A teachers’ project: “Towards learner autonomy”. A teachers’ project: towards learner autonomy §Rationale §What we wanted to achieve §The process §Problems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning at Lanyon High B Davies. Groups Previously students were seated around the classroom and were not participating well in the lesson. The structure.
Advertisements

Practical Work in A-level Science Is it valuable and justified, given limited contact time and content-heavy specifications?
Primary MCQ Course Evaluation September 2010 Mean score, maximum being 5.
How to teach heterogeneous groups
Copyright 2003, Christine L. Abela, M.Ed. I’m failing… help! Straight facts to help you try to rebound!
AVID Elective Overview
Teacher Implemented Learning Strategies for English Language Learners Amanda DeFelice October 31, 2007.
© 2014 wheresjenny.com ROLE PLAY STAFF IN CALL CENTERS AND TELEMARKETING FIRMS.
College Algebra Course Redesign Southeast Missouri State University.
1 Know Your Students Teaching Effectively in Higher Education in Hong Kong.
Dealing with diversity: Rethinking the Lecture – Seminar Format in Language and Content Provision Joanne Hooker and John Holder.
Whose learning is it anyway?
Problem Based Learning and Teacher Technology Training.
Student teachers’ attitudes towards subject knowledge and teaching in mathematics: The importance of understanding Patrick Barmby School of Education &
Erasmus+ Cooperation for the Innovation and Exchange of Good Practices Strategic Partnerships for School Education 1 September August 2016 “How.
UNIWERSYTET MIKOLAJA KOPERNIKA Turon, Polen – Subject integration through Transitions and boundary crossing Assistant Professor Vibeke.
What do I do if I don’t know the answer? Instructor: Emily Gregor Greenleaf TATP Co-ordinator
Informing Science + IT Education Conferences
STUDY SKILLS AND SEMINAR CORNERSTONE OF EXCELLENCE AND ACADEMIC SUCCESS Maria Martin Academic Facilitator Century High School.
INTRODUCTION.- PROGRAM EVALUATION
The possible effects of target language learning prior to secondary dual language school studies by Anna Várkuti 10th Summer School of Psycholinguistics.
FANTASTIC FACTORING!!! Greatest Common Factor Difference of Squares Perfect Square Trinomial Leading Coefficient of One Leading Coefficient Not One All.
Student Centered Learning
© Curriculum Foundation1 Section 2 The nature of the assessment task Section 2 The nature of the assessment task There are three key questions: What are.
School Innovation in Science Formerly Science in Schools An overview of the SIS Model & supporting research Russell Tytler Faculty of Education, Deakin.
Mixed-level English classrooms What my paper is about: Basically my paper is about confirming with my research that the use of technology in the classroom.
Thinking Actively in a Social Context T A S C.
Dr Elena Luchinskaya, Lancaster University/ Leeds Metropolitan University, UK.
Paragraph Writing Problems. Paragraph Writing Problems 1 University differ from High School such as number of lectures, time of lectures and exams. First.
Applying creativity in CS high school education - criteria, teaching example and evaluation Romeike, R. (2007). Applying creativity in CS high school education.
The Student-Centered Classroom
Business Discipline Breakout Session Summer 2000 ION Conference Facilitated By: Marcy Satterwhite.
The Impact of the MMP on Student Achievement Cindy M. Walker, PhD Jacqueline Gosz, MS University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee.
