BlueSky Implementation in CANSAC Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin Desert Research Institute - CEFA CANSAC Workshop Riverside, CA May 2006 Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A numerical simulation of urban and regional meteorology and assessment of its impact on pollution transport A. Starchenko Tomsk State University.
Advertisements

FOREST FIRE IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY THE LANCON-DE-PROVENCE 2005 CASE S. Strada, C. Mari Laboratoire d'Aérologie, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse,
Status and Changes to the US National Emissions Inventory (NEI) Thompson G. Pace, PE U.S. EPA Research Triangle Park, NC.
Georgia Chapter of the Air & Waste Management Association Annual Conference: Improved Air Quality Modeling for Predicting the Impacts of Controlled Forest.
Air Resource Management Wildland Fire Smoke Modeling Tools Rick Gillam/Bill Jackson U.S.D.A. Forest Service.
Meteorological Data Issues for Class II Increment Analysis.
The Use of High Resolution Mesoscale Model Fields with the CALPUFF Dispersion Modelling System in Prince George BC Bryan McEwen Master’s project
Smoke Modeling BlueSkyRains and SHRMC-4S Rick Gillam U.S. EPA Region 4 Air Modeler’s Workshop March 8-10, 2005.
Fire Modeling issues: fire effects on regional air quality under a changing climate Douglas G. Fox
Jacques Rousseau & Dr David Lavoué
BlueSky-EM, SMOKE and Data Linkages Andy Holland Carolina Environmental Program Symposium on Climate, Forest Growth, Fire and Air Quality Interactions.
Climate, Fire and Air Quality Climate Impacts Group June 1, 2006.
CANSAC MECHANICS Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin CANSAC Workshop 16 February 2006 Sacramento, CA.
Current Research in Smoke Modeling Scott Goodrick U.S. Forest Service Southern Research Station Athens, GA.
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
The ClearSky Field-Burning Decision Support System Joe Vaughan, Charleston Ramos, Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research WSU-Pullman NW-AIRQUEST.
Overview of the Pacific Northwest Environmental Prediction System.
CMAQ Simulations using Fire Inventory of NCAR (FINN) Emissions Cesunica Ivey, David Lavoué, Aika Davis, Yongtao Hu, Armistead Russell Georgia Institute.
Current Status and Ongoing Development of BlueSky Sim Larkin, Robert Solomon (US Forest Service) Dana Sullivan, Sean Raffuse, Chris Ovard, Lyle Chinkin.
fluidyn – PANAIR Fluidyn-PANAIR
Georgia Institute of Technology Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning: Fort Benning Case Study M. Talat Odman Georgia Institute of Technology School.
The CANSAC/BLUESKY Connection Timothy Brown Desert Research Institute Program for Climate, Ecosystem and Fire Applications Reno, NV.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
Photo Seattle Times, 9/2012 Use of Advanced Dispersion Modeling Examples for the Northwest Susan O’Neill, Research Scientist USDA Forest Service, AirFire.
Assessment of the vertical exchange of heat, moisture, and momentum above a wildland fire using observations and mesoscale simulations Joseph J. Charney.
Prototyping the Emergency Smoke Response System (ESRS) Sim Larkin, Tara Strand, Robert Solomon (US Forest Service AirFire Team) Sean Raffuse, Dana Raffuse,
PHASE II PROJECT Day 1 – 3:15p PHASE II PROJECT -- Ag Burning – Integration of QC responses -- NIF Format -- Plume Characteristics Update -- Next Steps.
Development of WRF-CMAQ Interface Processor (WCIP)
AMBIENT AIR CONCENTRATION MODELING Types of Pollutant Sources Point Sources e.g., stacks or vents Area Sources e.g., landfills, ponds, storage piles Volume.
Airmass History Analysis - Investigation of Spring Time Transport to the US Prepared by: Bret A. Schichtel And Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution.
Available Analytical Approaches for Estimating Fire Impacts on Ozone Formation Stephen Reid Sean Raffuse Hilary Hafner Sonoma Technology, Inc. Petaluma,
Verification and Case Studies for Urban Effects in HIRLAM Numerical Weather Forecasting A. Baklanov, A. Mahura, C. Petersen, N.W. Nielsen, B. Amstrup Danish.
Determining and Distributing Real-Time Strategic-Scale Fire Danger Assessments Chris Woodall and Greg Liknes USDA North Central Research Station, Forest.
FireCAMMS Fire Consortia for Advanced Modeling of Meteorology and Smoke
