ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

CLIC TeamMAD-X Day, September 4, 2003 MAD-X for CLIC H. Braun, R. Corsini, T.d’Amico, A. Faus-Golfe, M. Korostelev, S. Redaelli, T. Risselada, D. Schulte,

Advertisements

1 Collimation Simulations and Optimisation Frank Jackson ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.

BDS Change Request: Support of Single L* Optics Configuration Shared by both Detectors Glen White, Nick Walker Sept MDI/CFS Ichinoseki.

PARTICIPATION IN THE DESIGN AND R&D ACTIVITIES FOR A FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDER: A. Faus-Golfe IFIC - Valencia Accelerator and Detector aspects FPA

31st May 2007LCWS1 Robust Spin Polarisation Status Helical Collaboration I.R. Bailey, P. Cooke, J.B. Dainton, L.J. Jenner, L.I. Malysheva (University of.

Transport formalism Taylor map: Third order Linear matrix elementsSecond order matrix elements Truncated maps Violation of the symplectic condition !

January 2004 GLC/NLC – X-Band Linear Collider Peter Tenenbaum Beam Dynamics of the IR: The Solenoid, the Crossing Angle, The Crab Cavity, and All That.

MERLIN 3.0 only considers first order (dipole) modes. Kick is linearly proportional to offset. For offsets close to the axis this is a reasonable approximation.

ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury.

July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.

1 ATF2 Tuning and its application to ILC and CLIC FFS/IR region ASTeC and MAN : working together on tuning methods for the ATF2 and ILC IR/extraction design.

GRD - Collimation Simulation with SIXTRACK - MIB WG - October 2005 LHC COLLIMATION SYSTEM STUDIES USING SIXTRACK Ralph Assmann, Stefano Redaelli, Guillaume.

ILC Beam Delivery System Layout and Lattice Design Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Cockcroft Institute Cockcroft Institute SAC th November 2006.

The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.

ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.

CLIC main detector solenoid and anti-solenoid impact B. Dalena, A. Bartalesi, R. Appleby, H. Gerwig, D. Swoboda, M. Modena, D. Schulte, R. Tomás.

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Jürgen Pfingstner Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML and BDS Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML.

Ijaz Ahmed Ijaz Ahmed Helmut Burkhardt Andrea Latina Beam-Halo Generation Study in CLIC CLIC Beam Dynamics Meeting, CERN: 13/02/08.

New Progress of the Nonlinear Collimation System for A. Faus-Golfe J. Resta López D. Schulte F. Zimmermann.

European Organization for Nuclear Research International Linear Collider INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON FUTURE LINEAR COLLIDERS ЛЦВС14 Vinča Institute of Nuclear.

Emittance Growth from Elliptical Beams and Offset Collision at LHC and LRBB at RHIC Ji Qiang US LARP Workshop, Berkeley, April 26-28, 2006.

Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.

12th April 2007Cockcroft Institute1 WP2.3 - Robust Spin Polarisation Status Helical Collaboration I.R. Bailey, P. Cooke, J.B. Dainton, L.J. Jenner, L.I.

D. Angal-KalininEUROTeV Annual Meeting, DESY WP2 : Beam Delivery System D. Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, STFC, Daresbury Laboratory 4 th EUROTeV Annual.

Beam dynamics on damping rings and beam-beam interaction Dec 포항 가속기 연구소 김 은 산.

WP: Parameters and design. Plans from IFIC, Valencia Javier Resta López on behalf of the IFIC accelerator group ( IFIC (CSIC-UV),

October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.

Simulations Group Summary K. Kubo, D. Schulte, N. Solyak for the beam dynamics working group.

11th December 2007 LET workshop, SLAC 1 Beam dynamics issues in Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory.

BDS Andrei Seryi, Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Emmannual Tsesmelis, Rogelio Tomas, Andrea Latina, Daniel Schulte Detectors Civil engineering.

A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.

