MICE analysis meeting - (18/5/2006) 1 STEPIII: ICOOL vs G4MICE M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC

Advertisements

Emittance definition and MICE staging U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 1 Apr Topics: a) Figure of merit for MICE b) Performance of MICE stages.

1 Angular Momentum from diffuser Beam picks up kinetic angular momentum (L kin ) when it sits in a field –Canonical angular momentum (L can ) is conserved.

Cooling channel issues U. Bravar Univ. of Oxford 31-Mar-2004.

MICE analysis meeting - (01/06/2006) 1 few words on emittance growth in step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

1 PID, emittance and cooling measurement Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE Analysis phone conference.

1 September 09Mark Rayner – Emittance measurement by The TOFs1 Emittance measurement by the TOFs Via trace space reconstruction of individual muons. Complementary.

MICE analysis meeting - (4/5/2006) 1 some reflections on scraping, PID sizes and Transmittance M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

OPTICS UPDATE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 3 August 2004.

1 Downstream scraping and detector sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting CERN.

18 June 2004AFC meeting1 MICE  functions and so on Work in progress…. Observation by Ulisse Bravar at CERN meeting that beam not matched in baseline (Proposal.

Downstream transversal sizes Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE detector meeting.

10 October 2006 MICE CM-16 at RAL 1 Distributed versus Lumped Coupling Magnets Michael A. Green and Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley.

PID Detector Size & Acceptance Chris Rogers Analysis PC

M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2 - 25/2 2007)1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

MICE analysis meeting - (6/4/2006) 1 Update on MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

MICE analysis meeting - (21/09/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

1 G4MICE downstream distributions G4MICE plans Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 27/6-05.

Chris Rogers, MICE CM16 Wednesday Plenary Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.

MICE analysis meeting - (26/3/2006) 1 Update on MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.

1 OPTICS OF STAGE III Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 6 October 2004.

M.apollonioAM STEPIII – sizes and positioning m.apollonio, Oxford.

MICE CM - Fermilab, Chicago - (11/06/2006) 1 A (short) history of MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

Beamline-to-MICE Matching Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 August 2004 MICE performance with ideal Gaussian beam JUNE04 beam from ISIS beamline (Kevin.

1. Optical matching in MICE Ulisse Bravar University of Oxford 2 June 2004 Constraints Software MICE proposal mismatch MICE Note 49 (September 2004, Bob.

30 June 2004MICE VC1 MICE  functions Since last VC report: –New Mike Green configurations for decreased spacing between focus and matching coils of 400mm,

M.apollonioImperial College - London1 M. Apollonio University of Oxford the MICE diffuser: issues and operation MICE beamline review Nov. 16 th 2007 Imperial.

Beam Parameter Study - preliminary findings Tim Carlisle.

M.apollonioam M. Apollonio University of Oxford update on STEP III.

04/01/2006MICE Analysis Meeting1 MICE phase III M. Apollonio, J. Cobb (Univ. of Oxford)

Helical Cooling Channel Simulation with ICOOL and G4BL K. Yonehara Muon collider meeting, Miami Dec. 13, 2004 Slide 1.

18 August 09Mark Rayner – Momentum measurement by The TOFs1 Momentum measurement by the TOFs A correction to an O(4 MeV/c) bias on the current muon momentum.

Chris Rogers, Analysis Parallel, MICE CM17 Progress in Cooling Channel Simulation.

1 Chris Rogers MICE Collaboration Meeting 11th Feb 2005 Tracking and Cooling performance of G4MICE.

M.apollonio/j.cobbMICE UK meeting- RAL - (9/1/2007) 1 Single Particle Amplitude M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

Diffuser Studies Chris Rogers, IC/RAL MICE VC 09 March 2005.

The MICE beam line status a)Muon BL: P=208 MeV/c, emi_N= 7 mm rad “... the mother of all the beamlines “ b)Proton BL: derived from (a) by rescaling magnet.

Analysis of MICE Chris Rogers 1 Imperial College/RAL Thursday 28 October, With thanks to John Cobb.

Timothy Carlisle, Oxford CM 28. Step 3 Matching Step 3  Step 3 rematched for 830 mm spool piece  Calc. B(z) & BetaFn with the following:  Minimize.

M.apollonioCM17 -CERN- (22/2-25/2/2007)1 M. Apollonio – University of Oxford sizes for PID & shields.

Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.

Multiple Scattering (MSC) in Geant4 Timothy Carlisle Oxford.

1 Forces Yury Ivanyushenkov RAL. 2 Goal: find maximal (static and dynamical) possible forces in MICE magnetic system. Method: calculation of axial magnetic.

MICE input beam weighting Dr Chris Rogers Analysis PC 05/09/2007.

2 Oct 2008PC We have only 1 hour today May need to be brief.

11 Nov 2008PC Analysis PC Schedule 2008 Tuesdays fortnightly 9 September  23 September  2 October  CM22  11 November  25 November 9 December.

Marco apollonio/J.CobbMICE coll. meeting 16- RAL - (10/10/2006) 1 Transmittance, scraping and maximum radii for MICE STEPVI M. Apollonio – University of.

