Capital Structure: Part 1

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Capital Structure Decisions Chapter 15 and 16

Advertisements

Capital Structure Debt versus Equity. Advantages of Debt Interest is tax deductible (lowers the effective cost of debt) Debt-holders are limited to a.

Interest tax shields With $50 million in new debt, the present value of the interest tax shields would be – $50 million x 40% = $20 million If we count.

Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved 1 Chapter 16 Assessing Long-Term Debt, Equity, and Capital Structure McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Session 9 Topics to be covered: –Debt Policy –Capital Structure –Modigliani-Miller Propositions.

Capital Structure Theory Under Three Special Cases

Last Lecture.. Cost of Equity Cost of Preferred Stock Cost of Debt

McGraw-Hill © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Leverage and Capital Structure Chapter 13.

Key Concepts and Skills

Chapter Outline The Capital Structure Decision

Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

Capital Structure Refers to the mix of debt and equity that a company uses to finance its business Capital Restructuring Capital restructuring involves.

Cash Flows in Capital Budgeting Three approaches:  Free Cash Flow and WACC  Adjusted Present Value  Cash Flows to Equity.

Capital Structure: Part 2 For 9.220, Term 1, 2002/03 02_Lecture20.ppt Student Version.

Does Debt Policy Matter? Student Presentations Capital Structure Considerations Modigliani and Miller – Propositions 1 and 2 Financial Risk and Expected.

Jacoby, Stangeland and Wajeeh, The Capital Structure Questions The balance sheet of the firm(market values): We can write: V = B + S Or, draw a pie:

Capital Structure Decision

Capital Structure: Basic Concepts

Capital Structure MM Theory 1. Capital Structure “neither a borrower nor a lender be” (Source: Shakespeare`s Hamlet) “The firm`s mix of securities(long.

Capital Structure II Corporate income taxes. Review question  Describe the two basic capital budgeting decisions.

Capital Structure II Corporate income taxes. Now with taxes.  No threat of bankruptcy.  Corporate taxes, not personal.  Government gets a piece of.

Capital Structure (Ch. 12)

© K. Cuthbertson and D. Nitzsche Figures for Chapter 11 VALUING FIRMS : CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND THE COST OF CAPITAL (Investments : Spot and Derivatives Markets)

QDai for FEUNL Finance I November 21. QDai for FEUNL Topics covered  Last class: MM without taxes  This class: MM with corporate taxes.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Corporate Finance, 7/e © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved CHAPTER 15 Capital Structure: Basic Concepts.

16- 1 McGraw Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Sixth Edition Richard.

FIN 819 The Capital Structure Some classic arguments.

Capital Structure: Basic Concepts Chapter 16 Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Chapter 15 Debt Policy Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Fifth Edition

© 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible Web site, in whole or in part.

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2004by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Corporate Finance Ross  Westerfield  Jaffe Seventh Edition.

Advanced Project Evaluation

Capital Restructuring

Chapter 2- Capital Structure Determination. After studying this chapter, you should be able to: Define “capital structure.” Explain the net operating.

Chapter 16 Capital Structure.

FIN 351: lecture 12 The Capital Structure Decision MM propositions.

Capital Structure Modigliani-Miller

Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

Corporate Finance Lecture 06 INTRODUCTION TO CAPITAL STRUCTURE Ronald F. Singer FINA 7330 Fall, 2010.

1 課程 12: Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy.

FINANCIAL LEVERAGE AND CAPITAL STRUCTURE POLICY Chapter 16.

GROUP MEMBER HENRY EBUN ASMARAH RIKUN NOORINA ABD HAMID BUDIRMAN DAUD

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2002 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Corporate Finance Ross  Westerfield  Jaffe Sixth Edition.

McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Capital Structure: Basic Concepts Chapter 14.

Capital Structure. Effect of Corporate Taxes So far capital structure was irrelevant. What if we introduces corporate taxes? Corporate taxes are paid after.

© 2004 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limited Contemporary Financial Management Chapter 12: Capital Structure Concepts.

McGraw-Hill © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Leverage and Capital Structure Chapter 13.

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED No part of this document may be reproduced without written approval from Limkokwing University of Creative Technology 1-1 Chapter 10.

CHAPTER SIXTEEN Capital Structure By J.D. Han. Evaluation of Capital Structures A capital structure that maximizes share prices generally will minimize.

6- 1 Outline 6: Capital Structure 6.1 Debt and Value in a Tax Free Economy 6.2 Capital Structure and Corporate Taxes 6.3 Cost of Financial Distress 6.4.

Chapter 12: Leverage and Capital Structure

MODIGLIANI – MILLER THEOREM ANASTASIIA TISETSKA. AGENDA:  MODIGLIANI–MILLER I – LEVERAGE, ARBITRAGE AND FIRM VALUE  MODIGLIANI–MILLER II – LEVERAGE,

16- 1 McGraw Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Fundamentals of Corporate Finance Chapter 16 McGraw Hill/Irwin.

Prepared by Professor Wei Wang Queen’s University © 2011 McGraw–Hill Ryerson Limited Capital Structure: Basic Concepts Chapter Sixteen.

CHAPTER SIXTEEN Capital Structure By J.D. Han. Evaluation of Capital Structures A capital structure that maximizes share prices generally will minimize.

Capital Structure Theory Chapter Sixteen. Corporate Finance Ch16 1/p17 Prof. Oh, 2012 Choosing a Capital Structure  What is the primary goal of financial.

