A NOAA funded partnership of research institutions, state and regional resource managers, and private sector companies interested in developing and applying.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aquaculture Areas of Possible Collaboration High Priority Areas 1.Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture 2.Develop and verify models to predict environmental.
Advertisements

GEO SB-01 Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Oceans Task of GEO GEO-IX Plenary November 2012 Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil on behalf of the Blue.
Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) Data Management and Communication (DMAC) Standards Process Julie Bosch NOAA National Coastal Data Development.
A NOAA funded partnership of research institutions, state and regional resource managers, and private sector companies interested in developing and applying.
Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies David W. Yoskowitz Carlota Santos Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies Texas A&M University.
Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System Ann E. Jochens Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System Regional Association
Cooperative Efforts with Gulf of Mexico Alliance New Web Site – me.html First Annual Monitoring Forum Priority.
Carolinas Coast: A One-Stop Shop for Marine Observations in the Carolinas Funded by the National Oceanic And Atmospheric Administration A partnership among:
The Tampa Bay Physical Oceanographic Real-Time System (PORTS) Mark Luther, Robert Weisberg, Cliff Merz, Steve Meyers, Ruoying He, Vembu Subramanian, Sherryl.
-101 MACOORA Annual Meeting October 22-23, 2008 Dartmouth, Massachusetts Presenters: Scott Glenn & Josh Kohut.
IOOS Application to Harmful Algal Blooms and Ecosystem Health Monitoring Josh Kohut Rutgers University, Institute of Marine & Coastal Science Bob Connell.
GCOOS Status and Plans An Update Ann E. Jochens GCOOS Regional Coordinator Texas A&M University College Station, Texas GCOOS Parties and Board Meeting.
Parameters and instruments A. Proshutinsky, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Science and Education Opportunities for an Arctic Cabled Seafloor Observatory.
NCCOS Centers Center for Coastal Monitoring and Assessment, Silver Spring, MD CCEHBR - Cooperative Oxford Laboratory Branch, Oxford, MD Center for Sponsored.
Status and Plans for the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System (GCOOS) Ann E. Jochens GCOOS Regional Coordinator Texas A&M University College Station,
2009 Annual Winter Meeting of the GCOOS-RA Parties and Board of Directors Worth Nowlin February 2009 Orlando, FL Building the GCOOS.
Welcome MACOORA Annual Meeting October 22-23, 2008 Fall River, Massachusetts Carolyn Thoroughgood.
Harmful Algal Blooms Integrated Observing System HABIOS Vision Statement To establish a sustained observing system as part of the U.S. IOOS (Integrated.
Water Quality for Healthy Beaches and Shellfish Beds Long-term Alliance Partnership Goal Provide critical water quality information to Gulf of Mexico resource.
The Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System: a component of the U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System and of the Global Ocean Observing System.
The Gulf of Mexico Coastal Ocean Observing System (GCOOS) Worth D. Nowlin, Jr. & Ann E. Jochens GCOOS Office/Texas A&M University 1 Recreational Boating.
Building the GCOOS Enhancements to Observing Elements Ann Jochens GCOOS-RA Annual Meeting of the Parties & Board of Directors February 2009 Orlando,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Our Planet is Changing U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) We need advanced tools to understand and monitor our oceans, coasts and Great Lakes.
National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Alfred L. Korndoerfer, Jr. Karl Muessig.
The Gulf of Maine Ocean Observing System. Technical Program Real time monitoring and forecasts of: Weather - surface ocean winds, air temperature, visibility.
SUBCOMMITTEE ON HYDROLOGY Overall Goal – from purpose statement: “To improve the availability and reliability of (surface water) information needed for.
UNCW Ocean Observing: Providing Infrastructure, Data, and Products to Support State and Federal Agency Needs AQUARIUS NOAA’s Undersea Research Center (NIUST,
Ecosystem Forecasting Testbed David J. Schwab NOAA Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory.
Coastal Water Quality Remote Sensing Welcome Dr. Jeff Payne Deputy Director NOAA Coastal Services Center October 7, 2003.
Real-Time Coastal Ocean Data Products for Tampa Bay, West Florida, and the Southeast US Mark E. Luther College of Marine Science University of South Florida.
