PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/2010 1 Requirements 1.Present performance: 1E13p from.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.

Advertisements

Muon Coalescing 101 Chuck Ankenbrandt Chandra Bhat Milorad Popovic Fermilab NFMCC IIT March 14, 2006.

Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.

Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,

Space Charge meeting – CERN – 09/10/2014

Experimental Study of the Inductance of a Toroidal Ferrite Core at High frequencies Michelle Walker North Carolina A&T State University Supervisor: Dave.

(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,

Status of the PSB 2 GeV Upgrade and the RCS Study SGUI Meeting B. Mikulec, 07 July 2011.

A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.

22/03/1999A.Blas1 Hollow bunches A. Blas, S. Hancock, S. Koscielniak, M. Lindroos, F. Pedersen, H. Schonauer  Why: to improve space charge related problems.

Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.

Particle dynamics in electron FFAG Shinji Machida KEK FFAG04, October 13-16, 2004.

History and motivation for a high harmonic RF system in LHC E. Shaposhnikova With input from T. Argyropoulos, J.E. Muller and all participants.

AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.

EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.

MW Upgrades for the ISIS Facility John Thomason. OptionCommentsBeam Power (MW) Neutron Yield 1(a)Add 180 MeV LinacTechnical Issues~ (b)Add 800.

J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.

Recent RF Development at Fermilab Weiren Chou and Akira Takagi Fermilab, U.S.A. July 7, 2003 Presentation to the FFAG03 Workshop July 7-12, 2003, KEK.

F Project-X Related Issues in Recycler A.Burov, C.Gattuso, V.Lebedev, A.Leveling, A.Valishev, L.Vorobiev Fermilab AAC Review 8/8/2007.

FFAG Accelerators for Proton Driver Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG 2007, Grenoble, France April 12-17, 2007.

Beam loss and longitudinal emittance growth in SIS M. Kirk I. Hofmann, O. Boine-Frankenheim, P. Spiller, P. Hülsmann, G. Franchetti, H. Damerau, H. Günter.

1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.

0 1 Alternative Options in the Injectors – Preliminary Summary H. Damerau LIU-TM#8 18 October 2013 Many thanks for discussions and input to T. Argyropoulos,

Production of bunch doublets for scrubbing of the LHC J. Esteban Muller (simulations), E. Shaposhnikova 3 December 2013 LBOC Thanks to H. Bartosik, T.

Electron Model for a 3-10 GeV, NFFAG Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.

Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.

Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.

WG2 (Proton FFAG) Summary G.H. Rees. Proton Driver Working Group  Participants: M. Yashimoto, S. Ohnuma, C.R. Prior, G.H. Rees, A.G. Ruggiero  Topics:

E.M, PS-OP shut-down lectures, 20/02/ u Requirements of the LHC on its injectors u What are the nominal & already achieved beams at PS exit? u How.

Update on injection studies of LHC beams from Linac4 V. Forte (BE/ABP-HSC) Acknowledgements: J. Abelleira, C. Bracco, E. Benedetto, S. Hancock, M. Kowalska.

Early Beam Injection in the Fermilab Booster & its Implementation Plan Chandra Bhat Todd’s Operation Meeting /12/2015 Chandra Bhat Abstract:

Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,

SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.

Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage? 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 4 March 2014.

Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,

Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,

Damping Ring Specifications S. Guiducci ALCPG11, 20 March 2011.

Longitudinal Painting S. Hancock p.p. G. Feldbauer.

F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.

RCS design Valeri Lebedev AAC Meeting November 16-17, 2009.

PTC-ORBIT issues for PSB simulations V. Forte – E. Benedetto – M. Martini S.c. meeting (18/07/2013)

Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.

ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.

Longitudinal Limitations of Beams for the LHC in the CERN PS 0.

Update on RF parameters A.Lachaize11 th HPPS design meeting04/09/13.

HP-PS beam acceleration and machine circumference A.LachaizeLAGUNA-LBNO General meeting Paris 18/09/13 On behalf of HP-PS design team.

RF manipulations in SIS 18 and SIS 100 O. Chorniy.

Beam Manufacture in PS2 M. Benedikt, S. Hancock. LHC Beams in the PS by 2015 Typeh injε l inj [evs] h ejN bunch ej RF ej [MHz] ε l ej [evs] τ ej [ns]

Impact of the current debuncher limitations (…can we get rid of longitudinal painting?)

Alternative/complementary Possibilities

Alternative/complementary Possibilities

Acknowledgments: LIU-PT members and deputies, H. Bartosik

PSB rf manipulations PSB cavities

New AD Production Beam in the PSB

Multiturn extraction for PS2

CEPC Injector Damping Ring

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV

A Design Study of a Compressor ring for

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring

DEMONSTRATION OF TRIPLE BUNCH SPLITTING IN THE CERN PS

Generation of Higher Brightness Beams for LHC

PSB rf Foreseen limitations with 2 E13 p at 2 GeV

PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV

Injection design of CEPC

PSB rf Power limitations with Linac4

JLEIC ion fullsize booster (2256m) space charge limit (Δν=0

JLEIC Ion Integration Goals

JLEIC 200 GeV ion beam formation options

Some Thoughts on the JLEIC Ion Injector

JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV

Presentation transcript:

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Requirements 1.Present performance: 1E13p from 50 MeV to 1.4 GeV in 490 ms (1.2s cycle) 2.New Goal: 2.5E13p from 160 MeV to 2 GeV in < 490 ms but still 1.2s cycle (less RMS current required in magnetic elements).

