PEER Summative Meeting 13 June 2007 Implementation, Adoption, and Stakeholder Perspectives Peter J. May University of Washington.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNOPS Safer Hospitals Global Platform for DRR May 2013.
Advertisements

© UKCIP 2011 Learning and Informing Practice: The role of knowledge exchange Roger B Street Technical Director Friday, 25 th November 2011 Crew Project.
PEER 2002 PEER Annual Meeting Thinking Ahead: Issues for Adoption of PBEE uPeter J. May uCenter for American Politics and Public Policy uUniversity of.
Exercise: Defining Your State’s Role. Objectives  Understand the role that your state plays in supporting standards implementation through:  systems.
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
(The Global Programme of Research On Climate Change Vulnerability, Impacts and Adaptation) Adaptation Knowledge Day V: Climate Change Adaptation Gaps BONN,
Inclusive Green Growth Workshop Summary of discussion.
Society for Risk Analysis Meeting 5-8 December 2004 Improving Government Risk Management and Appraisal of Risk to the Public Brian Glicksman.
1 Holmes IRCC Workshop October 18, 2006 Motivation and Development of PBEE for Existing and New Buildings William T. Holmes Structural Engineer Rutherford.
Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency Preparedness Mr. James Kish, Director Technological Hazards National Preparedness Directorate.
Interstate Natural Gas Association of America INGAA Action Plan to Build Confidence in Pipeline Safety INGAA Integrity Management Continuous Improvement.
Forming And Sustaining Successful Partnerships Presenter: John M. Mutsambi, Community Liaison/Educator with University of Zimbabwe and University of California.
PBEE Decision Variable Considerations DISCUSSION PEER TESTBED MEETING 5/23/02.
Fatality Modeling and the PEER Testbeds Shoaf and Seligson Casualty Project Kickoff UCLA CPHD 27 January 2003 Keith Porter, California Institute of Technology.
Quantifying risk by performance- based earthquake engineering, Cont’d Greg Deierlein Stanford University …with contributions by many 2006 IRCC Workshop.
Risk Decision Making for Buildings – From Owners to Society Mary Comerio University of California, Berkeley PEER Summative Meeting 13 June 2007.
The story continues… Jack Moehle. PEER Graduation “Take a couple years off and find out what you really want to do.”
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
Implementation, Adoption, and Stakeholder Perspectives Peter J. May University of Washington PEER Summative Meeting – June 13, 2007.
Framework for Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering Helmut Krawinkler, Stanford U. PEER Summative Meeting – June 13, 2007.
Concrete Coalition Identify dangerous concrete buildings and fix them.
Orienting Innovation towards Grand Challenges: a real-time experiment in the application of foresight-assisted processes Professor Ron Johnston Australian.
UCAR These organizations have created guidance for the next Administration and Congress on making our nation more resilient to the impacts of severe weather.
Risk and Resilience: A Canadian Perspective on Climate Change Adaptation Donald S. Lemmen, PhD Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Directorate Natural.
Adapting to Climate Change: Canada’s Experience and Approach Elizabeth Atkinson Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Directorate Natural Resources Canada.
Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity Overview and Status Executive Order “Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity”
FDA’s Perspective Continued - Where We Are ?. GMP Task Groups.
21 CFR Part 11 A Food Industry Perspective FDA Public Meeting June 11, 2004 Sia Economides Center Director Center for Development of Research Policy and.
Codex Guidelines for the Application of HACCP
Unit 1 Community Capabilities
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency US NRC Approach for Seismic Hazard Assessments INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON LESSONS LEARNED FROM STRONG EARTHQUAKES.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Harold Winnie, CATS Manager (Central Region) Leak detection for.
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
Translating Knowledge to On-the-Ground Results Henry L. Green, Hon. AIA National Institute of Building Sciences Congressional.
KT-EQUAL/ CARDI Workshop: ‘Lost in Translation’ 23 June 2011 Communicating research results to policy makers: A practitioner’s perspective.
Implementing Shared Inspection Management Systems Insights from recent WBG research John R. Wille WBG Investment Climate Advisory Services Amman, Jordan.
Environmental and technology ethics Uncertainty, risk and precaution.
Fostering a ‘Whole Community’ Approach to Emergency Management David J. Kaufman Director, Office of Policy and Program Analysis 8 June 2011.
Discussion # 4 What Approaches are Needed? Lewis E. Link, Ph.D., HG, M.ASCE Robert G. Traver, Ph.D., P.E., D.WRE.
UNFCCC Workshop on TNAs Bonn, Germany 1 June 2011 Elmer HoltEconomist, United States Department of Energy Office of Policy and International Affairs and.
Relevant, Ready, Responsive, Reliable 1 Addressing the Flood Risk Challenge.
Adaptation knowledge needs and response under the UNFCCC process Adaptation Knowledge Day V Session 1: Knowledge Gaps Bonn, Germany 09 June 2014 Rojina.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Natural Hazards Science – Reducing the World’s.
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
SACCNet AGM and Working Groups Workshop Climate Change Research Reaching out for Policy and Practice Miriam Feilberg, DWF.
8 TH -11 TH NOVEMBER, 2010 UN Complex, Nairobi, Kenya MEETING OUTCOMES David Smith, Manager PEI Africa.
IT Governance Review Presentation to SAAG – January 11 th, 2011.
UNDP Handbook for conducting technology needs assessments and Preliminary analysis of countries’ TNAs UNFCCC Seminar on the development and transfer on.
Strengthening Science Supporting Fishery Management  Standards for Best Available Science  Implementation of OMB’s Peer Review Bulletin  Separation.
ISO (C)SR Standard: Implications from a market access perspective Tom Rotherham International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD)
Community Resilience To Climate Change in Hawai`i 2009 Hawai`i Conservation Conference Hawai`i in a Changing Climate: Ecological, Economic, and Policy.
RESPONSIBLE CARE ® SECURITY CODE Daniel Roczniak Senior Director, Responsible Care American Chemistry Council June 2010.
1 V&V Needs for NextGen of 2025 and Beyond A JPDO Perspective Maureen Keegan JPDO Integration Manager October 13, 2010.
The AIACC Project Assessments of Impacts and Adaptations to Climate Change Neil Leary, AIACC Science Director AIACC Regional Workshop for Latin America.
The Marine Stewardship Council: A Multi- Stakeholder Fisheries Assessment Programme for Sustainable Fisheries Oluyemisi Oloruntuyi (MSC)
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
David Moser USACE Chief Economist
CITEL – San Salvador | 16 April | Electromagnetic Fields: A WHO Perspective Dr E. van Deventer.
B IOCHEMICAL T ECHNOLOGY L EADERSHIP R OUNDTABLE (BTLR) Vision: A sustainable chemicals economy Scope: Chemicals made using bio-based and renewable technologies.
Kristin Gilroy, PhD International Center for Integrated Water Resources Management 24 February 2016 Climate Risk Informed Decision Analysis: Bridging the.
SEC-07-FCT-2016 Human Factor for the Prevention, Investigation, and Mitigation of Criminal and Terrorist Acts Dr. William Hynes Future Analytics Consulting.
Tools for Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction: Guidance Notes for Development Organisations Charlotte Benson and John Twigg Presented by Margaret Arnold.
Equipping the Next Generation for Active Engagement in Science EngagingScience.eu שילוב נושאים סוציו-מדעיים ואתיים בלימודי מדע ד"ר יעל שורץ, אתי דגן ואמיל.
Development of Community-based Adaptation Project Experiences of the GEF Small grants programme By Stephen Gitonga Climate change Programme officer GEF.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission NRC’s Risk-Informed and Performance- Based Approach to Decommissioning DOE Workshop on Risk-Based End States.
Topic Area 3. Water Management and Planning
Incorporating Climate Change Considerations
Considerations in Development of the SBSTA Five Year Programme of Work on Adaptation Thank Mr. Chairman. Canada appreciates this opportunity to share.
Presentation transcript:

