Experiences of the Youth Inclusion Programme Neighbourhood Renewal and Youth Crime 20 th March 2006.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Making Alberta Communities Safer The Challenges of Sustainability Crystal Hincks Impact & Evaluation Research Services Prof. John Winterdyk Dept. of Justice.

Advertisements

Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski

Comprehensive Area Assessment (CAA) Mike Cladingbowl Her Majesty's Inspector, Ofsted 21 April 2009.

New libraries, new users? Claire Creaser & Helen Greenwood.

Youth mentoring and the well-being of young people: Evidence from an Irish mixed- methods evaluation Dr Bernadine Brady Child & Family Research Centre.

Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.

Evaluation Research, aka Program Evaluation. Definitions Program Evaluation is not a “method” but an example of applied social research. From Rossi and.

Diploma in Management & Leadership Briefing Session

Indicator 4A & 4B Rates of Suspension & Expulsion Revised Methodology Identification of Significant Discrepancy DE-PBS Cadre December 1, 2011.

1 Ben George – Poet, Al Zantua & David Little Raven – Drummers.

YJB Practice and Performance Directorate Neighbourhood Renewal and Youth Crime.

Results-Driven Accountability OFFICE OF SPECIAL EDUCATION PROGRAMS 1.

Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

CDC Evaluation Process Harlen Hays, MPH Office of Health Promotion, KDHE.

Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.

Presented By: Rochelle Shoretz & Jennifer Thompson Thriving Again: Life After Breast Cancer For Young Jewish Women.

Slide 1 of 18 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 3: Developing effective work.

Welcome to Mentor Training for People and their roles Heather Davies – Programme Director Caroline Lundy – GEB Programme Tutor Jo Traunter.

Family Court Mediation and Counselling Service of Western Australia 1 The Columbus Program and its impact on the Family Court of Western Australia Kay.

Slide 1 of 17 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 2: The development of English.

Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.

Common Core 3.0 Executive Summary Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.

Evaluation of the SEND Pathfinder Programme: Early Findings June 2012.

Slide 1 of 19 Lessons from the Foundation Learning provision for the new 16 to 19 Study Programmes Discussion materials Issue 1: Attendance, retention,

PEACE III - Theme 1.1 Aid for Peace – Phases I & II 21 September 2011 Celeste McCallion.

Calderdale Place Survey “a new focus on improving outcomes for local people and places”

Maine SIM Evaluation Subcommittee June 2015 June 24, 2015.

Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.

Review of “One Way In” NAEH Coordinated Entry Briefing Paper Coordinated Entry Stakeholder Meeting May 23, 2013.

Conflict Sensitivity and Peacebuilding

Framework for the Inspection of services for children in need of help and protection, children looked after and care leavers. Gani Martins Assistant Director.

TRACKING AND REPORTING PROGRESS AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT AmeriCorps Program Directors’ Kickoff: 2015 –

Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:

Slide 1 of 16 Critical issues in the provision of youth work for young disabled people Discussion materials Issue 4: Youth workers and other practitioners.

Monitoring & Evaluation Baltic Retreat 2013 Federal Department of Foreign Affairs FDFA Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation SDC Federal Department.

Grade 9 Drug Education Programme For Cleveland District State High School By Alison Clark.

TitleHow do you know if you have got it right? Evaluation and Indicators Professor Vanessa Burholt.

Brighter Futures Programme Cheryl Hopkins Independent Consultant.

Salford Futures 2013/14 Evaluation John Reehill Dave Timperley.

A Practical Approach to Assessment in Service-Learning North Shore Community College.

CIRTL Network Data Collection 3/2/2013. Institutional Portrait: Purpose Consistency with the TAR principle Accountability: – Helps us all monitor Network.

School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.

“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.

New DFE Statutory Guidance and OFSTED Changes statutory-guidancewww.education.gov.uk/aboutdfe/statutory/g /sure-start-

Alain Thomas Overview workshop Background to the Principles Definitions The National Principles for Public Engagement What.

