Stream Restoration Techniques

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6.5 River Stability and Bank Protection John Ratsey
Advertisements

A section has been added regarding Stream Restoration Design Criteria: A. Designs for stream restoration try to mimic natural conditions present in stable.
Riparian Zone Habitat Assessment Vegetation and More.
Weirs and Canal Intakes By: Nell Kolden and Taylor Barnett Thursday April 12, 2012 CIVE 717.
Stream Geomorphology Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012.
Hickory Hills Lake Management Committee Erosion Control sub committee Tom BertramJane Blake.
Erosion. What is it?  Movement of soil materials by the action of water, wind or gravity.
Grade Control Structures Chris Shrimpton and Jonathan McIntosh CIVE 717 River Mechanics Spring 2012.
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 7 Stream Systems on Dynamic Earth Floodplain Management Principles & Practice Prepared By Donald R. Reichmuth, PhD.
Section 3: Stream Deposition
Natural Riparian Resources Vegetation Landscape/Soil Water.
Road Decommissioning Monitoring For every 10 miles of road decommissioned, one ¼ mile monitoring segment is established and monitored. Segments are monitored.
Pine Valley Country Club Stream Restoration: Phase 2 Proposal Presented March 17, 2003 Greg Jennings, NC State Univ Barbara Doll, NC Sea Grant Dave Bidelspach,
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
Habitat Assessment Developed by Ken Cooke Kentucky Division of Water Watershed Watch Program Coordinator Modified by Mike Kemp Professor of Environmental.
Bioassessment 1.0. Stream Visual Assessment Protocol 1. Turbidity 2. Plant growth 3. Channel Condition 4. Channel Flow Alteration 5. Percent Embeddedness.
CHARACTER OF RIVER CHANNELS
Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research Program Restoration of Chamberlain Creek Amy Clinefelter Riparian Wetland Research.
Department of Forestry 2004 Stream Habitat Restoration Guidelines
Minnehaha Creek – Reach 14 Streambank Improvement Project.
Proposed Novato Creek Bank Stabilization Guidelines Questa Engineering Corp.
Greg Jennings, PhD, PE Professor, Biological & Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University BAE 579: Stream Restoration Lesson.
Watershed Assessment and River Restoration Strategies
Modern Urbanized Stream Water Quality Improvement Technologies Creating a Net Zero Water Quality Impact Solution in the Natural Environment.
ODOT Programmatic ESA Consultation on the Federal-Aid Highway Program (FAHP) User’s Guide Training, June-July 2013 Bank Stabilization Streambank or channel.
Hat Creek Restoration Project Hat Creek Restoration ProjectHatRAC PresentationOctober 29, 2013 Prepared by Geomorphic Assessment and Preliminary Plans.
Applications of habitat data to fishery management Distribution and abundance of habitat for different life stages Barriers to migration; Waterfalls /
Habitat Presentation 1 Phil Kaufmann --- USEPA, Corvallis, OR
Materials Transport & NSCD Material Classes Velocity to Transport Relationships York NSCD Restoration PSY CCREP.
Step 1: Assess Riparian Resource Function Using PFC §1d. Complete PFC assessment l 17 questions about attributes and processes l Reminder – PFC based on:
Natural Riparian Resources Water Landscape & SoilVegetation.
Channel Modification Washington Dept. Forestry, 2004, Channel Modification Techniques Katie Halvorson.
Stream Processes and Habitat Ryan Johnson. Overview Watershed Processes – Factors and their effects on the watershed as a whole Stream Processes – Factors.
Mission, Brender, and Yaksum Creeks Habitat Conditions Low flows and associated high temperatures affect distribution and abundance of native species.
Dry Creek Fish Habitat Enhancement Feasibility Study Current Conditions Summary.
SKUNK RIVER PIPELINE PROTECTION PROJECT NEAR DENMARK, IOWA SUB MAR.
Stream Erosion and Transport
Coos Watershed Association Watershed Restoration Projects.
6.7 Improved Traditional Systems
An Experience In Conducting A Longitudinal Profile… A Study of the Response of San Pedro Creek to the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Flood Control.
HAW CREEK, PIKE COUNTY, MISSOURI-TRIB TO SALT RIVER ERODING STREAM THREATHENING COUNTY ROAD #107, FOURTEEN FT TALL ERODING BANK WITHIN 4 FT OF THE ROAD,
Riparian Areas: Functions and Conditions Authors: Gene Surber, MSU Extension Natural Resources Specialist Bob Ehrhart, Research Specialist, RWRP, Univ.
THE STEP- BY STEPS: as posted on the FTP site. Cross-section of Eroded Bank.
Introduction to Rivers
Section 3: Stream Deposition
7. Bedforms in coarse-grained channels Step-pool units Cluster bedforms Riffle-pool sequences.
The role of woody debris in riparian zones Jon M. Flinders.
Design and Implementation of Large Wood Structures at Twelvemile Creek Prince of Wales Island Tongass National Forest The Nature Conservancy TEAMS Enterprise.
NYS-DOT REGION 6 ROAD PROTECTION FOR ROUTE 248 CHENUNDA CREEK, SOUTH OF WELLSVILLE, NY. CONSTRUCTED AS A HANDS-ON WORKSHOP SEPTEMBER 2006.
RIVERS THE MIDDLE COURSE.
Natural Riparian Resources Water Landscape & SoilVegetation.
Esteban Quiles Earth and Physical Science Department Western Oregon University Monmouth, Oregon
NHACC Annual Meeting 2014 New Approaches to Restoring NH’s Rivers Natural Channel Design and Dam Removal Peter J. Walker.
Natural Riparian Resources Vegetation Landscape/Soil Water.
Bridges Reach analysis Fundamental tool for design
Department of Forestry 2004 Stream Habitat Restoration Guidelines
Emigration Creek Restoration
Erosion • outline a cause of soil erosion in  NSW due to: – an agricultural process – urbanisation and identify a management strategy that prevents or.
4 channel types defined at reach scale, based on 3 features
Brian murphy and Emily valenzuela
4 channel types defined at reach scale, based on 3 features
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys
Streams Hydrodynamics
Streams Hydrodynamics
Riparian Vegetation.
Anthony Keene Kristin LaForge CIVE 717 Spring 2018
Kastanis- Existing Conditions
Longitudinal Profile Survey for Successful Culvert Replacement
In-Stream Structures & Grade Control
Presentation transcript:

Stream Restoration Techniques Channel Geometry Design and Construction Streamside / Slope Protection Instream Structures

Stream Restoration Techniques Channel Geometry Design and Construction Objectives: Achieve a Stable Channel Geometry Bankful Channel Width and Depth Sinuosity Slope

Views of a River Cross-Sectional View (Dimension) Plan View (Pattern) Longitudinal View (Profile)

Stream Restoration Techniques Streamside / Slope Protection Objectives: Restore a Functional Riparian Zone Stabilize Banks Provide shading Filter sediments

Stream Restoration Techniques Streamside / Slope Protection Considerations: Native Species Materials (hard vs soft) Climate / Soils / Expected Inundation Wildlife Uses Timing

FUNCTIONAL APPLICATION Streamside / Slope Protection TECHNIQUES FUNCTIONAL APPLICATION 1. Bank Shaping and Plantings Bank stabilization, erosion control, promote vegetative growth, riparian habitat 2. Joint Plantings 3. Imbricated Riprap Bank stabilization, erosion control 4. Vegetated Gabions 5. Dormant Post Plantings 6. Live Stakes 7. Live Fascines 8. Natural Fiber Roles 9. Brush Mattresses 10. Live Crib Walls 11. Log, Rootwad, and Boulder Revetments Bank stabilization, erosion control, instream habitat 12. Tree Revetments 13. Riparian Forest Buffers everything

Live stakes taped into joints or openings between rock which have previously been installed on a slope or while rock is being placed on the slope face. Applications and Effectiveness Appropriate where there is a lack of desired vegetative cover on the face of existing or required rock riprap. Root systems provide a mat upon which the rock riprap rests and prevents loss of fines from the underlying soil base. Root systems also improve drainage in the soil base. Will quickly establish riparian vegetation. Should, where appropriate, be used with other soil bioengineering systems and vegetative plantings to stabilize the upper bank and ensure a regenerative source of streambank vegetation. Have few limitations and can be installed from base flow levels to top of slope, if live stakes are installed to reach ground water. Survival rates can be low due to damage to the cambium or lack of soil/ stake interface. Thick rock riprap layers may require special tools for establishing pilot holes.

Hollow, box-like interlocking arrangements of untreated log or timber members filled above baseflow with alternate layers of soil material and live branch cuttings that root and gradually take over the structural functions of the wood members. Applications and Effectiveness Provide protection to the streambank in areas with near vertical banks where bank sloping options are limited. Afford a natural appearance, immediate protection and accelerate the establishment of woody species. Effective on outside of bends of streams where high velocities are present. Appropriate above and below water level where stable streambeds exist. Don’t adjust to toe scour. Can be complex and expensive. Should, where appropriate, be used with soil bioengineering systems and vegetative plantings to stabilize the upper bank and ensure a regenerative source of streambank vegetation.