Maria Val Martin and J. Logan (Harvard Univ., USA) D. Nelson, C. Ichoku, R. Kahn and D. Diner (NASA, USA) S. Freitas (INPE, Brazil) F.-Y. Leung (Washington.
08/20031 Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office Helen Champion, Sarah Watkin Derrick Ryall Responsibilities Tools Etna 2002 Future.
WRAP Fire Emissions Meeting 5 December 2002 Community Smoke Emissions Model WRAP Fire Emissions Forum Meeting December 2002 Douglas Fox Cooperative Institute.
WRF Volcano modelling studies, NCAS Leeds Ralph Burton, Stephen Mobbs, Alan Gadian, Barbara Brooks.
Evaluation and Application of Air Quality Model System in Shanghai Qian Wang 1, Qingyan Fu 1, Yufei Zou 1, Yanmin Huang 1, Huxiong Cui 1, Junming Zhao.
An air quality information system for cities with complex terrain based on high resolution NWP Viel Ødegaard, r&d department.
Air Quality Effects of Prescribed Fires Simulated with CMAQ Yongqiang Liu, Gary Achtemeier, and Scott Goodrick Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 320 Green.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
Development of Wildland Fire Emission Inventories with the BlueSky Smoke Modeling Framework Sean Raffuse, Erin Gilliland, Dana Sullivan, Neil Wheeler,
Steve Edburg Assistant Research Professor Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Washington State University
Continued improvements of air quality forecasting through emission adjustments using surface and satellite data & Estimating fire emissions: satellite.
Analysis of Ozone Modeling for May – July 2006 in PNW using AIRPACT3 (CMAQ) and CAMx. Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. EPA Region 10 Nov CMAQ O 3 Prediction.
1 Aika Yano, Yongtao Hu, M. Talat Odman, Armistead Russell Georgia Institute of Technology October 15, th annual CMAS conference.
Lagrangian particle models are three-dimensional models for the simulation of airborne pollutant dispersion, able to account for flow and turbulence space-time.
Types of Models Marti Blad Northern Arizona University College of Engineering & Technology.
Impact of the changes of prescribed fire emissions on regional air quality from 2002 to 2050 in the southeastern United States Tao Zeng 1,3, Yuhang Wang.
171 PC-HYSPLIT WORKSHOP Workshop Agenda Model Overview Model history and features Computational method Trajectories versus concentration Code installation.
Denver 2004 TGP1 PM2.5 Emissions Inventory Workshop Denver, CO March 2004 Thompson G. Pace USEPA Emissions Estimation for Wildland Fires.
Uncertainties in Wildfire Emission Estimates Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling July 30, 2008 Shawn Urbanski, Wei Min Hao, Bryce Nordgren.
Transport Simulation of the April 1998 Chinese Dust Event Prepared by: Bret A. Schichtel And Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend.
Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.
Simulations of MAP IOPs with Lokal Modell: impact of nudging on forecast precipitation Francesco Boccanera, Andrea Montani ARPA – Servizio Idro-Meteorologico.
16-1 PC-HYSPLIT WORKSHOP Workshop Agenda Introduction to HYSPLIT Introduction.ppt Model Overview Model_Overview.ppt Meteorological Data Meteorological_Data.ppt.
Forecasting smoke and dust using HYSPLIT. Experimental testing phase began March 28, 2006 Run daily at NCEP using the 6Z cycle to produce a 24- hr analysis.
NW-AIRQUEST projects on Agricultural and Wildfire Smoke in the Inland Northwest: ClearSky and AIRPACT-3 presented by: Joe Vaughan WSU-LAR contributors:
Transport Simulation of the April 1998 Chinese Dust Event Prepared by: Bret A. Schichtel And Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend.
JFSP_2005 – “Proposals are sought that support the needs of wildland fire managers and policy makers in determining the contribution of biomass burning.
Comparisons of CALPUFF and AERMOD for Vermont Applications Examining differing model performance for a 76 meter and 12 meter (stub) stack with emission.
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Volcanic Ash Detection and Prediction at the Met Office
Forecasting the Impacts of Wildland Fires
Introduction to Modeling – Part II
Improving an Air Quality Decision Support System through the Integration of Satellite Data with Ground-Based, Modeled, and Emissions Data Demonstration.
Current Research on 3-D Air Quality Modeling: wildfire!
Presentation transcript:

BlueSky Implementation in CANSAC Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin Desert Research Institute - CEFA CANSAC Workshop Riverside, CA May 2006 Julide Kahyaoglu-Koracin Desert Research Institute - CEFA CANSAC Workshop Riverside, CA May 2006

BACKGROUND  BlueSky is a real-time smoke forecasting system that is used to predict surface smoke concentrations (PM2.5) from prescribed fire, agricultural burns, and wildfires.  The BlueSky smoke forecasting system was developed by the USDA Forest Service in cooperation with the US EPA and funded by the National Fire Plan.  It is currently being implemented and evaluated across the nation by the members of FCAMMS.  The BlueSky Rapid Access Information System (BlueSkyRAINS) is a web-based interactive map and database server that combines smoke predictions, selected meteorological parameters, air parcel trajectories, and geographic information (e.g., roads, rivers, boundaries, etc.) in a GIS environment. BlueSkyRAINS is operational in the Northwest U.S. (  BlueSky is a real-time smoke forecasting system that is used to predict surface smoke concentrations (PM2.5) from prescribed fire, agricultural burns, and wildfires.  The BlueSky smoke forecasting system was developed by the USDA Forest Service in cooperation with the US EPA and funded by the National Fire Plan.  It is currently being implemented and evaluated across the nation by the members of FCAMMS.  The BlueSky Rapid Access Information System (BlueSkyRAINS) is a web-based interactive map and database server that combines smoke predictions, selected meteorological parameters, air parcel trajectories, and geographic information (e.g., roads, rivers, boundaries, etc.) in a GIS environment. BlueSkyRAINS is operational in the Northwest U.S. (

BlueSky Modeling Framework Fire Characteristics Area burned Fuel moisture Fuel loadings Fire location Fire ignition time Meteorology CANSAC MM5 outputs Winds/Temps/Moisture 12 and 4 km domains 72 and 60 hour (-12 hr spin up) forecast Emissions EPM emissions model Fuel consumption Variable rate emissions PM10, PM2.5,CO, CO2, CH4 Smoke Dispersion&Transport CALPUFF/CALMET modeling system PM2.5 concentrations Display PAVE visualization package NCL images (in progress) Loops and hourly concentrations of PM2.5

Fire Characteristics (I)  Information to derive fire characteristics is obtained from the burn reporting systems. These can be multi-agency tracking systems such as FASTRACS in the Pacific Northwest, PFIRS in California, wildfire 209 reports (NIFC), and private manually entered burn information.  When the fuel loadings are not provided, the BlueSky system has three default fuel loadings look-up tables to employ:  1-km resolution fuel loadings mapping available for the western US (Hardy et al., 1998).  Fuel Characteristics Classification System (FCSS) at 1-km resolution (  National Fire Danger Rating System (NFDRS) at 1-km resolution.  Information to derive fire characteristics is obtained from the burn reporting systems. These can be multi-agency tracking systems such as FASTRACS in the Pacific Northwest, PFIRS in California, wildfire 209 reports (NIFC), and private manually entered burn information.  When the fuel loadings are not provided, the BlueSky system has three default fuel loadings look-up tables to employ:  1-km resolution fuel loadings mapping available for the western US (Hardy et al., 1998).  Fuel Characteristics Classification System (FCSS) at 1-km resolution (  National Fire Danger Rating System (NFDRS) at 1-km resolution.

Fuel Characteristics (II)  There are available three methods for the Fuel Moisture Model (FMM). These are:  NFDR  Weighted  Adjusted  Ignition duration is the time period within which the whole burn area is ignited. This is set to the run length for wildfires.  There are available three methods for the Fuel Moisture Model (FMM). These are:  NFDR  Weighted  Adjusted  Ignition duration is the time period within which the whole burn area is ignited. This is set to the run length for wildfires.

Emissions (I)  Fuel consumption and emissions are calculated using the Emissions Production Model (EPM)/Consume v1.03. Consume is a fuel consumption model that computes the total amount of fuel consumed by a fire. EPM is a model that predicts the time rate of fuel consumption and emissions from wildland biomass burns. Hourly emission rates of PM10, PM2.5, PM, CO, CO2, CH4 and heat release are obtained from this system.  Deficiencies:  Uses an integral method of prediction rather than dynamic simulation and is limited to simple fires where area growth rates do not change significantly over the burning period.  Fuel moisture  Lack of information of the current knowledge of wildland fire emissions calculation methodology.  Fuel consumption and emissions are calculated using the Emissions Production Model (EPM)/Consume v1.03. Consume is a fuel consumption model that computes the total amount of fuel consumed by a fire. EPM is a model that predicts the time rate of fuel consumption and emissions from wildland biomass burns. Hourly emission rates of PM10, PM2.5, PM, CO, CO2, CH4 and heat release are obtained from this system.  Deficiencies:  Uses an integral method of prediction rather than dynamic simulation and is limited to simple fires where area growth rates do not change significantly over the burning period.  Fuel moisture  Lack of information of the current knowledge of wildland fire emissions calculation methodology.

Emissions (II)  EPM2BAEM preprocessing tool is used to convert EPM emissions into the CALPUFF required format.  Inputs:  EPM file (hourly heat release and species emission rates).  Location and date specific information.  Area, elevation, initial vertical spread.  Outputs:  Vertices of the fire area (assumed square).  Effective height of the emissions above the ground.  Fire temperature (assumed 900 K).  Effective rise velocity.  Initial vertical spread.  Emissions rates.  EPM2BAEM preprocessing tool is used to convert EPM emissions into the CALPUFF required format.  Inputs:  EPM file (hourly heat release and species emission rates).  Location and date specific information.  Area, elevation, initial vertical spread.  Outputs:  Vertices of the fire area (assumed square).  Effective height of the emissions above the ground.  Fire temperature (assumed 900 K).  Effective rise velocity.  Initial vertical spread.  Emissions rates.

