Stakeholder Attitudes in Assessing Outdoor Recreational and Open Space Needs in Utah: A Rural--Urban Dichotomy Steve Burr and Dale Blahna Michael Butkus.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pinellas by Design: A Blueprint for Updating the Countywide Plan Pinellas Planning Council May 18, 2011.
Advertisements

From – A Report of the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21 st Century by Michael Gallis & Associates, 1999 (known as the “Gallis Report”) Knowledge.
Interfacing Initiatives Hometown Collaboration Initiative (HCI)  Expansion of leadership and civic engagement to capitalize on innovative strategies 
The Mystic River Corridor Strategy Project Metropolitan Area Planning Council Boston Redevelopment Authority City of Chelsea City of Everett City of Malden.
Cardener River Corridor Guiding Principles Diversity of Economic Development Scale of Growth –Incentives for Infill and Re-use –Appropriate to existing.
TRI-REGIONAL HERITAGE TOURISM PROJECT. Project Background  Sponsors—North Carolina’s Northeast, North Carolina’s Eastern Region, and North Carolina’s.
Positioning Trails for Community Value. Why Bother Formally Positioning Trails? Improve perceptions held by citizens and elected officials so that the.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Statewide Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah.
Long-Range Transportation Planning in Utah: Summary of Research Results from the UDOT 2003 Benchmark Study Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism.
High Growth Counties: Opportunities for Pinal County Pinal County Comprehensive Plan Curt Dunham AICP Partners for Strategic Action, Inc. Comprehensive.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Mountainland Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Bear River Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
The Challenge of Meeting Open Space Needs in Utah Steve Burr and Dale Blahna Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State University.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Southwestern Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
1 Utah State University’s Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Dr. Steve Burr Director Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Central Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State University Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Board.
Governor’s Trail Initiative Preliminary Results from the Statewide Telephone Poll Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State University.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Wasatch Front Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
DATA VISUALIZATION NEEDS IN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Trish Settles, AICP Principal Planner/Project.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Bureau of Reclamation Overview Christopher Cutler Deputy Chief Boulder Canyon Operations Office.
REGIONAL FORUM FOR BEVERLY, DANVERS AND SALEM DECEMBER 8, 2010 North Shore Regional Strategic Planning Project.
 Planning provides the foundation for conservation district programs and operations.  The planning process broadly defines the vision of the future.
Sustainable Tourism development
The Economics of Rivers (with an emphasis on the Verde) Doug Von Gausig, Verde River Institute, May 16, 2014.
Quality Growth Communities Presentation to the American Planning Association Utah Chapter Convention September 24, 2004.
Burl Carraway. Purpose of Redesign Shape and influence use of forest land on a scale and in a way that optimizes public benefits from trees and forests.
A Biodiversity Strategy for PMHC LGA. Policy background Key Natural Environment Strategy: To maintain and improve existing environmental values in the.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Blackstone Valley Prioritization Project Blackstone River-Users Conference September 18, 2012.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
May 27 th, 2003FRCV Conservation Plan Summary and Status Rock Creek Valley Conservation Plan & Priorities Prepared by Friends of Rock Creek Valley with.
 The SNC’s mission is to initiate, encourage and support efforts that improve the environmental, economic and social well- being of the Sierra Nevada.
© 2007 PMP. All rights reserved. Wednesday 18 th July South Northamptonshire Council Open Space, Sport and Recreation Study and Green Space Strategy.
Laguna Creek Watershed Council Development of the Laguna Creek Watershed Management Action Plan & It’s Relevance to the Elk Grove Drainage Master Planning.
Why things (supposedly) don’t happen in Hampton Roads Few coordinating bodies. Few coordinating bodies. Dillon Rule. Dillon Rule. 16 Independent cities.
Urban Sprawl.
Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Visioning Process Counties and Towns of Culpeper, Fauquier, Madison, Orange and Rappahannock Bruce Dotson Tanya Denckla Institute.
Jefferson County Agricultural Preservation and Land Use Plan Jefferson County’s Comprehensive Plan: Process and Strategies Presented to: Dane County Officials.
City of Suwanee 2030 comprehensive plan. TODAY’S AGENDA Process Update Community Agenda Framework “Compass” Review  Images and Questions  Comp Plan.
1 Status of AC Input from Last Meeting. 2 Overview  Input received on Strategic Planning Elements (Mission, Vision, Guiding Principles) & the 7 Key Content.
A Statewide Telephone Survey of Utah Residents’ Attitudes Toward Recreational Trails Uintah Basin Planning District Results Institute for Outdoor Recreation.
200/768_K 0 Sustainable Growth & Development Subcommittee Report Committee for a Sustainable Emerald Coast May 17, 2007.
Understanding and Improving Walkable Caribbean Urban Heritage: St Georges, Paramaribo, Bridgetown and East Port of Spain.
Why Plan? Unprecedented pressure for growth and change To identify development and preservation areas over next 20 years To recommend types of land uses.
SCORP Keys to Success Involvement-Steering Committee Public Input-Surveys and Focus Groups Comprehensive Evaluation of Statewide Recreational Needs and.
Lancaster Open Space & Recreation Public Forum March 22, 2009.
San Diego Regional Comprehensive Plan Presentation to Senate Transportation and Housing Committee February 8, 2005.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
Merrimack Conservation Partnership.  In 2010 the Merrimack River was identified by the US Forest Service as the most threatened watershed in the nation.
Tug Hill Commission Watertown, New York. Tug Hill region of New York covers 2,100 square miles between Lake Ontario and the Adirondack Mountains.
Dawn Ganje, Marketing Management and Colleen MacRae, Polk County Collaborative – MACMH September 2006 Challenge and Opportunity:
Community Wildfire Protection Planning: HFRA and Beyond.
Community Redevelopment for Eastside Report on Advisory Committee Input and Request for Board Direction June 26, 2012.
2060 Florida Transportation Plan Florida Model Task Force Meeting November 10, 2009.
Draft Public Involvement Plan for: Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation August 19, 2010.
Neighborhood Planning Process Lacoochee/Trilby Neighborhoods.
T H E P O R T L A N D P L A N A Comprehensive Plan for Portland in 2040 September 2007.
TRAP 5 th interregional meeting & Site Visits Limerick & Lough Derg, Ireland 9 th October 2013 CP3 GP6 Regional Planning Guidelines PP3 – Mid-West Regional.
Strategies for Colorado River Water Management Jaci Gould Deputy Regional Director Lower Colorado Region.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 3 – NATURAL & CULTURAL RESOURCE ELEMENTS 1/09/2014.
RESOURCE POTENTIAL AND CONSERVATION VALUES. Traditional Land Use and Occupancy Archeology, Rare Features, Historic Sites Wildlife Habitat Value 2/15.
2015 CLARENDON TOWN PLAN Barbara Noyes Pulling Rutland Regional Planning Commission.
Office of Greenways & Trails
Protecting the Quality of our Water
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Bannock County Comprehensive Plan
Rural Economic Development Initiative (REDI).
Presentation transcript:

