Intensive measurements and modelling of size segregated chemical composition of aerosols in June 2006 and Jan 2007 Wenche Aas, Rami Alfarra, Elke Bieber,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Task Force on Modelling and measurement activity : synergies with FAIRMODE Laurence Rouïl (INERIS) Co-chair of the TFMM.
Advertisements

Atmospheric Aerosol From the Source to the Receptor Insights from the Pittsburgh Supersite Spyros Pandis, Allen Robinson, and Cliff Davidson Department.
The evaluation of atmospheric pollution in Europe Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC (NILU) The EMEP Programme.
Using field campaigns results to reduce uncertainties in inventories Wenche Aas, Knut Breivik and Karl Espen Yttri And material from: Eiko Nemitz (CEH,
Section highlights Organic Aerosol and Field Studies.
Title PM2.5: Comparison of modelling and measurements Presented by Hilde Fagerli SB, Geneva, September 7-9, 2009.
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
PM in Sweden HC Hansson and Christer Johansson ITM, Stockholm University.
Title EMEP Unified model Importance of observations for model evaluation Svetlana Tsyro MSC-W / EMEP TFMM workshop, Lillestrøm, 19 October 2010.
Title Performance of the EMEP aerosol model: current results and further needs Presented by Svetlana Tsyro (EMEP/MSC-W) EMEP workshop on Particulate Matter.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
1 Laxenburg, 16 Nov TFIAM-TFMM joint workshop(1) Similarities and Differences in Particle Characteristics across Europe Jean-Philippe Putaud EC –
Developments in EMEP monitoring strategy and recommendations from AirMonTech Kjetil Tørseth, NILU/EMEP-CCC.
Cooperation of EMEP/CCC and EEA on near real-time air quality data. Presented by Wenche Aas Though most of the work is done by: Tim Haigh, Bernt Rondell,
/tfmm3 EMEP Chemical Coordinating Centre Measurements of particulate matter in EMEP Current implementation Kjetil Tørseth, Wenche Aas, Michael.
Simulating diurnal changes of speciated particulate matter in Atlanta, Georgia using CMAQ Yongtao Hu, Jaemeen Baek, Bo Yan, Rodney Weber, Sangil Lee, Evan.
Some Experiences and results from EMEP-Intensive- Measuring-Campaigns at Melpitz site (German lowlands, Saxony) Summer 2006 and Winter 2007 – Planned possible.
EMEP INTENSIVE MEASUREMENT PERIODS IN CLOSE PARTNERSSHIP WITH EU PROJECTS Wenche Aas, Andres Alastuey, Francesco Canonaco, Fabrizia Cavalli, Franco Lucarelli,
Title Progress in the development and results of the UNIFIED EMEP model Presented by Leonor Tarrason EMEP/MSC-W 29 th TFIAM meeting, Amiens, France,
Relevant activities in EMEP Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC (NILU) EMEP Monitoring programme Expansion to the EECCA region, HTAP QA/QC.
Uncertainties in atmospheric observations Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC.
Wish-list to the Emission community.  TFMM annual meeting held in Zagreb on the 6-8 May 2013  Main issues :  Review of the implementation of the EMEP.
Synergies between EMEP and EUSAAR Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
PM Model Performance in Southern California Using UAMAERO-LT Joseph Cassmassi Senior Meteorologist SCAQMD February 11, 2004.
EMEP Monitoring programme Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC (NILU)
EMEP Monitoring Strategy Status and challenges, with main focus on the EECCA region Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)
ENEON first workshop Observing Europe: Networking the Earth Observation Networks in Europe September, Paris [EMEP,ACTRIS,HELCOM,CAMP and more/NILU]
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrasón
EMEP intensive measurements, June 2006 and Jan 2007
EMEP intensive measurements
Wenche Aas and Karl Espen Yttri (EMEP/CCC)
ACTRIS Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) Network and new filter off-line techniques to measure PM chemical composition and determine organic aerosol.
Assessment of Atmospheric PM in the Slovak Republic
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
Massimo Vieno, Eiko Nemitz CEH Edinburgh & Univ. Edinburgh
EMEP Monitoring Strategy
Statistical analysis of the secondary inorganic aerosol in Hungary using background measurements and model calculations Zita Ferenczi   Hungarian Meteorological.
Status of data from EMEP intensive period 2008/2009
Monitoring strategy, technical issues
C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution
Rami Alfarra, Urs Baltensperger: Paul Scherrer Institute, CH.
Ari Laaksonen, Jukka Rukkainen: University of Kopio, FI.
Title Effect of horizontal resolution on PM calculations:
TFMM PM Assessment Report
Title Inorganic PM at selected sites during intensive period 2008:
EMEP intensive measurements, June 2006
Empa, Air Pollution/Environmental Technologies
Uncertainties in atmospheric observations
EMEP/ACTRIS/COLOSSAL intensive measurement period Des 2017 – March 2018 Wenche Aas, EMEP/CCC.
Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment
TFMM Work plan for 2010 Build-up the appropriate framework for the implementation of the revised monitoring strategy Technical support to the Parties.
An Overview of the EUSAAR I3 Project
H. Fagerli, TFMM Bordeux, april 2008
EUSAAR contribution to the EMEP intensive field campaigns
Eiko Nemitz Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) United Kingdom
Future intensive field periods Recommendations
Lessons learnt from the EMEP intensive measurements
UK (CEH) and ACTRIS WP3: In-situ chemical, physical and optical properties of aerosols WP4: Trace gases networking: Volatile organic carbon and nitrogen.
Wenche Aas Status of EMEP measurements today Field intercomparison
Title Recent developments of the EMEP/MSC-W model aiming at PM improvement Work by MSC-W modelling group presented by Svetlana Tsyro TFMM.
First use of satellite AOD data for EMEP model validation for PM
Welcome TFMM workshop on the implementation of the EMEP monitoring strategy Introduction to the monitoring strategy QA/QC activities of EMEP organisation.
EC/OC – monitoring within EMEP
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
EMEP intensive measurement periods
EMEP/MSC-W How can EMEP Intensive measurement periods help to improve modelling of acidification, eutrophication, O3 and PM? Views from MSC-W H. Fagerli.
accessed from the web about 2000 times
Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason
Presentation transcript:

