McDaniels – April 25, 2008. Outline Patient 13 ADC Values Progress Update Patient 7 issues.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Figure S1 A a b c 10× Ikkβ WT Ikkβ Mye  /  B C n=5, p

Advertisements

Week 10 - Project Today: – Team formation: 3 or 4 students each – Schedule: Progress meetings – during April Oral presentation/demo – final exam day Written.

Critical Book Review Due Dates March 3 rd -1 pg summary due (what you have read to this date, not the whole book)- 25pts March 10 th –Project proposal.

McDaniels – Sept 12, Outline Uncertainty in ADC value Correction Manuscript.

ROLE OF DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING IN UTERINE AND CERVICAL LESIONS. DR.VAISHNAVATHI.V.V. DR.ANUPAMA CHANDRASEKHARAN.

The Outline of an object. Helps define the image or shape you are drawing.

Bimonthly Meeting on September 12, 2008 Uncertainty in Transcription of Lesion Contours to Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Images Amarjeet Bhullar.

1 Research Update LAE 9/26/08. 2 Uncertainty in Apparent Diffusion Coefficients Determined from Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging

1 Research Update/Review LAE 5/23/08. 2 RIN/Recurrent Disease: The Problem T1 weighted contrast enhanced MRI taken 16 months after completion of radiotherapy.

1 ADC Calculations Lars Ewell Radiation Oncology University of Arizona Medical Center 2/8/08 1.

McDaniels – Oct 24, Outline MRI Image uncertainty Point uncertainty ADC uncertainty.

ADC Change with Pixel Shift Joshua Kim June 12, 2009.

Hierarchical Image Segmentation for Identifying Stroke Regions In Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Image Maps Anthony Bianchi UCR 2007 Advisor:

CSE 115 Week 14 April , Announcements April 14 – Exam 10 April 14 – Exam 10 April 18 – Last day to turn in Lab 8 for any credit April 18.

1 Research Update LAE 8/22/08. 2 Uncertainty in Transcription of Lesion Contours to Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Images

McDaniels – Oct 10, Outline Geometric Uncertainty Uncertainty in average intensity due to lesion placement ADC uncertainty.

McDaniels – Dec 19, Outline ADC Calculations – Estimation of placement uncertainty – Effect on Set 1 and Set 2 values.

McDaniels – Sept 26, Outline Patient 5 Exam 6 ADC uncertainty Manuscript.

DWMRI ADC Patient – Rhodes Four Exams. Rhodes 10 Contours 2 Lesions Exclusion Contour – Brain Stem.

1 Research Update LAE 12/5/08. 2 Variation of Lesion Intensity with Lesion Location Concerned about assumption stated in manuscript that uncertainty in.

1 Comparison of Different Diffusion Weighting Techniques Using Mutual Information Registration LAE 2/29/07.

ADC Calculations Joshua Kim. I. Objective and Goals II. Current ADC Results III. Current Progress on MatLab Program Outline.

McDaniels – Feb 29, Outline Patient 6 question Patient 11 ADC results Abstract for AAPM conference.

ADC Change with Pixel Shift Joshua Kim. I.Review II.Analysis Procedure III.ADC and Error Calculations IV.Current ADC Variation Results V.Future Work Outline.

McDaniels – Dec 5, Outline ADC Calculations – Estimation of placement uncertainty – Effect on Set 1 and Set 2 values.

McDaniels – Feb 8, Outline Patient 12 ADC results Whole lesion plots – Contour weighting factor.

Metabolic Concentrations and Ratios of Brain Tissue Amarjeet Bhullar, Lars Ewell, Tim McDaniel and Baldassarre Stea Department of Radiation Oncology, The.

Finding the ADC Taylor Gillie 6/12/09. Finding the ADC Exam 1 bArea avg. Imin. Imax. I. -ln (I/I0)ADC (best fit) Exam DateStack # Slice /22/20075.

Method for Determining Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values for Cerebral Lesions from Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examinations T.H.

Calcul mental. Calcul n°1 2 x 7 = Calcul n°2 3x 7 =

4.1 Divisibility and Mental Math. Mental Math Is 56 divisible by 7? Think! 56 = 8 x 7 Is 56 divisible by 4? Think! 56 = 8 x 7, and 4 x 2 = 8, 56 is divisible.

4x + 2y = 18 a. (1,8) = 18 a. 4(1) + 2(8) = 18 b. (3,3)20 = 18 b. 4(3) + 2(3) = = = 18 15x + 5y = 5 a. (-2,7) NoYes b. (-1,4) a.

 A -  B -  C -  D - Yes No Not sure.  A -  B -  C -  D - Yes No Not sure.

Introduction to Radiosity Geometry Group Discussion Session Jiajian (John) Chen 9/10/2007.

