Team 10 Air Conditioning Experiment Members –Sean Gallagher –Pamela McDowell –Brian Davison –Prathana Vanarath Sponsors –Dr. Wexler –Dr. Advani Advisor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Energy Vehicle
Advertisements

Product Design L5- Ch4: Product Specifications Dr. Husam Arman 1.
Systems Analysis and Design 9th Edition
Chapter 2.
P11511 Project Review. Project Team, Faculty, and Customer Project Team: – Project Lead: Kevin Argabright (ME) – Team Members: John Fitch Dean (ME) Mike.
Team #1: Brandon Fichera Dave Rabeno Greg Pease Sean Gallagher Sponsor: Dr. Stephanie Wright Delaware Aerospace Academy Advisor: Dr. Michael Keefe Mission.
INTELLIGENT TOOLING Team Joseph StaleyJeffrey Roushey Glenn GardnerAndrew Graybill.
Intelligent Tooling Team 8: Joseph Staley Jeff Roushey Andrew Graybill Glenn Gardner Sponsor: Dr. Mike Yu, FRC-DE Advisor: Dr. Michael Keefe.
Development of Laser Fuser Test Bed Project Number: P07501 Justin McMillan.
NCDA Team Resin Flow Controller n Customer: Dr. Suresh Advani n Advisor: Dr. Lian-Ping Wang n Team Members: –Anthony Ripanti –Joshua Radice –Frank.
Nonlinear Dynamics Laboratory Equipment Andrew DickJoe Houtz Jeremy RedleckiAshley Rice James Streeter Client: Mechanical Engineering Dept. at RITFaculty.
Overview of Phase 4 Performance Validation Methods and Techniques.
1 Composite Generator Enclosure PROJECT New Castle Design Associates.
Bangarang Musical Engineering University of Notre Dame Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Group Members: Roberto Ayala, Ryan Bradley, Pat.
IGen Fuser Bearing Project P Agenda Meeting Timetable Start Time Review Topic 2:20Introductions 2:25Project Description 2:35Customer Needs 2:40Risk.
Team Members: Bryan McCormick (ME) Andy Freedman (ME) John Kreuder (ME) Ken McLoud (ME) Jon Holdsworth (EE) Gabriela Santa Cruz (IE) Thermoelectric Module.
1 Composite Generator Enclosure PROJECT New Castle Design Associates.
RETROCOMMISSIONING AIR HANDLING SYSTEMS
Four Points Engineering and Design Project 99.04: Heat Pump Design for Whalen Co. FPED Team Members: Ricardo Blackett, Andy Parke, Scott Quirico, Brian.
ME Project: Air Conditioner Lab Team: 10 Members: Sean M. Gallagher, Brian Davison, Prathana Vannarath, Pam McDowell Customer: University of Delaware Mechanical.
Four Points Engineering and Design Project 99.04: Heat Pump Design for Whalen Co. FPED Team Members: Ricardo Blackett, Andy Parke, Scott Quirico, Brian.
NCDA: Pickle Sorter Project Proposal Project Sponsored by Ed Kee of Keeman Produce, Lincoln, DE.
Automatic Dental Bur Loader NCDA Dental Products Development Group Progress Review Team 99.06: Jason Dickey, Greg Frantz, Allison Martin, Nancy Meyer Sponsor:
Analyzing the Business Case
System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)
Professor Michael J. Losacco CIS 1150 – Introduction to Computer Information Systems Systems Analysis and Design Chapter 12.
Four Points Engineering and Design Project 99.04: Heat Pump Design for Whalen Co. FPED Team Members: Ricardo Blackett, Andy Parke, Scott Quirico, Brian.
EDGE™ Project Review P Automation/Improvement of Wegmans Cookie Line Packaging Project Team: Stephanie Rager (IE), Bruno Coelho (ME), Mark Voss (ME),
Team Members: Brandon Fichera Dave Rabeno Greg Pease Sean Gallagher Sponsor: Dr. Stephanie Wright Delaware Aerospace Academy Advisor: Dr. Michael Keefe.
Team 10 ME Project: Air Conditioner Lab Members Customer Advisor Sean M. Gallagher, Brian Davison U of D ME Department Dr. Keefe Prathana Vannarath, Pam.
Welcome to CMPE003 Personal Computer Concepts: Hardware and Software Winter 2003 UC Santa Cruz Instructor: Guy Cox.
“HEAR IT AND FORGET IT, SEE IT AND REMEMBER IT, DO IT AND UNDERSTAND IT” R12310: ME and ChemE Lab and Demo Hardware Development DPM – Spring 2012.
Electrical Engineering Capstone Courses EE-4BI6 Electrical and Biomedical Engineering  Dr. Hubert deBruin EE-4OI6 Electrical and Computer Engineering.
