28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn1 Update to the Upstream Cherenkov  -  Separation Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab May 2, 2005 Detector Tele-Meeting.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Neutrinos from kaon decay in MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn Columbia University MiniBooNE beamline overview Kaon flux predictions Kaon measurements in MiniBooNE.

Advertisements

Simulation of Neutrino Factory beam and quasielastic scattering off electrons in the near detector Yordan Karadzhov University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”

Quartz Plate Calorimeter Prototype Ugur Akgun The University of Iowa APS April 2006 Meeting Dallas, Texas.

PID activities 1. Summary of work/activities since last CM in Berkeley 2. PID parallel session in Frascati 3. Topics specific to each subdetector CKOV1.

CKOV1 folded geometry 1. Optimization 2. Pion-muon separation 3. Instrumented area 4. Possible developments November 16, 2005 Gh. Grégoire Contents.

Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?

Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Characteristics of Cherenkov light at low momenta (180 < p < 280 MeV/c) 2. Layout and characterization of the neutron beam.

30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.

Printed by MICE is a Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment running at the Rutherford-Appleton Laboratory, Chilton UK. Cooled muon beams.

1 MICE Beamline PID w Aerogel Counters Lucien CremaldiAerogel R&D and Test Beam Ghislain GregoireDesign and Simulation Don SummersAerogel Procurement &

Mar 31, 2005Steve Kahn -- Ckov and Tof Detector Simulation 1 Ckov1, Ckov2, Tof2 MICE Pid Tele-Meeting Steve Kahn 31 March 2005.

Global Particle Identification Software Requirements Steve Kahn Mice Collaboration Meeting 31 March 2004.

Review of PID simulation & reconstruction in G4MICE Yordan Karadzhov Sofia university “St. Kliment Ohridski” Content : 1 TOF 2 Cerenkov.

MICE analysis meeting - (6/4/2006) 1 Update on MICE – step III M. Apollonio – University of Oxford.

1 G4MICE downstream distributions G4MICE plans Rikard Sandström Universite de Geneve MICE collaboration meeting 27/6-05.

March 31, Status of the TOF, Ckov and Virtual Detector Packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Laboratory Mice Collaboration Meeting March.

Beam line characterization with the TOFs1 Demonstrating the emittance-momentum matrix Mark Rayner, CM26 California, 24 March Initial.

MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.

Software parallel session summary MICE collaboration meeting INFN, Frascati 27/6-05.

Could CKOV1 become RICH? 1. Simulations 2. Sensitive area of the detection plane 3. Example of a workable solution 4. Geometrical efficiency of the photon.

Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.

Dec 2005Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 Improving MuCal Design o Why we need an improved design o Improvement Principle o Quick Simulation, Analysis & Results.

1 Progress report on Calorimeter design comparison simulations MICE detector phone conference Rikard Sandström.

Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn October 15, 2003.

Find the period of the function y = 4 sin x

Jun 27, 2005S. Kahn -- Ckov1 Simulation 1 Ckov1 Simulation and Performance Steve Kahn June 27, 2005 MICE Collaboration PID Meeting.

Neutrino Study Group Dec 21, 2001 Brookhaven Neutrino Super-BeamStephen Kahn Page 1 Horn and Solenoid Capture Systems for a BNL Neutrino Superbeam Steve.

Stephen KahnParticle ID Software Mice Collaboration Meeting Page 1 Particle ID Software Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 27 March 2003.

27 Jun 2005S. Kahn -- Tof/Ckov Status1 Status of TOF and Ckov Sub- packages in G4Mice Steve Kahn 27 June 2005.

TOF/ACC test Overview M. Yoshida Osaka Univ.. TOF / ACC in the prototype test For the prototype test in May, we will need PID: –TOF counter Distinguish.

Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.

24/11/2014MAUS Status, A. Dobbs, MPB Talk2 24/11/2014MAUS Status, A. Dobbs, MPB Talk3 CKOV – Threshold Cherenkov detectors (aerogel) TOF – Three Time.

A Reconstruction Algorithm for a RICH detector for CLAS12 Ahmed El Alaoui RICH Workchop, Jefferson Lab, newport News, VA November th 2011.

GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.

Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Particle Accelerator Conference, May 2009, Vancouver, Canada Particle Production in the MICE Beam Line Jean-Sebastien.

Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.

