1 EXAM SCHEDULING PROBLEM: AN AHP MODEL FOR PARAMETER ESTIMATION Zehra KAMIŞLI ÖZTÜRK Anadolu University, Open Education Faculty Eskisehir/TURKEY

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 12 Analyzing Semistructured Decision Support Systems Systems Analysis and Design Kendall and Kendall Fifth Edition.
Advertisements

DECISION MODELING WITH Multi-Objective Decision Making
Multi‑Criteria Decision Making
Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) - by Saaty
Vivek Roy Sumit Agarwal Subhash Kumar Parikshit Charan INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT RAIPUR Selection of Post Disaster Humanitarian Logistics Structure.
An Introductory Overview to Multi Criteria Evaluation GEOG 5161: Research Design Professor Kenneth E. Foote Petra Norlund 2010.
1. Introduction 2 In this study, fuzzy logic (FL), multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) and maintenance management (MM) are integrated into one subject.
Introduction to Management Science
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc Course Arrangement !!! Nov. 22,Tuesday Last Class Nov. 23,WednesdayQuiz 5 Nov. 25, FridayTutorial 5.
The Rational Decision-Making Process
Multi Criteria Decision Modeling Preference Ranking The Analytical Hierarchy Process.
THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS. Analytic Hierarchy Process ► Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a multicriteria decision-making system. ► AHP was developed.
MSc project specification Unit PJ45P Dr Jim Briggs
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIES IMPLEMENTATION MODEL
KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM & MINERALS DHAHRAN SAUDI ARABIA DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING ARE 520: Advanced Construction and Maintenance.
Executive Manager Decision Making and Policy Planning, typically with many goals Sometimes even > 1 decision maker (Game Theory, Group Decisions) Linear.
Integration of Design & Control CHEN 4470 – Process Design Practice
Introduction to Management Science
Saturday May 02 PST 4 PM. Saturday May 02 PST 10:00 PM.
A semantic learning for content- based image retrieval using analytical hierarchy process Speaker : Kun Hsiang.
Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies
1 STATISTICS FOR BUSINESS DECISION MAKING Academic year Dott. Francesca Gagliardi.
ENGINEERING YOUR FUTURE
Step 6: Consult Fall/Winter Session Registration Instructions and Timetable ‘H’ indicates 0.5 credit ‘F’ section code indicates course takes place in First.
Computerized Multiple Criteria Decision Making Model for Projects Planning and Implementation By Ali Reda Al-Jaroudi Presented by: Jihad Farhat.
9-1 Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Multicriteria Decision Making Chapter 9.
Multicriteria Decision Making
9-1 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Multicriteria Decision Making Chapter 9.
«Enhance of ship safety based on maintenance strategies by applying of Analytic Hierarchy Process» DAGKINIS IOANNIS, Dr. NIKITAKOS NIKITAS University of.
Presented by Johanna Lind and Anna Schurba Facility Location Planning using the Analytic Hierarchy Process Specialisation Seminar „Facility Location Planning“
Using Network Simulation Heung - Suk Hwang, Gyu-Sung Cho
Column Generation Approach for Operating Rooms Planning Mehdi LAMIRI, Xiaolan XIE and ZHANG Shuguang Industrial Engineering and Computer Sciences Division.
Jason Chen, Ph.D. Professor of MIS School of Business
1 1 Slide © 2004 Thomson/South-Western Chapter 17 Multicriteria Decisions n Goal Programming n Goal Programming: Formulation and Graphical Solution and.
Spreadsheet Modeling and Decision Analysis, 3e, by Cliff Ragsdale. © 2001 South-Western/Thomson Learning Multicriteria Decision Making u Decision.
