Characterization MC Particles Missed by Axial-Barrel Reconstruction & Obtaining Perfect Efficiency Using Zpolebbar Event File By: Tyler Rice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
1 ttbar events with Atlantis   A lot of jets in this event !   Bjets (1 and 2) close in phi   Muon from semilep decay of b-jet1   Tau jet   Pb.
1 ttbar events with Atlantis   Tops back to back in the transverse plane, but objects in the barrel apart from c-jet (Extended tile)   Big activity.
Efforts to Improve the Reconstruction of Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Lori Stevens UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting May 15, 2007 Includes contributions.
PFA-Enhanced Dual Readout Crystal Calorimetry Stephen Magill - ANL Hans Wenzel - FNAL Outline : Motivation Detector Parameters Use of a PFA in Dual Readout.
1 Reconstruction of Non-Prompt Tracks Using a Standalone Barrel Tracking Algorithm.
LHCb PatVeloTT Performance Adam Webber. Why Upgrade?  Currently we de-focus the beams o LHCb Luminosity ~ 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 o ~ 1 interaction per bunch.
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
A Package For Tracking Validation Chris Meyer UC Santa Cruz July 6, 2007.
Some D0 Meeting November 2003 Muon Isolation Studies Ken Johns University of Arizona.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
First Thoughts About Backtracking Performance Assessment and Validation Bruce Schumm UC Santa Cruz July Validation Meeting.
Efficiency and Purity Studies Outside the VXD: Applying AxialBarrelTrackfinderZ and GarfieldTrackFinder By: Tyler Rice, Chris Meyer August 21, 2007.
Validation of DC3 fully simulated W→eν samples (NLO, reconstructed in ) Laura Gilbert 01/08/06.
SCIPP R&D on Time-Over-Threshold Electronics and Long-Ladder Readout Beijing Linear Collider Workshop Beijing, China February Bruce Schumm.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Linear Separators. Bankruptcy example R is the ratio of earnings to expenses L is the number of late payments on credit cards over the past year. We will.
1 Forward Tracking Simulation Norman A. Graf ALCPG Cornell July 15, 2003.
Effects of Tracking Limitations On Jet Mass Resolution Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting July 3, 2007.
Tracking Efficiency and Momentum Resolution Analysis Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting March 13, 2007.
1 Adventures In Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Chris Meyer, Tyler Rice UC Santa Cruz October 16, 2007.
Silicon Tracking for Forward Electron Identification at CDF David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002 David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara Oct 30, 2002.
Z Segmentation Update (improving reconstruction of non- prompt tracks with the SiD) Lori Stevens (SLAC/UCSC) August 21, 2007 ILC Simulation Reconstruction.
Tracking Simulation Studies at UC Santa Cruz Bruce Schumm UCSC/SCIPP LCWS07 DESY May 30-Jun Tracking Validation Studies Non-prompt tracks with SiD.
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
SIMULATION STUDIES AT SANTA CRUZ Bruce Schumm University of California at Santa Cruz ALCPG Workshop, Vancouver July 19-22, 2006 Special Recognition: Eric.
Background in the CILD01fw Weekly Detector Meeting May 5, 2009 André Sailer CLIC_01_ILD.
Tracking within hadronic showers in the SDHCAL Imad Laktineh.
LCWS 2004, ParisSonja Hillert, University of Oxfordp. 1 Flavour tagging performance analysis for vertex detectors LCWS 2004, Paris Sonja Hillert (Oxford)
Non-prompt Track Reconstruction with Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Dmitry Onoprienko, Eckhard von Toerne Kansas State University, Bonn University Linear.