MSD II –Managerial Presentation Spring 2009 P09454: Design & Testing of Centrifugal Pump Components.
Chemical Engineering Department
PIC Evaluation/ Development Board Dec02-12 December 10, 2002 Client: ECpE Department Faculty Advisors: Dr. Rover, Dr. Weber Chad Berg, Luke Bishop, Tyson.
Solid Performance Solutions This presentation was created to give you the ideas and support to present “Rethinking New Product Training Development” in.
1.  Objective  What is a Heat Exchanger?  Background  Problem  Goals  Market Analysis  HELA Design Criteria  Cost Analysis  Project Management.
System Design Review April 5th, 2013 P13623: Conductive Heat Transfer Lab Equipment.
1 ISA&D7‏/8‏/ ISA&D7‏/8‏/2013 Systems Development Life Cycle Phases and Activities in the SDLC Variations of the SDLC models.
Information Systems Technology Ross Malaga "Part III - Building and Managing Information Systems" III 11 Copyright © 2005 Prentice Hall, Inc MANAGING.
Engineering Design Introduction to Mechanical Engineering
Software Engineering Management Lecture 1 The Software Process.
Product Documentation Chapter 5. Required Medical Device Documentation  Business proposal  Product specification  Design specification  Software.
MSD I – Mid Project Presentation Winter 08/09 P09454: Design & Testing of Centrifugal Pump Components.
Educational Laboratory Virtual Instrumentation Suite (ELVIS) May Client: National Instruments Advisors: Dr. Mani Mina, Dr. Diane Rover Group Members:
COMPACT MOBILE LIFTING DEVICE Team 3 Michael Shaffer, Ken Kammerer, Dave Geesaman, Jin Ko Sponsor: Fraunhofer Advisor: Dr. Michael Keefe Innovative Lifting.
1/13 MER Design of Thermal Fluid Systems Professor Anderson Union College Spring 2012.
through Introduction  Particle Imaging Velocimetry (PIV) uses a sheet laser beam to illuminate particles that cross the sheet.  The particles.
January 4, 2005MER160 Course Intro1 MER Design of Thermal Fluid Systems Professors Anderson, Bruno, Kosky Union College Winter Term 2005.
Air Conditioning Experiment Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Delaware.
Dual-Use Wideband Microphone System
THROUGH NERANJAN DHARMADASA JAMES BROWN P09451: Thermo-Electric Module for Large Scale Systems.
Nanofluidic Characterization David Sharp David West Justin Davis.
P16680: AATech Universal Oil and Bag System System Design Review 9/29/15.
Spring CS-EE 481 Lillevik 481s07-l2 University of Portland School of Engineering Senior Design Lecture 2 Technical staff Prototype phase: DEP, TOP.
Lecture 2. An Overview of Engineering Design JANUARY 2016 GE105 Introduction to Engineering Design College of Engineering King Saud University.
Software Development Process CS 360 Lecture 3. Software Process The software process is a structured set of activities required to develop a software.
Client Senior Design Electrical and Computer Engineering Iowa State University Introduction Abstract Architectural plans are currently being developed.
CLIC Permanent Magnet Quadrupole Engineering Development update Norbert Collomb, STFC Daresbury Laboratory 1N. Collomb 03/10/2011.
BUS OPERATOR WORKSTATION PROCUREMENT TEAM TRAINING T O ENHANCE BUS OPERATOR ERGONOMICS, HEALTH, AND SAFETY A TRAINING TEMPLATE FOR TRANSIT AGENCIES [ADD.
Allen Luccitti (ME). Mission Statement Product Description ▫ Test stand consisting of a centrifugal pump, closed loop flow system with control through.
Systems Analysis & Design 7 th Edition Chapter 2.
Fall 2006P7305: Freshman Practicum AM Receiver P7305: Learning Module for EE Freshman Practicum Chris Urban: Lead Engineer Hans-Christian Rotmann: Project.
Advisor: Dr. Shangchao Lin
Prototyping and Testing of an Economizer in a Gas Cycled Chiller System Team 4 Members: Steven Hutto Breck Dorsey Kenneth Martin Brandon Van Guoxin.
Turbomachinery Flow Visualization P08453
The Systems Engineering Context
Systems Analysis and Design
MANAGING THE DEVELOPMENT AND PURCHASE OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Presentation transcript:

Team 10 Air Conditioning Experiment Members –Sean Gallagher –Pamela McDowell –Brian Davison –Prathana Vanarath Sponsors –Dr. Wexler –Dr. Advani Advisor –Dr. Keefe

Presentation Overview Introduction Method –Concept Generation –Concept Selection Schedule & Budget Questions

Project Background New Curriculum for Mechanical Engineers “ME 2000 Curriculum” Joint Laboratory Classes for Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer classes We must investigate 2 aspects of this issue: –Single lab apparatus for multiple labs (Hardware) –Increased understanding of Thermodynamic and Heat Transfer fundamentals (Lab Experiments)

Mission Design a set of thermodynamic and heat transfer experiments for the University of Delaware Mechanical Engineering Undergraduate Laboratory, using a window air conditioner, that will be completed by April for approximately $4000.

Approach 1Identifying customer(s) –wants –needs –constraints. 2Benchmark to identify –competitors –metrics –possible solutions. 3Generate concepts 4Compare, eliminate, expand and synthesize possible solutions based on the metrics. 5Proceed to a Go/No-Go review of the concepts. Build and test a prototype.

Customers Wants ¶Dr. Wexler  Dr. Advani Undergraduate students Graduate students  Judy Green: Educational  Dr. Sun  William Davison  Manufacturers: Hampden, Armfield Ltd.  Other Schools: Georgia Tech, Penn State ¶Effective learning tool  Easy to Use Self Evident  Easy to set up  Cost Effectiveness  Multiple Purposes  LabView compatible data acquisition  Forgiving of incompetence  Quiet  Quick

Constraints (Prioritized) Portable Schedule dictated by NCDA Budget set by Sponsor Separation of Project set by Sponsor

Concept Sub-Concept Category Sub-Category

Problem Description Hardware –Develop a lab apparatus using a window air conditioner and sensors –Develop a Data Acquisition Program Lab Experiments –Develop a set of experiments that include a variety of Thermodynamic and Heat Transfer Principles

Systems Benchmarking (Major Competitors) Hampden Basic Refrigeration Cycle Trainer Hampden Basic Refrigeration Cycle and Heat Pump Trainer Hampden Refrigeration Demonstrator Hampden Heat Pump Trainer Armfield Heat Exchanger Training Equipment Series Armfield Heat Transfer Teaching Equipment Series Armfield Temperature Measurement Bench Others

Functional Benchmarking Omega Engineering - Sensors –Carries every type of sensor we will require –Catalogs are an excellent technical reference Optrand - Sensors –Fiber-optic pressure transducer Air Conditioning Manufacturers - AC units University of Delaware HVAC - sample AC

