Stanford hci group 30 June 2015 CINCH David Akers a cooperatively designed marking interface for 3D pathway selection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
7 th Symposium on Smart Graphics A Sketch-based Interface for Modeling Myocardial Fiber Orientation Kenshi Takayama 1 Takeo Igarashi 1,2 Ryo Haraguchi.
Advertisements

Hover Widgets: Using the Tracking State to Extend the Capabilities of Pen-Operated Devices Adaptive Systems and Interaction Research Group Microsoft Research.
Prototyping Lecture #4 - February 5th, : User Interface Design and Development.
The Sketchbook. idea 1 Why Sketches The problem typically fixate on first idea local hill climbing idea 1.
SDP 12 Project “PRASER” Senior Design Project 2012 Team Mosaic Advisor: Professor Lixin Gao Members: Allen Chew, Charles Essien, Brian Giang, Simon Ma.
Stanford hci group Scott Klemmer Autumn 2008 What We Learned… and Where We’re Going.
Prototyping Professor: Tapan Parikh TA: Eun Kyoung Choe
Stanford hci group / cs376 Design Processes and Tools Sharon Lin Bowen Li.
A Field Study of Community Bar (Mis)-matches between Theory and Practice Natalia Romero Gregor McEwan Saul Greenberg Eindhoven University of Technology.
CS335 Principles of Multimedia Systems Multimedia and Human Computer Interfaces Hao Jiang Computer Science Department Boston College Nov. 20, 2007.
User Interface Design Tools for the Future Multimodal UI Research in the HCC James A. Landay Jason Hong, Scott Klemmer, Jimmy Lin, Mark Newman, & Anoop.
Human Interface Engineering1 Main Title, 60 pt., U/L case LS=.8 lines Introduction to Human Interface Engineering NTU Seminar Amy Ma HIE Global Director.
Computing & Information Sciences Kansas State University CIS 536/636 Introduction to Computer Graphics Lecture 28 of 41 William H. Hsu Department of Computing.
Unit 2: Engineering Design Process
TEACHING SCIENCE WITH SIMULATIONS. INTENDED AUDIENCE SECONDARY SCIENCE TEACHERS.
Sketch­based interface on a handheld augmented reality system Rhys Moyne Honours Minor Thesis Supervisor: Dr. Christian Sandor.
Yeonjoo Oh 1, Gabe Johnson 1, Mark D Gross 1, Ellen Yi-Luen Do 2 1 CoDe Lab, Carnegie Mellon University 2 College of Architecture and Computing in Georgia.
The effects of relevance of on-screen information on gaze behaviour and communication in 3-party groups Emma L Clayes University of Glasgow Supervisor:
Design Rules-Part B Standards and Guidelines
Supporting rapid design and evaluation of pervasive application: challenges and solutions Lei Tang 1,2, Zhiwen Yu 1, Xingshe Zhou 1, Hanbo Wang 1, Christian.
Wizard of Oz Prototyping + Making Video Scenarios HCC 729 4/17/14.
1 CP586 © Peter Lo 2003 Multimedia Communication Human Computer Interaction.
THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS. Chapter Three: The Scientific Process  3.1 Inquiry and the Scientific Method  3.2 Experiments and Variables  3.3 The Nature.
Andrew Nealen / Olga Sorkine / Mark Alexa / Daniel Cohen-Or SoHyeon Jeong 2007/03/02.
SketchWizard: Wizard of Oz Prototyping of Pen-Based User Interface Richard C. Davis 1 T. Scott Saponas 3 Michael Shilman 4 James A. Landay 2, 3 1 CS Division,
Interaction Design Dr. Jim Rowan Foley Introduction What’s in the Book that we’ll cover.
12/7/10 Looking Back, Moving Forward Computational Photography Derek Hoiem, University of Illinois Photo Credit Lee Cullivan.
The E ngineering Design Process Foundations of Technology The E ngineering Design Process © 2013 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association,
IMAGIS-GRAVIR / IMAG Drawing for Illustration and Annotation in 3D David Bourguignon*, Marie-Paule Cani* and George Drettakis** *iMAGIS, INRIA Rhône-Alpes,
Stanford hci group / cs376 u Scott Klemmer · 26 October 2006 Design Tools.
Faculty Coach: Professor Martinez  Justin Mahar  Chris Baum  Greg Schmitz  Adam Abdelhamed.
12.2C: Project (Design/Implementation). Lesson objectives O have experience of using prototyping to create solutions for project work O be aware of the.
Whiteboard Scanning Using Super-resolution Wode Ni Advisor: John MacCormick COMP 491 Final Presentation Dec
KINECT 3D MODELLING Mechatronics I - Final Project Proposal.
G2 Presentation Week 12 Rehearsal. Outline Demo User Testing Internal External Improvements Project Management.
Stanford hci group / cs376 u Scott Klemmer · 12 October 2006 Evaluati on Methods.
CGM NTUST An Interactive Design System for Plush Toys Plushie Yuki Mori* Takeo Igarashi*
Computer Photography -Scene Fixed 陳立奇.
Multimedia production Bo Fibiger Dept. of Information and Media Science Aarhus University.
Sectional Views Introduction Drawing Abilities Teacher © J Lewis 2004.
COS 429: Computer Vision Thanks to Chris Bregler.
Papier-Mache: Toolkit Support for Tangible Input HCI Group University of California Scott R. Klemmer Jack Li James Lin DUB Group University of Washington.
Informal PUIs: No Recognition Required James Landay Jason Hong Scott Klemmer James Lin Mark Newman.
Digital Media & Interaction Design LECTURE 4+5. Lecture 4+5 Draw requirement + Prototyping.
Foundations of Technology The Engineering Design Process
Mesh Modelling With Curve Analogies
Introduction to Event-Driven Programming
Chapter 6. Data Collection in a Wizard-of-Oz Experiment in Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Dialogue Systems by: Rieser & Lemon. Course: Autonomous.
CENG 789 – Digital Geometry Processing 10- Least-Squares Solutions
Concept Map: Clustering Visualizations of Categorical Domains
AlphaGO from Google DeepMind in 2016, beat human grandmasters
Enhanced-alignment Measure for Binary Foreground Map Evaluation
Physics-based Sound Synthesis with a Novel Friction Model
Interactive 3D Modeling Using Only One Image
Intermountain West Data Warehouse
Silhouette Intersection
CS 522: Human-Computer Interaction Lab: Formative Evaluation
The Design and problem solving process
Research Topics in Human-Computer Interaction
Pre-Final Presentation
Chapter by Loco Power Week 6: Medium-Fidelity Prototypes
spark: never miss a moment
Joseph I. Friedman et al. JIMG 2014;7:
CENG 789 – Digital Geometry Processing 11- Least-Squares Solutions
Human Computer Interaction
THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS
Gradient Domain Salience-preserving Color-to-gray Conversion
Miniature Train Project
TeNT did not affect lysosome fusion.
user-defined gestures for surface computing
Presentation transcript:

stanford hci group 30 June 2015 CINCH David Akers a cooperatively designed marking interface for 3D pathway selection

2 The Human Brain white matter

3 Estimated Pathways

4 Pathway Selection DTI-Query [Akers et al. 2004, Sherbondy, et al. 2005]

5 Background brain imaging and pathway selection Design Process Wizard of Oz prototype The CINCH System demonstration and implementation details Design Implications reflections on design process Outline

6 Touch

7 Shape Match

8 An Interface Design Quandary How to develop a marking language that is both: Useful to scientists (solves their selection problems) Intuitive to scientists (matches their mental model)

9 Whiteboard Explorations

10 Wizard of Oz Prototype Scientists invent their own marking operations Wizard modeUser mode Designer simulates the effects, using a crude but functional interface

11 Wizard of Oz Prototype [ Live Demo ]

12 Marking Operations Invented shape matchingtouchsurface intersection Selection modes: Add, Remove, Intersect

13 Design Principles Minimality Remove unnecessary parameters whenever possible. Visibility Marks should only affect pathways on the visible side of each cutting plane.

14 The CINCH Interface [ Demo Video ]

15 The CINCH Interface

16 Details: Shape Match 3D pathway (projected) Gestural mark Distance metric: Mean closest points

17 Details: Grow/Shrink Distance to selection Distance matrix

18 Related Work 3D modeling interfaces  Sketch [Zeleznik et al. 1996]  Teddy [Igarashi et al. 1999] 3D selection interfaces  SenseShapes [Olwal et al. 1999]  Volume Catcher [Owada et al. 2003] Participatory design  Cooperative Prototyping [Bødker and Grønbæk 1989]

19 CINCH In Use CINCH was evaluated using: Event logs Screen Captures Interviews Scientists self-reported 2-5 times speedup when using CINCH. CINCH has been adopted and is being used actively.

20 Final Thoughts

21 Acknowledgments Computer Science Scott Klemmer (Stanford U.) Tomer Moscovich (Brown U.) Neuroscience Brian Wandell (Stanford U.) All the participants in our experiments Sponsors NIH (EY ) Charles A. Dana Foundation ( )

stanford hci group jects/dti Questions? David Akers u