ATLAS Authorship Policy R. Voss Physics Department, CERN IUPAP C11 ICHEP’04, Beijing, China, August 18, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Authorship APS Professional Skills Course:
Advertisements

1 © Copyright and other Intellectual Property. 2 What is intellectual property? Patents Trade Marks Designs Plant Breeders Rights Copyright Confidential.
M. Klein - H1 Author rules for C11 discussion at ICHEP04 at Beijing Remarks to the H1 Authorship*) Max Klein *) These remarks.
Revision of AS 4708 and AS  AFSL announces the 5-yearly revision process of the Australian Standards for Sustainable Forest Management (AS 4708)
Proposal for a Constitution for MICE A Plan for Discussion P Dornan G Gregoire Y Nagashima A Sessler.
OHS&W Committee Training. View notes pages for detailed information about each item. View slides and information in the current order or look at particular.
1 Minutes DRAFT – August 17, 2001 Minutes of the Organizing Committee Meeting 5:30 –7:30 p.m. Monday, Aug. 6, 2001 Cotillion South Marriott Wardman Park.
Authorship Kazem Heidari.
31 May 2007LCWS R&D Review - Summary1 WWS Calorimetry R&D Review: CALICE Wrap-up Paul Dauncey, Imperial College London On behalf of the CALICE Collaboration.
August 19, IUPAP C11 Vera Lüth Chair of C11 International Union of Pure and Applied Physics Commission of Particles and Fields.
Calice Meeting DESY 13/2/07David Ward Guidelines for CALICE presentations Recently approved by the Steering Committee.
Proposal for a Constitution for MICE A Plan for Discussion P Dornan G Gregoire Y Nagashima A Sessler.
MICE CM39 Alain Blondel CB report 1 Report from the MICE collaboration board.
CBM Constitution (By-law) Mihai Petrovici, CBM-Meeting, GSI-Darmstadt, October 5-7, Short history - Why do we need a Constitution ? - Present draft.
Agenda - meeting of the GERDA Collaboration Board November 9, Approval of Agenda 2. Approval of minutes of previous Collab Board meeting 3. Update.
HPS EC Report John Jaros HPS Collaboration Meeting at JLAB June 18, 2014.
Region 1 Senior Member Elevation Program Concurrent with the Region 1 Board of Governor’s Meeting August 18, 2012 Harold Belson IEEE A & A Committee Member.
LIGO-G M LIGO R&D1 LSC Publication Policy Update LIGO Publication Policy guides collaboration on issues of authorship rights, protocols and guidelines.
Journal of Interdisciplinary Topics (JIST) Whilst most undergraduate science programmes provide students with a project, through which they obtain some.
1 LSST dark energy science collaboration meeting Penn June 11-13, 2012 LSST dark energy science collaboration meeting Penn June 2012 Governance Document.
Report to the collaboration Yifang Wang IHEP Progress of the construction –SSM: Valve box successful, magnet cool down in mid June –Mechanical structure.
VIRGINIA’S IMPLEMENTATION of the FINAL RULE on WORK ZONE SAFETY and MOBILITY Virginia Department of Transportation’s Instructional and Informational Memorandum-LD-241.
1 Effective Senates: The Key Ingredients of Collegial Consultation Angelica Bangle, Chris Hill, Wheeler North, Beverly Reilly, Cheryl Stewart.
JACoW Team Meeting Knoxville, TN 7 to 9 November 2004 JACoW and the SPMS: Modus Operandi Theory vs. Practice … Christine Petit-Jean-Genaz, CERN.
NCAR Scientific and Research Engineering Staff Appointments Process Jeff Stith 2012 Appointments Review Group (ARG) Chair October 5, 2011.
Long Range Planning Committee. Outline Issues being studied Society structure Conference improvement Electronic Services Role/Responsibility Descriptions/Commitments.
The Role of Parliament in the budget process. Overview Actors in the budget process Stages in the budget process Budgeting for the medium term.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
Gender and Other Statistics, CB Initiatives CMS Women’s Forum, CERN, 1 Oct C.-E. Wulz.
1 1 LCC Physics and Detector Hitoshi Yamamoto ECFA LC2013, DESY May 27, 2013.
1 ATLAS Publications Policy Stephen Haywood ATLAS Plenary – 27 February 2004.
Publication ethics Professor Magne Nylenna, M.D., PhD
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
1 Organisational Changes following TM Trieste Decisions J. Poole.
WG K. Jon-And, Stockholm University1 Access of non-ATLAS physicists to ATLAS data and unofficial results WG2 meeting
Geant4 Publication Procedures Geant4 Collaboration Meeting 23 September 2013 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
Authorship, peer review and conflicts of interest.
Open Archive Workshop, CERN th March 2001 Peer Review - the HEP View Mick Draper, CERN ETT Division
Research, Data Sharing & Publication/Authorship Protocols Lynch Syndrome Screening Network - October 27, 2012.
Dmitri Denisov, D0 Collaboration, ICHEP041 D0 Collaboration Authorship Rules As of Summer 2004 D0 Collaboration author list consists of 577 people in 74.
Outcomes of the online academia consultation Mr. Christopher Clark Head, Partnership and Resource Mobilization Division International.
The Reviewing Process Marie desJardins AAAI-13 Panel Conference Reviewing Best Practices.
NOνA NOνA Bylaws Committee Interim Report May 16, 2004 Dave Ayres for the Bylaws Committee Committee Members Dave Ayres (Chair) Debbie Harris Sacha Kopp.
Few ideas for the future of the collaboration I.laktineh.
Peer review in the era of LHC experiments Experimental particle physics as a Big Science paradigm Rüdiger Voss Physics Department CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Welcome and the ATF2 international collaboration in future 1.Introduction 2.Mission of ATF/ATF2 3.Organization of ATF/ATF2 4.International Collaboration.
17 March 2004LIGO-G Z1 The LSC Detection Committee Peter Saulson Syracuse University.
CLIC 23 rd Project Meeting: news and updates Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University 1.
Discussion 5: Selecting Spokespeople Stefan Söldner-Rembold and Chang Kee Jung September 24, 2014 Fermilab, iiEB meeting.
The scorecard indicators for 2012 Overview of the scorecard indicators for the integrated implementation report for the BFUG 2012.
Report from the spokesperson Lucie Linssen CLICdp IB meeting 21/1/2016 Lucie Linssen, CLICdp, IB meeting, January
US CMS Meeting U. Virginia May 8, US CMS Constitution Nick Hadley May 8, 2009.
LIGO R&D1 Proposed Changes in LSC Publication Policy Committee »Jim Hough, Nergis Mavalvala, Dave Reitze, Kip Thorne »Input from Alan Wiseman Charge »to.
Bow Basin Watershed Management Plan Revised Terms of Reference
“Redefined Roles of Applied Dissertation Chairs & Members”
Why Authorship is Important
Webinar on the Exposure Draft of CAS Continuing Education Policy
MADMAX draft MoU preamble:
ILD phone meeting September 5, 2017 K. Kawagoe (PSB chair)
Proposed Organisation of Evaluation of the Romanian NSRF and Operational Programmes, Niall McCann, Technical Assistance Project for Programming,
Governance and Collaboration By-Laws
Physics Analysis Summaries towards a proposal
ICFA Report to ICHEP 2016 August 2015 to August 2016 J. Mnich (DESY)
S4 will be a “big” Collaboration:
Policy Development in Yukon Education
ICFA Report to FALC February 2016 to August 2016 J. Mnich (DESY)
Customer Satisfaction Measurement Work
EU CAM Network Code and CMP Guideline Proposal Update
Virtual Constellation Leadership Rotation
Presentation transcript:

