Governments and Multinational Corporations in the Race to the Bottom Rosanne Altshuler (Rutgers University) and Harry Grubert (U.S. Treasury Department)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TAXATION OF COMPANIES Alan J. Auerbach Michael P. Devereux and Helen Simpson.
Advertisements

1 Indirect Foreign Tax Credit  Recall that the foreign tax credit is available to US persons for foreign income taxes paid on foreign source income 
1 International Taxation on the Road to Economic Recovery Clemens Fuest University of Oxford IFA Trilateral Meeting London, November 3 rd, 2010.
Tax Reform in the United States 2009 Art Franczek President of The American Institute of Business and Economics
International Tax Reform Prepared for SIEPR-TPC Tax Reform Conference Rosanne Altshuler January 18, 2013.
Foreign Tax Credit Tx 8300.
Capital Income Taxation, Corporate Taxation, Wealth Transfer Taxes and Consumption Tax Reforms Discussion.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 24 The U.S. Taxation of Multinational Transactions.
International Taxation
Irwin/McGraw-Hill ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Principles of Taxation Chapter 12 Jurisdictional Issues in Business Taxation.
International Finance FIN456 ♦ Spring 2013 Michael Dimond.
1 Using and Misusing Investment Incentives James Alm and David L. Sjoquist March 2008.
Università Bocconi, A.A: Mec – Comparative public economics 1 Università Bocconi A.A Comparative public economics Giampaolo Arachi.
CHAPTER 15 International taxation. Contents  Introduction – Main types of taxation  Corporate income tax and dividends  Deferred taxation  International.
, Introduction to Captives and the Bermuda Domicile Moderator: Federico Candiolo, Counsel, ASW Law Ltd Panelist(s):
Financial Management in the International Business
International Business 8e By Charles W.L. Hill. Chapter 20 Financial Management in the International Business Copyright © 2011 by the McGraw-Hill Companies,
International Taxation: Debt Financing, Taxation and Transfer Pricing By Koy Saechao.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 11 International Transfer Pricing.
Competitive Tax Policy Joel Slemrod University of Michigan CASIC Research Summit April 2, 2011.
P.V. VISWANATH FOR A FIRST COURSE IN FINANCE 1. 2 Corporations pay taxes on their profits after interest payments are deducted. Thus, interest expense.
MANAGING INTRACOMPANY FUND FLOWS. THE MNC’s DISTINCT VALUE MNCs can arbitrage 1.Financial markets 2.Tax systems 3.Regulatory systems.
International Taxation of Equity Returns An imbroglio of tax laws and the MacDougall Model.
Chapter Outline The Objectives of Taxation Types of Taxation
The Latin American Tax System and Foreign Investment
THE CORPORATION TAX Chapter 19. I’ll probably kick myself for having said this, but when are we going to have the courage to point out that in our tax.
©2001 Prentice Hall Takeovers, Restructuring, and Corporate Governance, 3/e Weston Chapter Tax Planning Options.
© Grant Thornton LLP. All rights reserved. International Developments and Trends in International Taxation Günter Spielmann Executive director, EMEA Tax.
Sources of Government Revenue
Chapter 13 Jurisdictional Issues in Business Taxation McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Chapter Twenty Financial Management in the International Business.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 11 International Transfer Pricing.
The Multinational Corporation and Globalization
International Finance FIN456 Michael Dimond. Michael Dimond School of Business Administration Strategic Multinational Financial Management The ability.
Kirt C. Butler, Multinational Finance, South-Western College Publishing, 3e 17-1 Chapter 17 Taxes & Multinational Corporate Strategy 17.1The Objectives.
Thin Capitalisation What is Thin Capitalisation.
Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT EUN / RESNICK Fourth Edition.
Case Study Facts – Organic Growth into Canada ©2011 True Partners Consulting LLC. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. Canada (distribution) (IP.
5-c. Case Study - Overview of issues TRANSFER PRICING CASE STUDIES WORKSHOP SAN JOSE 31 MARCH - 4 APRIL 2014 OECD freely authorises the use of this material.
1 Update: 8 Feb 2012 ECON 635:PUBLIC FINANCE Lecture 10 Topics to be covered: a.Corporate Income Tax b.Cost of Goods sold c.Depreciation d.Straight Line.
 Click to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level  Fifth level #12-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies,
Dr. A. DeMaskey Managing the Multinational Financial System International Financial Management.
Dr. A. DeMaskey Managing the Multinational Financial System International Finance.
International Business 9e By Charles W.L. Hill McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
International Tax Proposals and Their Implications for Cayman Gary Clyde Hufbauer Reginald Jones Senior Fellow Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Managing the Multinational Financial System
1 Course Summary n Our goal: Incorporate taxes into the business and investment decision-making process –Distinguish between tax planning and tax minimization.
Kirt C. Butler, Multinational Finance, South-Western College Publishing, 3e 17-1 Chapter 17 Taxes & Multinational Corporate Strategy 17.1The Objectives.
Horlings is a world-wide network of independent accountants and consultants firms 6 February 2009 The Dutch co-operative Nexia European Tax Group Meeting.
1 Importance of Income Sourcing U.S. persons earning foreign source income are entitled to a foreign tax credit Foreign persons earning U.S. source income.
Fiscal engineering and IPPs Discussant comments Agenda item 6.
International Business 9e By Charles W.L. Hill McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Policy Considerations in the Taxation of Foreign Direct.
Ch. 3 Financial Statements, Cash Flows and Taxes.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2002 Principles of Taxation Chapter 12 Jurisdictional Issues in Business Taxation.
Lecture 28. Lecture Review Financial Management in the International Business 1. investment decisions – decisions about what to finance 2. financing decisions.
Kirt C. Butler, Multinational Finance, South-Western College Publishing, 2e 8-1 Chapter 8 Taxes and Multinational Corporate Strategy 8.1The Objectives.
Lecture 27. Lecture Review Financial Management in the International Business 1. investment decisions – decisions about what to finance 2. financing decisions.
Why Do Firms Hold So Much Cash? A Tax-based Explanation Fritz Foley Harvard Business School and NBER Jay Hartzell The University of Texas at Austin Sheridan.
Chapter 15 Debt and Taxes. Copyright ©2014 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved The Interest Tax Deduction Corporations pay taxes on.
What Do We Know About Base Erosion and Profit Shifting? A Review of the Empirical Literature ITPF/AEI Conference: “Economic Effects of Territorial Taxation”
C. Fritz Foley Harvard Business School. US MNE US MNE Foreign Sub Foreign Sub Repatriates $80 Owes US tax of ($100 x 35%)=$35, less foreign tax credit.
Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Auditing Multinational Enterprises 3 Taxation of Multinational.
Jurisdictional Issues in Business Taxation 13-1 Chapter 13 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
International Taxation
International Business 9e
Intercorporate Investments and Consolidations
Jurisdictional Issues in Business Taxation
Auditing Multinational Enterprises
Kevin Markle, University of Waterloo Douglas A
Presentation transcript:

Governments and Multinational Corporations in the Race to the Bottom Rosanne Altshuler (Rutgers University) and Harry Grubert (U.S. Treasury Department)

Tax competition and the “race to the bottom” Focus tends to be on host countries using tax policy instruments such as statutory tax rates and tax incentives to compete for mobile capital, but –neglects role of corporate tax planning by multinational corporations (MNCs) –neglects role of home governments that facilitate this planning through their tax codes There are three parties in the “race to the bottom” –host governments, home governments, and MNCs –tax havens play a passive role only

Goal of paper Understand role of the three parties in explaining the reduction of corporate tax burdens worldwide Use data on operations of US MNCs to illustrate role of each of the actors and how these roles may have evolved –No single data set gives complete picture Country- and subsidiary-level data from Treasury tax files Data on foreign direct investment and country affiliate income from Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) Focus on 1992 to 2002 –Emphasis on period after 1996 –Treasury regulations issued in 1997 greatly simplified use of more aggressive tax planning strategies

Plan of today’s talk Background on new tax planning strategies Evidence on tax planning –Changes in firm level effective tax rates –The growth of income shifting at the subsidiary level –The location of income and real capital –Revenue estimate of the tax savings to US companies due to new tax planning strategies

The new tax planning strategies What is a hybrid? –An entity that is incorporated from the host country point of view and a branch from the US point of view (or vice- versa) What is the advantage of using hybrid? –Allows US companies to avoid the current US tax under the CFC rules on inter-company payments like interest, royalties, and dividends –A hybrid entity makes this payment invisible to the US because it all occurs within one combined entity Setting up hybrids simplified by check-the-box regulations passed in Dec and effective Jan. 1, 1997 –All the company had to do to create a “disregarded” entity was check the box on a tax form –Once the box is checked, the entity disappears from the US view

Hybrid entities Parent injects equity into tax haven Tax haven lends to high-tax affiliate High-tax affiliate makes interest payments –Interest would be taxable currently under US CFC rules But, check-the-box on the high-tax affiliate –Transaction invisible to Treasury which regards combined tax haven - high-tax operation as a consolidated corporation Result –Interest escapes current U.S. taxation –Interest deduction in high-tax country –Income deferred in tax haven –Interest not taxed anywhere! Data issue –In reports to the Treasury, the parent can elect to list the surviving consolidated corporation as incorporated in the high-tax location or the tax haven Tax haven affiliate InterestLoan Equity High- tax affiliat e Parent MNC