Intensive measurements and modelling of size segregated chemical composition of aerosols in June 2006 and Jan 2007 Wenche Aas, Rami Alfarra, Elke Bieber, Darius Ceburnis, Thomas Ellermann, Martin Ferm, Marina Frölich, Robert Gehrig, HC Hansson, Gyula Kiss, Ulla Makkonen, Nichos Mihalopoulos, Eiko Nemitz, Rene P. Otjes, Noemí Perez, Cinzia Perrino, Jean Philippe Putaud, Christian Plass-Duelmer, Gerald Spindler, Svetlana Tsyro, Milan Vana, Karl Espen Yttri.

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Outline  Background  EMEP Monitoring Strategy  Supersites  Sites, frequenzy etc  Results  Spatial, temporal level of PM, inorg, organic  Mass closure  Episodes  High resolution data (AMS, MARGA)  Comparison with EMEP model  Artefacts  EC/OC  Nitrogen gas/particle distribution  Outlook  New campaigns/intensive periods

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept EMEP Monitoring programme Level 1 Main ions in precipitation and in air heavy metals in precipitations ozone PM 10 and PM 2.5 mass meteorology at ca 125 sites Level 2, supersite (joint EMEP/GAW) POPs Heavy metals in air and aerosols VOC EC/OC, OC speciation Mineral Dust PM speciation incl. gas particle ratio + all level 1 activities sites Both levels are mandatory by all Parties

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Objective of intensive measurments  To underpin the EMEP programme  not realistic to require full daily chemical speciation or continuous measurements 365 days a year.  Coordinate and harmonise the research campaigns and monitoring efforts in Europe  Important for improving our current understanding of the temporal and spatial variation of PM and PM constituents in Europe, their sources and formation mechanisms, and for model validation.  Such measurement periods also motivate and prepare the Parties to initiate new measurements stated in the EMEP monitoring strategy.