Incomplete Pairwise Comparison Matrices in Multi-Attribute Decision Making S. Bozóki*, J. Fülöp*, L. Rónyai** * Research Group of Operations.
1 Chapter 16 The Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2 The analytic hierarchy process (AHP), which was developed by Thomas Saaty when he was acting as an adviser.
Chapter 9 - Multicriteria Decision Making 1 Chapter 9 Multicriteria Decision Making Introduction to Management Science 8th Edition by Bernard W. Taylor.
Nuray GİRGİNER Eskisehir Osmangazi University, Bus. Administ. Dep., Turkey, Zehra KAMISLI OZTURK Anadolu University.
UGI2011 Regional Geographic Conference November 14th-18th Santiago-Chile COMPARISON OF ANALYSIS RESULTS FOR TWO DECISION MAKER GROUPS IN MULTICRITERIA.
HOW TO MAKE A TIMETABLE USING GENETIC ALGORITHMS Introduction with an example.
University Course Timetabling with Soft Constraints Hana Rudova, Keith Murray Presented by: Marlien Edward.
Subcontractor Performance Evaluation with Respect to HRM Considerations By: Hamidreza Abbasianjahromi.
A Decision Support System for Supplier Evaluation and Order Allocation M.A. Thesis By Emir Göçen Supervised by Aslı Sencer Department of MIS November 2008.
MAINTENANCE STRATEGY SELECTION BASED ON HYBRID AHP-GP MODEL SUZANA SAVIĆ GORAN JANAĆKOVIĆ MIOMIR STANKOVIĆ University of Niš, Faculty of Occupational Safety.
FINAL EXAM SCHEDULER (FES) Department of Computer Engineering Faculty of Engineering & Architecture Yeditepe University By Ersan ERSOY (Engineering Project)
Agenda for This Week Wednesday, April 27 AHP Friday, April 29 AHP Monday, May 2 Exam 2.
Analytic Hierarchy Process. 2 The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Founded by Saaty in It is a popular and widely used method for multi-criteria.
To accompany Quantitative Analysis for Management, 9e \by Render/Stair/Hanna M1-1 © 2006 by Prentice Hall, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Analytic Hierarchy.
BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Presented By Dr. Mohsen Alardhi College of Technological Studies, Kuwait April 19 th,2009.
FEASIBILITY STUDY.
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
The Analytic Network Process Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback.
Zehra KAMIŞLI ÖZTÜRK Anadolu University, TURKEY Müjgan SAĞIR Eskisehir Osmangazi University, TURKEY.
MCDM Y. İlker TOPCU, Ph.D twitter.com/yitopcu.
It’s Time to Build! SCH06 Stephen Rando. Agenda Schedule build process Room management Validating Running/analyzing the build Running/analyzing the load.
Managerial Economics Linear Programming Aalto University School of Science Department of Industrial Engineering and Management January 12 – 28, 2016 Dr.
Constructing the PAHP-based Decision Support System by Considering the Ambiguity in Decision Making Norihiro Saikawa Department of Computer and Information.
Examination Management System - EMS A Web based Examination Management System Developed for the colleges and institutes to conduct online exams and assessments.
ON ELICITATION TECHNIQUES OF NEAR-CONSISTENT PAIRWISE COMPARISON MATRICES József Temesi Department of Operations Research Corvinus University of Budapest,
ESTIMATING WEIGHT Course: Special Topics in Remote Sensing & GIS Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact: EXT:2257 RG712.
This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Aha! Analytics 2278 Baldwin Drive Phone: (937) , FAX: (866) An Overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
Semih Buyukipekci Selcuk University,Turkey Ali Erbasi
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
A Scoring Model for Job Selection
Agenda for This Week Monday, April 25 AHP Wednesday, April 27
Multicriteria Decision Making
IME634: Management Decision Analysis
Chapter 12 Analyzing Semistructured Decision Support Systems
Presentation transcript:

1 EXAM SCHEDULING PROBLEM: AN AHP MODEL FOR PARAMETER ESTIMATION Zehra KAMIŞLI ÖZTÜRK Anadolu University, Open Education Faculty Eskisehir/TURKEY Assoc.Prof. Dr. Mujgan SAĞIR ÖZDEMİR Eskişehir Osmangazi University Industrial Engineering Department Eskisehir/TURKEY

2 Outline The Goal Timetabling Problems Educational Timetabling Invigilator-Exam Scheduling The AHP Conclusions and Future Works

3 GOAL Constructing a valid multi cirteria decison model. –Robustness –Appropriate method –Qualitative and quantitative factors

4 Timetabling Problems allocation resourcesspace time objectives constraints.Timetabling problems are a kind of scheduling problems that deal with allocation of given resources to objects being placed in space time, in such a way as to satisfy as nearly as possible a set of desirable objectives, subject to constraints.

5 Educational Timetabling The problem of constructing course timetables for academic institutions consists of “allocating the set of courses offered by the university to time periods and classrooms in such a way that no teacher, student or room is used more than once per period and that room capacities are not exceeded”

6 Educational Timetabling Educational Timetabling Problems Exam Scheduling Exam-invigilator assignment Course-timeslot assignment Course-room assignment Course-lecturer-room-timeslot assignment Course Scheduling Course-lecturer assignment Exam-timeslot assignment Exam-room assignment Exam-room-timeslot assignment

7 which invigilators will take part on which exam Invigilator-Exam Assignment Time Slots (TS)Exams Invigilators S1S1 S2S2 S3S3... TS 1 Exam 1 ???? Exam 2 ???? TS 2 Exam 3 ???? Exam 4 ???? Exam 5 ???? TS 3 Exam 6 ????..????..????

8 The context diagram of automated invigilator assignment system

9 Multiobjective Structure Simultaneous minimization of total assignment cost, the total deviation from average exam weights the total deviation from average number of exams in undesired time slots

10 Constraints … continue Hard Constraints One invigilator must be assigned to maximum one exam at time slot t required number of invigilators must be assinged to exactly each exam Pre assignments must be satisfied Soft Constraints (description of user’ whishes) balancing of the total exam weights of each invigilators number of exams in undesired time slots,

11 Mathematical Model subject to C1C1C1C1 C2C2C2C2 C3C3C3C3 C4C4C4C4 C5C5C5C5

12 AHP tangibleintangible An Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) model is developed to weigh different criteria of the problem. AHP has been a popular research and application tool for multicriteria decision-making. The AHP was developed by Saaty [Saaty, 1986; Saaty, 1980] and has been identified as an important approach to multi-criteria decision making problems of choose and prioritization. There can be several tangible and intangible criteria that influence the decision problems.

13 AHP judgments preferencesIn the AHP process decision makers give judgments about relative importance for each criterion, and then they specify preferences on each criterion for each decision alternative. The first step of AHP is the definition of decision problem and determination of its objective. Then, the decision criteria are defined in the form of a hierarchy. pair-wiseTo make the pair-wise comparisons, the comparison matrices of criteria and decision alternatives are constructed. weightsBy making the comparisons, the weights (importance) of each criterion are obtained. In the final step, by hierarchical synthesis, the weights (priorities) of the alternatives are obtained.

14 AHP Model of the Problem Goal: Find the most important criteria of invigilator-exam assignment problem Invigilator RequirementsExam parameters Assignments to undesired time slots Equally loaded exam schedules Time slotDayType Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday 9 am -11 am 11 am- 1 pm 2 pm- 4 pm 4 pm- 6 pm Open book Test based Paper based Without answer sheet Duration 60 minutes 120 minutes 90 minutes

15 Weights of all criteria

16 Sensitivity Analysis

17 Sensitivity Analysis

18 Conclusions and Future Works Considering preferences affect the overall performance of the system Exam scheduling problem is a time consuming task that is usually solved manually The parameters of invigilator-exam assignment problem are evaluated

19 Future work

20 Future Work 20

21 An integer programming approach to classification problems based on polyhedral conic functions Thank you … EXAM SCHEDULING PROBLEM: AN AHP MODEL FOR PARAMETER ESTIMATION Zehra KAMIŞLI ÖZTÜRK Anadolu University, Open Education Faculty Eskisehir/TURKEY Assoc.Prof. Dr. Mujgan SAĞIR ÖZDEMİR Eskişehir Osmangazi University Industrial Engineering Department Eskisehir/TURKEY