Metrics Easy to Use –Visible Components Physically look at chosen apparatus and rate , target value 10. –Accessible Components same as above Cost Effectiveness –Low initial price Target value $4000 –Low operating cost Target value $22. –Durable Target value 10 years –Parts availability Target value: 2 week lead time

Metrics Cont’d Self Evident –Clear Lessons/Objectives Survey scored 1 - 5: target value 5 –Logical Procedure Survey scored 1 - 5: target value 5 Quiet –Low noise level Target value of 60 dB Effective Learning Tool –Fun –Number of Fundamentals –Clear Lessons/Objectives –Real World Connection to Students –Keeps Students’ Interests –Hands-on/Interactive All are evaluated yes or no, the target value is yes.

Metrics Cont’d Quick –Time Target Value within set lab time (2 hrs) Easy Maintenance –Parts visibility Physically look at chosen apparatus and rate , target value 10. –Parts availability Target value: 2 week lead time Forgiving of Incompetence –Years of experience Target value 2 years engineering experience Easy to set up –Time Target value 15 minutes –Self Contained Target value 1

Concept Generation and Selection Concept Lab Reports Hardware Overall Presentation of Experiments Number of Experiments Sensors Presentation of Lab Reports Apparatus

Concept Generation and Selection Number of Experiments 1 Experiment4-7 Experiments 13 Experiments

Number of Experiments Generation and Selection Experiments –Easy to set up –More effective learning tool than  and  Multiple Purposes ¶One Experiment using different sensors –Not an effective learning tool –Difficult to set up  13 Experiments – Easy to set up – More effective learning tool than  – Multiple Purposes

Concept Generation and Selection Overall Presentation of Experiments By ComponentBy Fundamental

Overall Presentation of Experiments Generation and Selection ¶By Fundamental –Self Evident: clear lessons –Quick: can be completed in lab time  By Component –Self Evident: clear lessons –Quick: can be completed in lab time –More effective learning tool than 

Concept Generation and Selection Presentation of Lab Reports Standard Lab Reports Short Lab Reports + Technical Paper

Presentation of Lab Reports Generation and Selection ¶Standard Lab Reports –Self Evident: clear lessons  Short Lab Reports & Technical Paper –Self Evident: clear lessons –More effective learning tool than 

Concept Generation and Selection Apparatus Air Conditioning Unit Other

Apparatus Generation and Selection ¶Other –Quick: can be completed in lab time –Easy to set up: can be set up in less than 15 min.  Air Conditioning Unit –Quick: can be completed in lab time –Easy to set up: can be set up in less than 15 min. –More effective learning tool than  –More self evident than  –Easier to use than  –More cost effective 

Sensors Generation and Selection ¶Fully Instrumented with Redundancy –Most expensive  Fully Instrumented without Redundancy –Most feasible Economically Instrumented –Least expensive but sacrifices functionality

Updated Concept Flow-Chart

Final Concept Selection Number of Experiments –4 - 7 Experiments Overall Presentation of Experiments –By Components Apparatus –Air Conditioning Unit Presentation of Lab Reports –Short Lab Reports & Technical Paper Sensors –Fully Instrumented without Redundancy

Working Model Lab Experiments –See Handout Air Conditioner –See apparatus

Actual Progress Wanted to be here: –Develop Heat Transfer Lab Fundamentals –Develop Thermodynamic Lab Fundamentals –Investigate Educational Values/Criteria –Evaluate Key Equations –Obtain Sample Air Conditioner for Study –Examine Possible Sensor Placements We are here: –Applied Heat Transfer fundamentals to labs –Applied Thermodynamic fundamentals to labs –Researched and applied these values to labs –Lab write-ups made –Sample Air Conditioner used in determining labs –Possible locations determined

Not Too Detailed Schedule January February –Compile and finalize lab manuals –Select and purchase required equipment March –Assemble lab apparatus –Test and evaluate labs April –Complete project

Estimated Budget

Concluding Remarks