CAPITAL STRUCTURE & COST OF EQUITY MODIGLIANI AND MILLER MODEL CAPITAL STRUCTURE & COST OF EQUITY MODIGLIANI AND MILLER MODEL

Capital Structure I: Basic Concepts.

Capital Structure (1).

Capital Structure Debt versus Equity.

Out of the perfect capital market: Role of taxes

Financial Leverage and Capital Structure Policy

Capital Structure (1).

Capital Structure Byers.

Capital Structure Determination

Capital Structure I: Basic Concepts.

Executive Master in Finance Capital Structure – Wrap up

Capital Structure: Basic Concepts

Presentation transcript:

Capital Structure: Part 1 For 9.220, Term 1, 2002/03 02_Lecture19.ppt Student Version

Outline Introduction Theories of Capital Structure Modigliani and Miller – No tax M&M with Corporate Tax Summary and Conclusions (so far)

Introduction Definition: Capital Structure is the mix of financial securities used to finance the firm. Our goal is to see if there is an optimal way for firms to finance. Should a firm have a higher or lower D/E ratio. What factors affect the optimal D/E choice? In order to optimize the D/E ratio, our overall goal is to maximize the total value of the firm and thus maximize expected shareholder wealth.

Modigliani and Miller – No Tax Case M&M began looking at capital structure in a very simplified world so that we would know what does or does not matter. Assume no taxes No transaction costs Including no bankruptcy costs Investors can borrow/lend at the same rate (the same as the firm). No information asymmetries A fixed investment policy by the firm

M&M No Tax: Result A change in capital structure does not matter to the overall value of the firm. The total cash flows produced are the same, thus the total value of the cash flows is the same. It doesn’t matter if the cash flows from the firm to its security holders are called debt or equity cash flows.

M&M – No Tax Case Equity, $1,000, 100% Debt, $300, 30% Equity, $700, 70% Equity, $1,000, 100% Debt, $600, 60% Equity, $400, 40%

The M&M Propositions I & II (No Taxes) Proposition I Firm value is not affected by leverage VL = VU Proposition II Leverage increases the risk and return to stockholders rs = r0 + (B / SL) (r0 - rB) rB is the interest rate (cost of debt) rs is the return on (levered) equity (cost of equity) r0 is the return on unlevered equity (cost of capital) B is the value of debt SL is the value of levered equity

M&M Proposition I (No Taxes) The derivation is straightforward: The present value of this stream of cash flows is VL The present value of this stream of cash flows is VU

M&M Proposition II (No Taxes) The derivation is straightforward:

Exercise Suppose the firm is currently all equity financed and the total value of the firm is $90 million. E[Requity] is 18%. Also, suppose Rf = 4% and E[RM] = 14%. What is the value of the equity and the total value of the firm if the capital structure is changed to include $30 million of debt? If E[Rdebt] is 6%, then what is the new E[Requity]? What is the WACC? Compare the beta of the levered equity to the unlevered equity. What is the weighted beta of the firms securities? Redo 1 with $60 million of debt.

The Cost of Equity & Debt, and the WACC: M&M Proposition II with No Corporate Taxes Cost of capital: r (%) r0 rB rB Debt-to-equity Ratio

M&M with Corporate Taxes When corporate taxes are introduced, then debt financing causes a positive benefit to the value of the firm. The reason for this is that debt interest payments reduce taxable income and thus reduce taxes. Thus with debt, there is more after-tax cash flow available to security holders (equity and debt) than there is without debt. Thus the value of the equity and debt securities combined is greater.

M&M with Corporate Taxes TC = 40% in this example Tax, $400, 40% Equity, $600, 60% Tax, $280, 28% Debt, $300, 30% Equity, $420, 42% Debt, $600, 60% Tax, $160, 16% Equity, $240, 24%

M&M Proposition I (with Corporate Taxes) Firm value increases with leverage VL = VU + TC B

M&M Proposition I (with Corp. Taxes) The present value of this stream of cash flows is VL The present value of the first term is VU The present value of the second term is TCB

M&M Proposition II (with Corp. Taxes) Proposition II (with Corporate Taxes) This proposition is similar to Prop. II in the no tax case, however, now the risk and return of equity does not rise as quickly as the debt/equity ratio is increased because low-risk tax cash flows are saved. Some of the increase in equity risk and return is offset by interest tax shield rS = r0 + (B/S)×(1-TC)×(r0 - rB) rB is the interest rate (cost of debt) rS is the return on equity (cost of equity) r0 is the return on unlevered equity (cost of capital) B is the value of debt S is the value of levered equity

Exercise Suppose the firm is currently all equity financed and the total value of the firm is $90 million. E[Requity] is 18%. Also, suppose that TC = 40%, Rf = 4% and E[RM] = 14%. What is the value of the equity and the total value of the firm if the capital structure is changed to include $30 million of debt? If E[Rdebt] is 6%, then what is the new E[Requity]? What is the new WACC? Redo 1 with $60 million of debt.

The Effect of Financial Leverage on the Cost of Debt and Equity Capital Cost of capital: r (%) r0 rB Debt-to-equity ratio (B/S)

Summary and Conclusions At this point, it appears clear that an increase in the debt/equity ratio increases the risk of the equity. With corporate taxes, it also appears that the value of the firm increases as the amount of debt used increases (due to taxes being saved). However, in reality, we don’t see 100% debt financing, so there must be other factors that affect the firm’s optimal capital structure. The next lecture addresses these other factors and extends the theory.