Prime Factor Form 18-Mar-16 More free resources available from: free-online-calculator.netfree-online-calculator.net.

Fig. 5. Left atrium (LA) function evaluation in a patient with severe asymptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR). The LA ejection fraction calculated by LA.

Noninvasive Quantification of Brain Edema and the Space-Occupying Effect in Rat Stroke Models Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging by T. Gerriets, E. Stolz,

Patient 1. Patient 1. A 40-year-old man with mild ataxia and homonymous hemianopia. CRP level was initially 0.5 mg/dL and did not change in the clinical.

Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology

Herpes encephalitis type 2 in a 2-week-old girl

Figure 1 Cerebral MRI during the disease course Cerebral MRI with multiple cerebral supratentorial lesions during the disease course: periventricular lesions.

Unit 3 Review (Calculator)

End of year exam- yr 7- begins Monday 8th -19th May 2017

Differentiation of prostate cancer lesions in the Transition Zone by diffusion-weighted MRI Jie Bao, Ximing Wang, Chunhong Hu, Jianquan Hou, Fenglin.

A novel method for assessing signal intensity within infrapatellar fat pad on MR images in patients with knee osteoarthritis M. Lu, Z. Chen, W. Han,

Calculate 9 x 81 = x 3 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x 3 x =

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Endothelin antagonists in renal disease

Patient 9. Patient 9. A 31-year-old man with mental status changes and seizure activity.A, T2-weighted axial MR image shows bilateral frontal and right.

Patient 12. Patient 12. A 43-year-old woman with headache, blurred vision, and mental status change.A, T2-weighted axial MR image shows bilateral centrum.

MR images of patient 2 (with juvenile-onset DRPLA).

Fig. 3. Measurement of the fatty infiltration ratio in a sagittal magnetic resonance imaging image using the picture archiving and communication system.

Find the limit {image} ,024 2,160 -1,

A, A sagittal fat-saturated T2-weighted image demonstrates increased signal intensity (arrow) in the superior endplate from an acute compression fracture.

(A) Na18F PET images (maximum-intensity projection).

Fig. 5. Serial follow-up sellar MRIs after treatment

Fig. 1. Benign osteoporotic vertebral fracture in a 57-year-old female who presented with low back pain. Fat-saturated T2-weighted image (T2WI) (a) demonstrates.

Fig. 2. Neoplastic vertebral fracture of a 60-year-old female with breast cancer who presented with back pain. Fat saturated T2WI (a) demonstrates vertebral.

Patient 2. Patient 2. A 31-year-old man with fever, seizures, and weakness of the left upper extremity. DW images were superior to conventional MR images.

Fig. 3. Box plots of SI norm on DW-SSFP and ADC on DW-EPI in the neoplastic and benign osteoporotic vertebral fracture groups. In DW-SSFP, the neoplastic.

T1-weighted image obtained 2 months after exposure to carbon monoxide (A) shows slightly high-signal-intensity lesions in the bilateral substantia nigra.

Patient 3 was an 8-week-old female infant with a history of seizures that started 3 days before MR imaging was performed. Patient 3 was an 8-week-old female.

Brain MR imaging 2 hours after onset of symptoms

Patient 2. Patient 2. Additional MR images.A–C, Follow-up image (A) obtained 15 days after surgical intervention shows reduced size of the abscess cavity.

Diffuse axonal injury in a 20-year-old man after motor vehicle accident.A, T2-weighted image shows hyperintense lesions in the splenium of the corpus callosum.

Isolated restricted diffusion in a patient who recovered without residual symptoms.A, DW image shows asymmetric (right greater than left) high signal intensity.

Scatterplot of the log of infarct signal intensity on DW images versus the log of hours from symptom onset. Scatterplot of the log of infarct signal intensity.

Delayed hyperenhancement (DHE) images from patients with RP

Presentation transcript:

McDaniels – April 25, 2008

Outline Patient 13 ADC Values Progress Update Patient 7 issues

Patient 13 One lesion “Good” intensity values, location DW image for every contour

Patient 13

Progress Update Patient Exams ADC Whole Contours _______________________________ Lesion________available 1 (God)2 yes yes yes 2 (Mej)2 yes yes yes 3 (Fog)2 yes yes yes 4 (Skr)0 no no no 5 (Dur)4 yes yes yes 6 (Rho)4 yes yes yes 7 (Gut)2 no no yes 8 (Rat)1 no no no 9 (Mar)1 no no no 10 (Anj)1 no no no 11 (Mye)3 yes yes yes 12 (McN)2 yes yes yes 13 (Bou)1 yes yes yes

Patient 7 Issues Very superior location No good match between Contour and DW images Will calculate ADC, but questionable