LOCA/LOFA Analyses for Blanket and Shield Only Regions – LiPb/FS/He System Carl Martin, Jake Blanchard Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Shai Ehrmann California State University, Los Angeles.

Advertisements

Interim Design Amy Eckerle Andrew Whittington Philip Witherspoon Team 16.

MECHANISM OF HEAT TRANSFER Mode of Heat transfer Conduction Convection

September 24-25, 2003 HAPL meeting, UW, Madison 1 Armor Configuration & Thermal Analysis 1.Parametric analysis in support of system studies 2.Preliminary.

Thermo Fluid Design Analysis of TBM cooling schemes M. Narula with A. Ying, R. Hunt, S. Park ITER-TBM Meeting UCLA Feb 14-15, 2007.

09 FNST meeting Preliminary Neutronics Analysis for IB Shielding Design on FNSF (Standard Aspect Ratio) Haibo Liu Robert Reed Fusion Science and Technology.

Japan-US Workshop held at San Diego on April 6-7, 2002 How can we keep structural integrity of the first wall having micro cracks? R. Kurihara JAERI-Naka.

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory Safety Issues Related to Flibe/Ferritic Steel Blanket and Vacuum Vessel Placement Brad Merrill.

September 15-16, 2005/ARR 1 Status of ARIES-CS Power Core and Divertor Design and Structural Analysis A. René Raffray University of California, San Diego.

SOL Vacuum Vessel FS Shield Gap Thickness (cm) FW Gap + Th. Insulator Winding Pack Plasma ≥  ≥ 149 cm | | Coil Case & Insulator Blanket.

1 LOCA/LOFA Analyses for LiPb/FS System Carl Martin, Jake Blanchard Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison ARIES-CS Project Meeting.

ARIES-CS Radial Build Definition and Nuclear System Characteristics L. El-Guebaly, P. Wilson, D. Henderson, T. Tautges, M. Wang, C. Martin, J. Blanchard.

First Wall Thermal Hydraulics Analysis El-Sayed Mogahed Fusion Technology Institute The University of Wisconsin With input from S. Malang, M. Sawan, I.

September 3-4, 2003/ARR 1 Initial Assessment of Maintenance Scheme for 2- Field Period Configuration A. R. Raffray X. Wang University of California, San.

In-Hohlraum Layering of Indirect Drive Targets Mark S. Tillack and John E. Pulsifer University of California, San Diego Dan T. Goodin and Ron W. Petzoldt.

ARIES-CS Page 1 Summary of ARIES Power Core Unit Costs L. Waganer The Boeing Company 16 September 2004 ARIES Meeting at Madison, WI.

Optimization of Stellarator Power Plant Parameters J. F. Lyon, Oak Ridge National Lab. for the ARIES Team Workshop on Fusion Power Plants Tokyo, January.

January 11-13, 2005/ARR 1 Ceramic Breeder Blanket Coupled with Brayton Cycle Presented by: A. R. Raffray (University of California, San Diego) With contributions.

1 ANS 16 th Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy September , 2004 Madison, Wisconsin.

ARIES Meeting General Atomics, February 25 th, 2005 Brad Merrill, Richard Moore Fusion Safety Program Pressurization Accidents in ARIES-CS.

June 16, 2004/ARR 1 Thermal-Hydraulic Study of ARIES-CS Ceramic Breeder Blanket Coupled with a Brayton Cycle Presented by A. R. Raffray With contributions.

Status of the Power Core Configuration Based on Modular Maintenance Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray and the ARIES Team ARIES.

Status of safety analysis for HCPB TBM Susana Reyes TBM Project meeting, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA May 10-11, 2006 Work performed under the auspices of the.

Ceramic Breeder Blanket Conceptual Design for ARIES-CS Contributors: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray, and L. El-Guebaly ARIES Meeting University of Wisconsin,

ARIES-CS Systems Studies J. F. Lyon, ORNL Workshop on Fusion Power Plants UCSD Jan. 24, 2006.

Radial Build Definition for Solid Breeder System Laila El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison With input from: S. Malang.

Status of 3-D Analysis, Neutron Streaming through Penetrations, and LOCA/LOFA Analysis L. El-Guebaly, M. Sawan, P. Wilson, D. Henderson, A. Ibrahim, G.

June19-21, 2000Finalizing the ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Designs, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design (The Final Stretch)

Initial Activation Assessment for ARIES Compact Stellarator Power Plant L. El-Guebaly, P. Wilson, D. Paige and the ARIES Team Fusion Technology Institute.

