Update on H  studies Catalin and Tony FTK meeting, July 13, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tracey Berry1 Looking into e &  for high energy e/  Dr Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Advertisements

H/Abb -> 4b’s process & Multi-Et-Threshold Study for 4jet Trigger Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on July 13 th, 2006.
B Tagging with CMS Fabrizio Palla INFN Pisa B  Workshop Helsinki 29 May – 1 June 2002.
FTK H->  update Catalin, Tony. Recap - slides 2-9.
1  trigger optimization in CMS Tracker Giuseppe Bagliesi On behalf of  tracking group Workshop on B/tau Physics at LHC Helsinki, May 30 - June 1, 2002.
Fully reconstructed SM 130 GeV Higgs  in the lepton+hadron channel First look at the samples Catalin, Kevin, Tony Univ. of Illinois.
Trigger studies of SM 130 GeV Higgs  in the lepton+hadron channel First pass at estimating trigger efficiency Higgs mass reconstruction Catalin Ciobanu,
FTK Studies: H  hh  bbbb FTK Physics Case Meeting 11/03/05 Erik Brubaker University of Chicago.
Progress on the FTK Physics Case (For H/Abb 4b signal) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of FTK Meeting on January 26 th, 2006 (1)Brief Sample.
Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.
Daniele Benedetti CMS and University of Perugia Chicago 07/02/2004 High Level Trigger for the ttH channel in fully hadronic decay at LHC with the CMS detector.
Update on Tools FTK Meeting 06/06/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
Update on H/Abb -> 4b’s process (4jet Trigger) Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK Meeting on Sep. 7 th, 2006.
Sept 30 th 2004Iacopo Vivarelli – INFN Pisa FTK meeting Z  bb measurement in ATLAS Iacopo Vivarelli, Alberto Annovi Scuola Normale Superiore,University.
July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers1 Salavat Abdullin For CMS Collaboration SUSY 2005, July 18-23, 2005 Durham, UK.
14-sep-2004 Midwest Physics Group University of Indiana Triggering and Luminosity Scenarios Maris Abolins Michigan State University.
Real Time 2010Monika Wielers (RAL)1 ATLAS e/  /  /jet/E T miss High Level Trigger Algorithms Performance with first LHC collisions Monika Wielers (RAL)
Update FTK Meeting 07/13/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
H  FTK update Catalin, Tony FTK meeting, 9/7/2006.
FTK update H→  Tony, Catalin By speeding up/adding rejection at LVL2, we can have a higher rate coming in from LVL1. Therefore some of the LVL1 threshold.
Dijet Mass Sherpa vs Pythia Multi-Threshold e.t.c. for H/Abb->4b’s Kohei Yorita University of Chicago FTK Meeting 12/19/2006.
Status: WW,ZZ->H->  Catalin, Kevin, Tony, Dovid.
Update FTK Meeting 05/02/06 Erik Brubaker U of Chicago.
Tau Jet Identification in Charged Higgs Search Monoranjan Guchait TIFR, Mumbai India-CMS collaboration meeting th March,2009 University of Delhi.
1 Modelling parameters Jos Vermeulen, 2 June 1999.
LHCC Review, CERN, 19/10/99Paul Bright-Thomas, for Alan Watson 1 LVL1 Calorimeter Algorithm Updates Changes since the TDR: Greater “integration” of e/
H → ZZ →  A promising new channel for high Higgs mass Sara Bolognesi – Torino INFN and University Higgs meeting 23 Sept – CMS Week.
Analysis Plans for Jets + EtMiss Signatures Pierre Savard ATLAS Toronto Group Meeting January
Progress on H/Abb -> 4b’s channel for the FTK physics case ~ 4jets Trigger w/ and w/o FTK ~ Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of the FTK.
ATLAS ATLAS Week: 25/Feb to 1/Mar 2002 B-Physics Trigger Working Group Status Report
Trigger & Analysis Avi Yagil UCSD. 14-June-2007HCPSS - Triggers & AnalysisAvi Yagil 2 Table of Contents Introduction –Rates & cross sections –Beam Crossings.