ATLAS Authorship Policy R. Voss Physics Department, CERN IUPAP C11 ICHEP’04, Beijing, China, August 18, 2004

IUPAP C11 18/08/2004 R. Voss2 Preliminaries  ATLAS publication policy still under development  Guidelines on authorship formally approved by Collaboration Board in June 2004  Full draft policy at SCINOTES/policy/policy.html

IUPAP C11 18/08/2004 R. Voss3 Qualification for authorship  ATLAS member for at least one year  Not an author of another major LHC collaboration  Exceptions allowed for engineers  Spent > 80 working days and > 50% of available research time on ATLAS  “Technical work”: detector construction/ running/maintenance, shifts, software development, management  Does NOT include physics analysis  Technical work shared by institutes in proportion to number of authors

IUPAP C11 18/08/2004 R. Voss4 Continued authorship  To continue initial qualification  Continue as ATLAS member  Spend > 50% of research time on ATLAS  Not an author of another major LHC collaboration  After ceasing ATLAS membership:  Retained as author for one year  Everybody who would have qualified before start of ATLAS data-taking receives an additional credit of 4 months/year

IUPAP C11 18/08/2004 R. Voss5 Author lists  All general ATLAS papers to be signed by all ATLAS authors  Names of all authors will be presented on equal footing (alphabetically by name or institute)  Non-qualified authors may be included  Frequency and medium of publication do be decided after consultation with relevant journals

IUPAP C11 18/08/2004 R. Voss6 Scientific notes  Papers published by (small) subsets of ATLAS  Detector R&D, construction and tests  Physics studies  ….  All physics analyses using ATLAS collision data to appear first as general publications  Role after start of data-taking under discussion  Consensus: continue  Self-contained studies of sub-system aspects  Back-up to provide analysis details for general papers  …

IUPAP C11 18/08/2004 R. Voss7 Policy & decision making  ATLAS Publications Committee (PubComm) in charge of developing policies for authorship, internal refereeing etc.  Reports to Collaboration Board  Authorship Committee to be established (3 people, subset of PubComm)  Set up and maintain author list  Will rely essentially on input from institutes  Will deal with exceptional/controversial, in consultation with Spokesperson and CB Chair  Final decision by Spokesperson