CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Optimal Merging of Water Vapour Retrievals from Different Instruments Ralf Lindau Bonn University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Diplomanden-Doktoranden-Seminar Bonn – 29. Juni 2008 Surrogates and Kriging Part I: Kriging Ralf Lindau.
Advertisements

Spatial autoregressive methods
Methane inversion from satellite, TRANSCOM meeting, Jena,12-15 May 2003 Inversion strategy 4D-var method adjoint model of TM3 CH4-only version has been.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Air temperature Metabolic rate Fatreserves burned Notion of a latent variable [O 2 ]
K. Fuchsberger  Kick response measurements  Dispersion measurement
1 High resolution SST products for 2001 Satellite SST products and coverage In situ observations, coverage Quality control procedures Satellite error statistics.
1 アンサンブルカルマンフィルターによ る大気海洋結合モデルへのデータ同化 On-line estimation of observation error covariance for ensemble-based filters Genta Ueno The Institute of Statistical.
Basic geostatistics Austin Troy.
Workshop 2: Spatial scale and dependence in biogeographical patterns Objective: introduce the following fundamental concepts on spatial data analysis:
1 ATOVS and SSM/I assimilation at the Met Office Stephen English, Dave Jones, Andrew Smith, Fiona Hilton and Keith Whyte.
Deterministic Solutions Geostatistical Solutions
Diplomanden-Doktoranden-Seminar Bonn – 23 June 2008 LandCaRe 2020 Dynamical and Statistical Downscaling Ralf Lindau.
Diplomanden-Doktoranden-Seminar Bonn, now Cologne – 8 Januar 2007 CMSAF water vapour in comparison to radiosondes and CHAMP Ralf Lindau.
Multivariate Distance and Similarity Robert F. Murphy Cytometry Development Workshop 2000.
FOUR METHODS OF ESTIMATING PM 2.5 ANNUAL AVERAGES Yan Liu and Amy Nail Department of Statistics North Carolina State University EPA Office of Air Quality,
SMOS SMOS Workshop – Hamburg, November 2006 Uni Bonn contributions to SMOS Validation Ralf Lindau Bonn University.
1 Review of Correlation A correlation coefficient measures the strength of a linear relation between two measurement variables. The measure is based on.
Diplomanden-Doktoranden-Seminar Bonn – 18. Mai 2008 LandCaRe 2020 Temporal downscaling of heavy precipitation and some general thoughts about downscaling.
Geoland Core Service bio-geophysical Parameter Issue I.1.00 Ralf Lindau UniBonn CSP Meeting 9 th September 2005 R&D Status report.
FOUR METHODS OF ESTIMATING PM 2.5 ANNUAL AVERAGES Yan Liu and Amy Nail Department of Statistics North Carolina State University EPA Office of Air Quality,
Mapping Chemical Contaminants in Oceanic Sediments Around Point Loma’s Treated Wastewater Outfall Kerry Ritter Ken Schiff N. Scott Urquhart Dawn Olson.
Diplomanden-Doktoranden-Seminar Bonn – 18. Januar 2010 Kriging Connection between Stepwise Kriging and Data Construction and Stepwise Kriging of Victorian.
Diplomanden-Doktoranden-Seminar Bonn, now Cologne – 9. July 2007 My_Summer_Term_Work Ralf Lindau.
Daily Stew Kickoff – 27. January 2011 First Results of the Daily Stew Project Ralf Lindau.
Two and a half problems in homogenization of climate series concluding remarks to Daily Stew Ralf Lindau.
Geo479/579: Geostatistics Ch13. Block Kriging. Block Estimate  Requirements An estimate of the average value of a variable within a prescribed local.
Ensemble-variational sea ice data assimilation Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Buehner, Alain Caya, Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research Jean-Francois.
Nynke Hofstra and Mark New Oxford University Centre for the Environment Trends in extremes in the ENSEMBLES daily gridded observational datasets for Europe.
Spatial Interpolation of monthly precipitation by Kriging method
$88.65 $ $22.05/A profit increase Improving Wheat Profits Eakly, OK Irrigated, Behind Cotton.
Streamflow Predictability Tom Hopson. Conduct Idealized Predictability Experiments Document relative importance of uncertainties in basin initial conditions.
Gridding Daily Climate Variables for use in ENSEMBLES Malcolm Haylock, Climatic Research Unit Nynke Hofstra, Mark New, Phil Jones.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss High-resolution data assimilation in COSMO: Status and.
Potential benefits from data assimilation of carbon observations for modellers and observers - prerequisites and current state J. Segschneider, Max-Planck-Institute.
Sea Ice Modelling and Data Assimilation at CIS Tom Carrieres.
Development and evaluation of Passive Microwave SWE retrieval equations for mountainous area Naoki Mizukami.
Geographic Information Science
The Semivariogram in Remote Sensing: An Introduction P. J. Curran, Remote Sensing of Environment 24: (1988). Presented by Dahl Winters Geog 577,
Quality control of daily data on example of Central European series of air temperature, relative humidity and precipitation P. Štěpánek (1), P. Zahradníček.
Long‐term satellite‐based datasets of atmospheric water vapour derived within CM SAF Martin Stengel, Marc Schröder, Nathalie Courcoux, Karsten Fennig,
A data assimilation system by using DMI ocean model BSHcmod Jiang Zhu, Ye Liu, Shiyu Zhuang, Jun She, Per Institute of Atmospheric Physics Chinese Academy.
Task 1 Definition of the AMSU+MHS measurement covariance.
USE OF AIRS/AMSU DATA FOR WEATHER AND CLIMATE RESEARCH Joel Susskind University of Maryland May 12, 2005.
Ensemble assimilation & prediction at Météo-France Loïk Berre & Laurent Descamps.
INVERSE MODELING TECHNIQUES Daniel J. Jacob. GENERAL APPROACH FOR COMPLEX SYSTEM ANALYSIS Construct mathematical “forward” model describing system As.
Dept of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University Lab for Remote Sensing Hydrology and Spatial Modeling STATISTICS Linear Statistical.
LESSON 6: REGRESSION 2/21/12 EDUC 502: Introduction to Statistics.
The Hyperspectral Environmental Suite (HES) and Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI) will be flown on the next generation of NOAA Geostationary Operational Environmental.
GRAS-SAF User Workshop June The H umidity C omposite P roduct of the CM-SAF Helga Nitsche Deutscher Wetterdienst, D Offenbach Content: The.
Infrared and Microwave Remote Sensing of Sea Surface Temperature Gary A. Wick NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory January 14, 2004.
By Russ Frith University of Alaska at Anchorage Civil Engineering Department Estimating Alaska Snow Loads.
1 Experimental Statistics - week 12 Chapter 11: Linear Regression and Correlation Chapter 12: Multiple Regression.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
Korea Institute of Atmospheric Prediction Systems (KIAPS) ( 재 ) 한국형수치예보모델개발사업단 Identical Twin Experiments for the Representer Method with a Spectral Element.
Small-scale variability and observational error estimates for gridded analyses of SST data Alexey Kaplan Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University.
ECMWF/EUMETSAT NWP-SAF Satellite data assimilation Training Course Mar 2016.
*CPC Morphing Technique
Statistical Methods for Model Evaluation – Moving Beyond the Comparison of Matched Observations and Output for Model Grid Cells Kristen M. Foley1, Jenise.
Linear Regression Prof. Andy Field.
M. Goldberg NOAA/NESDIS Z. Cheng (QSS)
Dipdoc Seminar – 15. October 2018
The ECMWF weak constraint 4D-Var formulation
Composite Method Results Artificial Cases April 2008
Relationship between two continuous variables: correlations and linear regression both continuous. Correlation – larger values of one variable correspond.
Fig. 1 The temporal correlation coefficient (TCC) skill for one-month lead DJF prediction of 2m air temperature obtained from 13 coupled models and.
NOAA Objective Sea Surface Salinity Analysis P. Xie, Y. Xue, and A
Figure 6.1 Risk as Function of Number of Stocks in Portfolio
Project Team: Mark Buehner Cecilien Charette Bin He Peter Houtekamer
Conclusions of the CDR.
Presentation transcript:

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Optimal Merging of Water Vapour Retrievals from Different Instruments Ralf Lindau Bonn University

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Data  Merging daily water vapour fields from: AMSU and SSM/I over sea only ATOVS  NOAA-15  NOAA-16

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Data Example NOAA15 NOAA16 Number of observations Swath-oriented data is averaged on a 150 km grid (Sinosuidal projection) 4 independent observations per day at maximum

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Kriging Approach n observations x i at the locations P i are given. Perform a prediction x 0 for the location P 0, where no obs is available. Construct the prediction by a weighted average of the observations x i. Take into account the observation errors  x i. Determine the weights i.

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Kriging Equations To determine the weight i we need: the spatial covariances [ x i x j ] the error variance [  x i  x i ]

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Spatial Correlation Correlation as a function of distance Fitting of: r = exp (a 0 + a 1 x) Handy characteristics: Correlation length: 645 km ordinate intercept: 0.969

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Error of daily means AMSU SSM/I

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Ready to run

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 TPW on 4 th April 2004 Anomaly on 4.April Mean and Stddev. in April

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Raw Data / Results

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Conclusion  Daily fields of Total Water Vapour: ATOVS Spatial correlation function Error of daily grid averages  For each TPW field an error field is provided

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Error Covariance D = ((x 1 +  x 1 ) – (x 2 +  x 2 )) 2 D = 2 Var – 2 Cov + Err1 + Err2 - 2 ErrCov

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Error Covariance D = ((x 1 +  x 1 ) – (x 2 +  x 2 )) 2 S = (x 1 +  x 1 ) 2 + (x 2 +  x 2 ) 2 D = 2 Var – 2 Cov + Err1 + Err2 - 2 ErrCov S = 2 Var + Err1 + Err2

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 Error Covariance D = ((x 1 +  x 1 ) – (x 2 +  x 2 )) 2 S = (x 1 +  x 1 ) 2 + (x 2 +  x 2 ) 2 D = 2 Var – 2 Cov + Err1 + Err2 - 2 ErrCov S = 2 Var + Err1 + Err2 S – D = 2 Cov + 2 ErrCov

CMSAF 2 nd CMSAF U&T Workshop – Nürnberg, 30. August 2005 TPW anomaly on 4 th April