Team CNH Design a less expensive propulsion control system with equivalent or better performance than existing hardware for Hydrostatic Windrower Machine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Machine Condition Monitoring
Advertisements

Feasibility Study of Replacing an Industrial Hydraulic Lift System with an Electro-Mechanical Lift System Critical Design Review Thursday, 21 September.
Top of Car Load Assisting Bike Lift.  Summary & Objectives  Mission Statement  Key Product Design Specifications  Top Level Design Options  Final.
Pneumatics A useful alternative to motors Tim Siepmann (Alumni Team 2175)
Hydraulic Power Assist
Victor Calamaro, Nick Flanagan, Rashaud Harvey, Danielle Painter Cockpit Assembly Team.
Case-New Holland Steer-by-Wire Detailed Design. Today’s Agenda  Who is CNH?  Background  Project Goal  System Level Concept  Design Components 
M.E. 462 Capstone Design I.U.P.U.I. Spring 2007 Bishop Steering: 1970 Lotus Europa Front Axle Re-design Aaron Emmons Phil Palmer Brad Holtsclaw Adam Spindler.
SolidWorks Simulation. Dassault Systemes 3 – D and PLM software PLM - Product Lifecycle Management Building models on Computer Engineering Analysis and.
2 Problem Definition Background: Boeing’s Auburn Plant manufactures airplane wing spars which are the primary structural component that runs the length.
1. P09203 – 1kg Robotic Motor Module Gen 2 Platform This project is Sponsored by the Kate Gleason Foundation.  Team Members:  Lauren Farnsworth → Team.
Overview of Phase 4 Performance Validation Methods and Techniques.
PURPOSE OF DFMEA (DESIGN FAILURE MODE EFFECTS ANALYSIS)
Team Hybrid  Daniel Farley  John Hoyt  Sean Frost Hoyt.
Team HazardHawk Team HazardHawk The HazardHawk Team HazardHawk 2008.
Six Sigma Quality Engineering
Catheter Tube Assembly Process
Baltimore Tool Chisel Test Stand Baltimore Tool President: Harry McCarty Baltimore Tool Representative: Dennis Shewbridge Consultant: Peter Popper Team.
Pneumatic Logic Sensors and Actuators
Team P12472 Phil Glasser – Lead Engineer, Electrical Engineer William Tierney – Mechanical Engineer Bryan Abbott – Mechanical Engineer Mike Scionti– Mechanical.
Lucas Phillips Anurag Nanajipuram FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS.
The Water Benders Final Presentations. Outline Introduction Project Description Motivation Problem Statement Objectives Customer Requirements Design Concepts.
Sponsor/Customer: Dr. Ferat Sahin Multi Agent Bio-Robotics Lab Faculty Guide: Prof. George Slack Team Members: Matthew LeStrange – Electrical Engineering.
Client Logo LEAN ENTERPRISE Implementation Workshop.
Athletic Field Marking Device Anthony Cortese, Ryan Crump, Matthew Lawler, Patrick Shaughnessy (Team Leader), John Sudia.
By the end of this chapter, you should:  Understand the properties of an engineering requirement and know how to develop well-formed requirements that.
Group 1: Material Testing Device Jobe Dyson Brie Witherspoon John Chandler Brett Newstead.
New Components Introduction (NCI) and Suppliers Selection. General Awareness Presentation Valentina Shirina GE Transportation June 22, 2011 Eskisehir.
Robust Design and Reliability-Based Design ME 4761 Engineering Design 2015 Spring Xiaoping Du.
Analyze Opportunity Part 1
Basic Utility Vehicle (BUV) ME 462 Capstone Design Presentation Department of Mechanical Engineering, IUPUI December 14, 2005 Presented by: Tom Peters.
Advance to the next slide when ready to start $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 Sample.
1. Mission Statement Design Requirements Aircraft Concept Selection Advanced Technologies / Concepts Engine / Propulsion Modeling Constraint Analysis.
COSMOSMotion Slides.
Cmpe 589 Spring 2006 Lecture 2. Software Engineering Definition –A strategy for producing high quality software.
Chapter 27 The Engineering Design Process. Learning Objectives Describe the various factors that are changing the design process Discuss the steps in.
1 Clutch Selection for American Marine Z-Drive Product ETM 5131 Project Phillip Magee July, 2004.
The EPHS = Electrically Powered Hydraulic Steering is familiar from the Lupo FSI. This system is supplied by TRW and by KOYO. The steering system offers.
Bryan McDonnel Michael Mize Ryan Taylor (presenter) Miles Whittaker
Mechanical Workshop FIRST Mid Atlantic Region January 2016.
Using Hydraulic Systems
P13631: Gravity Fed Flow Process Control Teaching Aid An RIT education couples theory in lecture with practical application in lab. In the past, carts.
Lianna Dicke MOTOR HARDWARE BREAKDOWN. Design Goals: Drive DC motor that draws 5 A maximum continuous current Voltage operation at 12 Volts (automotive)
Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA)
Fluid Power Control.
AVTC Model Based Design Curriculum Development Project.
P15342 Linear RF Measurement System Kate Gunderson Matt Chauncey Will Tourtillotte.
Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis
Machine Elements in Mechanical Design Prepared by: Misrty Dipen
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
Linear actuator Cylinders Single acting Double acting
SNS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING
GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE DAHOD
FINAL PRESENTATION Western Michigan University Advisors:
P07307: Controls for Dynamic Suspension
Logic Functions Pneumatics Module 7.
FMEA PROCESS FLOW Determine Causes/ mechanisms failure
Failure mode and effect analysis
Actuators & Directional Control Valves
H-BRAKE Hybrid Serie.
ABE 223 ABE Principles – Machine systems Cylinders Tony Grift
MOOG EMA Installation MSD1 - P12251
GE 6757 TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Tree Limbing and Harvesting ROV
OVERVIEW Debate in engineering design community: Should design be taught as: Establishing a foundation of theory? or Engaging students in loosely supervised.
PDR Connor, Lance, Aldrin.
MOOG EMA Installation MSD1 - P12251
Module – 4: Single Acting Cylinder
Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
Actuators & Directional Control Valves
Presentation transcript:

Team CNH Design a less expensive propulsion control system with equivalent or better performance than existing hardware for Hydrostatic Windrower Machine. Mission Statement: Forward

Customer Wants Low Cost Very Reliable Easy to Use Easy Maintenance High Level of Accuracy Comfortable to Use Minimal Machine Redesign Highly Repeatable Continued Operation Ability High Perception of Safety

Constraints System Must Be Safe System Must Meet all ASAE Codes Total System < $300.00

Benchmarking Current CNH System

Benchmarking John DeereHesston

Design Metrics Time to Reach Neutral Total Cost Response Time Serviceability Index Component Effects Energy Usage Repeatability Rate Number of Parts Changed

Design Target Values Stopping Time < 10 Seconds Total Cost < $ Response Time < ¼ Second Serviceability Index < Volt System, Draw < 30 Amps Mean Time Between Failures > 3,240 Hours Number of Parts Replaced <4

Design Breakdown

Motion Actuation

Concept 1- Rotary Actuator

Motion Actuation Concept 2- Linear Actuator

Actuation Design Decision Chose to Use A Linear Actuator Because: Least Expensive Solution Smallest Amount of Machine Redesign More Durability Lowest Energy Requirements

Safety Return

Concept 1- Engine Shutoff Benefits: Least Expensive and Easiest to Implement Major Problems: Complete Loss of Operation After Failure Customer Perception of “Unsafe”

Safety Return Concept 2- Collapsible Linkage Normal Operating Conditions Failure Mode

Safety Return Concept 3-Hydrostatic Braking

Safety Return Concept 4- Hydro-Mechanical Failsafe

Safety Return Design Decision Chose the Hydro-Mechanical Failsafe Because: Safe Low Cost Quick Time to Reach Neutral Position Ability to Use Other Functions After Propulsion Shutoff

Final Design Assembly

How Does it Work?

Reverse vs. Forward Engine Shutoff Machine will not be cutting crop in reverse Center of gravity is close to front of machine Reverse speed much less than maximum forward speed Machine will not be moving in reverse on roadways

Future Controller Design

Validation- Machine Tests How Will Machine React if Engine is Shutoff While Operating in Reverse?

Validation- Machine Tests Engine RPMCylinder Position Ground Speed

Validation- FMEA Failure Modes and Effects Analysis Identifies Potential Failure Modes Estimates Occurrence Rate Assess Severity of Failure Evaluates Potential To Detect Failure Recommends a Design Action to Lower Risk if Needed

Sample FMEA

Validation- Cost Breakdown

Validation-Stress Analysis

Path Forward Finalize Actuator Supplier Build Prototype Write Controller Code Test Mean Time Between Failure in Lab Perform Field Tests

QUESTIONS ?

Final Design Layout

Spring Return Mechanism Existing CNH Return Spring

Hydraulic Cylinder + Valve

Linear Actuator

Hydraulic / Spring Connection To Pintel Arm To Spring Assembly Hydraulic Connection

Actuator Mounting Bracket

Actuator-Cylinder Connection

Controller Diagram DC Motor C i PWM Screw Linear actuator CdCd rdrd eded riri eiei ydyd yiyi  r d : Reference Displacement e d : Error Displacement C d : Displacement Controller R i : Reference Current E i :Current Error C i /PMW: Current Controller Y i : Output Current Y d :Output Displacement

Validation- Stress Analysis