(Roughly) Bending Effects of Magnetic Field in VELO & TT S. Blusk June 17, 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kinematics from GEM hits for pvdis Rich Holmes March 2013 SoLID Collaboration Meeting.
Advertisements

Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
Particle rate in M1 and M2 Muon Meeting
Background effect to Vertex Detector and Impact parameter resolution T. Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.) Feb LC Detector Meeting.
More on making fake TT clusters More creating Fake TT clusters We can compute the number of combinations instead of the purity (following all the possible.
LHCb PatVeloTT Performance Adam Webber. Why Upgrade?  Currently we de-focus the beams o LHCb Luminosity ~ 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 o ~ 1 interaction per bunch.
7 Nov 2002Niels Tuning - Vertex A vertex trigger for LHCb The trigger for LHCb ….. and the use of the Si vertex detector at the first and second.
1 Tracker Resolution Malcolm Ellis MICE Analysis Forum Meeting 15 th September 2005.
Atmospheric Neutrino Event Reconstruction Andy Blake Cambridge University June 2004.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
Increasing Field Integral between Velo and TT S. Blusk Sept 02, 2009 SU Group Meeting.
Steven Blusk, Syracuse University -- 1 Update on Global Alignment Steven Blusk Syracuse University.
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, for the LHCb Collaboration, 16 December 2014
Study of the Optimum Momentum Resolution of CMS Experiment Presented by: Timothy McDonald Faculty Mentor: Darin Acosta.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
KIP TRACKING IN MAGNETIC FIELD BASED ON THE CELLULAR AUTOMATON METHOD TRACKING IN MAGNETIC FIELD BASED ON THE CELLULAR AUTOMATON METHOD Ivan Kisel KIP,
HLab meeting 10/14/08 K. Shirotori. Contents SksMinus status –SKS magnet trouble –Magnetic field study.
1 Track reconstruction and physics analysis in LHCb Outline Introduction to the LHCb experiment Track reconstruction → finding and fitting Physics analysis.
Muon alignment with Cosmics: Real and Monte Carlo data S.Vecchi, S.Pozzi INFN Ferrara 37th Software Week CERN June 2009.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
STS track recognition by 3D track-following method Gennady Ososkov, A.Airiyan, A.Lebedev, S.Lebedev, E.Litvinenko Laboratory of Information Technologies.
TWIST A Precision Measurement of Muon Decay at TRIUMF Peter Kitching TRIUMF/University of Alberta TWIST Collaboration Physics of TWIST Introduction to.
Optimising Cuts for HLT George Talbot Supervisor: Stewart Martin-Haugh.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Preliminary results of a detailed study on the discharge probability for a triple-GEM detector at PSI G. Bencivenni, A. Cardini, P. de Simone, F. Murtas.
V.Petracek TU Prague, UNI Heidelberg GSI Detection of D +/- hadronic 3-body decays in the CBM experiment ● D +/- K  B. R. 
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
18 december 2002, NIKHEF Jamboree Tracking and Physics Studies, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking and Physics Studies in LHCb Jeroen van Tilburg NIKHEF Jaarvergadering.
G4Beamline Simulated Electron Distribution within the HPRF Cavity 2/15/20121.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Fast Tracking of Strip and MAPS Detectors Joachim Gläß Computer Engineering, University of Mannheim Target application is trigger  1. do it fast  2.
STS simulations: Layout, digitizers, performance Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
T-Station Alignment Infrastructure at LHCb Adlène Hicheur (Ecole Polytechnique F é d é rale de Lausanne) T-Station Alignment group: J.Blouw, F.Maciuc,
Optics, Tracking, and TOF Status/Update/Roadmap Xin Qian KRL Caltech.
Cellular Automaton Method for Track Finding (HERA-B, LHCb, CBM) Ivan Kisel Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Uni-Heidelberg Second FutureDAQ Workshop, GSI.
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
The Q Weak Experiment Event tracking, luminosity monitors, and backgrounds John Leacock Virginia Tech on behalf of the Q Weak collaboration Hall C Users.
1 Fast Pixel Simulation Howard Wieman, Xiangming Sun Lawrence Berkeley Lab.
CMS Torino meeting, 4 th June, 2007 R. Castello on behalf of Torino Tracker’s group Tracker Alignment with MillePede.
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
MKI failure event 17-April-11 Recall from logbook: MKI D (1st one seen by the beam) had a real flashover between the two sets of 36b during the 3rd 72b.
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
Performance and Early Results from the Muon Tracking System of Rusty Towell of Abilene Christian University for the PHENIX collaboration First Joint Meeting.
+ GE2/1 Case Considerations Alexei Safonov. + CMS Muon Upgrades CMS Technical Proposal in its part related to muon systems lists following: MEX/1 electronics.
Update on B-analysis Introduction Towards a definition of a limited set of plots for TDR, using all available data. Based on few general.
July 22, 2002Brainstorming Meeting, F.Teubert L1/L2 Trigger Algorithms L1-DAQ Trigger Farms, July 22, 2002 F.Teubert on behalf of the Trigger Software.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
Alignment Challenge at LHCb Steven Blusk Syracuse University LHC Alignment Workshop, Aug 3-5, 2006.
FP-CCD GLD VERTEX GROUP Presenting by Tadashi Nagamine Tohoku University ILC VTX Ringberg Castle, May 2006.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
Gloria Corti, LHCb LHCb background on detector. Gloria Corti Page 2 Evaluating impact on experiment Increasing the inner coverage of the TT detector will.
The Ring Imaging Cherenkov Detectors for LHCb Antonis Papanestis CCLRC – RAL On behalf of the LHCb RICH group.
Detector Alignment with Tracks Wouter Hulsbergen (Nikhef, BFYS)
Full Sim Status Estel Perez 27 July 2017.
Dipole Magnetic Field Effect on the Antiproton Beam
Time Independent Analysis
Target Effect, Beam correction and T0 Adjustment
CBM beam pipe current status
Converted photons efficiency
Global Alignment in LHCb Steve Blusk Syracuse University
The LHC collider in Geneva
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Niels Tuning (Outer Tracker Group LHCb)
Particle Identification with the LHCb Experiment
Low mass dimuon acceptance
Presentation transcript:

(Roughly) Bending Effects of Magnetic Field in VELO & TT S. Blusk June 17, 2009

Question Issue: In trigger, we don’t want to consider low momentum tracks, since they undergo large multiple scattering and thus have degraded resolution. Would like to avoid doing tracking in T stations, as this is likely CPU intensive. Can we use tracking station(s) at Z=2.5 m (such as TT), to select tracks of sufficient momentum for triggering?

Basic Idea Bending in xz plane due to B y LL

LHCb Magnetic Field Parameterization CHEP 07 Use = 1.8x10 -4 T,  L=0.7 m Use = 0.02 T  L = 2.5 m (Based on Hall probe measurements)

Displacement from linear projection at TT 60 um

Displacement from linear projection at end of VELO

Preliminary Conclusions A station at TT could provide a “momentum selection” Need a real simulation to see if we pick up too many hits in current TT –Maybe finer granularity needed –No gaps, obviously Will do a more realistic GEANT simulation vs luminosity Perhaps slightly higher field can be obtained in region between VELO and TT?