MICE Experiments Introduction Introduction Disclaimers Disclaimers Assumptions Assumptions Baseline programme Baseline programme Full programme Full programme.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 MICE Beamline: Plans for initial commissioning. Kevin Tilley, 16 th November. - 75days until commissioning Target, detectors, particle production Upstream.
Advertisements

Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
January 14, 2004 TJR - - UPDATED 1/25/04 1 MICE Beamline Analysis Using g4beamline Including Jan 25 Updates for Kevin’s JAN04 Beamline Design Tom Roberts.
Emittance definition and MICE staging U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 1 Apr Topics: a) Figure of merit for MICE b) Performance of MICE stages.
FIGURE OF MERIT FOR MUON IONIZATION COOLING Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 28 July 2004.
1 Angular Momentum from diffuser Beam picks up kinetic angular momentum (L kin ) when it sits in a field –Canonical angular momentum (L can ) is conserved.
ISIS Related Issues for MICE Adam Dobbs Proton Accelerator Development Meeting, RAL 24 th March /03/20111A. Dobbs.
TJR Feb 10, 2005MICE Beamline Analysis -- TRD SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – TRD SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. February 10, 2005.
FODO-based Quadrupole Cooling Channel M. Berz, D. Errede, C. Johnstone, K. Makino, Dave Neuffer, Andy Van Ginneken.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
Particle ID in the MICE Beamline MICE Collaboration Meeting 30 March Paul Soler, Kenny Walaron University of Glasgow and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
1 EMCal & PID Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 26/6-05.
1 PID, emittance and cooling measurement Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE Analysis phone conference.
1 26 Nov 2010 SOLID ABSORBERS Solid absorbers will provide first cooling demonstration –This is important for a number of reasons! Can use only solids.
Changing the absorbers: how does it fit in the MICE experimental programme? Besides the requirement that the amount of multiple scattering material be.
March 30, 2004 TJR1 MICE Upstream Particle Identification Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology March 30, 2004.
TJR Sept 22, 2004MICE Beamline Analysis -- SEPT041 MICE Beamline Analysis – SEPT04 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. September 22, 2004.
1Malcolm Ellis - Video Conference - 7th December 2006 Data Challenge Report  Disclaimer  Data Challenge definition(s)  Software status u G4MICE u GRID.
Alain Blondel MICE: Constraints on the solenoids 2.Field Homogeneity: or ? this will be dictated by the detector requirements. TPG will be.
1 Downstream scraping and detector sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting CERN.
TJR 10/30/031 MICE Beam rates Tom Roberts Illinois Institute of Technology 10/30/03.
MICE analysis meeting - (6/4/2006) 1 Update on MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
K.Walaron Fermilab, Batavia, Chicago 12/6/ Simulation and performance of beamline K.Walaron T.J. Roberts.
Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
1 OPTICS OF STAGE III Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 6 October 2004.
Controls Review  Want to record a full configuration of the experiment at every possible “event”, including controls data.  Event trigger = accelerator.
1. Optical matching in MICE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 June 2004 Constraints Software MICE proposal mismatch MICE Note 49 (September 2004, Bob.
MICE analysis meeting Alain Blondel 5 August MICE -- what running strategy? disclaimer: of course we will evolve the running strategy as problems.
MOM Report Paul Soler MICE Operations Manager University of Glasgow MICO April 19, 2010.
Overview of Experiment and Parameter Choices presented by Giles Barr.
04/01/2006MICE Analysis Meeting1 MICE phase III M. Apollonio, J. Cobb (Univ. of Oxford)
Chris Rogers, Analysis Parallel, MICE CM17 Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.
Diffuser Studies Chris Rogers, IC/RAL MICE VC 09 March 2005.
MICE magnetic measurements Sequence of events and MICE hall movements Alain Blondel – 10-April 2012 revision from 13 December 2012.
MICE Video meeting Alain Blondel 7 December MICE -- what running strategy? reflections on steps I and II.
17 March 2005Edda Gschwendtner1 MICE Cooling Channel: Can we predict cooling to ? Edda Gschwendtner Challenge Systematics Cooling Channel Beam Line.
Report on the Analysis Group & Plans V. Blackmore MICE VC 163 Thursday, 12 th December /11.
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices iteratively to determine trace.
Physics Program and Runs: Autumn 2011 & Step IV V. Blackmore MICE Project Board, 08/03/12.
CM37 Alain Blondel step IV physics success 1 « STEP IV operations : Physics »
Emittance measurement: ID muons with time-of-flight Measure x,y and t at TOF0, TOF1 Use momentum-dependent transfer matrices to map  path Assume straight.
Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.
MICE Beam-line and Detectors Status Report 16 th October 2009 Chris Booth The University of Sheffield.
MICE Step 1: First Emittance Results with Particle Physics Detectors Linda R. Coney EuCARD Meeting – 10 May 2011.
TWIST A Precision Measurement of Muon Decay at TRIUMF Peter Kitching TRIUMF/University of Alberta TWIST Collaboration Physics of TWIST Introduction to.
MICE at STFC-RAL The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment -- Design, engineer and build a section of cooling channel capable of giving the.
MICE Status & Plans MICE-UK paul drumm 15 th September 2004.
Alain Blondel MICE VC 12 March 2009 Brief MICE news 1. Decay solenoid: operations will restart in early July. Criteria for acceptance have been specified.
Controls for Particle ID/tracking in MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.Controls types 3.Controls list 4.Needed for particle ID/tracking M. A. Cummings May.
March 18, 2008 TJRMICE Beamline Status1 MICE Beamline Status (March 18, 2008) Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. Illinois Institute of Technology.
Progress in the construction of the MICE cooling channel and first measurements Adam Dobbs, EPS-HEP, 23 rd July 2011.
Controls and monitoring in MICE 1.Physics and systematics 2.Controls types 3.Controls list 4.Data record M. A. Cummings April 2004 CERN.
1June 2 nd 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 m. apollonio Beamline+( ,P) matrix.
Nufact02, London, July 1-6, 2002K.Hanke Muon Phase Rotation and Cooling: Simulation Work at CERN new 88 MHz front-end update on cooling experiment simulations.
Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.
1June 1 st 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 Beamline Optics m. apollonio.
(one of the) Request from MPB
MICE S TEP IV P HYSICS ‘D ELIVERABLES ’ V. Blackmore MAP 2014 Spring Meeting 30 th May, /15 AKA “What will we learn from Step IV?”
K. Long, 28 June, 2016 Introduction to MICE — and the role of the Hydrogen Delivery System.
CM Nov 2009 DOES MICE NEED STEP III ? Somewhat hard to understand MICE Schedule… –If the gods are (un)kind it’s possible that SS1, SS2 & FC1 are.
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
Marco apollonioAnalysis Meeting (9/12/2006)1 transmission vs amplitude with a finite size diffuser M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.
MICE. Outline Experimental methods and goals Beam line Diagnostics – In HEP parlance – the detectors Magnet system 2MICE Optics Review January 14, 2016.
Spokesman's update.
Field-on measurement of multiple scattering
M. Migliorati, C. Vaccarezza INFN - LNF
Completing the Step IV Programme
مفاهیم بهره وري.
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
The Detector System of the MICE Experiment
Presentation transcript:

MICE Experiments Introduction Introduction Disclaimers Disclaimers Assumptions Assumptions Baseline programme Baseline programme Full programme Full programme

Introduction and Disclaimer One question asked by Review Panel: What experiments do we plan to do with MICE? One question asked by Review Panel: What experiments do we plan to do with MICE? We had sort of said: vary everything, but not defined We had sort of said: vary everything, but not defined Need to define this soon for: - Review Panel - Final design and engineering for MICE Need to define this soon for: - Review Panel - Final design and engineering for MICE Programme presented is based on opinions (SG + others) Programme presented is based on opinions (SG + others) Simulations to check are just starting Simulations to check are just starting All opinions are equally valid, so don’t hold back! All opinions are equally valid, so don’t hold back! Emittance change is the important thing Emittance change is the important thing

Assumptions …..taken from the proposal Solenoid decay channel: 3000 muons/s Quadrupole decay channel: 300 muons/s “Useful” muons = Losses X in-phase 0.25 X 0.17 = X0.04  100 muons/s  10 muons/s precision  10 5 muons But efficiency  x2 systematic checks  x2.5  0.3 hours  2.7 hours  1.5 hours  15.0 hours ISIS runs for ~170 days/year  solenoid channel = 2720 runs  quad channel = 272 runs Define: Baseline programme ~272 runs Full programme + ~2450 runs

Full Programme (1) Absorbers: AbsorberThickness/cmCooling/% LH LHe LiH Li Be C Al  Use 6: LH2, LHe, LiH, Li, Be, Al

Full Programme (2) Absorber thicknesses Lots of discussion Lots of discussion If we’re gonna do it, may as well do it properly If we’re gonna do it, may as well do it properly  LH2 with central absorber empty  LH2 with LHe in central absorber  LiH/Li: 5 thicknesses: 0.25 to 1.75 x standard (3) RF voltage Backgrounds suggest we need to be careful Backgrounds suggest we need to be careful One point as high as backgrounds allow One point as high as backgrounds allow Rest down Rest down  2/3 additional voltages

Full Programme Input emittance LiH LH2 + LHe LH2 + vac

Full Programme (4) Emittance By changing the absorber thickness at TOF1 By changing the absorber thickness at TOF1 Avoid correlations if possible Avoid correlations if possible Probably most important parameter Probably most important parameter  10 diffferent emittances around equilibrium (5) Beam momentum Scan around central momentum Scan around central momentum  5 momenta in total  both signs

Full Programme (6) Optical configurations i.e. beta i.e. beta Six are given in the proposal Six are given in the proposal There is also the possibility of changing field sign There is also the possibility of changing field sign  2 diffferent configurations used

Putting that together Runs = targets x RF voltage x emittance x momentum x beta = x 4 x 10 x x = 21840! Do only 3 RF voltages = Do only 3 RF voltages = Can do everything only for 3 targets: LH2, LiH, Li = 3780 Can do everything only for 3 targets: LH2, LiH, Li = 3780 Scan all parameters all other targets = = 286 Scan all parameters all other targets = = 286 Total = 4066 runs = 18 months

Baseline Programme Runs = targets x RF voltage x emittance x momentum x beta = 1 x 1 x 8 x x = 240 Do everything for 1 target only: LH2 = 240 Do everything for 1 target only: LH2 = 240 Scan all parameters for LHe, LiH, Li + thickneses (3 LiH) = = 152 Scan all parameters for LHe, LiH, Li + thickneses (3 LiH) = = 152 Scan emittance only Be and Al = 16 Scan emittance only Be and Al = 16 Total = 408 runs = 18 months