Public Participation and the Advisory Committee Process A Collaborative Partnership For Water Resources Toni M. Johnson, Chief Water Information Coordination.
SAON is a process to support and strengthen the development of multinational engagement for sustained and coordinated pan-Arctic observing and data sharing.
Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM Opening Remarks and WG/WIST Activities Update Paul Pisano Mike Campbell WG/WIST Cochairs June 6,
1 E nvironmental R esponse M anagement A pplication Amy Merten, Michele Jacobi, John Whitney and Nancy Kinner October 28, 2008.
Gulf of Mexico Alliance SIMOR Briefing June 9, 2009.
HABMAP: CALIFORNIA HARMFUL ALGAL BLOOM MONTORING and ALERT PROGRAM Meredith Howard Southern California Coastal Water Research Project University of Southern.
JCOMM Data Buoy Cooperation Panel October 16, 2006 National Data Buoy Center 2006 Review: A Year of Growth Paul F. Moersdorf, PhD, Director.
Plan Development Workshop NOAA Coastal Services Center Charleston, SC November 2-5, 2009 Ocean and Coastal Mapping Integration Act.
Dr. William (Monty) Graham The University of Southern Mississippi Department of Marine Science Stennis Space Center, Mississippi GCOOS.
The US Integrated Ocean Observing System Mark E. Luther College of Marine Science University of South Florida US-GOOS Steering Committee.
A NOAA Cooperative Institute David R. Shaw, Director Northern Gulf Institute.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO Ocean Studies Board November 10, 2009.
1 The Integrated Ocean Observing System Where do we go from here? J. Michael Hemsley, PE, CFM Deputy Director for Coastal Operations, OceanUS.
James C. Gibeaut Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Presented to: Coastal Engineering Research.
1 Zdenka Willis IOOS Program Director March 20, 2015 Zdenka Willis IOOS Program Director March 20, 2015.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
NWQMC July 26, 2005 Developing A National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design.
DATA QUALITY CONTROL Julie Thomas Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP) Scripps Institution of Oceanography CI Design Workshop October 2007 La.
1 CILER Review – 2005 A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Carl Richards Chair, CILER Review Committee Director, US EPA Mid-Continent Ecology.
Water Quality Ru Morrison, NERACOOS Pixie Hamilton, USGS Water Quality John Haines, USGS, Pixie Hamilton, USGS, Ru Morrison, NERACOOS, Mario Tamburri,
The Physical Observing System: From Monitoring and Predicting Hazards to Long Term Changes Doug Wilson Co-Chairman, IOCARIBE-GOOS U.S. NOAA GEO CZCP Workshop.
SUBCOMMITTEE ON HYDROLOGY Overall Goal – from purpose statement: “To improve the availability and reliability of (surface water) information needed for.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
1 U.S. IOOS Update GREAT LAKES OBSERVING SYSTEM - Annual General Meeting Zdenka Willis IOOS Program Director October 7, 2015.
Marine Aquaculture in U.S.A. David O’Brien. 2 Today’s Talk U.S. Aquaculture NOAA’s Role Research Initiatives.
Marine Metadata Interoperability Acknowledgements Ongoing funding for this project is provided by the National Science Foundation.
State Agency Needs for Remote Sensing Data Related to Water Quality By Bob Van Dolah Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural.
U.S. Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS ® ) Z Improve safetyEnhance our economyProtect our environment CIMAR-GOMC meeting – 25 Feb 2015 Zdenka Willis.
Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory Review – Ann Arbor, MI November 15-18, 2010 Page 1 Observing Systems & Advanced Technology Steve Ruberg.
NOAA Climate Program Office Richard D. Rosen Senior Advisor for Climate Research CICS Science Meeting College Park, MD September 9, 2010.
Future needs and plans for ocean observing in the Arctic AOOS Arctic Town Hall Futur Zdenka Willis Integrated Ocean Observing System National Program Office.
1 Zdenka Willis IOOS Program Director March 20, 2015 Carl Gouldman IOOS Deputy Director May 8, 2015.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
FGDC Coordination Group Meeting – December 5, 2006 Tony LaVoi, NOAA December 5, 2006 FGDC Coordination Group Meeting Marine & Coastal Spatial Data Subcommittee.
US IOOS ® Zdenka Willis Director, US IOOS. Programmatic year Awards Administration Transition.
GCOOS Governance Team Andrew Clark, Harris Corporation Cortis Cooper, ChevronTexaco Ann Jochens, Texas A&M University Buzz Martin, Texas General Land Office.
The GEO Water Quality Community of Practice
The GEO AquaWatch Initiative CEOS “Freshwater from Space” Workshop
William Corso Deputy Assistant Administrator
Presentation transcript:

A NOAA funded partnership of research institutions, state and regional resource managers, and private sector companies interested in developing and applying sensor technologies for monitoring coastal environments.

 Supports development of the US Integrated Ocean Observing System (IOOS) and its Regional Associations  Based on a 2000 workshop of academics, resource managers, and private sector companies  Funded by NOAA’s Coastal Service Center, Charleston, South Carolina  Made up of a Headquarters office, Partner institutions, a Stakeholder Council, and Alliance Members  An evaluation program for sensor technologies  An information clearinghouse for sensor technologies  A forum for capacity building ACT Organization and Functions ACT Organization - Headquarters, Partners, Stakeholder Council, Alliance Members

Alliance for Coastal Technologies (ACT) Coastal Services Center Gulf of Maine Ocean Observing System Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Moss Landing Marine Laboratories University of Michigan Cooperative Institute for Limnology & Ecosystems Research Alaska SeaLife Center University of Alaska (Joining Soon) ACT Organization - Headquarters, Partners, Stakeholder Council, Alliance Members

Membership:  Up to 21 members with term appointments  Recruited from private sector companies and environmental management agencies  Representing geographic and sector diversity Objective:  Prioritizing technologies to be evaluated and workshop topics  Participating in decision making process to ensure ACT focuses on service-oriented activities  Fostering interactive flow of information between various users and disciplines critical to success of ACT Stakeholder Council ACT Organization - Headquarters, Partners, Stakeholder Council, Alliance Members

Membership:  Collaborating institutions, companies, and organizations involved in developing and/or use of coastal sensor technologies  Organized into regional Alliance Chapters. Objective:  Fostering interactive flow of ideas and information between various users and disciplines critical to the success of ACT Alliance Members ACT Organization - Headquarters, Partners, Stakeholder Council, Alliance Members Kept abreast of current ACT activities Identify regional issues Provide advice on technology foci Participate in developing ACT Workshops

 US-ACT is collaborating with European colleagues in an effort to form a EuroACT  EuroAct will eventually include partners from each European eco-region  First workshop was held in Lisbon on 1-2 March 2004 and hosted by  EuroAct Partners currently seeking EU funding EuroACT ACT Organization - Headquarters, Partners, Stakeholder Council, Alliance Members  Assure common/standardized technologies  Encourage joint opportunities in technology development  Exchange information

Technology Evaluations Activities  Recent/Present Testing: In Situ Dissolved Oxygen Sensors test performed summer 2004 results / reports now available at In Situ Fluorometers for measures of chlorophyll now underway – 8 sensors submitted for testing at 7 partner locations – 56 individual tests Next evaluation on Turbidity Sensors – RFT recently published  Testing Guidelines developed with a verification trial in winter ACT Functions - Testbed, Clearinghouse, Capacity Building

ACT has completed a Performance Verification of four in situ dissolved oxygen sensors: Aanderaa, Greenspan, In-Situ and YSI. Complete Verification Statements and Detailed Testing Protocols can be downloaded from the ACT website ( us.info/evaluation/Past-eval.php). Instrument performance demonstrations and verifications are necessary so that effective existing technologies can be recognized and so that promising new technologies can become available to support coastal science, resource management, and ocean observing systems.

 Information on ACT mission, structure, and background  Information on process and results of ACT technology evaluations.  Updates on upcoming and reports on past workshops and seminars  A searchable sensor technology database… Data and Information Clearinghouse Web Site: ACT Functions - Testbed, Clearinghouse, Capacity Building

Past ACT Technology Workshops PY: 2 ( )  Biosensors for Harmful Algal Blooms  Developing Acoustic Methods for Surveying Groundfish  In Situ Nutrient Sensors  Data Telemetry from Remote Coastal Sensors and Platforms  Rapid Identification of Coastal Pathogens ACT Functions - Testbed, Clearinghouse, Capacity Building Project Year 3 ( )  Biofouling Prevention Technologies  Dissolved Oxygen Sensors  Surface Current Radar  Nano-Technology Systems for Water Quality  Optical Particle Counters  Management Applications for AUVs and Gliders  Acoustic Remote Sensing  Underwater Remote-Operated Vehicle

ACT Functions - Testbed, Clearinghouse, Capacity Building Workshops in Project Year 4 ( )  Autonomous Geno-sensors/Genetic Probes (USF, January 2005).  In situ Methods for Carbon Species (UH/SOEST, February 2005).  Coastal Groundwater Contamination Sensors (SkIO, March 2005).  In Situ Fluorometery (GoMOOS, February 2005).  Transfer of Medical Technology to Coastal Monitoring (CBL, April 2004).  Remote Imaging Technology II: Trace Metal Sensors for Coastal Monitoring (MLML/MBARI, April 2005).

Upcoming Workshops: Project Year 5 ( ) August Turbidity (UH/SOEST) September Current Meters (GoMOOS) October Application of Drifting Buoy Technologies for Coastal Watershed and Ecosystem Monitoring (UM/CILER) November Remote Imaging Technology 1: Optical Remote Sensing (MLML/MBARI) January Dissolved Oxygen Sensors II (USF/ORION) February Seabed Sensors (SkIO) March Meteorological Buoy Sensor Systems (CBL-UMCES)

Autonomous Microbial Genosensor-Prototype 1 COT USF, January 2005 Genetic Sensors for Environmental Water Quality Workshop report available online at

Gulf of Mexico Partner: University of South Florida College of Marine Science 140 Seventh Avenue South St. Petersburg, FL

Harmful Algal Blooms - GCOOS Gulf of Mexico Regional Workshop St. Petersburg, FL Attendees included coastal zone managers and other state and federal agency representatives, researchers working with HABs, in situ and remote sensing observationalists, and modelers.

Foci Identify observations and products needed to support –Early HAB alerts –Frequent updates on locations of existing blooms –Timely forecasts of HAB trajectories including landfalls –Probabilities that bloom will occur based on environmental conditions.

Recommendations made for Integrated data system HAB Bulletin Ocean Observations Models Standards and Protocols New Research and Development needed