Feb 13 2004 Absorber/coil instrumentation and controls  Subsystems Absorbers RF Magnets  Monitoring/safety  Data acquisition: Information on system.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Electrical wiring for piezo movers piezo power supply strain gauges readout temperature probes 1 Frédéric BOGARD – LAL/IN2P3/CNRS – Jan 25, 2013 Electrical.

Advertisements

MTA Instrumentation M. Haney University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 25 February 2004.

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Parameter List Edda Gschwendtner Introduction Parameter list for sub-systems of MICE.

Cooling Channel Count Recap Cooling channel components # Engineering? Absorber: temperature 8*3 yes pressure 2*3 yes He temp 2*3 level 8*3 yes length (optical)

Magnet Cooldown Scheme 17 th February 2012 Roy Preece (STFC RAL)

Absorber R&D and Test Results CM16 at RAL, Oct 8-11, 2006 Shoji Suzuki & Shigeru Ishimoto KEK.

LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.

MICE: Hall Infrastructure Chris Nelson CEng CM16 8 th Oct 2006.

Instrumentation: ground and noise Temperature Measurement.

MICE Engineering Integration Update August 13, 2003 Edgar L. Black IIT.

MICE Safety System DE Baynham TW Bradshaw MJD Courthold Y Ivanyushenkov.

MICE AFCSWG Safety Review Summary Mary Anne Cummings Dec. 17, 2003 MICE Video Conference.

Nov-1st 2004, MICE TV Conf. Plans for absorber tests at KEK Shigeru Ishimoto KEK.

Slow controls and instrumentation of MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.How the state of the cooling channel gets defined 3.Engineering for the signal readout.

Flammable Gas Electrical Safety Concerns for detectors: Power per channel Feedthroughs Seals.

MICE LH2 Absorber Instrumentation - What is necessary/ desirable? (physics calibration) Temperature inside the the absorber Temperature inside the absorber.

MICE CM Berkeley 9-12 Feb February 2005 Edda Gschwendtner 1 Control/Monitoring and DAQ for PIDs Edda Gschwendtner.

MuCool Test Facility Instrumentation Update M. Haney, D. Errede, Z. Conway University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 12/13 August 2002.

Controls Review  Want to record a full configuration of the experiment at every possible “event”, including controls data.  Event trigger = accelerator.

LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.

1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.

March 14, 2003 MICE Absorber/Coil Integration MICE LH2 Absorber 1.Assembly 2.Safety 3.Staging 4.Instrumentation.

Goal of MICE:   out /  in of   Assuming a standard (or agreed to) definition of 6-D cooling.  We can also assume that the tracker can give.

1 Infrastructure at RAL Iouri Ivaniouchenkov, RAL MICE Collaboration CERN, 29 March 2003.

LH2 Absorber Design Mary Anne Cummings MICE Safety Review LBL Dec 9, 2003.

Applied Science Division MICE Prototype Control System T W Bradshaw April 2004 MICE Proto Control System Organisation.ppt.

Absorber Design Details Mary Anne Cummings MICE MEETING Columbia June 13, 2003.

Internal Cryomodule Instrumentation Sensors, Actuators, Heaters, and Wiring ERL Main Linac Cryomodule 9/5/2012 Peter Quigley Internal Design Review.

Liquid-hydrogen absorber: Shigeru Ishimoto KEK Contents (1)Introduction (2)MICE absorber design (3)Prototype absorber test at KEK (4)MICE absorber instrumentation.

Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.

MICE Hydrogen Control System MICE H2 Review Meeting RAL 15 th Jan 2015 PJ Warburton – STFC Daresbury Lab.

17 March 2005Edda Gschwendtner1 MICE Cooling Channel: Can we predict cooling to ? Edda Gschwendtner Challenge Systematics Cooling Channel Beam Line.

Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Roy Preece Rutherford Appleton Lab October 28, 2011 MICE Collaboration Meeting.

18-Jan-021W. Karpinski System Test Design verification of petals and interconnect boards and control links without detectors a)mechanics b)electrical.

Cooling Channel Instrumentation Update M. Haney University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 6 February 2004.

Linac Test Area Instrumentation Update M. Haney, D. Errede, Z. Conway University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 14 June 2002.

MICE CM February 08Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Detector DAQ Hardware Status o Introduction o Preliminary list o Plan for action o Summary Jean-Sebastien.

Internal Cryomodule Instrumentation ERL Main Linac Cryomodule 10/10/2015 Peter Quigley, MLC Design Review.

Absorber Production Status Contents (1)MICE absorber design/status (2)MICE absorber instrumentation (3)Schedule (4)Summary Sasanqua at KEK on 13-DEC,’09.

ITAR Restricted Data THEMIS Power Subsystem CDR Peer Review 6/14/04 Probe and Probe Carrier Harness Dave Manges (301)

NIKHEF B-field monitors Paul Balm November 11 th, 1999.