Performance of Track and Vertex Reconstruction and B-Tagging Studies with CMS in pp Collisions at sqrt(s)=7 TeV Boris Mangano University of California,
The Santa Cruz Linear Collider Group Simulation Effort SiLC Workshop Prague, Czech Republic April 26, 2007 Bruce Schumm.
Update on Mistag in 5GeV Single γ Events Elizabeth Brost, Jim Brau, and Chaowaroj Wanotayaroj SiD PFA Meeting 8/18/
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Bill Atwood, SCIPP/UCSC, May, 2005 GLAST 1 A Parametric Energy Recon for GLAST A 3 rd attempt at Energy Reconstruction Keep in mind: 1)The large phase-space.
Two Density-based Clustering Algorithms L. Xia (ANL) V. Zutshi (NIU)
1 Calorimetry Simulations Norman A. Graf for the SLAC Group January 10, 2003.
T RACKING E FFICIENCY FOR & CALORIMETER S EED TRACKING FOR THE CLIC S I D Pooja Saxena, Ph.D. Student Center of Detector & Related Software Technology.
PFAs – A Critical Look Where Does (my) SiD PFA go Wrong? S. R. Magill ANL ALCPG 10/04/07.
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia Goal: To generate electron fiducial.
Day 3 – May 9 – WBL Chapter 2 Kinematics: Description of Motion PC141 Intersession 2013Slide 1 A bit of terminology… Kinematics (the topic of the.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
Geant4 Tracking Test (D. Lunesu)1 Daniela Lunesu, Stefano Magni Dario Menasce INFN Milano GEANT4 TRACING TESTs.
CALOR April Algorithms for the DØ Calorimeter Sophie Trincaz-Duvoid LPNHE – PARIS VI for the DØ collaboration  Calorimeter short description.
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set R. Burrell, G.P. Gilfoyle University of Richmond, Physics Department CEBAF The Continuous Electron Beam Accelerating.
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
Tracking R&D at SCIPP: Charge Division Long Ladder Readout Noise Non-Prompt Tracks with SiD CERN Linear Collider Workshop October
Two-particle separation studies with a clustering algorithm for CALICE Chris Ainsley University of Cambridge CALICE (UK) meeting 10 November 2004, UCL.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
SiD Detector Workshop at SLAC, October 26-28, 2006 Calorimeter Assisted Tracking Status Report Dmitry Onoprienko Kansas State University.
Hadron production in C+C at 1 and 2 A GeV analysis of data from experiments NOV02 and AUG04 for high resolution tracking (Runge-Kutta tracks) Pavel Tlustý,
VXDBasedReco TRACK RECONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE STUDIES Bruce Schumm University of California at Santa Cruz ALCPG Workshop, Snowmass Colorado August 14-28,
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
Living Long At the LHC G. WATTS (UW/SEATTLE/MARSEILLE) WG3: EXOTIC HIGGS FERMILAB MAY 21, 2015.
BEACH 04J. Piedra1 SiSA Tracking Silicon stand alone (SiSA) tracking optimization SiSA validation Matthew Herndon University of Wisconsin Joint Physics.
Fiducial Cuts for the CLAS E5 Data Set K. Greenholt (G.P. Gilfoyle) Department of Physics University of Richmond, Virginia INTRODUCTION The purpose of.
By: Daniel Coelho Matthew Szydagis Robert Svoboda Improving Electron / Gamma Separation LBNE Software Fermilab, ILFebruary 1, 2013.
F2F Tracking Meeting, Prague 12/12/2013
SiD tracking using VXD as a primary tracking device
VTX tracking issues Y. Akiba.
Studies with PandoraPFA
Data Analysis in Particle Physics
Individual Particle Reconstruction
Momentum Corrections for E5 Data Set
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Fast Track Fitting in the SiD01 Detector
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Presentation transcript:

Characterization MC Particles Missed by Axial-Barrel Reconstruction & Obtaining Perfect Efficiency Using Zpolebbar Event File By: Tyler Rice

Review of MC Particle Requirements Radius of origin beyond the VXD (2cm) and below 40cm Not backscatter off the calorimeter Either Intermediate or Final State with a path length exceeding 50cm Transverse Momentum beyond 0.75GeV Cosine of theta is below 0.7 in magnitude Carries a charge Leaves a hit on the outer 5 detector layers once and only once (“5hit Requirement”)

Event Selection Parameters Cosine of thrust less than 0.5 in magnitude Thrust value greater than or equal to 0.94 Using Zpole b-bbar events Reconstructing non-prompt tracks with AxialBarrelTracker Requiring all hits to lie within  /2 in phi Requiring all hits to have the same sign in Z Track Reconstruction

Characterization Figures 1-6

Accepted Events Figure 1: Number of Events Passing Jet Accept Requirements (out of 1000)

Figure 2: Number of particles found and missed by the tracking algorithm vs. hits. If plotted with “0” hits the track has purity not meeting our 75% requirement 82% found with 5 hits

MC Particles Failing To Meet 5hit Requirement Figure 3: MC Particles which failed to meet the 5layer requirement (but passed all other requirements) vs. Radius of Origin. 81% of these particles originate outside the first layer (200mm)

Figure 4: The same batch of particles as fig. 3, but plotted with the respective number of hits left on the detector layers. The vast majority are 4 hit tracks

A Relationship Between Hits and Rorg Figure 5: Two Dimensional Histogram of the radius of origin vs. hits left on the detector. The particles in this graph were not subject to momentum or path length restrictions.

Figure 6: The radius of origin for tracks which leave exactly 4 hits. 81% originate outside the first layer of the detector (200mm) *Note: The fact that the number of entries and the percentage of particles originating below 200mm in this figure is the same as the particles not passing the 5hit requirement is coincidental.

Achieving Perfect Efficiency Figures 7-13

Figure 7: Found and Missed Particles with an MC Particle agreement restriction in place at each layer of the tracking algorithm, and the initial set variable values Requiring All Hits to be from the Same MC Particle 87% found with 5 hits

Small Look at Z Figure 8: The number of hits left on the positive z side of the detector. Two of the three missed particles change sign in Z midway through their paths.

Changing “Data Members” The following variable restrictions were adjusted in the track-finder algorithm in the following order to allow all hits to be used (All Dimensions in millimeters except for Chisquared) 1) Seed Hit Isolation (From 0.5 to 0) 2) Seed DCA (From 100 to 9 x 10^5) 3) Pass1 Track/Hit Sep. (From 0.5 to 9 x 10^5) 4) Pass1 Hit Isolation (From 0.5 to 0) 5) Pass2 Track/Hit Sep. (From 0.25 to 9 x 10^5) 6) Chisquared (From 10 to 1.0 x 10^20)

Variables adjusted with no effect on the output until pass1 track/hit separation was changed Figure 9: Found MC Particles with seedhit isolation, seed DCA, and pass1 track/hit sep. adjusted. The number found with 4hits decreased dramatically, with a small decrease in the general number of found particles.

Figure 10: Missed MC Particles with adjusted variables up to the first pass track/hit separation. There is a mild increase here from when the initial variable settings were used.

Variables continued to be adjusted with no further effect on the output until the Chisquared restriction was abolished Figure 11: Found MC Particles. Nearly all MC particles are found (155/157) and all but 2 were found with 5 hits.

Another Small Look at Z Figure 12: Number of hits on positive Z provided by the 2 missed particles, both changed Z sign mid flight.

The Requirement that all hits be on the same sign of Z was removed and… Figure 13: Perfect Efficiency was reached at last

Conclusions Most 4 hit tracks originate outside the first layer of the detector (rather than looping, they want to be good tracks but simply get a late start in life). This seems to imply that an additional layer would greatly assist in finding these tracks. AxialBarrelTracker (with phi-restriction and no Z- segmentation) is 75-80% efficient for finding 5hit tracks. Of the inefficiency here, roughly 1/3 is due to the mixing of hits between different particles, and 2/3 due to a high Chisquared. The same side Z requirement currently in place in the trackfinder, while effective in eliminating fake tracks, also creates some inefficiency.