Stakeholder Attitudes in Assessing Outdoor Recreational and Open Space Needs in Utah: A Rural--Urban Dichotomy Steve Burr and Dale Blahna Michael Butkus and Judy Kurtzman Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State University

2 Rapid Growth Cities and Communities Experiencing Growth Rates Exceeding the National Average A Number of Problems: lack of infrastructure increased cost of living changes in land values lack of planning to manage growth resulting environmental and social impacts perceived decline in quality of life

3 Certainly True in the State of Utah High rate of in-migration Highest birthrate in the nation Concentrated growth-- sixth most urban state High rate of land and resource use Poor zoning regulations encouraging sprawl

4 More Than Four-Fifths of Utah’s Population Now Lives in a Metropolis --the Greater Wasatch-- a Ten County “Blob” of Urbanization l By % increase in GW-- 1.6M to 2.7M people Adding 43,000 people every year 84% increase in developed land (590 square miles) l By Five million people in Utah The Greater Wasatch

5 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project l Purpose: Identify open space needs, priorities, and initiatives for each of the seven Planning Districts in Utah. l Focus on issues related to: outdoor recreation amenity values ecological services

6 Utah’s 7 Planning Districts and 29 Counties l Bear River l Wasatch Front l Mountainland l Uintah Basin l Central l Southeastern l Southwestern

7 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project l Seek input from key stakeholders: land management and planning professionals; state and local officials; community leaders and residents. l Identify action strategies for addressing open space needs.

8 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Three Phase Process l Phase 1: l Phase 2: l Phase 3: Utah’s Great Outdoors Conference Statewide Key Informant Mail Survey Public Meetings--Presentations of Findings and Opportunities for Stakeholder Input

9 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Utah’s Great Outdoors Conference l 176 participants in 19 different groups responded to these two questions: What are the most pressing outdoor recreation and open space needs in your region of the state for the next 20 years? What are the most pressing outdoor recreation and open space problems or needs for specific towns and communities in your region?

10 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Utah’s Great Outdoors Conference Results: l Question # items identified: “Preserve the wetlands and wildlife areas surrounding the Great Salt Lake.” l Question # items identified: “Small communities have insufficient funds for purchase of critical lands or development of recreation facilities.”

11 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Statewide Key Informant Survey l To further validate and prioritize the importance of outdoor recreation and open space needs for each Planning District that were identified at the Conference (7-point Likert Scale). l To obtain stakeholder attitudes toward 25 open space protection tools (7-point Likert Scale).

12 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Statewide Key Informant Survey l 287 Surveys Mailed l 182 Returned l 63% Response Rate Utah’s Great Outdoors A survey conducted by Utah State University’s Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism and the Utah Division of Parks and Recreation Spring 1999

13 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Statewide Key Informant Survey Results--Open Space Needs l Statewide: Cooperation/partnerships in planning for and provision of open space; Trails/corridors for recreation and access; Education for children and adults directed at proper use, minimizing impacts, and importance of open space; Developing access and managing open space.

