Dispositions The Conditional Analysis

Dispositions The Conditional Analysis: For any object O, response R and stimulus S, O is disposed to R when S iff O would R if S. Objection #1: Finks Objection #2: Reverse-Finks

The Conditional Fallacy A n illustration of a second version of this mistake appears in the following definition, offered by Keith Lehrer: "But what does it mean to say that reasons give a man knowledge? It means that if he were asked, 'How do you know that?' and he were to give those reasons, his answer would be correct. Those reasons explain how he knows." But suppose that Mr. Silent, the only friend of Mr. Faker, knows that they will remain friends in the immediate future. Yet Mr. Faker pretends to all others that he himself is a misanthrope, and the continuation of the friendship depends on Mr. Silent's keeping the secret. Mr. Nosey, who suspects that the former two are friends, asks Mr. Silent in front of Mr. Faker, "How do you know that you will remain friends with Mr. Faker in the immediate future?" Mr. Silent does know this, but would not if he were to state his actual reasons.

Dispositions An intrinsic property is one that things have in and of themselves. An extrinsic property is one that things have partly in virtue of their relations to other things. The Revised Conditional Analysis: For any object O, response R and stimulus S, O is disposed to R when S iff O would R if S, provided that O remained intrinsically unchanged.

Dispositions The Revised Conditional Analysis: For any object O, response R and stimulus S, O is disposed to R when S iff O would R if S, provided that O remained intrinsically unchanged. Objection #1: Masks Objection #2: Reverse-Masks

Dispositions The Revised Revised Conditional Analysis: For any object O, response R and stimulus S, O is disposed to R when S iff O would R if S under ideal conditions.