Introduction: Tasks of “Information for simulations”, hardware specs K.Kubo

Collimator design and short range wakefields Adriana Bungau University of Manchester CERN, Dec 2006.

1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.

Slide 1 FP7: Collimator Wakefields program Building on the achievements in EuroTeV to provide a comprehensive system of knowledge of wakefield effects.

Collimation Baseline Configuration and Collimation Studies Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.

Global Design Effort CLIC-ILC BDS & MDI work Materials for discussion Daniel Schulte, Rogelio Tomas and Emmanuel Tsesmelis for CLIC team Andrei Seryi for.

Collimation for the Linear Collider, Daresbury.1 Adam Mercer, German Kurevlev, Roger Barlow Simulation of Halo Collimation in BDS.

ILC-BDS Collimators - Simulation and Experiment Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Group Annual Meeting December, 2007, Manchester Adriana Bungau.

Placet based DFS simulations in the ILC Main Linac. Some preliminary results of error scans open for discussion Javier Resta Lopez JAI, Oxford University.

ILC-GDE Meeting Beijing Feb Effect of MDI Design on BDS Collimation Depth Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory Cockcroft Institute.

Kiyoshi Kubo Electron beam in undulators of e+ source - Emittance and orbit angle with quad misalignment and corrections - Effect of beam pipe.

Low Emittance Generation and Preservation K. Yokoya, D. Schulte.

BDS Lattice Design : EDR plans GWP03 Meeting 04/12/2007.

LET in the ILC DRs with Minimal Tuning Knobs and other assorted information James Jones Deepa Angal-Kalinin and Frank Jackson.

Main Linac Tolerances What do they mean? ILC-GDE meeting Beijing Kiyoshi Kubo 1.Introduction, review of old studies 2.Assumed “static” errors.

Simulations - Beam dynamics in low emittance transport (LET: From the exit of Damping Ring) K. Kubo

Six-dimensional weak-strong simulations of head-on compensation in RHIC Y. Luo, W. Fischer Brookhaven National Laboratory, USA ICFA Mini-workshop on Beam-Beam.

Main and Drive Beam Dynamics Working Group Caterina Biscari, Daniel Schulte Attending people ~ 20 ± 5 Presentations ~ 18 (7 from CERN) CL IC 07.

Beam-beam Simulation at eRHIC Yue Hao Collider-Accelerator Department Brookhaven National Laboratory July 29, 2010 EIC Meeting at The Catholic University.

Freddy Poirier ILC project Meeting Integrated Luminosity Performance Study on the ILC – WP6 (A snapshot of the European LC workshop at Daresbury) Freddy.

BDS, Start to End Simulation, Simulation Codes Summary D. Schulte.

IWLC10, 18 th -22 nd October10, CERN/CICG 1 Global Design Effort Updates to ILC RDR Beam Delivery System Deepa Angal-Kalinin & James Jones ASTeC, STFC.

G.R.White: F.O.N. T. From Ground Motion studies by A.Seryi et al. (SLAC) ‘Fast’ motion (> few Hz) dominated by cultural noise Concern for structures.

Tuning Knobs for ATF2: An Update Anthony Scarfe, James Jones The Cockcroft Institute LCWS’07 31 st May 2007.

Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.

1 Updated comparison of feedback implementation for e + e - and e - e - modes of operation with realistic errors in the BDS M. Alabau Pons, P. Bambade,

ILC DR Lower Horizontal Emittance, preliminary study

Collimation Simulations and Optimisation

In collaboration with P. N. Burrows, A. Latina and D. Schulte

Benchmarking MAD, SAD and PLACET Characterization and performance of the CLIC Beam Delivery System with MAD, SAD and PLACET T. Asaka† and J. Resta López‡

Beam Dynamics in Curved ILC Main Linac (following earth curvature)

