTS DATA COLLECTION National Forum: PPI Committee: 2011 MIS Meeting

Goals for the CRDC Reduce the burden on LEAs while maintaining data quality and adherence to business rules. Explore the feasibility of state-level reporting options in Identify and resolve challenges to state-level reporting in the long-term

Schedule  Goals:  Reduce burden on school districts  Increase technical assistance to school districts  Involve SEAs and LEAs in improving the collection process  Publish the CRDC collection early to allow sufficient time for LEAs to collect the data elements for the CRDC  Estimated Timeframes:  Publish Final List of Data Elements: Early Spring 2011  Advanced Website: Open in Early Fall 2011 – Close in Late Fall 2011  Part 1 Collection Window (Snap Shot Data): January – March 2012  Part 2 Collection Window (Cumulative Data): Summer 2012-Winter 2013

Guiding Business Rules 1. Every student is counted at the school that he or she actually, physically attends  Every student receiving instruction at the school is reported on the CRDC  Every school reports students that receive more than 50% of instruction at that school Students are not reported back to a home school, even if assessment results, grades, and/or funding is linked back to the home school.

Guiding Business Rules 2. Educational outcome and access data for every school is disaggregated by race/ethnicity, gender, limited English proficiency status, disability, and, as appropriate, section 504 Race/EthnicityMaleFemale -Hispanic or Latino of any race -American Indian or Alaska Native -Asian -Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander -Black or African American -White -Two or More Races Total Race/Ethnicity Students with Disabilities (IDEA) Section 504 Only LEP  CRDC collects cumulative and snapshot information about students’ access to educational services and educational outcomes Snap shot data, collected in Part I, includes students enrolled in AP classes, Algebra I, teacher experience Cumulative data, collected in Part II, the number of students passing Algebra, the number of students (not incidents) disciplined over the course of the entire school year.

Guiding Business Rules 3. Local education agencies are the responsible entity for data quality  Data completeness and accuracy is the responsibility of the LEA.  States may choose to collect and submit data on behalf of their LEAs.

Guiding Business Rules 4. Unit of analysis is the school  Unlike many other Department of Education collections, the primary focus and use of CRDC data is at the school and district level.  CRDC includes specific data collected at the school and LEA level.  School level data is aggregated and statistical methodology is applied to produce state-level projections.

CRDC: Defining the Universe  All educational programs serving students.  Previous CRDC collections included state and local operated programs including, for example, the following:  “Regular” K-12 schools  Preschools operated by, or on behalf of, LEAs  Programs for students receiving special education services  Programs serving students with disabilities from age18 to 21  Alternative Schools  Charter Schools  Schools serving students who are deaf and/or blind  Juvenile justice centers  OCR is exploring options for which include SEAs submitting data for a subset of schools.

CRDC: Defining the Universe  Identifying the universe of schools for  Work Underway: Collaboration within the Department of Education: NCES (Common Core of Data), Office of Special Education Programs, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Alternative schools Schools (or programs) serving students with disabilities Cross-Agency Preschool Working Group: Health and Human Services (Head Start), Department of Education Cross-Agency Collaboration on Juvenile Justice Facilities: Department of Justice, Department of Education

Feasibility Study  In preparation for the CRDC, OCR will conduct a state feasibility study to help plan the universe collection.  Part of the study is an online questionnaire to survey SEA willingness and capacity in CRDC reporting  The proposed questionnaire is in the OMB clearance process  The voluntary survey will take about 8 minutes to complete  Completion of the short survey is critical because your feedback is vital to the CRDC planning process.

Considering CRDC DQ Options Goal: Adhere to high CRDC data quality standards while reducing burden on SEAs and LEAs Discussion Questions:  What support can OCR offer SEAs and LEAs?  What are the implications for student-level data systems?  Will one model serve all states?  What about pre-populating LEA or school forms?  What models OCR should consider?

Identify the risks. Explore the opportunities. Continue the discussion. Work on the CRDC Feasibility study draft report Evaluate technical options Gather feedback on technical options Next Steps