Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Learning about users: observation & interviewing UCD Hoorcollege blok 1 week 5.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Site Visits Interviews and observations. Site visits What we see and do for ourselves is more memorable, more real, more true than what someone else tells.
Advertisements

User Centred Development UCD Werkcollege blok 1 week 4.
Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media A theory of communication Hoorcollege marketing communication blok 4 week 1.
User problems, scenarios and storyboards
Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Preparing for the exam UCD hoorcollege blok 1 week 10.
An introduction to personas
Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media UCD werkcollege blok 1 week 4.
Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media The art of pitching Hoorcollege marketing blok 2 week 6.
IS214 Recap. IS214 Understanding Users and Their Work –User and task analysis –Ethnographic methods –Site visits: observation, interviews –Contextual.
What makes a great interview?
A Student’s Guide to Methodology Justifying Enquiry 3 rd edition P ETER C LOUGH AND C ATHY N UTBROWN.
Observing Users Paul Bogen, LaShon Johnson, Jehoon Park.
Topics: Interviewing Question Type Interviewing techniques
Identifying Needs and Establishing Requirements John Thiesfeld Jeff Morton Josh Edwards.
User-Centered Design and Development Instructor: Franz J. Kurfess Computer Science Dept. Cal Poly San Luis Obispo FJK 2005.
Observing users.
Observing users. The aims Discuss the benefits & challenges of different types of observation. Describe how to observe as an on-looker, a participant,
Data-collection techniques. Contents Types of data Observations Event logs Questionnaires Interview.
An evaluation framework
Saul Greenberg Evaluating Interfaces With Users Why evaluation is crucial to interface design General approaches and tradeoffs in evaluation The role of.
CHAPTER 7 Creating Qualitative Data MANAGEMENT RESEARCH Third Edition, 2008 Prof. M. Easterby-Smith, Prof. R. Thorpe, Prof. Paul R. Jackson.
Types of interview used in research
Gathering news Learning objective: to understand how to gather news and conduct good interviews.
Surviving the Data Collection Report. What is a Qualitative Interview?  Qualitative interviews are interviews designed to :  Have the interviewee do.
Reflective practice Session 4 – Working together.
An introduction to  Interviewing  Presenting  Recording  Editing.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
Chapter 11: An Evaluation Framework Group 4: Tony Masi, Sam Esswein, Brian Rood, & Chris Troisi.
Focus groups ScWk 242 – Session 4 Slides.
CSCI 4163/6904, summer Quiz  Multiple choice  Answer individually - pass in  Then class discussion.
 Organizing and Presenting a Persuasive Message.
Gathering User Data IS 588 Dr. Dania Bilal Spring 2008.
Chapter 12 Observing Users Li, Jia Li, Wei. Outline What and when to observe Approaches to observation How to observe How to collect data Indirect observation.
Human Computer Interaction
Educational Action Research Todd Twyman Summer 2011 Week 2.
MEDIA AND YOUR ORGANISATION. THE MEDIA INTERVIEW Always ask the journalist or reporter What’s the angle? What’s your story about? What sorts of questions.
Being a GP Applying for a job. Career Planning Self Awareness Opportunity Awareness.
Allison Bloodworth, Senior User Interaction Designer, Educational Technology Services, University of California - Berkeley October 22, 2015 User Needs.
©2001 Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville All rights reserved. Today Interview Techniques (Hand-in partner preferences) Thursday In-class Interviewing.
CS2003 Usability Engineering Usability Evaluation Dr Steve Love.
Paul Mundy Writing a project report Collecting, organizing and writing information on a project.
Chapter 15 Qualitative Data Collection Gay, Mills, and Airasian
CS2003 Usability Engineering Human-Centred Design Dr Steve Love.
Virtual University - Human Computer Interaction 1 © Imran Hussain | UMT Imran Hussain University of Management and Technology (UMT) Lecture 40 Observing.
Ways of Collecting Information Interviews Questionnaires Ethnography Books and leaflets in the organization Joint Application Design Prototyping.
Techniques for Highly Effective Communication Professional Year Program - Unit 5: Workplace media and communication channels.
Centre for Information & Knowledge Management INFORMATION SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT Jamie O’Brien Centre for Information & Knowledge Management University of.
Slide 1 Systems Analysis and Design with UML Version 2.0, Second Edition Alan Dennis, Barbara Wixom, and David Tegarden Chapter 5: Requirements Determination.
Observing users. The aims Discuss the benefits & challenges of different types of observation. Describe how to observe as an on-looker, a participant,
Interviews By Mr Daniel Hansson.
Single-camera Interviews RTV 322 REMINDERS: 1--See course outline for upcoming exam, due dates, project guidelines, etc. 2—News Package materials were.
EVALUATION PROfessional network of Master’s degrees in Informatics as a Second Competence – PROMIS ( TEMPUS FR-TEMPUS-JPCR)
Key principles Everything is strange –Question why? –Stop and reflect Members’ point of view –Developer themselves – why do that? No a priori expectations.
Introduction to Evaluation without Users. Where are you at with readings? Should have read –TCUID, Chapter 4 For Next Week –Two Papers on Heuristics from.
Case Studies and Review Week 4 NJ Kang. 5) Studying Cases Case study is a strategy for doing research which involves an empirical investigation of a particular.
Observing users. What and when to observe Goals & questions determine the paradigms and techniques used. Observation is valuable any time during design.
Today Discussion Follow-Up Interview Techniques Next time Interview Techniques: Examples Work Modeling CD Ch.s 5, 6, & 7 CS 321 Human-Computer Interaction.
Facilitated by Kelly Bailey, Durham College Prepared by Ruth Rodgers, Durham College Based on the work of Ingrid Bens (Facilitation at a Glance)
WRITING FROM OBSERVATION ESSAY 2. TIME TO OBSERVE On your computer, type adjectives that describe the type of individual in the image that you see. Words.
Week 2: Interviews. Definition and Types  What is an interview? Conversation with a purpose  Types of interviews 1. Unstructured 2. Structured 3. Focus.
Some general tips for the interviews. Interviews Data collection method used to discover opinions held by users Works better for qualitative research.
Cooper Goal-Directed Design: Practice Session Dr. Cindy Corritore Creighton University ITM 734 Fall 2005.
Day 8 Usability testing.
From: A. Cooper et al.: About Face Andreas Rudin
Types of interview used in research
Communication Skills Lab 5
Observing users.
Teaching & Inquiry I: Fundamentals of Teaching Through Inquiry
Dr Amina Rashad and Dr Nahed Kandeel
Presentation transcript:

