Cross-Layer Application-Specific WSN Design over SS-Trees -Prepared by Amy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advisor : Prof. Yu-Chee Tseng Student : Yi-Chen Lu 12009/06/26.
Advertisements

A 2 -MAC: An Adaptive, Anycast MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Hwee-Xian TAN and Mun Choon CHAN Department of Computer Science, School of Computing.
SELF-ORGANIZING MEDIA ACCESS MECHANISM OF A WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK AHM QUAMRUZZAMAN.
TDMA Scheduling in Wireless Sensor Networks
Wireless Sensor Networks ‘WSN’
Sensor Network 教育部資通訊科技人才培育先導型計畫. 1.Introduction General Purpose  A wireless sensor network (WSN) is a wireless network using sensors to cooperatively.
Network Layer Routing Issues (I). Infrastructure vs. multi-hop Infrastructure networks: Infrastructure networks: ◦ One or several Access-Points (AP) connected.
An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Network
S-MAC Sensor Medium Access Control Protocol An Energy Efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks.
1 A Novel Topology-blind Fair Medium Access Control for Wireless LAN and Ad Hoc Networks Z. Y. Fang and B. Bensaou Computer Science Department Hong Kong.
Investigating Mac Power Consumption in Wireless Sensor Network
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
Directed Diffusion: A Scalable and Robust Communication Paradigm for Sensor Networks.
PEDS September 18, 2006 Power Efficient System for Sensor Networks1 S. Coleri, A. Puri and P. Varaiya UC Berkeley Eighth IEEE International Symposium on.
1 Cross-Layer Scheduling for Power Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks Mihail L. Sichitiu Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering North Carolina.
1-1 Topology Control. 1-2 What’s topology control?
A Survey on Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Huma Naushad.
CS541 Advanced Networking 1 Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) Neil Tang 02/02/2009.
An Energy-efficient MAC protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
Focused Beam Routing protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks Josep Miquel Jornet Montana, Milica Stojanovic, Michele Zorzi, Proc. WuWNet 2008.
A Topology Discovery Algorithm for Sensor Networks Go Suzuki CS691, SSNS Spring 2003.
On the Energy Efficient Design of Wireless Sensor Networks Tariq M. Jadoon, PhD Department of Computer Science Lahore University of Management Sciences.
Wireless Video Sensor Networks Vijaya S Malla Harish Reddy Kottam Kirankumar Srilanka.
Dynamic Clustering for Acoustic Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Network Wei-Peng Chen, Jennifer C. Hou, Lui Sha Presented by Ray Lam Oct 23, 2004.
WiseMAC: An Ultra Low Power MAC Protocol for the Downlink of Infrastructure Wireless Sensor Networks Presented by Angel Pagan November 27, 2007 A. El-Hoiydi.
1 An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks The First ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys 2003) November.
Dynamic Clustering for Acoustic Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Network Wei-Peng Chen, Jennifer C. Hou, Lui Sha.
College of Engineering Non-uniform Grid- based Coordinated Routing Priyanka Kadiyala Major Advisor: Dr. Robert Akl Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
Ubiquitous Networks WSN Routing Protocols Lynn Choi Korea University.
Why Visual Sensor Network & SMAC Implementation Group Presentation Raghul Gunasekaran.
Lan F.Akyildiz,Weilian Su, Erdal Cayirci,and Yogesh sankarasubramaniam IEEE Communications Magazine 2002 Speaker:earl A Survey on Sensor Networks.
SENSOR NETWORKS BY Umesh Shah Mayuresh Patil G P Reddy GUIDES Prof U.B.Desai Prof S.N.Merchant.
Presenter: Abhishek Gupta Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Presentation of Wireless sensor network A New Energy Aware Routing Protocol for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks Supporting QoS 王 文 毅
A Survey on Sensor Networks Hussein Alzoubi Rami Alnamneh
KAIS T Distributed cross-layer scheduling for In-network sensor query processing PERCOM (THU) Lee Cheol-Ki Network & Security Lab.
Computer Network Lab. Integrated Coverage and Connectivity Configuration in Wireless Sensor Networks SenSys ’ 03 Xiaorui Wang, Guoliang Xing, Yuanfang.
