CLAIMS Identifying the arguer’s point. Claims A claim is the point an arguer is trying to make. The claim is the conclusion, proposition, or assertion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
Advertisements

Keystone Illustrations Keystone Illustrations next Set 10 © 2007 Herbert I. Gross.
Reading Section SAT PREP.  Rare to ever encounter a level one or level two question in the passage-based reading section  The answer to a reading question.
Issue and Conclusion CSIT 58 Chapter 2.
Chapter 1 Critical Thinking.
COMPLETE IN TEN MINUTES Turn to page 18 in your notes and write down two differences between Balfour and Merritt in terms of legal points. Complete the.
Statistical Issues in Research Planning and Evaluation
Integrated English II Week 7: November 10. Follow-up questions (15: 5x3) Make three follow-up questions A: Have you ever been to Disneyland? B: Yes, I.
The functionalist perspective of crime and Deviance Learning objective: To understand the functionalist perspective of crime and deviance.
Empirical Analysis Doing and interpreting empirical work.
Matakuliah : G1222, Writing IV Tahun : 2006 Versi : v 1.0 rev 1
Definitions – John Dewey
Basic Critical Thinking Skills Essentials of Clear Thinking: Claims and Issues.
© 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 1 Explaining Behavior.
Personal Financial Management Semester – 2008 Gareth Myles Paul Collier
INTRODUCTION TO PROGRAM EVALUATION By Lizzette Rojas, PhD and Flordeliz Serpa, PhD Non-Profit Evaluation & Resource Center, Inc. (NPERCI)
LOCATING THE STATED MAIN IDEA
A Tool for Diagramming “Informal” Arguments
Testing Hypotheses Tuesday, October 28. Objectives: Understand the logic of hypothesis testing and following related concepts Sidedness of a test (left-,
Elements of Argument - Claims
Rhetorical Argument. Stephen E. Toulmin  philosopher and rhetorical theorist.  born in England in 1922  received his Bachelor’s degree at King’s College.
Completion, Short-Answer, and True-False Items
Toulmin model of argument
Debate: Claims. Claims Each claim is a statement within the argument that the arguer needs accepted. These statements are given to logically lead the.
The Nature of Science Mathematical Reasoning & Science.
Propositions A proposition is the declarative statement that an advocate intends to support in the argument. Some propositions are stated formally, some.
Welcome to Unit 8! Fact and Opinion Dr. Angela Lavine Ku120.
Identifying the arguer’s point
The Toulmin Model A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments.
Basic Critical Thinking Skills Essentials of Clear Thinking: Claims and Issues.
The Art of Politics: Critical Analysis and Knowledge The Underpinnings of Knowledge.
BUS 290: Critical Thinking for Managers
CT (critical thinking) in Economics When economists reason, they make arguments, they deduce from hypotheses, they create models, and they offer explanations.
Philosophy 2803 – Health Ethics Andrew Latus. Introduction Ethics Study of right and wrong/good and bad A Branch of Philosophy Central Question = “How.
Claims A claim states a clear and specific argument in any case. The complexity, effectiveness, and quality of the entire case hinges on the claim. If.
What are the Issue and Conclusion? The first step in critical thinking. CSIT 58 Chapter 2.
HOW TO CRITIQUE AN ARGUMENT
 Evidence – “ supporting material known or discovered, but not created by the advocate.” (Wilbanks, Church)  The minor premise of the classical logical.
Logic and Persuasion AGED 520V. Logic and Persuasion Why do scientists need to know logic and persuasion? Scientists are writers and must persuade their.
The Toulmin Model A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments.
Everything’s An Argument Chapter 8 The Toulmin Model
Categorization and Hypothesis Testing
Propositions for Persuasion or Debate There are four kinds of propositions: (1) propositions of fact, (2) propositions of value, (3) propositions of explanation,
Inductive and Deductive Reasoning AP Language and Composition.
Philosophy and Logic The Process of Correct Reasoning.
This lesson plan focuses on grammar. Grammar can be dry and boring. So, hopefully this game helps you spice up the classroom. Recommended Method: First,
CLAIMS Identifying the arguer’s point. claims A claim is the point an arguer is trying to make. The claim is the conclusion, proposition, or assertion.
Types of Claims.
1984-Inspired Timed Writing
Chapter 3 Basic Logical Concepts. Deduction vs. Induction Deductive Arguments try to prove their conclusions with rigorous, inescapable logic. Example:
Structures of Reasoning Models of Argumentation. Review Syllogism All syllogisms have 3 parts: Major Premise- Minor Premise Conclusion Categorical Syllogism:
CM104: Seminar Week Three Evidence and Argumentation.
The Toulmin Model A tool for diagramming arguments.
11th Grade.
Debate: Claims.
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
A tool for diagramming arguments
The Literature Review 3rd edition
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
Start-Up - Discussion 8/16/17 In your TRIAD, discuss the following:
Inductive and Deductive Logic
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
February 2.
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
Logic Problems and Questions
Start-Up - Discussion What do you think the word “claim” means?
A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments
The Toulmin Model A tool for diagramming “informal” arguments.
Presentation transcript:

CLAIMS Identifying the arguer’s point

Claims A claim is the point an arguer is trying to make. The claim is the conclusion, proposition, or assertion an arguer wants another to accept. The claim answers the question, "So what is your point?” You should send a birthday card to Mimi –example: “You should send a birthday card to Mimi, because she sent you one on your birthday.” this time it’s your turn to drive –example: “I drove last time, so this time it’s your turn to drive.” there will be six more weeks of winter.” –example: “Because the groundhog saw his shadow, there will be six more weeks of winter.”

Clue words for identifying claims Claims often follow words such as “therefore,” “thus,” and “hence” –example:” Ned is conservative, therefore he tends to vote for John McCain.” –example: “There are newspapers in the Boswell’s driveway, thus they are probably out of town this weekend.” –example: “The car’s engine is still warm, hence it must have been driven recently.”

More clue words for identifying claims We conclude that… Results indicate… Consequently… So… In short… It follows that… Shows that… Indicates that… Suggests that… It should be clear that… We may deduce that… Points to… The point I’m trying to make is… The most obvious explanation is… It is highly probably that… Proves that… The truth of the matter is…

More about claims... There are four basic types of claims: fact: claims which focus on empirically verifiable phenomena judgment/value: claims involving opinions, attitudes, and subjective evaluations of things policy: claims advocating courses of action that should be undertaken definition or classification: claims about categorization and classification

Factual claims Empirically verifiable—ultimately there is a correct answer somewhere The arguers may not be able to prove the correct answer –example: “More than 300 innocent people have been executed in the United States.” An arguer is making a factual claim even if the arguer has the facts wrong –example: “Dr. Gass is 6’4” tall. Facts may involve the past, present, or future –example: “California’s Hispanic population will more than double over the next 10 years.”

Judgment or Value claims Involve matters of taste, opinion, attitudes –example: “Torture is wrong.” Always carry an evaluative dimension: positive vs. negative good versus bad right vs. wrong Not all opinions are equally good –example: “Norbit was the best movie of 2007.”

Policy advocates what should be done example: “there oughta be a law…” example: “You should change your motor oil every 4,000 miles.” Requires someone to take a specific course of action an individual a legislature a court should ≠ would

definition advocates a specific definition or interpretation of a concept –example: “Tiger Woods is African-American.” often necessary to define key concepts prior to arguing claims of fact, value, or policy –example: “Rich people should pay higher taxes.” What constitutes “rich”? often centers on what category or classification is most appropriate