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Learning about users: observation & interviewing UCD Hoorcollege blok 1 week 5

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Learning goals  By the end of the colleges and reading (UCD reader chapter 2) you should:  Understand why interviewing and observing the user is an essential part of the UCD process  Understand some of the ways you can obtain information on user goals and needs  Be aware of the three user observation paradigms  Have learned a framework that will help you carry-out user observation  Be in a position to carry out user interviews

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Agenda  Introduction: why bother looking at the user?  Techniques for obtaining user needs and goals  Observing the user  Interviewing the user  General guidelines  Summary

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Users and (new) product development  Products are created to meet the need(s) and goals of a user  So logically in order to develop or change a product you need to know the user’s needs and goals  There are a number of techniques for finding out user goals and needs  Some rely on imagination and developing personas and scenarios  These can be useful in the early stages, but they are very unreliable  Other techniques involve the user  These can then be used to develop more reliable personas and scenarios  Involving the user can be risky  Users cannot always put their needs into words  They may even not be conscious of the need  Even so, if well managed, involving the user is rewarding

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Techniques to obtain user needs and goals TechniqueInformation that can be obtained Major benefitsMajor drawbacks Be the user  Tacit knowledge (stilzwijgend kennis)  Impact of trade-offs on functionality for the use  Process knowledge  Depth of knowledge  Belief in identified needs  Difficult to articulate to others  Time / cost Observe users critically  Tacit knowledge  Process knowledge  Learn the language of the user  Find unarticulated needs  Difficult to translate into words for others (data collection and use essential here)  Time / cost Interview users for needs and goals  Large volumes of detail  Context specific needs  Speed  Breadth of information  Interviewer bias  Interviewee reactions to interviewer  Poor for process, and unarticulated needs Adapted from: Rosenau, M.D., et. At, The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc., p. 158

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Observing users

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media User observation paradigms Adapted from: Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Sharp, H., Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, New York NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2002, pp