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Sites and measurments

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept PM10 speciation, spring 2006 TC = OC* EC*1.1 (or meas TC *1.3)

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept PM 10 June 2006 PM2.5 june 2006 PM 10 Jan 2007 PM 2.5 Jan 2007 PM 2.5 June 2006

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept PM 10 June 2006 PM2.5 june 2006 PM 10 Jan 2007 PM 2.5 Jan 2007 PM 2.5 June 2006

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept PM 2.5 speciationPM 10 speciation Montelibretti, IT01 June ± 10.7  g/m ± 12  g/m ± 11.2  g/m ± 25.5  g/m 3 CrustalSeasaltNO 3 - NH 4 + SO 4 2- OC*1.7ECUnknown January % 12% 15% 12%

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Montelibretti, IT01: 29 June 2996 PM  g/m 3 PM  g/m 3 Flextra

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Melpitz, DE44 PM 1 speciationPM 10 speciation PM 2.5 speciation 10 ± 4.3  g/m 3 13 ± 6.1  g/m ± 6.3  g/m 3 June ± 4.4  g/m ± 7.2  g/m ± 7.3  g/m 3 January % 37% 29% 37% 43% 49% Ca 2+, K + SeasaltNO 3 - NH 4 + SO 4 2- OC*1.7ECUnknown

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Melpitz, 7 and 19 jan 2007

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept PM 2.5 speciationPM 10 speciation Birkenes, NO01 (June 2006) 7.0 ± 4  g/m 3 PM 1 speciation Ca 2+, K + SeasaltNO 3 - NH 4 + SO 4 2- OC*1.7ECUnknown 7.1 ± 4.3  g/m ± 5.8  g/m 3 OM (PM 1 ) = 31% OM (PM 2.5 ) = 35% OM (PM 10 ) = 28% Minor differences in chemical composition with respect to size 22% 34%31%

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Auchencorth, Scotland Mace Head, Ireland Payerne, Switzerland Total PM 1 = 19.4  g m -3 Total PM 1 = 8.6  g m -3 Total PM 1 = 6.0  g m -3 Total PM 2.5 = 13.7  g m -3 Cabauw, The Netherlands Total PM 2.5 = > 12.4  g m -3 Harwell, England Melpitz, Germany June 2006: Gas / aerosol partitioning of inorganic (ECN, NL; Univ. Kopio, FI; PSI, CH)

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Total Measured Concentrations June 2006

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Total Measured Concentrations Jan 2007

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Overview of Average Concentrations: June 2006

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Overview of Average Concentrations: January 2007

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Comparison with EMEP Model See more at Svetlana Tsyro’s poster: LP24, Thursday 13 sept

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Artefact in Nitrogen det. IT01, Jan 2007 IT01, June 2007 Artefact free measurements using denuders only done at Montelibretti

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Carbonaceous material in PM 2.5 corrected for positive artefacts.

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Estimates of the positive artefact of OC in PM 10 and PM 2.5 /PM 1 -June 2006 QBQ-approach

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Next intensive periodes  Harmonised with EUCAARI,  Periods  17 Sep – 16 Oct 2008 and 25 Feb – 26 Mar 2009  Focus  Daily and hourly measurements of aerosol components  size distributions  Artefact free gas/particle  Reference method for EC/OC (EUSAAR protocol)  Attempts to quantify aerosol water  Attempts to quantify the OC/OM ratio  primary vs. secondary and biogenic vs. anthropogenic  vertical distribution (EARLINET)  filling of thes spatial gaps in Southern and Eastern Europe.  Funding?  Try national research councils  or EUSAAR, ACCENT

Wenche Aas, EAC2007 Salzburg 9-14 sept Conclusions  Comprehensive and valuable data set for many further analysis  High spatial and temporal resolution covering different chemical regimes in Europe  Important for model development  Need to have control of artefacts with PM sampling (N and TC)  Future intensive periods will be harmonised with EUCAARI (sept 08, march 09)