8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR 46.111(a)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.
RESEARCH COMPLIANCE Agenda 1. No Destruction of local research documents after scanning 2. Training for shipping biological samples/specimens 3. Regulatory.
Criteria For Approval 45 CFR CFR Minimized risks Reasonable risk/benefit ratio Equitable subject selection Informed consent process Informed.
The Consent Process: It’s More Than Just a Form A “10 Minute Training” Brought to you by Cyndi Long, MS, RD, CCRC CU Sports Medicine.
© HRP Associates, Inc. Informed Consent, Parental Permission & Assent Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D., CIP President, HRP Associates, Inc.
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), Informed Consent, and Responsibilities Requirement for IRBs -DHHS: 45 CFR Part 46 -FDA: 21 CFR 56 Requirement for and.
Vulnerable Populations Subpart B Requirement for IRB to make Protocol Specific Determinations.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
Ethical Considerations when Developing Human Research Protocols A discipline “born in scandal and reared in protectionism” Carol Levine, 1988.
TODAY’S TOPIC: Ethics – deconstructing consent and participation with “vulnerable” populations.
IRB Determinations 1. AAHRPP Site Visit Results Site visitors observed a real commitment to human subject protections Investigator and research staff.
Evaluating Risk 1 IRB CELT Presentation Colleen Donaldson – IRB Administrator Julie Wilkens – IRB Coordinator.
1 Developed by: U-MIC To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the.
Pediatric Ethics Subcommittee of Pediatric Advisory Committee, September 10, 2004 Analysis of Research Protocols Involving Children: Combining Subparts.
Conflict and Consent: Managing Disclosure in Human Subjects Research University of Miami Human Subjects Research Office Conflict of Interest Symposium.
IRB 101: Informed Consent Columbia University Medical Center IRB September 22, 2005.
Ethical Guidelines for Research with Human Participants
IRB 101: IRB Review Criteria; Tips for Submission
Scientific Data Management for the Protection of Human Subjects Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Center for International.
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
HRPP Training – Session Two Human Research Protection Program Manager
Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.
Regulatory criteria for approval Bob Craig, July 2007.
The IRB Approval Process Michael Bingham, JD Assistant Director, University of Wisconsin-Madison Education IRB
May I have your permission please? The consent process: What, Where, When, Who and Why Valerie Smith OHRP IRB Program Manager
1 Protection of Vulnerable Subjects in Research Melody Lin, Ph.D. December 2012.
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.
Institutional Review Board (IRB) What is our Purpose and Role for Ethical Research.
Institutional Review Board Issues for Classroom Research Sharon McWhorter IRB Administrator, The University of Akron (With assistance from Phil Allen,
NAVIGATING THE IRB PROCESS University Institutional Review Board California State University, Stanislaus.
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) School of Professional Studies April 18, 2013
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
APPROVAL CRITERIA AN IRB INFOSHORT MAY CFR CRITERIA FOR IRB APPROVAL OF RESEARCH In order for an IRB to approve a research study, all.
WELCOME to the TULANE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION OFFICE WORKSHOP for SOCIAL/BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (March 2, 2010) Tulane University HRPO Uptown.
Regulatory requirements: children, assent, and consent waivers and waiver of documentation Bob Craig, 2007.
Donna B. Konradi, DNS, RN, CNE GERO 586 Understanding the Ethics of Research.
Idara C.E.. Three ethical principles guides research with human participants. principle of Autonomy 1. The principle of Autonomy requires investigators.
Chapter 5 Ethical Concerns in Research. Historical Perspective on Ethics Nazi Experimentation in WWII –“medical experiments” –Nuremberg War Crime Trials.
Avenues of Consent Options available under 45 CFR (d) &
The Core of IRB Review William L. Freeman, MD, MPH, CIP [with material by Jeff Cohen & Moira Keane] FALCON Meeting, Las Vegas, NV December 6, 2008 Director.
 What is an IRB and why do we need one at Western?  Who needs to submit proposals to the IRB?  If approved, how long is your proposal good for?  Is.
THE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD. WHAT IS AN IRB? An IRB is committee set up by an institution to review, approve, and regulate research conducted under.
Informed Consent Presented by Marian Serge, RN. Goals Informed consent process and form Title 38 CFR , Common Rule required elements and additional.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
Conditional IRB Approval
Back to Basics – Approval Criteria
UCR IRB–SB Reviewer Placemat
To start the presentation, click on this button in the lower right corner of your screen. The presentation will begin after the screen changes and you.
IRB BASICS Ethics and Human Subject Protections Summer 2016
Research on Populations Prone to Being Vulnerable
Risk Determinations and Research with Children
Conducting Human Subjects Research
Criteria for Approval Is an IND Required? Devices
Protection of Human Subjects In Research
Jeffrey M. Cohen, Ph.D. CIP President HRP Associates, Inc.
Conducting Human Subjects Research
UCR IRB–SB Reviewer Placemat
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Conducting Human Subjects Research
Greg Nezat CRNA, PhD CDR/NC/USN Chairman, IRB II
CUNY Human Research Protection Program (HRPP)
Appendix 2 of New Application
Exploring 45 CFR , Criteria for IRB Approval of Research
IRB Educational Session - IRB Regulations on Expedited Review
Revised Common Rule: Informed Consent Changes
Office of Research Integrity and Protections
Protocol Approval Criteria
Presentation transcript:

8 Criteria for IRB Approval of Research 45 CFR (a)

Criterion #1 – Risks to Participants are Minimized By using procedures which are consistent with sound research design By using procedures which do not unnecessarily expose subjects to risk When appropriate, by using procedures already being performed on the subjects for diagnostic or treatment purposes.

Criterion #1 – Questions IRB Must Ask What are the physical, psychological, social, legal, and economic risks? Can fewer and/or alternative procedures answer the scientific question and reduce the likelihood and/or magnitude of harm? Does data exist (or will data be collected anyway) that could be used to reduce the likelihood and/or magnitude of harm?

Criterion #2 – Risks are Reasonable in Relation to Anticipated Benefits The IRB should consider only those risks and benefits that may result from the research (as distinguished from risks and benefits of therapies subjects would receive even if not participating in the research). The IRB should not consider possible long-range effects of applying knowledge gained in the research (for example, the possible effects of the research on public policy) as among those research risks that fall within the purview of its responsibility.

Criterion #2 – Questions IRB Must Ask What are the risks associated with participation in the research? What are the benefits associated with participation in the research? Is the importance of the aims clear? Is the research likely to achieve its proposed aims? Research that cannot achieve its proposed aims has no benefit.

Criterion #3 – Selection of Participants is Equitable The IRB must take into account: – Purposes of the research – Setting in which the research will be conducted – Vulnerable populations such as children, prisoners, pregnant women, mentally disabled persons, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons.

Criterion #3 – Questions IRB Must Ask Which populations are likely to enroll in the research? Are vulnerable populations likely participants? What safeguards exist to protect vulnerable populations? How will prospective participants be recruited? Are the benefits/burdens of participation fairly distributed among all populations? Are any populations unfairly targeted or excluded? What are the inclusion/exclusion criteria?

Criterion #4 – Informed Consent Must be sought from each prospective participant or the participant's legally authorized representative IRB may approve a consent procedure which waives or alters some or all of the elements of informed consent (as outlined in 45 CFR )

Criterion #4 – Questions IRB Must Ask What is the informed consent process, of which the informed consent document is one component? Is the information provided in understandable language? Is the possibility of coercion or undue influence minimized? Is the consent process free of exculpatory language? Do participants have sufficient opportunity to consider whether to participate?

Criterion #5 – Informed Consent is Documented The IRB may waive the requirement to obtain a signed consent form if: – The only record linking the subject and the research would be the consent document and the principal risk would be potential harm resulting from a breach of confidentiality. or – The research presents no more than minimal risk of harm to subjects and involves no procedures for which written consent is normally required outside of the research context. Waiver not allowed if research is subject to FDA regulations.

Criterion #5 – Questions IRB Must Ask Does the written summary (informed consent document) contain all required elements? What information will the investigator disclose if consent documentation is waived?

Criterion #6 – Data will be Monitored to Ensure Participant Safety (When Appropriate) Typically required in studies involving an intervention and greater than minimal risk

Criterion #6 – Questions IRB Must Ask Does the research involved greater than minimal risk? Is there an intervention? If a plan is required, how often will the data and accompanying reports be reviewed? If a plan is required, who will review the data?

Criterion #7 – Privacy is Protected And Confidentiality is Maintained Privacy is about people – Privacy is in the eye of the participant Confidentiality refers to data

Criterion #7 – Questions IRB Must Ask (Privacy) How will the privacy of participants be protected? What expectations of privacy will participants have? Will participants be comfortable in the research setting?

Criterion #7 – Questions IRB Must Ask (Confidentiality) Are there legal/ethical requirements that necessitate confidentiality? Is the data anonymous (or could it be collected anonymously)? Will the accidental release of data increase the potential risk of harm (social, psychological, economic, etc.) How will access to data be protected (locks, passwords, encryption, etc.) How long will data be stored?

Criterion #8 – Safeguards Exist to Protect Vulnerable Populations (When Appropriate) Applicable when some or all of the participants are likely to be vulnerable to coercion or undue influence – Examples include children, prisoners, pregnant women, mentally disabled persons, students, employees, or economically or educationally disadvantaged persons How will the rights and welfare of these participants be protected?

Criterion #8 – Questions IRB Must Ask Is the risk-benefit relationship appropriate to the vulnerable populations? Have all reasonable steps been taken to minimize the possible of coercion and undue influence of the vulnerable populations? Are participants able to provide a truly informed consent (is an assessment of the participant’s capacity or the permission of a legally authorized representative necessary)?