August 30, 2006 CAT physics meeting Calibration of b-tagging at Tevatron 1. A Secondary Vertex Tagger 2. Primary and secondary vertex reconstruction 3.
Possibility of tan  measurement with in CMS Majid Hashemi CERN, CMS IPM,Tehran,Iran QCD and Hadronic Interactions, March 2005, La Thuile, Italy.
Electroweak and Related Physics at CDF Tim Nelson Fermilab on behalf of the CDF Collaboration DIS 2003 St. Petersburg April 2003.
DPF2000, 8/9-12/00 p. 1Richard E. Hughes, The Ohio State UniversityHiggs Searches in Run II at CDF Prospects for Higgs Searches at CDF in Run II DPF2000.
Physics at LHC Prague, 6-12 July, 2003 R. Kinnunen Helsinki Institute of Physics A/H ->  and H + ->  in CMS R. Kinnunen Physics at LHC Prague July 6.
PESAsim – the e/  analysis framework Validation of the framework First look at a trigger menu combining several signatures Short-term plans Mark Sutton.
Overview of the High-Level Trigger Electron and Photon Selection for the ATLAS Experiment at the LHC Ricardo Gonçalo, Royal Holloway University of London.
M. Pilar Casado 1 Optimization of Tau Menus: L1 & L2 Trigger & Physics week (19-22 March 2007) M. Pilar Casado (IFAE & UAB) on behalf of the Tau Trigger.
Hardware: Software:
Tracey BerryTAPM Meeting June 25 th Triggers Tracey Berry Royal Holloway.
Γ +Jet Analysis for the CMS Pooja Gupta, Brajesh Choudhary, Sudeep Chatterji, Satyaki Bhattacharya & R.K. Shivpuri University of Delhi, India.
29,30 July 2010 India CMS Meeting,BARC Mumbai 1 Update on Z’-> τ τ->τ jet+ τ jet analysis Nitish Dhingra(P.U.,India) Kajari Mazumdar(TIFR,India) Jasbir.
Update on WH to 3 lepton Analysis And Electron Trigger Efficiencies with Tag And Probe Nishu 1, Suman B. Beri 1, Guillelmo Gomez Ceballos 2 1 Panjab University,
Hggs-D meeting MPI 11/20061 Higgs Physics – Activities in Bonn/Siegen Jörn Große-Knetter ATLAS-Higgs-D Treffen München,
HG 5: Trigger Study for ttH, H→bb Catrin Bernius (UCL) CPPM, Genova, Glasgow, RAL, RHUL, UCL some outline.
Search for the Standard Model Higgs in  and  lepton final states P. Grannis, ICHEP 2012 for the DØ Collaboration Tevatron, pp √s = 1.96 TeV -
Mark OwenManchester Christmas Meeting Jan Search for h ->  with Muons at D  Mark Owen Manchester HEP Group Meeting January 2006 Outline: –Introduction.
Z  BF using  hadronic events Silke Duensing Aug 8th, 2003.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
BEACH 04J. Piedra1 SiSA Tracking Silicon stand alone (SiSA) tracking optimization SiSA validation Matthew Herndon University of Wisconsin Joint Physics.
UPDATE First Look at Trigger Efficiencies from AOD for ttH, H  bb Catrin Bernius UCL ATLAS Physics Meeting
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
ATLAS UK physics meeting, 10/01/08 1 Triggers for B physics Julie Kirk RAL Overview of B trigger strategy Algorithms – current status and plans Menus Efficiencies.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
Some introduction Cosmics events can produce energetic jets and missing energy. They need to be discriminated from collision events with true MET and jets.
Simone Gennai on Behalf of the CMS and ATLAS collaboration
The University of Manchester
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
The First-Level Trigger of ATLAS
Erik Brubaker U of Chicago
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
VBF Htt report Catalin & Tony April 24, 2007.
Muons from light meson decays
Samples and MC Selection
Kohei Yorita Young-Kee Kim University of Chicago
Higgs  update Catalin and Tony May 22, 2007
Northern Illinois University / NICADD
Presentation transcript:

Update on H  studies Catalin and Tony FTK meeting, July 13, 2006

H  with FTK Step1: look at LVL1 side Step2: look at LVL2 side Similar to Kohei’s study –But the gain comes from modifying the LVL1 side rather than LVL2 LVL1 (+new trigger) LVL2 (+FTK) 40 kHz 200 Hz

Trigger Study – May LOW-LUMHIGH-LUM MU20(20) 2MU6 EM25I(30) 2EM15I(20) J200(290) 3J90(130) 4J65(90) J60+xE60( ) TAU25+xE30(60+60) MU10+EM15I Lepton E T Tau E T Missing E T 15,20,25,30 10,15,20,25 10,15,20

Low Luminosity Regime Signal: 130 GeV H  E T (  ) threshold E T (lep) > 10 GeV E T (  ) threshold E T (lep) > 15 GeV E T (  ) threshold E T (lep) > 20 GeV met>15 met>30 Reminder: - only lepton, tau, and met thresholds are varied - rest of the trigger table stays the same Biggest effect: lowering the lepton E T threshold (up to 15% gain) Trigger efficiency

LVL1 trigger table

LVL1 Triggers LVL1 output rate dominated by the EM and tau+miss.Et triggers. We tuned the fake probability to reproduce the values in the previous table. LVL1 output rates are comparable now: –EM: 12.5 kHz (vs 12 kHz fom Slide5) –Muon: 0.7 kHz (vs 0.80 kHz from Slide5) –Tau+missEt: 1 kHz (vs 2 kHz from Slide5) –Single jet: 0.23 kHz (vs 0.2 kHz from Slide5) –The new trigger would add to the bandwidth 15Hz assumed both Et threshold (lep, tau) are set at 15 GeV a problem for LVL2 where the max output rate is 200Hz.

Step2 – LVL2 rejection Thanks to Paola for pointing us to the CMS algorithm RORO RIRI RSRS leading P T track Recipe: - find leading P T track in a R I =0.1 cone around the jet - require P T (lead. track) > 3 GeV - find tracks within an R S =0.07 cone around lead. Track - count, as before, tracks in the isolation reg: R I <R<R O Jet axis

Requiring N t  1 within  R=0.1 of the  jet 130 GeV Higgs signal

Requiring N t  1 within  R=0.1 of the  jet Sherpa dijet

3,1 2,2 2,1 4,0 3,0 1,2 1,1 2,0 1,0 Max tracks in,out “in” tracks are here w/ P t >1.0 “out” tracks are here w/ P t >0.5 factor of ~1.4 optimum R O =0.3, P T Sig >3.0 GeV/c R O =0.5, P T Sig >10.0 GeV/c Curves correspond to different R O & min leading P T. R S =0.07, R I =0.1 for all. Higgs 130 GeV

3,1 2,2 2,1 4,0 3,0 1,2 1,1 2,0 1,0 Max tracks in,out factor of ~10 R O =0.3, P T Sig >3.0 GeV/c R O =0.5, P T Sig >10.0 GeV/c Curves correspond to different R O & min leading P T. R S =0.07, R I =0.1 for all. “in” tracks are here w/ P t >1.0 “out” tracks are here w/ P t >0.5 Sherpa Dijet

Step1+Step2 From adding the lepton+tau trigger we gain about 15% signal, and add  O(10)Hz into LVL2 For the point shown, we reduce LVL2 contribution to 1-2 Hz, while keeping 65% of signal. Net gain 9-10% signal Curves correspond to different R O & min leading P T. R S =0.07, R I =0.1 for all. 3,1 2,2 2,1 4,0 3,0 1,2 1,1 2,0 1,0

Conclusions Studied efficiency/rejection optimization using the CMS algorithm: –Dijet rejection: 1/2 – 1/100 –Signal efficiency: 40%-70% Tuned lepton fake rates to match the default LVL1 output rates Using a lepton+tau trigger with 15 GeV Et thresholds, we find a 5-10% signal gain Need to run over a larger dijet sample