An Energy-Efficient and Low-Latency Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Antonio G. Ruzzelli, Richard Tynan and G.M.P. O’Hare Adaptive Information.
A Wakeup Scheme for Sensor Networks: Achieving Balance between Energy Saving and End-to-end Delay Xue Yang, Nitin H.Vaidya Department of Electrical and.
SMAC: An Energy-efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Networks
1 An Adaptive Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Tijs van Dam, Koen Langendoen In ACM SenSys /1/2005 Hong-Shi Wang.
A+MAC: A Streamlined Variable Duty-Cycle MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks 1 Sang Hoon Lee, 2 Byung Joon Park and 1 Lynn Choi 1 School of Electrical.
SEA-MAC: A Simple Energy Aware MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks for Environmental Monitoring Applications By: Miguel A. Erazo and Yi Qian International.
KAIS T Medium Access Control with Coordinated Adaptive Sleeping for Wireless Sensor Network Wei Ye, John Heidemann, Deborah Estrin 2003 IEEE/ACM TRANSACTIONS.
A Throughput-Adaptive MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Zuo Luo, Liu Danpu, Ma Yan, Wu Huarui Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications.
An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Speaker: hsiwei Wei Ye, John Heidemann and Deborah Estrin. IEEE INFOCOM 2002 Page
Cross-Layer Scheduling for Power Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks Mihail L. Sichitiu Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering North Carolina.
Delivery ratio-maximized wakeup scheduling for ultra-low duty-cycled WSNs under real-time constraints Fei Yang, Isabelle Augé-Blum National Institute of.
Michael Buettner, Gary V. Yee, Eric Anderson, Richard Han
Energy-Efficient Randomized Switching for Maximizing Lifetime in Tree- Based Wireless Sensor Networks Sk Kajal Arefin Imon, Adnan Khan, Mario Di Francesco,
0.1 IT 601: Mobile Computing Wireless Sensor Network Prof. Anirudha Sahoo IIT Bombay.
Cross-Layer Scheduling for Power Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks Mihail L. Sichitiu Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering North Carolina.
An Enhanced Cross-Layer Protocol for Energy Efficiency in Wireless Sensor Networks Jaehyun Kim, Dept. of Electrical & Electronic Eng., Yonsei University;
CS541 Advanced Networking 1 Contention-based MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Neil Tang 4/20/2009.
Energy-Efficient, Application-Aware Medium Access for Sensor Networks Venkatesh Rajenfran, J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, and Katia Obraczka Computer Engineering.
Critical Area Attention in Traffic Aware Dynamic Node Scheduling for Low Power Sensor Network Proceeding of the 2005 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking.
Toward Reliable and Efficient Reporting in Wireless Sensor Networks Authors: Fatma Bouabdallah Nizar Bouabdallah Raouf Boutaba.
S-MAC Taekyoung Kwon. MAC in sensor network Energy-efficient Scalable –Size, density, topology change Fairness Latency Throughput/utilization.
On Mobile Sink Node for Target Tracking in Wireless Sensor Networks Thanh Hai Trinh and Hee Yong Youn Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops(PerComW'07)
Power-Efficient Rendez- vous Schemes for Dense Wireless Sensor Networks En-Yi A. Lin, Jan M. Rabaey Berkeley Wireless Research Center University of California,
Oregon Graduate Institute1 Sensor and energy-efficient networking CSE 525: Advanced Networking Computer Science and Engineering Department Winter 2004.
ROUTING TECHNIQUES IN WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS: A SURVEY.
Wireless sensor and actor networks: research challenges Ian. F. Akyildiz, Ismail H. Kasimoglu
MAC Protocols for Sensor Networks
How to minimize energy consumption of Sensors in WSN Dileep Kumar HMCL 30 th Jan, 2015.
Towards Optimal Sleep Scheduling in Sensor Networks for Rare-Event Detection Qing Cao, Tarek Abdelzaher, Tian He, John Stankovic Department of Computer.
Net 435: Wireless sensor network (WSN)
Overview: Chapter 3 Networking sensors
Investigating Mac Power Consumption in Wireless Sensor Network
Speaker : Lee Heon-Jong
Presentation transcript:

Cross-Layer Application-Specific WSN Design over SS-Trees -Prepared by Amy

Outline Background Introduction Sleep Scheduling Issues & the SS-Tree Concept SS-Tree Operational Stages SS-Tree Computation SS-Tree Operational Specifics & Sleep Scheduling Conclusions and Future Work

Background Introduction Wide-area surveillance WSN applications − expected lifetime − limited battery supply Energy Efficiency is paramount Adaptive sleep schedules to minimize energy lost

Background Introduction Sleep scheduling: − shorten the time radio transceiver engaged in idle listening Good impact: − reduced overhearing Ensuing problem: − link table entries expire prematurely − control and data packet compete for resources − real-time data reporting function reduced

Background Introduction Ultimate Design Goal: − Balance: sensing requirements end-to-end data communication overhead network control effectiveness − With energy efficiency − Through a cross-layer sleep scheduling scheme

Sleep Scheduling Issues Not recommended: Random sleep scheduling − detrimental effect on network connectivity and topology control efficiency Global sleep scheduling − network-wide communication blackout Groups of leaf nodes sleep scheduling − non-leaf nodes depleting battery reserves sooner

Sleep Scheduling Issues Using coordinated sleep scheduling − Realize the benefits: reduced overhearing reduced packet collision simplified topology − Without sacrifice: network connectivity sensing capabilities

SS-Tree Concept

Advantages: − Avoid overburdening any set of nodes from being the sole virtual backbone − Increase monitoring sensitivity (greater event reporting windows) without altering communication duty cycle(reporting frequencies)

SS-Tree Concept --issues to be considered Gaps appearing in between the active period of adjacent SS-Tree

SS-Tree Concept --issues to be considered -- Blackout duration -- Sleep period -- number of mutually adjacent SS-Trees -- Active period Number of distinct live path To guarantee 100% real-time event reporting capability Not feasible due to limited nodal density And high SS-Tree computation complexity Not necessary to approach real-time Intuition suggests the number of SS-Tree Should less than the average nodal degree

SS-Tree Concept --issues to be considered Drawback: timer-driven Data cannot be simultaneously Gathered from all SS- Trees

SS-Tree Operational Stages

Network Initialization: − gather network connectivity information, − compute the SS-Trees − disseminate the sleep schedules Sleep: − shut down the radio transceiver − processor and sensing unit remain active Hibernation: − Shutting down all hardware components − except for a tiny low-power wakeup timer

SS-Tree Operational Stages Active: − all data reporting − network maintenance tasks are performed Failure Recovery: − data sink repair or reconstruct SS-Trees Neighborhood Update: − neighboring nodes exchange local information − for each other ’ s sleep schedule

SS-Tree Computation

A greedy depth-first approach From the bottom-up on a branch-by-branch basis Proceeds in a number of iterations In each iteration an end-to-end minimum cost path is appended to one of the SS-Trees.

SS-Tree Computation

SS-Tree Operational Specifics & Sleep Scheduling Major task – determine an optimal sleep schedule that maximizes energy efficiency Short active period -> high transmission latency Longer active period -> increase sleep time between two consecutive active periods Determine an upper bound of active period − balance low communication duty cycle − monitoring sensitivity − end-to-end packet transmissions

SS-Tree Operational Specifics & Sleep Scheduling Network Layer Routing

SS-Tree Operational Specifics & Sleep Scheduling Some flexible strategies in manipulating application requirements: − Compact query formats shrink packet size by formatting data types reduce hop-by-hop transmission time − Aggressive data aggregation duplicate suppression reduce unnecessary packet exchange − Hop-by-hop ACK in MAC layer instead of end-to end ACK in transport layer reduce energy expenditure

SS-Tree Operational Specifics & Sleep Scheduling

Medium Access Control − Prefer single-channel unslotted CSMA simplicity greater scalability looser time synchronization requirements − Bypass the RTS/CTS handshake long end-to-end propagation delay

SS-Tree Operational Specifics & Sleep Scheduling Timing components constituting a single active period Round-trip time recorded for node I on its respective SS-Tree

SS-Tree Operational Specifics & Sleep Scheduling

IACK works better in reducing the time when the size of C/D packet is comparable to that of EACK

Conclusion and Future Work Following issues will be explored: 1.For a given random topology, what is the maximum number of SS-Trees that can be constructed to minimize the number of shared nodes? 2.For a given number of nodes, what is the optimal method of deployment that ensures 100% coverage of the subject area while maximizing the number of available SS-Trees with minimum shared nodes? 3.What are the suitable neighborhood discovery and failure recovery strategies for the SS-Tree design?

The End