ABSTRACT Much recent work has suggested that nitrogen fluxes to the coastal zone depend on interactions between input loading rates, climate, and landscape.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends in Suspended Sediment Input to the San Francisco Bay from Local Tributaries Presented by Setenay Bozkurt Philip Williams &
Advertisements

Overview – Nutrient Fate and Transport Mark B. David University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Presented at Building Science Assessments for State-Level.
REMM: Riparian Ecosystem Management Model USDA-Agricultural Research Service University of Georgia California State University – Chico USDA-Natural Resources.
Ecological Perspectives on Critical Loads - Linkages between Biogeochemical Cycles and Ecosystem Change Differences and Similarities in N and S Cycling.
Robert Howarth Cornell University Ithaca, NY USA Ocean Hypoxia and its Impacts on Ecosystems UNDP Side Event at GESAMP #39 New York City, USA 18 April.
Scenario Builder and Watershed Model Progress toward the MPA Gary Shenk, Guido Yactayo, Gopal Bhatt Modeling Workgroup 12/2/14 1.
Reactive nitrogen (N) is essential to life, making up compounds such as proteins and nucleic acids. Technology now allows us to create N fertilizers, increasing.
Michael J. Brayton MD/DE/DC Water Science Center Hydrologic Controls on Nutrient and Pesticide Transport through a Small Agricultural Watershed, Morgan.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
Lisa Helper 1 CE 394 GIS WR 2011 Lisa Helper 2011 Special Thanks to: Ahmad Tavakoy, Tim Whiteaker (CRWR), Rich Mueller(USDA NASS Research and Development.
Contaminant Source and Watershed Characterization Data Needs Gregory McIsaac, Robert Howarth, and Richard B. Alexander Univ. of Illinois Cornell Univ.
The Caveat: Hydrology Complex Site specific Difficult to accurately quantify More questions than answers.
SPARROW Modeling in the Mississippi River Basin Iowa Science Assessment Davenport, IA Nov. 14, 2012 (608) By Dale M. Robertson*
Sybil P. Seitzinger International Geosphere-Biosphere Program (IGBP) Stockholm, Sweden Modeling global river export: N, P, C, Si E. Mayorga A.F. Bouwman.
REFERENCES Maria Val Martin 1 C. L. Heald 1, J.-F. Lamarque 2, S. Tilmes 2 and L. Emmons 2 1 Colorado State University 2 NCAR.
We have considered U(P,N) in the form of a Michaelis-Menten relation in N and proportional to P, ie, U(P,N)=VPv n N/(k n +N). Grazing, G(P,Z) is regarded.
Acknowledgements This work has been supported by an EPA STAR grant, “Developing regional-scale stressor models for managing eutrophication in coastal marine.
NYCDEP Evaluation of Watershed Management Programs FAD requirement: Last one ; Next FAD Assessment : Use models to evaluate effects.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
ABSTRACT We are developing ReNuMA, an event-based, regional watershed-scale nutrient loading model with biogeochemical dynamics that is readily accessible.
We have considered U(P,N) in the form of a Michaelis-Menten relation in N and proportional to P, ie, U(P,N)=VPv n N/(k n +N). Grazing, G(P,Z) is regarded.
SPARROW Water- Quality Modeling: Application of the National Hydrography Dataset What is SPARROW? Use of NHD SPARROW results By Craig Johnston and Richard.
Impact of Climate Change on Flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin
Chesapeake Bay Program Incorporation of Lag Times into the Decision Process Gary Shenk 10/16/12 1.
4. CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER WORK With the knowledge library developed within this research we are establishing a new integrated watershed modeling approach.
Modeling water and biogeochemical cycles in the Front Range, Colorado: effects of climate and landuse changes Landrum, Laura L., Natural Resource Ecology.
Export and metabolism of carbon in urban watersheds: Climate implications Rose M. Smith 1, Sujay S. Kaushal 1 1 University of Maryland College Park Motivation.