Work Choice Evaluation and the DWP Disability Employment Strategy. Sarah Foster - Inclusion Debi Bleines – DWP Specialist Disability Employment Programmes.

Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas A Framework for Program Evaluation.

Health Quality Ontario: Health System Performance New Zealand Master Class March 25, 2014.

Police providing crime information and evidence Public Safety Infrastructure Fund Grants Presenter: Superintendent Peter Brigham Title: Assistant Director,

Breastfeeding rates and practices: Monitoring, evaluation and research gaps.

ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.

Evaluation design and implementation Puja Myles

@theEIFoundation | eif.org.uk Early Intervention to prevent gang and youth violence: ‘Maturity Matrix’ Early intervention (‘EI’) is about getting extra.

Vicky Copley, PHE Risk Factor Intelligence

Education and Training Assuring quality in education 18 November 2015 – National conference on Quality Assurance ssurance-Slovenia Isabelle De Coster Policies.

1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.

Intervention and Support Inclusion Questions. Early and Strategic  How does the school provide purposeful early intervention and support to lift the.

E101 Section 8 October 31, 2012 Policy and Program Evaluation.

Community Planning: Monitoring & Evaluation Geddes Institute Research The Geddes Institute Emma Coles.

Supporting More Choices More Chances Gail Mackay Skills Development Scotland James Allan Perth and Kinross Youth Services.

Inter-American Development Bank BIMILACI 2007 QUALITY PROCUREMENT Third Party Review May 2007 Project Procurement Division.

A Framework for Evaluating Coalitions Engaged in Collaboration ADRC National Meeting October 2, 2008 Glenn M. Landers.

European Social Fund Promoting improvement 15 th March 2016 Nigel Finch.

The MOST project How have we changed the business model? 12 December 2012 Andrew McIntosh, Tunstall Healthcare Adam Steventon, Nuffield Trust.

Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.

Pre-school Learning Alliance Organising, Operating and Delivering the service at Queens Park Children’s Centre.

Youth Support Service Carmarthenshire. ‘ By the time a young offender stands before a youth magistrate we may be ten years too late in addressing some.

Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.

Monitoring & Evaluation

Termly Pupil Tracking Meeting

Presentation transcript:

Experiences of the Youth Inclusion Programme Neighbourhood Renewal and Youth Crime 20 th March 2006

A Comprehensive Evaluation Description: “What the hell is going on out there?” Process: ‘Looks Like A YIP, Sounds Like a Yip. Is it a YIP?’ Performance Indicators: ‘Navigation tools for the projects’ Impact: ‘Did it work?’

Overview of Methods Youth Inclusion Management Information System (YIPMIS) Quarterly returns Feedback reports to projects Programme Level Data Surveys of 72 projects Focused Fieldwork in 20 YIPs Pen Portraits of projects and neighbourhoods Intervention Typologies Progress of young people Interviews with stakeholders and young people

Four Dimensions of YIP 1. The Areas and Projects 2. Identification Procedures 3. Engagement and Assessment 4. Interventions

Descriptive: The Neighbourhood Deprivation Indices; crime, population, area. The projects Staffing and management structures Identification, Engagement and Assessment Formal/informal tools and processes Interventions What, why, when and for whom?

Process ID 50 Process How often, which agencies, how many young people Engagement Outreach, letter, home visits Assessment Formal tools/informal tools Intervention Planning To address risk factors

Performance Indicators (i) Ensure that 75% of the core group are engaged; And those engaged receive at least 5 hours of interventions per week. Reduce arrest rates by some 70%. Ensure 90% of those engaged are in ‘suitable’ ETE.

Performance Indicators (ii) Quarterly Feedback of PIs Individual Project Reports Discussed with YJB and National Supporters Remedial Action Suggested Quarterly Programme Level Bulletin

Impact RDS-NOMS Standards for Impact Studies Randomised Control Trials ??? Matched Comparison Groups Heckman Two Stage Regression Analysis

Conclusion Evaluation has provided: Definitive Report on YIP Contributed to local performance improvement Contributed to revision of management guidance Overall lessons for evaluation of community based initiatives?