M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski and M. D. Hageman Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Extrapolating Experimental Results for Model Divertor.

March 20-21, 2000ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design, ARIES Project Meeting/ARR Status ARIES-AT Blanket and Divertor Design The ARIES Team Presented.

Minimum Radial Standoff: Problem definition and Needed Info L. El-Guebaly Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison With Input from:

Accident assessment for DCLL DEMO design Susana Reyes TBM Project meeting, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA March 2-4, 2005 Work performed under the auspices of the.

1 THERMAL & MECHANICAL PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ELM COIL ALTERNATE DESIGN Interim Review July 26-28, 2010 In-Vessel Coil System Interim Review – July 26-28,

Overview of ARIES ACT-1 Study Farrokh Najmabadi Professor of Electrical & Computer Engineering Director, Center for Energy Research UC San Diego and the.

Fracture and Creep in the All-Tungsten ARIES Divertor

M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski and M. D. Hageman Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Update on Thermal Performance of the Gas- Cooled.

1 Calorimeter Thermal Analysis with Increased Heat Loads September 28, 2009.

Neutronics Parameters for Preferred Chamber Configuration with Magnetic Intervention Mohamed Sawan Ed Marriott, Carol Aplin UW Fusion Technology Inst.

Fracture of Tungsten in a HAPL Chamber Jake Blanchard HAPL MWG Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin September 2003.

October 27-28, 2004 HAPL meeting, PPPL 1 Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of Ceramic Breeder Blanket and Plan for Future Effort A. René Raffray UCSD With contributions.

Calorimeter Analysis Tasks, July 2014 Revision B January 22, 2015.

Completion of Water-Cooled Backup Study Eric Pitcher TAC-10 November 5, 2014.

CS Thermal Analysis Status Heating and Cooling of CS During Normal Operation - SN & DN Operation –Overall Heat Balance –Heating of Center Stack First Cut.

M. Yoda, S. I. Abdel-Khalik, D. L. Sadowski, B. H. Mills, and J. D. Rader G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering Correlations for the Plate Divertor.

NML High Energy Beam Absorbers and Dump 29-August-2011 Beams-doc-3928.

1 Parametric Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of TBM Primary Helium Loop Greg Sviatoslavsky Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.

1 Neutronics Assessment of Self-Cooled Li Blanket Concept Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.

Magnet for ARIES-CS Magnet protection Cooling of magnet structure L. Bromberg J.H. Schultz MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center ARIES meeting UCSD January.

First calculation of the antenna heating for HFS reflectometry system Yu.S. Shpanskiy, N.N. Vasiliev RRC KURCHATOV INSTITUTE April 10, 2006.

1 Neutronics Parameters for the Reference HAPL Chamber Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.

Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe FZK - EURATOM ASSOCIATION 05/14/2005 Thomas Ihli 1 Status of He-cooled Divertor Design Contributors: A.R. Raffray, and The.

56 MHz SRF Cavity Thermal Analysis and Vacuum Chamber Strength C. Pai

Required Dimensions of HAPL Core System with Magnetic Intervention Mohamed Sawan Carol Aplin UW Fusion Technology Inst. Rene Raffray UCSD HAPL Project.

ENEN BSRT: NUMERICAL EVALUATION OF RF INDUCED HEATING 04/09/2012EN-MME-PE.

1 A Self-Cooled Lithium Blanket Concept for HAPL I. N. Sviatoslavsky Fusion Technology Institute, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI With contributions.

Chapter Three Sections 3.1 through 3.4

ARIES Meeting University of Wisconsin, April 27 th, 2006 Brad Merrill, Richard Moore Fusion Safety Program Update of Pressurization Accidents in ARIES-CS.

TUTORIAL 1 7/3/2016.

MELCOR model development for ARIES Safety Analysis

Updates of the ARIES-CS Power Core Configuration and Maintenance

Description of Thin Liquid Wall Protection w/Porous Walls

DCLL Blanket Analysis and Power Core Layout for ARIES-DB

Modified Design of Aries T-Tube Divertor Concept

Chapter Three Section 3.5, Appendix C

Presented by A. R. Raffray University of Wisconsin, Madison

DCLL TBM Design Status, Current and future activities

Status of the ARIES Program

ACT1 LOFA model updates and LOCA analyses

Update on Fracture Analyses

Presentation transcript:

LOCA/LOFA Analyses for Blanket and Shield Only Regions – LiPb/FS/He System Carl Martin, Jake Blanchard Fusion Technology Institute University of Wisconsin - Madison ARIES-CS Project Meeting February 24-25, 2005

LOCA/LOFA Analysis Update 1.Results from LOCA/LOFA models with the gap between blanket and shield removed. The interface has been replaced with a perfect contact condition. 2.Maximum temperatures for LOCA and LOFA as a function of  are presented to help establish thermal operating limits. 3.Preliminary results for the shield only regions will be discussed.