Meteorology  Meteorology driving the BlueSky system is obtained from MM5 forecasts.  A preprocessor, CALMM5, is used to extract the meteorological fields used in CALMET. These are:  Horizontal and vertical winds, temps, pressure, humidity, and vapor, cloud, rain, snow, ice mixing ratios.  Meteorology driving the BlueSky system is obtained from MM5 forecasts.  A preprocessor, CALMM5, is used to extract the meteorological fields used in CALMET. These are:  Horizontal and vertical winds, temps, pressure, humidity, and vapor, cloud, rain, snow, ice mixing ratios.

Smoke Dispersion and Transport  The BlueSky system incorporates the CALMET/CALPUFF (Scire et al., 2000) system to predict smoke dispersion and transport.  CALPUFF is a multi-layer, multi-species non-steady state Lagrangian puff dispersion model which can simulate the time and space varying pollutant transport, transformation and removal.  CALMET is a diagnostic meteorological model that calculates the three dimensional winds and temperatures along with microphysical parameters such as surface characteristics, dispersion parameters, and mixing heights to be used by CALPUFF dispersion model.  The BlueSky system incorporates the CALMET/CALPUFF (Scire et al., 2000) system to predict smoke dispersion and transport.  CALPUFF is a multi-layer, multi-species non-steady state Lagrangian puff dispersion model which can simulate the time and space varying pollutant transport, transformation and removal.  CALMET is a diagnostic meteorological model that calculates the three dimensional winds and temperatures along with microphysical parameters such as surface characteristics, dispersion parameters, and mixing heights to be used by CALPUFF dispersion model.

Smoke Dispersion and Transport (II)  CALMET can incorporate the output from prognostic models such as MM5. In this case, prognostic fields can be used as initial fields, step 1, or the observations.  CALMET performs objective analysis using MM5 fields as observations.  CALPUFF fire plume:  Temperature stratification  Wind stratification  No limit on the emission source size  Effects of plume radiative heat loss  Free of Boussinesq approximation  CALMET can incorporate the output from prognostic models such as MM5. In this case, prognostic fields can be used as initial fields, step 1, or the observations.  CALMET performs objective analysis using MM5 fields as observations.  CALPUFF fire plume:  Temperature stratification  Wind stratification  No limit on the emission source size  Effects of plume radiative heat loss  Free of Boussinesq approximation

Burn Information  The CANSAC BlueSky system is fed by the Wildfire 209 reports and the CANBURN web- based manual prescribed burn information system.  Prescribed Fire Incidence Reporting System, PFIRS, will begin to feed data into the CANBURN system in June  The CANSAC BlueSky system is fed by the Wildfire 209 reports and the CANBURN web- based manual prescribed burn information system.  Prescribed Fire Incidence Reporting System, PFIRS, will begin to feed data into the CANBURN system in June 2006.

BlueSky Simulations  The BlueSky simulations are performed daily using the MM5 output initialized at 0Z.  These simulations start at midnight and are initialized at 12Z.  Surface smoke (PM2.5) concentration predictions are obtained on the nested (12 km) and innermost (4 km) MM5 domains.  Forecast lengths:  60-hr for 12 km  48-hr for 4 km  Accomplished burns are reprocessed 4-6 days back in order to account for carryover smoke.  The BlueSky simulations are performed daily using the MM5 output initialized at 0Z.  These simulations start at midnight and are initialized at 12Z.  Surface smoke (PM2.5) concentration predictions are obtained on the nested (12 km) and innermost (4 km) MM5 domains.  Forecast lengths:  60-hr for 12 km  48-hr for 4 km  Accomplished burns are reprocessed 4-6 days back in order to account for carryover smoke.

BlueSky Application Examples (I)  Wildfire simulations initialized on 29 July UTC.

BlueSky Application Examples (II)

BlueSky Application Examples (III)  Fire locations will be indicated on a map in order to help with the assessment of the impact from each fire.

Next Step  Evaluation of the reported low surface pollutant concentrations.  Upgrades in emissions calculation methodology: FEPS, EES, …  Dispersion and transport module: new generation CALPUFF, CMAQ, ….  More organized and timely information of burn incidence reports across the CANSAC modeling domain.  Evaluation of the reported low surface pollutant concentrations.  Upgrades in emissions calculation methodology: FEPS, EES, …  Dispersion and transport module: new generation CALPUFF, CMAQ, ….  More organized and timely information of burn incidence reports across the CANSAC modeling domain.

Questions