Apr. 4, KEK JHF-SK neutrino workshop 1 e appearance search Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK - IPNS)

Cherenkov Counters for SoLID Z.-E. Meziani on behalf of Simona Malace & Haiyan Gao (Duke University) Eric Fuchey (Temple University) SoLID Dry Run Review,

Luminosity Monitor UKNF Meeting 7 June 2010 Paul Soler, David Forrest Danielle MacLennan.

Status of GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell September 10, 2004.

NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.

1 Beam and Target Issues Chris Booth 5 th May 2004.

1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.

Oct 15, 2003 Video Conference Energy Deposition Steve Kahn Page 1 Energy Deposition in MICE Absorbers and Coils Steve Kahn November 2, 2003.

Resolution and radiative corrections A first order estimate for pbar p  e + e - T. H. IPN Orsay 05/10/2011 GDR PH-QCD meeting on « The nucleon structure.

One,Two pion channels from PE target August 2014 (~10 hours of beam) 50 MLN events (1.2 shift) Day 232/233 Piotr & Witek.

Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.

KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.

1 MICE Beamline PID w Aerogel Counters Ghislain Gregoire, Don Summers, Lucien Cremaldi*, MICE Collaboration Meeting, FNAL, Jun 06.

FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.

Running plan Step I.1 Basic radiation levels. I.1.1 ISIS running with beam elements on, target off, beam stop shut. Establish permanent MICE monitoring.

Aerogel Cherenkov Counters for the ALICE Detector G. Paić Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares UNAM For the ALICE VHMPID group.

MICE CM39 St Catherine’s, Oxford, 26 June 2014 Paul Soler Instrumentation Global Commissioning Plan.

RF background, update on analysis Rikard Sandström, Geneva University MICE Analysis phone conference, October 30, 2007.

April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.

M. Bonesini - CM 22 RAL October 081 TOF0 status M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.

Calorimeter design & simulations for Stage I Rikard Sandström University of Geneva MICE PID phone conference

TOF Emittance Pion Emittance Measurement with the TOFs? Mark Rayner 11 December 2008.

1 Plannar Active Absorber Calorimeter Adam Para, Niki Saoulidou, Hans Wenzel, Shin-Shan Yu Fermialb Tianchi Zhao University of Washington ACFA Meeting.

1 Updated Run Plans. K.Tilley, MICO, 07/02/08 - pre-commissioning - Target, - beamline functionality - detectors, particle production - decay solenoid.

Monte Carlo simulation of the particle identification (PID) system of the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) Mice is mainly an accelerator physics.

CKOV1 design status 1. Generation of muon and pion beam files 2. PID performances with water radiator 3. Does it help with fluorocarbon FC72 ? 4. Conclusion.

or getting rid of the give-away particles in a test-beam environment

Luminosity Monitor Status

MICE Collaboration Meeting

MICE Beamline PID w Aerogel Counters

Pure  exposure for e/ separation

PARTICLE FLUX CALCULATION-III

A summary of world-wide test beam facilities

Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K

Presentation transcript:

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn1 Update to the Upstream Cherenkov  -  Separation Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab May 2, 2005 Detector Tele-Meeting

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn2 Simulation Running Conditions Using a 10 cm C 6 F 14 radiator for these calculations: Produces more  c (and PE) by a factor of 5. A traversing muon loses ~26 MeV in energy in radiator. A thicker radiator should not affect the  thresholds so we should not a priori improve the separation (other than having enough light) The beam contamination has the same momentum distribution as the muons. The relative number of PE from  and  now have meaning. The initial sample has 50%  and 50% . Samples with mono-chromatic momentum are run 180, 200, 220, 240, 260 MeV/c samples.

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn3 180 MeV/c:  c Generated by Traversing 

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn4 200 MeV/c:  c Generated by Traversing 

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn5 220 MeV/c:  c Generated by Traversing 

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn6 240 MeV/c:  c Generated by Traversing 

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn7 260 MeV/c:  c Generated by Traversing 

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn8 180 MeV/c: PE Seen in PMTs from 

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn9 200 MeV/c: PE Seen in PMTs from 

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn MeV/c: PE Seen in PMTs from 

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn MeV/c: PE Seen in PMTs from 

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn MeV/c: PE Seen in PMTs from 

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn13 Separatibility of pions from muons. Defining the overlap of the distributions of the number of PE seen from a muon and pion traversing the radiator as below we see that we can reasonably separate pions from muons up to about 240 MeV/c.

28 April 2005Ckov1 Update -- S. Kahn14 Cone Sizes P cc tan  c sin 2  c º º º º º