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ BASIC CONSIDERATIONS 1.Only h1 cavity current capabilities considered for an h1 acceleration. The h2 cavity is considered as not participating to the acceleration (little h2 beam current with a rectangular bunch  π phase of h2 rf centered at φ S of h1) 2.8 kV considered as the maximum voltage on both h1 and h2 cavities. 3.Space charge effects due to faster acceleration not considered (shouldn’t be a worry anyhow) 4.Beam longitudinal emittance (4 sigma, h=1) with L2 -> 400 keV/600kHz=0.66 eV.s; with L4 -> 80% of 8kV injection bucket with 1.2T/s = 1.02 eV.s 5.Longitudinal blow-up (require more accelerating time due to higher emittance) and splitting (require flat-top) not considered.

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Approach Keep the longitudinal acceptance at least equal its value at injection with 8 kV and 1.2 T/s (due to a lack of time the analysis is made for a pure h=1 bucket). To be done for h1 + h2!).

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Simulation 1: injection at 1.2 T/s, bucket filled up to 80 % with 2.5E13p Only limitation = 8 kV on h1 cavity and acceptance kept at initial value. The acceleration lasts 310 ms (490 ms presently)

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Simulation 1: injection at 1.2 T/s, bucket filled up to 80 % with 2E13p Only limitation = 8 kV on h1 cavity and acceptance kept at initial value. The acceleration lasts 310 ms (490 ms presently)

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Simulation 2: injection at 1.2 T/s, bucket filled up to 80 % with 2.5E13p Limitations= 8 kV on h1 cavity, Bdot max = 28 G/ms. The acceleration lasts 380 ms (490 ms presently)

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Simulation 2: injection at 1.2 T/s, bucket filled up to 80 % with 2.5E13p Limitations= 8 kV on h1 cavity, Bdot max = 28 G/ms. The acceleration lasts 380 ms (490 ms presently)

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Simulation 3: injection at 1.2 T/s, bucket filled up to 80 % with 2.5E13p Limitations= 8 kV on h1 cavity, I C02 limited to 3A (acceleration current only). The acceleration lasts more than the present 490 ms (1.7 GeV reached after 530 ms (C805); we would need 100 ms more.

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Simulation 3: injection at 1.2 T/s, bucket filled up to 80 % with 2.5E13p Limitations= 8 kV on h1 cavity, I C02 limited to 3A (acceleration current only). The acceleration lasts more than the present 490 ms (1.7 GeV reached after 530 ms (C805); we would need 100 ms more.

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.0E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Simulation 4: injection at 1.2 T/s, bucket filled up to 80 % with 2.0E13p Limitations= 8 kV on h1 cavity, I C02 limited to 3A (available acceleration current). The acceleration lasts 530 ms (490 ms at present) No more flat-top

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.0E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Simulation 4: injection at 2 T/s, bucket filled up to 80 % with 2.0E13p Limitations= 8 kV on h1 cavity, I C02 limited to 3A (available acceleration current). The acceleration lasts 530 ms (490 ms at present) No more flat-top

PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Preliminary conclusion: The C02 cavity current is the main limiting parameter 3A are available for acceleration and tuning errors induced effects => should be more than 6 A (for 2.5E13p) The present maximum Bdot is ok for a 380 ms acceleration duration with 2.5E13p Simulations showing that we could accelerate 2E13p with a zero flat-top and the present C02 available current are very theoretical (no margin for tuning loop errors induced effects and tube ageing) These simulations need to be refined to take into account the real h1+h2 acceleration parameters (pure h1 approximation here), the bunch shape distortion due to asymmetrical accelerating bucket, the adiabaticity (around extraction), the limit of rf beam loading instability…)

PSB magnetic cycle 50 MeV to 2 GeV with 1.0E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Simulation 5: inj. at 50 MeV, 0.5 T/s (current L2 value), beam emittance = 0.66 eV.s, 1.0E13p. Limitations: 8 kV on h1 cavity, I C02 limited to 2A (1A margin), Bdot limited to 26 G/ms. The acceleration lasts 490 ms (same as with 1.4 GeV)

PSB magnetic cycle 50 MeV to 2 GeV with 1.0E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ The acceleration lasts 490 ms (same as with 1.4 GeV) Simulation 5: inj. at 50 MeV, 0.5 T/s (current L2 value), beam emittance = 0.66 eV.s, 1.0E13p. Limitations: 8 kV on h1 cavity, I C02 limited to 2A (1A margin), Bdot limited to 26 G/ms.