Potential Effects of Climate Change on New York City Water Supply Quantity and Quality: An Integrated Modeling Approach Donald Pierson, Elliot Schneiderman.
Map of US 144 US watersheds used as input in the NANI dataset calculations. The Net Anthropogenic Input is calculated at the county level. We explore county-level.
Center for Science in the Earth System Annual Meeting June 8, 2005 Briefing: Hydrology and water resources.
1 Evaluating and Estimating the Effect of Land use Changed on Water Quality at Selorejo Reservoir, Indonesia Mohammad Sholichin Faridah Othman Shatira.
Spatial and temporal patterns of CH 4 and N 2 O fluxes from North America as estimated by process-based ecosystem model Hanqin Tian, Xiaofeng Xu and other.
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
VQ3a: How do changes in climate and atmospheric processes affect the physiology and biogeochemistry of ecosystems? [DS 194, 201] Science Issue: Changes.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
Twinning water quality modelling in Latvia Helene Ejhed
Effects of Rising Nitrogen Deposition on Forest Carbon Sequestration and N losses in the Delaware River Basin Yude Pan, John Hom, Richard Birdsey, Kevin.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Monitoring Data from Multiple Networks/Agencies to Calibrate Nutrient SPARROW* Models, Southeastern.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Delaware River Basin SPARROW Model Mary Chepiga, , Susan Colarullo, , Jeff Fischer, ,
Invest Nutrient Retention model Yonas Ghile.
Dr. Naira Chaouch Research scientist, NOAA-CREST Nir Krakauer, Marouane Temimi, Adao Matonse (CUNY) Elliot Schneiderman, Donald Pierson, Mark Zion (NYCDEP)
“Physical and Anthropogenic Controls of the Biogeochemistry of the Ji-Paraná River Basin (Western Amazônia)” 1 Ballester, M.V.R.; 1 Krusche, A.V.; 1 Kavaguishi,
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin “A Landscape Level Analysis of Potential Excess Nitrogen in East-Central North Carolina, USA”
Fine-Resolution, Regional-Scale Terrestrial Hydrologic Fluxes Simulated with the Integrated Landscape Hydrology Model (ILHM) David W Hyndman Anthony D.
Table 1- Results of observed and modeled mean annual DOC, HPOA and SUVA, calculated from monthly model output. RMSE is the root mean squared error between.
A Mass-Balance, Watershed-Scale Analysis of the Chemistry of Adirondack Lakes Discussion - Day 5.
Surface Water Surface runoff - Precipitation or snowmelt which moves across the land surface ultimately channelizing into streams or rivers or discharging.
Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Modeling Stream Flow of Clear Creek Watershed-Emory River Basin Presented by Divya Sharon.
How much water will be available in the upper Colorado River Basin under projected climatic changes? Abstract The upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB), is.
L Modeling the impact of land cover change and water withdrawals on runoff and N retention in the Ipswich River, MA Hydrological Modeling Nitrogen Loading.
Abstract Man-made dams influence more than just the flow of water in a river. The build up of sediments and organic matter, increased residence times,
Chapter 7 The Nitrogen Cycle © 2013 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved. From Fundamentals of Ecosystem Science, Weathers, Strayer, and Likens (eds).
Nitrogen Budgets for the Mississippi River Basin using the linked EPIC-CMAQ-NEWS Models Michelle McCrackin, Ellen Cooter, Robin Dennis, Jana Compton, John.
University of New Hampshire EXPORT OF CARBON, NUTRIENTS, AND WEATHERING PRODUCTS FROM A HIGHLY URBANIZED TROPICAL WATERSHED William H. McDowell, Jody D.
Nitrogen loading from forested catchments Marie Korppoo VEMALA catchment meeting, 25/09/2012 Marie Korppoo, Markus Huttunen 12/02/2015 Open DATA: Nutrient.
Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS)
Conclusions & Future Work
in the Neversink River Basin, New York
ReNuMa: Nitrogen Dynamics
Model Calibration Mode
Image courtesy of NASA/GSFC
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
1. The Study of Excess Nitrogen in the Neuse River Basin
Nitrogen Transport Estimates in the San Antonio River Basin
How do small dam removals affect reach-scale nitrogen exports?
Overview of Climate Impact Assessment Framework and Implementation
Forests, water & research in the Sierra Nevada
Systems and Components – A Process for Developing the Total Water Budget Handbook for Water Budget Development - With or Without Models CWEMF 2019 Annual.
Presentation transcript:

ABSTRACT Much recent work has suggested that nitrogen fluxes to the coastal zone depend on interactions between input loading rates, climate, and landscape processes. Direct relationships between nitrogen inputs and riverine fluxes have been shown with a relatively simple nitrogen accounting methodology for 16 large watersheds in the northeastern US (Boyer et al., 2002). More recently, statistical models have shown that the average response of these watersheds per unit nitrogen load is strongly related to precipitation or hydrology (Howarth et al., in press). To extend this approach to examine the temporal response of these systems in response to climate and land use change, we are developing a simple Regional Nutrient Management model (ReNuMa) based on watershed-scale water balances and statistical relationships between N loads and responses. For the 6- year period examined so far, interannual discharge is well predicted over the range of watersheds studied. Nitrogen fluxes vary across watersheds in response to anthropogenic sources, including point sources, atmospheric deposition and fertilizer use. MODELLING DISCHARGE AND NITROGEN FLUXES FROM LARGE WATERSHEDS IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES D. P. Swaney 1 *, R. W. Howarth 1, A. E. Galford 1, E.W. Boyer 2, C.L. Goodale 1 and R.M. Marino 1 1 Cornell University, Ithaca, NY USA 2 University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA USA *( References The predecessor of ReNuMa is the Generalized Watershed Loading Function Model (GWLF): Haith, D. A., Shoemaker, L. L Generalized watershed loading functions for stream flow nutrients. Water Resources Bulletin 23(3): A spreadsheet-based version of the model can be found on the web at: Other references Acknowledgements This work has been supported by an EPA STAR grant, “Developing regional-scale stressor models for managing eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems, including interactions of nutrients, sediments, land-use change, and climate variability and change,” EPA Grant Number R830882, R.W. Howarth, P.I. Ongoing work and future directions Our work to date has focused on developing parameterizations of biogeochemical responses related to landuse/landcover: Atmospheric deposition Landscape level N retention of agricultural N sources (fertilizer, manure, N-fixation) Nitrogen retention and losses (DIN) from forests In-stream and landscape denitrification We are currently working on refining the model parameters for individual watersheds to reduce bias at this scale, as well as developing alternative parameterizations of processes which incorporate results from smaller-scale models. Additional processes to be considered will include: Phosphorus losses from P-saturated soils Soil erosion and sediment transport Water & wetland Forest & shrubland Urban & barren ReNuMa: Nitrogen Dynamics Human Waste Direct addition (load) to streams In-stream denitrification Threshold response in DIN concentrations following Aber et al (2003) Direct addition (load) to streams Direct addition to streams Riverine DIN flux Threshold response in DIN concentrations similar to Billen &Garnier (2000) Onsite treatment Wastewater Treatment Plants Atmos Deposition Manure Fertilizer Agricultural N-Fixation Agricultural Landuses Landscape denitrification & other losses Annual DIN flux in 16 large Northeastern US watersheds ReNuMa: Hydrological Dynamics BarrenWetland Vineyards/ orchards Row cropsOpen WaterForestShrubland Unsaturated zone Saturated zone Evapotranspiration Snowpack Urban Daily Precipitation Daily Temperature Snowmelt Baseflow Shallow flow/runoff Streamflow 16 watersheds in the Northeastern USA in which Net Anthropogenic