PEER Summative Meeting 13 June 2007 Implementation, Adoption, and Stakeholder Perspectives Peter J. May University of Washington

PEER Summative Meeting 13 June 2007 PEER research has addressed: Decision Considerations & Heuristics How stakeholders think about earthquake performance Role of experts, codes, and uncertainty in these choices Implementation and Adoption Considerations Lessons from past earthquake engineering innovations Barriers to adoption and future scenarios for PBEE adoption Societal and Regulatory Considerations Benefits of performance-based approaches Regulatory systems implications Relevant PEER Research

PEER Summative Meeting 13 June 2007 Decision Considerations (J. Meszaros – PEER research) Issue Surfacing Portfolio of Objectives PBEE Analysis Choice(s) Code-based Environment 0-1 Logic 3-D model: Deaths Dollars Downtime Site specific Preferred Metrics Stages in Low Probability High Consequence Investment Decisions Individuals, Consortium have varied concerns

PEER Summative Meeting 13 June 2007 Contributions of PEER Decision Research Lessons for communicating PBEE results Role of “the three D’s” – death, dollars, and downtime as they relate to decision-making by owners and others Importance of multiple ways of presenting PBEE assessments Results from the Van Nuys Testbed

PEER Summative Meeting 13 June 2007 Adoption Issues for Prior Earthquake Engineering Innovations Key Barriers High perceived (or real) costs of the required analyses or technologies Lack of agreed upon standards or guidelines Lack of necessary computational power and analysis routines Lack of data concerning performance of structures Reluctance of some of the engineering community to incorporate the advances into practice Key Facilitators Actions to overcome the above barriers Documented uses of methodologies and their benefits Willingness of early adopters to share experiences Implementation and Adoption Research (May and Koski 2002 PEER research)

PEER Summative Meeting 13 June 2007 Contributions of PEER Implementation and Adoption Research Shaping PEER’s efforts to stimulate adoption and implementation Imagining future scenarios for PBEE adoption

PEER Summative Meeting 13 June 2007 Regulatory and Societal Considerations (May and others 2003, 2006)

PEER Summative Meeting 13 June 2007 Societal Perspectives -- Benefits (May 2007) The benefits of PBEE are the “value added” of information in quantifying performance and addressing uncertainties

PEER Summative Meeting 13 June 2007 Related PEER Research Activities PEER Catastrophic Risk Workshop Engaging economists, engineers, and others in discussing risk Earthquake performance and “cat bonds” PEER Inter-jurisdictional Regulatory Coordinating Committee Workshop Regulatory officials from around the word met with PEER experts to discuss risk-based regulatory standards Tri-Center FEMA “Guidance for Seismic Safety Advocates” Project to take lessons from social science research for communicating about policy considerations for earthquake hazard reduction

PEER Summative Meeting 13 June 2007 We have sought to influence:  How policy and other decisions about seismic safety investments are made.  Future codes and guidelines as a primary means for enhancing seismic safety.  Engineering practice and education.  Future research directions for improving the scientific base for performance-based engineering. PEER research is about more than buildings, bridges, lifelines, or technologies

PEER Summative Meeting 13 June 2007 The broadest societal benefits of the performance-based approach are not just wiser decisions about seismic objectives and design, but the design and construction of safer facilities and of more resilient infrastructure