14 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Statewide Key Informant Survey Results--Open Space Needs l Northern Utah: Water quality and quantity, wetlands, and wildlife habitat; Protecting access to mountain canyons and public lands; Open space protection in urban, suburban, and developing areas; Land acquisition (identification and funding).

15 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Statewide Key Informant Survey Results--Open Space Needs l Rural Utah: Long-term, reliable funding for development and maintenance; Long-range planning (cooperation and assistance); Specific projects with economic benefits; Community quality of life and economic benefits; Historic/heritage sites.

16 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Public Meetings l Present prioritized listing of outdoor recreation and open space needs for each Planning District. l Seek out stakeholder comments on these findings. l Ask participants to identify existing and potential projects addressing outdoor recreation and open space needs.

17 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Public Meetings l Presentations: To approximately 350 individuals at 19 different meetings throughout the state; Association of Governments (AOG) meetings in each Planning District; Travel Region meetings; City/County Councils meetings; Special Groups (e.g. Public Lands Forum)

18 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Results of Public Meetings l Over 300 specific outdoor recreation and open space projects identified for the seven Planning Districts in Utah. l A broader picture of the social and political context in which open space planning must occur in Utah.

19 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident ¶ Two broad types of open space needs: Specific Purpose Projects individual trails water projects visitor centers heritage sites parks General Concerns funding education partnerships planning needs

20 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident · There are two different orientations toward open space values. Some major differences exist between stakeholders in urban/suburban and rural planning districts regarding the purpose and value of open space.

21 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident l Urban/Suburban stakeholders emphasize protection of open space for non-use or intrinsic values, along with recreational and access needs. For community aesthetics and amenities For controlling growth and development For providing ecological services -wildlife habitat -wetlands protection -water quality

22 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident l Stakeholders in rural areas are more concerned with the use value or instrumental value of open space. To help meet local economic needs through outdoor recreation and tourism development To retain public access for recreation To retain traditions of multiple use of natural resources on public lands

23 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident l Key challenge to successful, long-term statewide planning and funding efforts... …is providing opportunities to enhance both the use and environmental protection roles of open space simultaneously.

24 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Recommendations l Linking these two orientations is possible. l Will require an explicit and balanced effort to bring these together. l Especially important to encourage support and collaboration with rural areas of the state.

25 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident ¸ Open space linear corridors and water-related resources are critical. Linear corridors mentioned most often: -trails and paths -bikeways -OHV routes Corridors implied by projects mentioned for: -parkways-riparian corridors -riverways -wildlife corridors -canyon protection & access -corridors linking communities & towns

26 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident Water-related projects are considered important throughout the state. In rural areas, focus is on providing or improving reservoir and river recreation. In urban/suburban areas, water quality, wetlands protection, and wildlife habitat are of equal or greater importance.

27 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Recommendations l To enhance long-term benefits from statewide coordination and funding will require Specific Purpose Projects to be designed to simultaneously meet recreational development and use goals along with natural resource protection goals.

28 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident ¹ Funding, funding, funding… Stakeholders throughout the Planning Districts view funding as a key role for state agencies. Not simply providing funds, but also providing technical advice and coordination for identifying and acquiring funds.

29 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Recommendations l Provide a larger portion of funds to rural Planning Districts. Distributing funds on per capita basis is problematic. Many urban/suburban residents travel to rural areas of the state for recreation. Tourists visit many of the rural areas. Puts a higher level of pressure on rural resources and infrastructure.

30 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes & Recommendations l Long-term and consistent sources of funding important for rural areas. l Long-term resource protection and amenity/ecological service values are statewide concerns. l Funding should be used to encourage planning districts to help protect these broader social values.

31 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes Evident º Local Control--State Coordination In general, stakeholders see great value in statewide coordination of open space planning and funding efforts, but at the same time want to retain local control.

32 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Recommendations l Focus on projects that meet local needs. Large pool of existing and potential open space projects in all planning regions. Priorities can be identified by local stakeholders. Local needs should be a starting point for statewide planning and funding priorities.

33 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Recommendations l But also focus on projects that meet broader state needs. Funding criteria should recognize both use and non-use values of open space. Funding should help meet local needs as well as broader state level needs. Open space planning and funding must be a joint effort between local and state agencies and stakeholders.

34 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes & Recommendations l Planning and funding criteria for a project might include evidence that it: Meets both local and state level needs; Has local community support; Is part of larger scale planning efforts;

35 Utah’s Great Outdoors Open Space Project Major Themes & Recommendations l Planning and funding criteria for a project might include evidence that it: Meets objectives related to amenity and ecological service values... even if the project focuses on use; Is part of a collaboration or partnership; Has an educational component.

36 Stakeholder Attitudes in Assessing Outdoor Recreational and Open Space Needs in Utah: A Rural--Urban Dichotomy Steve Burr & Dale Blahna Michael Butkus & Judy Kurtzman Institute for Outdoor Recreation and Tourism Utah State University 5220 Old Main Hill Logan, Utah (435)