Nitrogen Inputs (NANI) have been related to average riverine N fluxes over the period (Boyer et al., 2002). We are extending the analysis to simulate seasonal and annual streamflow and nitrogen fluxes using the ReNuMa model. Annual streamflow in 16 large Northeastern US watersheds The 2928 weather stations in the National Climate Data Center network for Northeastern states were identified ( To select candidate stations for each watershed, Thiessen polygons for the network were generated using ArcView™ 3.2. Stations with polygons intersecting a watershed and with >95% complete records (daily temperature and precipitation) were averaged to obtain representative weather data for each watershed. Missing temperature data for each station were replaced with averages of the records preceding and following the missing interval; missing precipitation values were replaced with zero. Minor adjustments to evaporative cover factor for the Androscoggin and Susquehanna rivers were the only changes made to baseline parameter values for the watersheds. While individual watersheds may exhibit some bias above or below observations (ie USGS annual streamflows ), agreement over all years and across all watersheds was generally good. Preliminary comparison of simulated vs observed annual DIN fluxes for the 12 watersheds with adequate observations of DIN ; E NS = Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency; n=6 years*12 watersheds =72 ) Run# Run descriptionBiasR 2 E NS Baseline (all sources) Pt sources + agriculture N dep (no forest) 3Pt sources + agriculture Pt sources + agriculture without load response 5Pt sources only Examples of threshold responses in agricultural and forest systems in the literature. Left: response of [NO3] to fertilizer loads in agricultural leachate (Billen & Garnier, 2000); Right: response of [NO3] to N deposition in forest leachate (Aber, et al., 2003). We use a similar parameterization to estimate landscape response from these land cover types. SCS runoff equation for each cover type (1 st order linear reservoir) Across all watersheds, simulated annual DIN fluxes also match observed values reasonably well. Some individual watersheds exhibit significant bias above or below observed fluxes, but generally correlate with annual changes variations reasonably well. Human waste contributes N through sewers and septic system effluent. N deposition traverses lakes and wetlands without retention, but exhibits a threshold landscape response in forests. Agricultural N sources (fertilizer, manure and fixation) also exhibit a threshold response due to retention (ie landscape denitrification, etc). The proportions of in-river denitrification are based on estimates in Van Breemen et al., 2002) Aber, J. D., C. L. Goodale, S. V. Ollinger, M.-L. Smith, A. H. Magill, M. E. Martin, R. A. Hallett, and J. L. Stoddard Is Nitrogen Deposition Altering the Nitrogen Status of Northeastern Forests? Bioscience 54(4): Billen, G. and J. Garnier Nitrogen transfers through the Seine drainage network: a budget based on the application of the ‘Riverstrahler’ model. Hydrobiologia. 410: 139–150. Boyer, E.W., C. L. Goodale, N. A. Jaworski and R. W. Howarth Anthropogenic nitrogen sources and relationships to riverine nitrogen export in the northeastern U.S.A. Biogeochemistry 57/58: Howarth, R.W., D.P. Swaney, E.W. Boyer, R.M. Marino, N. Jaworski and C.L. Goodale. The influence of climate on average nitrogen export from large watersheds in the Northeastern United States. Accepted for publication in Biogeochemistry. Van Breemen, N., E.W. Boyer, C.L. Goodale, N.A. Jaworski, K. Paustian, S.P. Seitzinger, K. Lajtha, B. Mayer, D. Van Dam, R.W. Howarth, K.J. Nadelhoffer, M. Eve, and G. Billen Where did all the nitrogen go? Fate of nitrogen inputs to large watersheds in the northeastern U.S.A. Biogeochemistry 57/58: 267–293. Simulated annual DIN fluxes improve as more sources are added. Here, the scenarios show the increase in several goodness-of-fit measures as more terms are included in the model. Point sources alone (#5) underpredict the DIN load, but still exhibit a significant R 2 (ie a linear relationship with observations). Adding a fixed contribution from agricultural lands greatly improves the agreement, and adding a load-dependent contribution improves it further. Direct N deposition and the response of forests also improves the agreement with observed fluxes across watersheds.