Controls for Particle ID/tracking in MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.Controls types 3.Controls list 4.Needed for particle ID/tracking M. A. Cummings May.

LH2 Safety Issues for MICE 1.O2/LH2 separation 2.No Ignition sources near LH2 3.Adequate ventilation 4.Affects: Windows: absorbers and vacuum Primary and.

Spectrometer Solenoid Test Plan Workshop: Safety Considerations Steve Virostek - LBNL February 17, 2012.

CM27 – 8 th July 2010 LH2 System Progress and Future Plans M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold I Mullacrane P Warburton.

1 Mice Collaboration Meeting CM33 Glasgow University 25 th – 29 th June 2012 STFC Daresbury Laboratory Electrical Infrastructure Report Authors : Ian Mullacrane.

Controls and monitoring in MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.Controls types 3.Controls list 4.Data record M. A. Cummings April 2004 CERN.

1 Mice Collaboration Meeting CM27 STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK 7 th -10 th July 2010 Daresbury Laboratory Electrical Infrastructure Report Authors.

Installation of the T600 at Fermilab CSN2, September 22,

By: Eric Seabron. B-Field Sensors: Used for magnetic field mapping. Tube Gases: No leaks, 93% Argon/ 7% CO2 at 3 bars. MDC Temp. Sensors: Accounts for.

MICE Detector Integration A. Bross Mice Video Meeting August 27, 2003.

Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.

1 MQXF(S) Magnet Interface Document MQXF(S) magnet interface document will describe electrical connection between the magnet and the header assembly Scope.

CLOSING REMARKS. Following the Review Charge Cryo-Design  Review and comment on the overall cooling circuit and overall cryo-design. u Temperature Margin.

-1- Steve Virostek (LBNL) and Li Wang (SINAP) Instrumentation for the MICE Coupling Coil Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab February.

Clive Field, Reggie Rogers, Venkat Srinivasan Undulator Week: BFW Card Status Update 01/23/ BFW Card - Physics Requirements.

Cryomodule Instrumentation Darryl Orris 13 May 2015 Production CM FDR.

FC Status CM39 1/20 June 2014 OXFORDRALDARESBURY V. BlackmoreV. BaylissT. Hartnett J. CobbT. BradshawS. Griffiths W. LauM. CourtholdI. Mullacrane R. PreeceA.

LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Darryl Orris 21 January 2015 Final Design Review: Instrumentation.

S A Griffiths CM42 June 2015 Electrical & Control.

National Centre for Nuclear Research, Poland

Instrumentation for status monitoring of SST-1 superconducting magnets

AEGIS Magnet System.

Linac Test Area Instrumentation

MuCool Test Facility Instrumentation Update

Linac Test Area Instrumentation

SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation

SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation

J. Fleiter, S. C. Hopkins, A. Ballarino

Presentation transcript:

Feb Absorber/coil instrumentation and controls  Subsystems Absorbers RF Magnets  Monitoring/safety  Data acquisition: Information on system state:  dE/dx density  Magnetic field  RF field  Calibration: Magnetic fields:  Offline field maps  Fringe fields  Survey

Feb MICE Absorber/Coil Readout  What is necessary/ desirable? (physics calibration) Temperature inside the the absorber/vacuum Pressure on the LH2 outlet Optical occlusion methods (laser or non-laser) Temp/flow on Helium  Controls (questions of data acquisition ) LH2 Safety systems (subset of monitoring describing the “state” of the system) Magnetic field measurements: currents power supply location monitors RF: power  Design considerations (depends on the final dimensions, routs, ports) LH2/flammable gas safety Clearance and strain relief Feedthroughs to outside electronics Noise cancellation/shielding

Feb Electronics CX-1030-SD Cernox RTD sensors (12)  -10  /K at 20K (estimated from plots)  Better suited for lower temperatures  Recommended for use in magnetic fields (B<19T)  Rad hard CX-1050-SD Cernox RTD sensors (24)  -70  /K at 20K (estimated)  Fermi “favorite” Also  TG-120PL GaAlAs diodes (4) -180mV/K at 4.2 K for B < 5 T, but no longer claimed to be rad hard… Common probes for magnets and absorbers

Feb Signal transfer Wire+Shielding Concerns  Cable plant into solenoid Shielded-twisted pairs (two pairs per Cernox) –Shield drains carried from Lakeshore(s) to sensors (not grounded) Grounding –Details depend on overall MICE grounding scheme  Common mode (surges) due to magnets Need to protect electronics without burning barriers  Noise/sensitivity issues  Channel Counts

Feb Feedthroughs Vacuum compatible, electrically insulated  Have to decide pin configuration based on 2, 4 wire readouts  MDC Vacuum Products Corp Vacuum/air Cryo/air Temp  Port through LH2 or vacuum