Collimator design and short range wakefields

DFS Simulations on ILC bunch compressor

PLACET collimator studies

First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring

NEW DESIGN OF THE TESLA INTERACTION REGION WITH l* = 5 m

Collimation Optimisation

Start-to-End Simulations for the TESLA LC

Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov

Presentation transcript:

ILC BDS Collimation Optimisation and PLACET simulations Adina Toader School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester & Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Laboratory The University of Manchester Outline of talk Introduction to collimation optimisation PLACET Introduction & Capabilities Examples: CLIC BDS Relevance to collimation Results with PLACET Future plans

Collaborators Roger Barlow University of Manchester Roger Jones Adriana Bungau Deepa Angal-Kalinin Daresbury Laboratory, ASTEC Frank Jackson Jonny Smith Lancaster University Daniel Schulte CERN Geneva Andrea Latina Giovanni Rumolo

WP1 BDS Lattice Design and Simulation Began using PLACET as general tool for collimation- related simulations Recently used to complement collimation lattice optimisation by Frank Jackson Preliminary results with PLACET Background

ILC BDS collimation performance not good compared to NLC. - phase advances not correct and bandwidth poor Tighter apertures to compensate for poor performance  increased wakefields, emittance dilution. Adjust matching of collimation and final focus optics. - open collimators to reduce wakefields Collimation Lattice Optimisation

Phase advance 2006e2006e optimised SP4- SPEX x: 0.38 y: 0.59 x: 0.5 y: 1.0 SP4-IPx: 2.76 y: 2.34 x: 2.75 y: e Original 2006e Optimised matching quadrupoles SP4 SPEX SP2 Use matching quadrupoles to restore correct phase advances between SP4, SPEX and IP. Multiple solutions available. Choose solution with the best lattice bandwidth. Collimation Optimisation

MERLIN BDS halo tracking, “black” spoilers set at nominal collimation depth, uniform halo dimension 50% larger than nominal collimation depth. Clearly improved performance in new lattice. Original 2006e PerformanceNew Performance Plot shows halo profile at Final Double Entrance. The black square is the nominal collimation depth (same population in both halos at FD) Optimised Performance Tracking Results

PLACET Introduction & Capabilities: The program PLACET (Program for Linear Accelerator Correction Efficiency Tests) was initially developed by Daniel Schulte and currently updated by Andrea Latina (CERN) for CLIC (Compact Linear Collider). It is a tracking code for linear colliders which implements: wakefileds, synchrotron radiation emission, single or multibunch effects, lattice errors, ground motion, the earth’s magnetic field and beam jitter. Interfaced in PLACET there is GUINEA-PIG – a beam-beam interaction code to simulate beam-beam collisions and calculates the luminosity.

Example of PLACET tracking along the CLIC BDS Horizontal (left) and vertical (right) phase space portraits at the end of BDS including or not including the collimator wakefields in the tracking *. CLIC Luminosity reduction curves versus vertical collimator offset *. *EUROTeV-Report

Relevance of PLACET to collimation optimisation Collimation modifications disturb lattice and may make luminosity more sensitive to errors in quadrupole strength and alignment. Can easily introduce quadrupole strength errors and offsets to check luminosity sensitivity in PLACET.

Results with PLACET Wakefield results: The y kick varies with the position along the bunch - the tail is more affected than the head. Plots show qualitative agreement with MERLIN.

Results with PLACET Tracking original ILC2006e lattice: Plots of beam size at IP in x, x’, y, y’ agreeing with designed values (top) and of beam distributions in x and y (bottom). x (µm)y (µm) y’ (µrad)x’ (µrad) Designed values PLACET values σ x’ (nrad) σ y’ (nrad) σ x (nm) σ y (nm) Number of particle

Future Plans Collimation optimisation led to improved halo tracking performance. Use PLACET to check optimised lattice sensitivity to magnet errors. Also we can study the effect of the collimator wakefields. PLACET is useful to calculate the luminosity deterioration due to these effects.