More tax planning strategies with hybrids Move income across locations without tax implications through payment of inter-company dividends –Typically pay to “holding companies” in countries with favorable regimes (exempt dividends and impose low withholding taxes) Shift income from intellectual property like patents to tax havens –Tax haven engages in a cost-sharing agreement with parent –Haven affiliate licenses resulting technology to other affiliates in exchange for royalty payments. These inter-company payments are invisible with check the box. “Hybrid securities” –Considered debt by host country and equity by company receiving payments (more relevant for dividend exemption countries)

Tax planning and changes in effective tax rates AETR = taxes paid in host country/ E&P in host country Data from Treasury tax files. Average Effective Tax Rates in Manufacturing for 58 Countries

What explains the recent decreases in AETRs? Is country behavior (tax competition) or company behavior (tax planning) responsible? –Simple regression analysis of country level data from 1992 and 1998 –Results suggestive of a tax competition story Countries losing share of U.S. capital relative to their neighbors cut their effective tax rates the most Countries with relatively high AETRs in 1990 and small countries cut their rates more than the average

Company versus country behavior? Add statutory tax rate to analysis –Statutory tax rate indicates incentives for company tax planning at the margin –Find that statutory tax rate plays no role in explaining decreases in AETRs over the period But, the story changes in 2000 –Change in capital share and initial effective tax rates no longer explain differences in declines in AETRs –Statutory tax rate has greater explanatory power Company rather than country behavior seems to be explaining changes in AETRs in the most current data

Tax planning and changes in firm-level ETRs Cannot directly observe extent to which tax planning has lowered ETRS Can look at whether factors explaining the variation in ETRs at the firm-level have changed in recent years –Hybrid entities and securities that allow income to be stripped out of high-tax countries may weaken the relationship between statutory rates and ETRs Compare CFC level data for 1996 and 2000 –Statutory rate is smaller and much less significant determinant of ETRs in 2000 than in 1996 –Role of profitability in explaining differences in ETRs has changed Higher profitability now associated with lower ETRs –R&D intensive CFCs in 2000 have lower ETRs Suggests that companies are able to shift income from R&D projects in high- tax countries to hybrid entities in tax havens through royalty payments

Evidence on the location of income and real capital Growth Total pre-tax earning and profits$160.8$ % Earnings and profits in seven major low-tax countries (Ireland, Singapore, Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Switzerland) Dividends received in the seven major low-tax countries Tangible capital in all countries (net plant & equipment plus inventories) Tangible capital in five major holding company low-tax countries (Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Netherlands, Luxembourg, Switzerland) Earnings and profits of CFCs with parents in finance in the seven major low-tax countries Dollars in billions. Tabulations from Treasury tax files. All CFCs.

Evidence on income shifting Subsidiary level data from Treasury tax files Compare income shifting behavior in 1996 and 2000 Results –Significant widening in the profitability disparities between high-tax and low-tax countries Possible explanations –High-tax countries may have reacted to increasing tax sensitivity of investment by easing up on transfer pricing and thin cap rules to attract mobile corporations –Some highly profitable subsidiaries in high-tax countries may have disappeared

Evidence of tax planning in the BEA data Information from majority owned foreign affiliates (MOFAs) US parents are instructed to include income from equity investments in foreign affiliates in their report of total income for each MOFA –Advantage: includes information from disregarded affiliates –Disadvantage: double counting of inter-company dividends In fact, almost 100% of the growth of pre-tax income in seven major low-tax locations between 1997 and 2002 is attributable to the equity in the income of other foreign affiliates

Evidence of tax planning in the BEA data Income from equity investments Pre-tax income Income from equity investments Pre-tax income Growth in income from equity investments Growth in pre-tax income All countries$41,781$188,092$120,782$255,225189%36% Selected low-tax countries Ireland1,4149,3598,50226, Luxembourg1,9352,35218,99518, Netherlands9,24917,61215,23820, Switzerland6,3269,70911,51514, Bermuda1,6495,93322,14225,2121, Cayman Islands1,0462,6782,2682, Singapore5785,7652,4657, Total22,19753,40881,125115, Dollars reported in millions.

Inter-company income and worldwide tax payments Inter-company payments may be deductible in host country and thus save host country taxes We estimate inter-company payments deductible in the paying country but exempt from tax in the receiving country saved US MNCs $7 billion in foreign taxes in 2002 compared with 1997 –About 4% of total foreign affiliate income --- a substantial reduction in a short period

Conclusions Suggestive evidence that the roles of the three parties may have changed over the last decade From 1998 on, tax planning by companies seems to be much more significant, facilitated by the more permissive US rules introduced in 1997 Results illustrate importance of including both company tax planning and the cooperation of governments in any accurate depiction of race to the bottom Results show the difficulty of using the data to understand the “real” location of profits and how it has changed over time