Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Sep 19, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEOMETRY.
Advertisements

Parallel and Perpendicular Lines
6.3 Parallel Plane Facts Objectives: 1.Recognize lines parallel to planes, parallel lines and skew lines 2.Use properties relating parallel planes and.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester Vittorio Paolone University of Pittsburgh MINERvA Collaboration Meeting, Sep 13-15, 2007.
Analysis on TP detector Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Dec 19, 2007.
1 Calorimetry Study Update Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Apr 12, 2006.
E/  Final state Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Reconstruction in final state Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, May 23, 2007.
Update on final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, June 27, 2007.
Baryon Spectroscopy and The   Program at Jlab/CLAS The Advantages of  * Experiments Complimentary to N* program For every N* and , there is a  * Narrow.
Photostatistics Error Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Sep 5, 2006.
TP Calorimetry and particle ID Jaewon Park. 2 Calorimetry We assumed that (dE/dx) min is constant for differe nt particles. In previous study:  Hcal.
OD Calorimetry Study Update — Z vertex position dependence Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, May 17, 2006.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Feb 7, 2007.
Detector Alignment using cosmic muon data Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter group Meeting, Oct 31, 2007.
Calorimetry Study Update Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Mar 22, 2006.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Oct 10, 2007.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Feb 14, 2007.
Gamma track study update Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Sep 5, 2007.
E/  Final state Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Jan 31, 2007.
Update on final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Aug29, 2007.
Reconstruction in final state Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, June 13, 2007.
MINERvA Calorimetry Resolution function Jaewon Park University of Rochester Jupiter/MINERvA Group Meeting, Nov 22, 2006.
1 Calorimetry Study Update — Implementing Kinematic cut Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Apr 26, 2006.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Feb 21, 2007.
TP Calorimetry Jaewon Park. 2 Semi-infinite ID Proton shows much hi gher calibration const ant. Calibration const for p roton for medium/high energy is.
1 Calorimetry Study Update — Dependence of energy and phi Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Apr 19, 2006.
MINERvA Calorimetry Calibration with infinite detector Jaewon Park University of Rochester Jupiter/MINERvA Group Meeting, Nov 15, 2006.
1 Calorimetry Study Update — Angle dependence with cut Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, May 03, 2006.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Mar 07, 2007.
OD Calorimetry Study Update — Leakage Effect and relative calibration Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, May 31, 2006.
Update on final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, July 25, 2007.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, May 09, 2007.
EM Calorimetry Study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Sep 5, 2006.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Mar 14, 2007.
Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.
Lesson 5.5 OBJ: To write equations of parallel and perpendicular lines.
Flashback. 1.2 Objective: I can identify parallel and perpendicular lines and use their postulates. I can also find the perimeter of geometric figures.
Difference between Roman Pots and VELO Very forward tracking is typically done using detectors located in Roman pots. They are far away from the interaction.
Frank L. H. WolfsDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester Status of the TOF February 22, 2001 Straight-line tracking What have we learned?
Basic Geometric Elements Point Line Line segment Ray Parallel lines Intersecting lines Perpendicular Angles Vertex Sides.
Angle Relationships.
3.4 P ROOFS WITH P ERPENDICULAR L INES OBJ: Students will be able to find the distance from a point to a line, prove theorems about perpendiculars, and.
3-4 Parallel and Perpendicular Lines
Update on pion and muon showers Erik van der Kraaij & Przemyslaw Majewski CERN LCD May 17, 2010.
Lesson 18Power Up DPage 114 Lines and Angles. Lines – No end, extends in both directions forever. Segments – Two endpoints, length can be measured. Lines.
Red card, Green Card, Yellow Card Transversal. Angle 2 is 100 degrees. TRUE, FALSE, NOT SURE.
Discrete Math Section 12.9 Define and apply the cross product The cross product of two vectors results in another vector. If v 1 = and v 2 =, the cross.
8-3 Angle Relationships Objective: Students identify parallel and perpendicular lines and the angles formed by a transversal.
3.1 – 3.2 Quiz Review Identify each of the following.
Darius Bellamy Powerpoint.
Objectives Identify parallel, perpendicular, and skew lines.
Unit 3 Parallel and Perpendicular Lines Review Problems
Geometry Symbols The angle with vertex B and having points A
Candy Land Geometry 18.1.
Parallel and Perpendicular Lines
Parallel and Perpendicular Lines
Jaewon Park University of Rochester
MINERvA Simulation -OD calibration
Parallel and Perpendicular Lines
Basic Geometric Elements
Monitoring SCT Efficiency and Noise
5-6 Parallel and Perpendicular Lines
R Value measurement from to GeV
Mapping Simulation — in concern with MA64 crosstalks
1.5: Parallel and Perpendicular Lines
Planes, segments and rays can also be perpendicular to one another if they intersect at 90 degree angles.
Lesson 26: Slicing 3 dimensional figures
Presentation transcript:

final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, Sep 19, 2007

2 nStrips depends plane orientation (X,U,V) Single gamma even t sample Vertex: Vr<50cm Perpendicular: Parallel: nStrips only increas es when angle betw een particle scintill ator strip increase p erpendicularly.

3 Proton tracking efficiency – angle dependence Proton is mostly forward Vertex range selection doesn’t impro ve efficiency? Vr<50cm Comparison between no selection and Vr<50cm

4 Muon tracking efficiency – E,angle dependence Muon tracking efficienc y is pretty good. Vertex range selection i mproved efficiency. Vr<50cm Comparison between no selection and Vr<50cm

Feedback: Privacy Policy Feedback
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
About project: SlidePlayer Terms of Service

© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc. All rights reserved.