Lack of Learning or Lack of Studying? An Inquiry into Low Exam Scores Katherine M. Sauer Metropolitan State College of Denver February.
'Learner Autonomy through the production of a public history resource' Emma Robertson.
Why did I get a 5 out of 10? Connecting standards, assessment, and instruction: the power of rubrics. Peace Corps Erin Bohler, Msg. TEFL Teacher Trainer.
Reporter: Ching-ting Lin Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Information Communication Technology and the New University A View on e-Learning Cheol, H. O. (2003).
Six Tips for Talking Technical When Your Audience Isn’t By Janis Robinson Presenter: Samir Chahid.
CHILDREN’S PERCEPTIONS OF LEARNING WITH EDUCATIONAL GAMES USING IPOD TOUCHES Yasemin Allsop ICT Coordinator, Wilbury Primary School (UK)
VISUAL LEARNING – Interview with learners Our target group: Adults which are participating at training programmes Adults who wants to learn foreign languages.
HAVING YOUR SAY Scottish Procurement Directorate Joint Improvement Team and Learning Disability Alliance Scotland.
Social Factors Collecting Information on the impact of Social Factors on Your Teams Performance.
COSEE California Communicating Ocean Sciences Session 4: Building Towards Inquiry.
2009 Assessment of the Learning Edge Academic Program (LEAP) Tony M. Lentz & Talia Carroll.
Difference between an “A” student and a “C” Student ► They are always prepared for class. They always respond when called on. Their attention to detail.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
The Relationship between Elementary Teachers’ Beliefs and Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving Misfer AlSalouli May 31, 2005.
FORESTUR How to work… …with this training platform? …with this methodology?
Bringing it all together: Strategies students apply when synthesizing information Ilse Born-Lechleitner Centre for Business Languages and Intercultural.
Sara Davila 2009 Task Based Learning and Performance Assessment Low Budget, No Budget, Low Prep.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. CONTENT-BASED.
Patrik Hultberg Kalamazoo College
AN INQUIRY INTO THE STUDENTS’ READINESS TOWARDS SELF- DIRECTED LEARNING L.M. Kapila Bandara Faculty of Education University of Colombo.
Differentiation What is meant by differences between learners?
My Action Research Tracey Low. How do I develop a classroom learning programme which stimulates, engages and extends more able students in their learning?
Project Impact CURR 231 Curriculum and Instruction in Math Session 3 Chapters 3.
Idiom of the Day IN THE LOOP To keep someone informed and up-to-date about what’s happening – usually in the workplace.
Ayoub Kafyulilo DUCE Challenges and Opportunities of Integrating ICT in Education.
Strategies for blended learning in an undergraduate curriculum Benjamin Kehrwald, Massey University College of Education.
HOW TO INTERVIEW - SUPPLEMENT Read me first! This is a copy of a session from Toomas that was created by an HR consultancy (CVO) for an AIESEC conference;
READING WITH YOUR CHILD USING HIGHER ORDER QUESTIONING TO SUPPORT HOW WE TEACH READING AT SCHOOL AND HOW YOU CAN SUPPORT AT HOME.
How learners learn in my teaching world…
International support programme
Factors facilitating academic success: a student perspective
Informing Science + IT Education Conferences
Action learning Session Two
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS TOWARD ACTIVE LEARNING IN STATISTIC 2 COURSE AND THEIR ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Vanny Septia Efendi.
Difference between an “A” student and a “C” Student
Managing Your Time in College
Presentation transcript:

A teachers’ project: “Towards learner autonomy”

A teachers’ project: towards learner autonomy §Rationale §What we wanted to achieve §The process §Problems §The experience §The teachers’ opinions §The students’ opinions

Rationale: Lack of motivation of the students in traditional classes. Belief that schools need to be better adjusted to the students’ world. §Do students learn better using I.T.? §Project designed by the R+D coordinator

What we wanted to achieve §Design a learning unit of the subject we teach: l use materials already made (CD-rom, Internet..) or create new ones. l Methodology should focus on the learners’ autonomy. §Teach the units using the materials created. §Where possible, contrast with a class taught in the traditional way. §Students and teachers fill in questionnaires to evaluate the experience.

The process à7 Teams of teachers according to subject area and level. àTraining sessions in programmes such as hot-potatoes, click, multigestor, power- point, dreamweaver. àAgreement on the design of the units. àDesign of the assessment questionnaires for the students and teachers. àProblem solving and follow up sessions.

Problems Some teachers dropped out because: §They had to create the materials in their own time. §Some did not feel confident enough in the use of basic programmes. §It was the first experience in unit design for most teachers. §Some were not motivated enough if they were not going to teach the unit that the team chose. §Day to day life does not leave much time for meetings and doing personal work.

The experience: §Creation of 7 learning units for CFGM (vocational studies), 2nd and 4th year High School. §Materials created were used in the classes: In 2 classes it was possible to compare the same unit taught in 2 different ways. §There was no comparison of the academic results in the respective exams.

The materials Sample of units: §Science: “Cinematics” §The first World war §The Second world war §Geometry: “Quadrilaterals”

The teachers’ opinions Programmes used: §-Word, §- Power point, Excel, Internet explorer §-Access, Multigestor, Hotpotatoes... Photoshop §The programmes used to create the materials are the same as the ones used by the students to go through the unit. Material used §Text book, notbook, tape,... About the material created or used

The teachers’ opinions Percentage of alredy made materials used (internet, CD-roms...) §Varies from 90% to 10%. Average 55%. Preparation time of the unit and the classes §Between 15 and 80 hours. It seems that the higher the level the more time is invested. §Everyone agrees that they would spend half the time to create another unit. Material already made: §Most of it, from the course book and materials from previous years. Preparation time : §Three hours (most materials were already prepared) About the material created or used

The teachers’ opinions What took you most time? §searching for materials § Creating the desired format. §preparing the tests Satisfaction level with the material created. §Very high (this was also the case in the traditional class) Things that you would like to change §More attractive format §Include more links §More evaluation activities §Find more communication strategies between students and teachers.

The teachers’opinions Problems: §Very few technical problems §Some low speed computers §Some links didn’t work §Different computing skills of the students There were no references to any other problems. About the experience in the class

The teachers’ opinions about the students’ response Motivation: between high(4/5) and very high (5/5). Achievement of the objectives : high (4/5) Participation and implication of the students: quite a lot (4/5) Benefit for the students of this type of methodology: § Higher motivation for learning §More autonomy §Easier to deal with mixed ability classes. §More personal work §Better result and presentation of the work Motivation: average (3/5) Achievement of the objectives: high (4/5) Participation and implication of the students : (3/5) Benefit for the students of this type of methodology: The presentation of the contents by the teacher focus on the main ideas of the content

Teachers’ opinion Problems §Not enough computing skills in some cases. §Danger of getting lost in so much information. §Not used to these type of classes. Problems §The teacher is the center of the class. §The dialogue is one way (sometimes it is a monologue) §Boredom of the students who do not follow the class About the students’ response

The teachers’ opinion Where is the teacher during the class? Facing the students, next to the blackboard Benefits of this type of class for the teacher Easier to control if something is understood by looking at the students. About the role of the teacher Where is the teacher during the class? Back of the class or going around students. Benefits for the teacher -less tiring -results are more satisfactory -more motivating -more individual coaching -student centered Problems -lack of computing skills/ technical problems. -more preparation than class hours. -more difficult to control some students.

The teachers’ opinions The use of IT involves a change in the traditional concept of class: preparation, position of the teacher, type of room used, organisation of work, class management, relation with the students and between students,... Final comments

The students’ opinions What did you learn in this unit? IT classes: quite a lot. Traditional class: little

The students’ opinions When you had a question what did you do? Ask the teacher so he could answer individually, 60 % little, 15 % never Ask another student, 55% a lot; 35% little Check through the material, 47 % a lot I didn’t do anything; 67% always tried to solve their questions. IT class: (67%) always tried to solve questions Traditional class: (37%) always answer the questions

The students’ opinions What you learnt in this unit was mainly due to … Teachers’ general explanation, teachers individual explanation, another students help, own research Differences between groups depending on the way the teachers teach. Big difference between the group who used IT and the traditional class: Traditional class: 76% learnt mostly from the teacher and 20 % from personal research. IT class 50% due to personal research and 23 % to the teachers’ explanations.

The students’ opinions During the class what did you devote most time? ITclass (109): (91%) spent class time working (72%) speaking to other students about the unit. (42%) listening to the teacher 85% consider they have wasted little time during classes. Traditional class (25): 84% spent most time working 88% spent listening to the teacher, 20% spent talking to other students about the unit.

The students’ opinion What did you think about this unit? Most students think of the unit as interesting, easy and profitable. The same unit; traditional class: 60 % boring; IT class 29 % boring

Thank you