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media User observation paradigms What is it?AdvantagesIssues Quick & dirty observation Simply watching users in their natural environment Quick and cheap Useful for initial understanding of needs / problems Can be done anytime and anywhere Observer bias Little or no data capture Difficult to articulate Low credibility Usability testingObserving the user in a controlled environment (usability lab) Data collection Credible Result can be seen by many Unnatural situation for user User “bias” Field studiesPlanned observation and interviewing of users in their natural environment Clear goals More natural for user Data can be collected and seen by others Credible Observer bias Some risk of user “bias” Adapted from: Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Sharp, H., Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, New York NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2002, pp

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Data collection techniques Notes and cameraAudio and cameraVideo EquipmentPaper, pen / pencil and (digital) camera Audio recorder, microphone, camera Video camera, editing software FlexibilityVeryQuiteNeeds to be positioned Completeness of data Reliant on note takerCan miss visual dataVery Disturbance to users LowSome people do not like microphones Can be disturbing, can get in the way Reliability of dataCan be low - depend on experience Medium - problem in noisy environments High - dependent on camera operator AnalysisEasy to transcribe - rich descriptions Good PresentationStrong if audience trusts observers StrongVery powerful Adapted from: Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Sharp, H., Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, New York NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2002, pp

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media A framework for field observation What? SpaceWhat is the space like? Describe it (indoors / outdoors, public / private, quiet / noisy, calm / busy, etc.) ActorsWhat are the names and relevant details of the people involved ActivitiesWhat (in general) are the actors doing and why? ObjectsWhat physical objects are present? (furniture, PC, papers, remote control, etc.) ActsWhat specific acts are the individuals doing? EventsIs what you are observing part of a special event? GoalsWhat are the actors trying to achieve by carrying out these specific acts? FeelingsWhat is the mood of the individuals - how are they feeling? SayingsWhat are the actors saying? Adapted from: Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Sharp, H., Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, New York NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2002, p. 368

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Interviewing users

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Stages of interview process

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Identifying candidates  Develop a persona hypothesis by answering these questions:  What sort of persons might use this product or have this problem?  What might be their goals and needs?  What range of behaviours (gedrag) might these users have?  This will give you an idea of the type of candidates you should try to find  Note: this may have to be adapted after you begin the interviews

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Example persona hypothesis: A cookbook  Sorts of people  Type A: Women with families (very sexist - sorry)  Type B: Single men who can’t cook (Me)  Goals and needs  Type A: Quick meal for a hungry family, more complex meal for a dinner party (kids at grandparents)  Type B: Easy to follow and shop for, quick, impress a date  Behaviours  Type A: Expert(?), adventurous, variety seeking  Type B: Amateur, nervous, constant checking

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Planning the interviews  Find suitable candidates based on the persona hypothesis  Identify your goals - what do you want to find out  This will help you frame some basic questions and areas you want to explore  You should avoid having a fixed question list beyond the basics

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Interviewing guidelines (see also reading p )  Think of the interview as a (structured) conversation  Avoid fixed question lists - keep your questions loose  Use some basic questions as a warm-up  Use your goals as the basis of further questions  Be ready to explore things based on what the interviewee says  Do not ask leading questions  “Why do you like this product?” when it is not clear that they do  Focus on the goals the user has not the the tasks they carry-out  Not “what do you do?” but “what do you want to achieve?"  Encourage the interviewee to tell stories  “Tell me about your experiences with this product”  Ask them to show and tell (if possible)  Don’t make them the designer

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Reviewing findings  This should happen between interviews and afterwards  Between interviews  Discuss the following questions with your partner  Are you achieving the goals you defined?  Is your persona hypothesis good or should it be modified?  How should we approach the next interview?  After the interviews  With your partner you should  Review all your notes to look for trends and patterns in the answers  Compare these with the results of your observations: is there evidence here that supports or contradicts your interviews?  Write up your own notes for the interviews as the basis for developing personas

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media General guidelines  Explain who you are and what your goals are  If they do not want to be observed and/or interviewed then find someone else  Respect the user  Ask permission if you photograph  No means no  The user is never stupid  Listen to what they are saying  Try not to let your personal views colour what they say  Ask questions do not give opinions  Don’t get in the way  Don’t over-stay your welcome

Hogeschool van Amsterdam Interactieve Media Summary  UCD relies on understanding the needs of the end user  This is achieved by observing and interviewing the user  Both user observation and interviewing require planning  To be effective both require an open and respectful approach to the user