ANSYS FE Model and Boundary Conditions for Thermal Analyses BlanketShieldVacuum Vessel First Wall T init = 500 C LiPB T init = 625 C Back Wall T init = 450 C Shield T init = 450 C Vacuum Vessel T init = 100 C Gap Radius = 2.0 m Ferritic SteelBoronated Ferritic Steel LiPb H20H20H20H20H20H20 Adiabatic boundary at back of vacuum vessel. Model is axisymmetric about plasma centerline and symmetric on sides. Gap between blanket and shield replaced with perfect contact condition. Emissivity of 0.3 assumed across vacuum gap and vacated cooling channels. All analyses assume there is no helium in channels.

Thermal Results LOFA for LiPb and Water and LOCA for He 740 C temp limit 1 cm Gap Between Blanket and Shield Maximum temperature – 715 C 1 s1 m1 h 1 d 1 mo 740 C temp limit Perfect Contact Between Blanket and Shield Maximum temperature – 701 C 1 s1 m1 h 1 d 1 mo Model modified to remove vacuum gap between blanket and shield to agree with current configuration. Maximum temperature is 14 C lower with gap removed and perfect contact assumed.

Thermal Response for LOCA in Blanket/Shield and LOFA in Vacuum Vessel Maximum temperature is 23 C lower with ideal contact between blanket and shield compared to 1 cm vacuum gap case. Maximum temperature is higher for LOCA (706 C) compared to LOFA (701 C). Perfect Contact Between Blanket and Shield Maximum temperature – 706 C 740 C temp limit 1 s1 m1 h 1 d 1 mo 740 C temp limit 1 cm Gap Between Blanket and Shield Maximum temperature – 729 C 1 s1 m1 h 1 d 1 mo

Thermal Results for Fusion Power Scaled by C temp limit LOCA for LiPb 801 C max 740 C temp limit LOFA for LiPb 760 C max 1 s1 m1 h 1 d 1 mo 1 s1 m1 h 1 d 1 mo Maximum temperatures for ratio  =1.5 exceed 740 C FS limit. Again, maximum temperature is higher for LOCA than LOFA.

740 C temp limit Variation of Maximum Temperature with  Maximum Temperature vs  740 C FS limit exceeded for  > 2.3 MW/m 2 with current configuration

Shield Only Zone Analysis FWBWVacuum VesselWC-Shield-IIWC-Shield-IGap H20H20H20H20H20H20 FEA Model Assumes shield only region about entire radius (conservative temperature estimate) Replaceable Plasma

LOCA Thermal Results for Shield Only Region Max. Temp – 1427 C at 1 day 740 C temp limit Maximum temperature of 1427 C occurs after 24 hours. Natural convection to water in vacuum vessel included. Emissivity of 0.3 assumed for radiation in vacuum gap. Initial temperatures of 500 C assumed for 1 st wall and WC, 450 C for cooling channels, and 100 C for vacuum vessel. 1 s1 m1 h 1 d 1 mo

Temperature Distribution at t = 1Day Vacuum gap  T = 880 C Large gradient occurs across vacuum gap (  =0.3 assumed). Temperature gradients across Shield II and gap confirmed with hand calculations.

Variation of Maximum Shield Temperature with Gap Emissivity Increasing emissivity across can not reduce temperatures to acceptable levels. 3-D analysis with transition regions are required to properly analyze region. Passive system may be required to achieve temperature limits.

Summary and Future Plans 1.Removal of the gap between the vacuum and shield reduced the maximum temperatures by C for LOCA/LOFA cases. 2.  should not exceed 2.34 MW/m 2 to keep blanket FS temperature below 740 C during LOCA/LOFA for current configuration. 3.Blanket and shield model is to be updated to latest configuration and temperature limits/design sensitivity will be further evaluated. 4.Shield only region temperatures greatly exceed limits. Increasing emissivity does not solve problem. Passive safety system may be needed. 5.A full 3-D model of shield only and transition regions will be developed to further investigate this problem.