MICE Run Plan Sept/Oct 2009 m. apollonio – IC MACHINE PHYSICS USERs RUN NO SHIFT A B C D E.

1 Statistics David Forrest University of Glasgow May 5 th 2009.

M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Thursday 28th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.

PID simulations Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE collaboration meeting RAL.

PID PC 7th Sept MICE MAGNETIC FIELDS & SHIELDS J. H. Cobb & H. Witte Oxford University Magnet fields for MICE (VI) calculated including magnetic.

3 June 2009J. H. Cobb 1 ANALYSIS SUMMARY CM24 Agenda for Analysis parallel session at CM Sunday 31 May 14:00.

Field Modelling Tools in G4MICE MICE VC Chris Rogers 1st Feb 2006.

Step IV Studies Timothy Carlisle Oxford. Intro. CM28 – Step III vs Step IV Cooling formula & G4MICE disagree on – Also observed in ICOOL (note #199 –

14 Aug 2008PC New task at last meeting (29 July): MICE magnets will be bolted to steel plates on floor of MICE Hall What – if any – is the effect.

Re-tuning MICE June 1 st 2010 Tim Carlisle. Intro At the moment MICE coil currents optimized for: central Pz = 0 RF No LH2 want to rematch M1 & M2 in.

Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November Beam characterization by the TOFs Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.

Measuring Multiple Scattering in Step IV Timothy Carlisle Oxford See MICE Note 374 for updated results.

Mark Rayner 26/8/08Analysis Meeting: Emittance measurement using the TOFs 1 Measuring emittance with the TOFs Data: –G4MICE has been used to obtain transfer.

M. Ellis - MICE Collaboration Meeting - Wednesday 27th October Sci-Fi Tracker Performance Software Status –RF background simulation –Beam simulation.

This presentation will describe the state of each element in the beam line with regards to the current update being undertaken. Firstly, it will describe.

1June 1 st 2009MICE CM24 - RAL1 Beamline Optics m. apollonio.

CM Nov 2009 DOES MICE NEED STEP III ? Somewhat hard to understand MICE Schedule… –If the gods are (un)kind it’s possible that SS1, SS2 & FC1 are.

1 1 Optics related work: the major threads: -Current (ε,p) status - G4BL/TTL Simulation comparisons - Beam steering/correction -Collimation d/stream &

Marco apollonioAnalysis Meeting (9/12/2006)1 transmission vs amplitude with a finite size diffuser M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

Beam Energy-Loss measurement

MICE at Step IV without SSD

Muon Front End Status Chris Rogers,

Presentation transcript:

MICE analysis meeting - (18/5/2006) 1 STEPIII: ICOOL vs G4MICE M. Apollonio – University of Oxford

MICE analysis meeting - (18/5/2006) 2  These are very preliminary results of a work in progress  Joint effort between me and Chris who provided the code and relevant cards (and beam) to produce the G4MICE simulation  NO material in the channel (no absorbers)  Currents in G4MICE adapted to reproduce the currents I found for the ICOOL study of STEPIII  Some check on geometry/positioning of the coils  COMPARISONs:  G4MICE(simul.) + G4MICE(beam)  ICOOL(simul.) + G4MICE(beam)  ICOOL(simul.) + ICOOL(beam)  ICOOL beam= 207 MeV/c, 10% Pz spread, e_T(0) = 6mm rad

MICE analysis meeting - (18/5/2006) 3  ICOOL field (with ICOOL beam)  G4MICE field (with G4MICE beam)  ICOOL field (with G4MICE beam)  Shift by m: realign

MICE analysis meeting - (18/5/2006) 4  ICOOL beta (with ICOOL beam)  G4MICE beta (with G4MICE beam)  ICOOL beta (with G4MICE beam)  Use the offset of m  NB: the beta valley (centered in the ICOOL+ICOOL case) has a residual offset (~15 cm)

MICE analysis meeting - (18/5/2006) 5  ICOOL Pz (with ICOOL beam)  G4MICE Pz (with G4MICE beam)  ICOOL Pz (with G4MICE beam)  Different choices for the initial momentum  Remark: my current optimization was done for Pz=207 MeV/c  Pz(out) = Pz(in), but there’s a small (0.5%) increase in Pz in the case of ICOOL sim using G4MICE beam  ???

MICE analysis meeting - (18/5/2006) 6  ICOOL e_T (with ICOOL beam)  G4MICE e_T (with G4MICE beam)  ICOOL e_T (with G4MICE beam) Pure ICOOL shows a 1.5 % emittance growth ICOOL + G4MICE ~ 15% G4MICE + G4MICE ~ 25 % (plus some happy spikes)

MICE analysis meeting - (18/5/2006) 7 Conclusions  Basically the G4MICE code (with the relevant specifications for coil geom+current) seems to produce a Bz consistent with ICOOL sim.  Beta functions start being reasonably ok, but still there’s a shift of the centre + some difference in width  Pz nearly ok  e_T show completely different beahviours: particularly worrying the G4+G4 calculations (huge increase in e_T and strange spikes)