Boulders and logs with root masses attached placed in and on streambanks to provide streambank erosion, trap sediment, and improve habitat diversity. Applications and Effectiveness Use of native materials can sequester sediment and woody debris, restore streambanks in high velocity streams, and improve fish rearing and spawning habitat. Site must be accessible to heavy equipment. Materials might not be readily available at some locations. Can create local scour and erosion. Can be expensive. Will tolerate high boundary shear stress if logs and rootwads are well anchored. Suited to streams where fish habitat deficiencies exist. Should, where appropriate, be uses with soil bioengineering systems and vegetative plantings to stabilize the upper bank and ensure a regenerative source of streambank vegetation. Will give limited life depending on climate and tree species used. Some species, such as cottonwood or willow, often sprout and accelerate colonization. Might need eventual replacement if colonization does not take place or soil bioengineering systems are not used.

Charles N. Greene

Bioengineering Charles N. Greene

Stream Restoration Techniques Instream Structures Objectives: Maintain efficient sediment transport and channel geometry Protect vulnerable banks Direct flow towards or away from critical areas (e.g., road grade, bridge abutment) Create natural hydraulic channel units Restore habitat complexity

Stream Restoration Techniques Instream Structures Considerations: Overall Design Appropriate Materials (size and type) Placement Location Machinery Timing of Construction

FUNCTIONAL APPLICATION Instream Structures TECHNIQUES FUNCTIONAL APPLICATION 1. Boulder Clusters protect stream bed, instream habitat, channel complexity 2. Log and Rock Vanes protect stream bed, bank erosion control, instream habitat, channel complexity 3. J-Hook Vanes 4. W-Weirs 6. Rootwad / Logvane / J-Hook Combo 5. Stream Deflectors bank erosion control, instream habitat, channel complexity 6. Tree Kickers 7. Log / Rock Check Dams 8. Log Sills / Check Dams 9. Step Pools 10. Lunker Structures instream habitat, channel complexity 11. Stream Meander Restoration 12. Hydraulic Connection Restoration

Groups of boulders placed in the base flow cannel to provide cover,create scour holes, or areas of reduced velocity. Applications and Effectiveness Can be used in most stream habitat types including riffles, runs, flats, glides and open pools. Greatest benefits are realized in streams with average flows exceeding 2 feet per second. Group placement of these boulders are desirable in larger streams. Whereas single boulder placement in smaller streams might have the same effect. Boulder clusters are most effective in wide, shallow streams with gravel or rubble beds. Also useful in deeper streams for providing cover and improving substrate. Not recommended for sand bed (and smaller bed materials) streams because they tend to get buried. Added erosive forces might cause channel and bank failures. Not recommended for streams which are aggrading or degrading. May promote bar formation in streams with high bed material.

Cell constructed of heavy wooden planks ad blocks which are imbedded into the toe of streambanks at channel bed level to provide covered compartments for fish shelters, habitat, and prevention of streambank erosion. Applications and Effectiveness Most commonly used in streams with gravel-cobble beds. Heavy equipment may be necessary for excavating and installing the materials. Can be expensive. Appropriate along outside bends of streams where water depths can be maintained at or above the top of the structure. Suited to streams where fish habitat deficiencies exist. Should, where appropriate, be used with soil bioengineering systems and vegetative plantings to stabilize the upper bank and ensure a regenerative source of streambank vegetation. Are often used in conjunction with wing deflectors and weirs to direct and manipulate flows. Are not recommended for streams with heavy bed material loads.

Structures that protrude from either streambank to provide overhead cover, aquatic organism substrate and habitat, stream current deflection, scouring, deposition, and drift catchment. Applications and Effectiveness Should be designed and located far enough downstream from riffle areas to avoid backwater effects that would drown out or otherwise damage the riffle. Should be sized based on anticipated scour. The material washed out of scour holes is usually deposited a short distance downstream to form a bar or riffle area. These areas of deposition are often composed of clean gravels that provide excellent habitat for certain species. Can be installed in series on alternative streambanks to produce a meandering thalweg and associated structural diversity. Rock and rock-filled log crib deflector structures are most common. Should be used in channels with low physical habitat diversity, particularly those with a lack of stable pool habitat. Deflectors placed in sand bed streams may settle or fail due to erosion sand, and in these areas a filter layer or geotextile might be needed underneath the deflector.

Rock Vane W Weir

Indian Crk., Rt 16, S of Woosley, Wyoming Co., 8 July 2002 Photo 7/ 8 0025 UTM 451341mE 4150501mN S. Kite Photo