Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes Anne-Claude Gavin, Markus Bosche, Roland Krause, Paola Grandi,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Arabidopsis Genomics in France. Physiological role Expression microarrays Systematic functional analysis: from genome to function Reverse genetics Gène.
Advertisements

Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways Parsons et al Nature Biotechnology.
Research Methodology of Biotechnology: Protein-Protein Interactions Yao-Te Huang Aug 16, 2011.
Bio 402/502 Section II, Lecture 7 Systems Biology of the Nucleus Dr. Michael C. Yu.
Protein domains vs. structure domains - an example.
Protein analysis and proteomics II Monday, 30 January 2006 Introduction to Bioinformatics DA McClellan
Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein- protein interaction network Han, et al
New Approaches for High-Throughput Identification and Characterization of Protein Complexes Michelle V. Buchanan Oak Ridge National Laboratory NIH Workshop.
Microarrays: Theory and Application By Rich Jenkins MS Student of Zoo4670/5670 Year 2004.
Biological networks: Types and origin
Affinity chromatography/mass spec Bait protein GST Page 252.
GTL Facilities Characterization and Imaging of Molecular Machines Lee Makowski.
Cloning, genomes, and proteomes
Announcements: Proposal resubmissions are due 4/23. It is recommended that students set up a meeting to discuss modifications for the final step of the.
Previous Lecture: Regression and Correlation
Protein-protein Interactions June 18, Why PPI?  Protein-protein interactions determine outcome of most cellular processes  Proteins which are.
MCB 317 Genetics and Genomics MCB 317 Topic 10, part 5 A Story of Transcription.
Proteomics Understanding Proteins in the Postgenomic Era.
Purification of Proteins Associated with Specific Genomic Loci Jérôme Déjardin and Robert E. Kingston.
Biotechnology Final Project Recombinant DNA Gene Cloning.
A highly abbreviated introduction to proteomics
Protein protein interactions
歐亞書局 PRINCIPLES OF BIOCHEMISTRY Chapter 9 DNA-Based Information Technologies.
Functional Organization of the Yeast Proteosome by Systematic Analysis of Protein Complexes Nature.Vol January Anne-Claude Gavin, Markus.
9/14/20151 EECS 730 Introduction to Bioinformatics Introduction to Proteomics Luke Huan Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
1 By: Mahnaz Habibi 2011/03/07. Interpretation of cellular processes Interpretation the functions of proteins Identify some structural properties of proteins.
Research Methodology of Biotechnology: Protein-Protein Interactions
Protein analysis and proteomics (Part 2 of 2). Many of the images in this powerpoint presentation are from Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics by Jonathan.
Genome Biology and Biotechnology 10. The proteome Prof. M. Zabeau Department of Plant Systems Biology Flanders Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology.
A systems biology approach to the identification and analysis of transcriptional regulatory networks in osteocytes Angela K. Dean, Stephen E. Harris, Jianhua.
Assigning Function to Yeast Proteins By Integration of Technologies Hazbun, TR et al. (2003) Mol. Cell 12, Kate Drahos 23 April 2004.
Transient Protein-Protein Interactions (TPPI)
IOSI Journal Club Giulia Poretti June 1, RMCE targeted transgenesis system in a lymphoma cell line: a tool for studying the function of candidate.
GTL Facilities Computing Infrastructure for 21 st Century Systems Biology Ed Uberbacher ORNL & Mike Colvin LLNL.
Finish up array applications Move on to proteomics Protein microarrays.
Introduction to Proteomics 1. What is Proteomics? Proteomics - A newly emerging field of life science research that uses High Throughput (HT) technologies.
Function first: a powerful approach to post-genomic drug discovery Stephen F. Betz, Susan M. Baxter and Jacquelyn S. Fetrow GeneFormatics Presented by.
Proteome and interactome Bioinformatics.
A road map for cell biology: Why studying large protein complexes is crucial at this time David Drubin, UC Berkeley.
Protein Microarrays and detection via MALDI-TOF: Project Overview Kyle Nordquist Advisor: Dr. Andrew Link.
Lecture 9. Functional Genomics at the Protein Level: Proteomics.
TAP(Tandem Affinity Purification) Billy Baader Genetics 677.
Genomics II: The Proteome Using high-throughput methods to identify proteins and to understand their function.
Proteomic characterization of the human centrosome by protein correlation profilling Andersen JS et al. Nature 426:
Central dogma: the story of life RNA DNA Protein.
Erwin Schrodinger What is Life? 1944 Nobel Prize in Physics 1933 Atomic Theory.
Two powerful transgenic techniques Addition of genes by nuclear injection Addition of genes by nuclear injection Foreign DNA injected into pronucleus of.
Announcements: Note that there will be presentations and associated paper summaries for both Thursday and Tuesday classes. The Exam II mean is 81.6 and.
1 Protein-Protein Interactions High-throughput strategy –Prediction from sequence In silico analysis –Protein A from species A: domain 1 and 2 –Protein.
How many interactions are there? ~6,200 genes ~6,200 proteins x 2-10 interactions/protein ~12, ,000 interactions Yeast.
BioZ, TUDresden The core proteome of S. cerevisiae has been mapped using knock-in tag methodology EMBL/CellZome, Heidelberg Krogan…Greenblatt, Toronto.
Protein interactions: main methods for detection (all organisms) Two-hybrid8,446 (Co-)Immunoprecipitation567 Interaction adhesion assay225 In vitro binding138.
The Yeast Resource Center An NCRR Biomedical Technology Resource Center
Nature as blueprint to design antibody factories Life Science Technologies Project course 2016 Aalto CHEM.
Affinity chromatography based strategies “Fishing for partners” Immunoprecipitation approaches The TAP TAG system Two hybrid assay.
Protein-protein Interactions
 Facilities Open House Functional Genomics Facility Molishree Joshi, Ph.D. 6/1/2015 Contact Information:
Protein-protein Interactions
Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes Presented by Nathalie Kirshman and Xinyi Ma.
Molecular techniques for the study of the interaction between……..
Department of Chemical Engineering
Natalie Galles S. N. Bose Research Exchange Summer 2016
Protein Complex Discovery
Volume 120, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 91, Issue 4, Pages (November 1997)
Protein Complex Discovery
Voronoi treemaps (109) comparing protein expression profiles of M
Proteomic analysis of human transcription factors Disease correlation of 19 TFs and 4 well‐studied FOX family members, based on their GO annotations. Proteomic.
Identification of GRP78 and vaspin complex by tandem affinity tag purification. Identification of GRP78 and vaspin complex by tandem affinity tag purification.
ChAP-MS: A Method for Identification of Proteins and Histone Posttranslational Modifications at a Single Genomic Locus  Stephanie D. Byrum, Ana Raman,
Presentation transcript:

Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes Anne-Claude Gavin, Markus Bosche, Roland Krause, Paola Grandi, Martina Marzioch, Andreas Bauer, Jorg Schultz, Jens M. Rick, Anne-Marie Michon, Cristina-Maria Cruciat, Marita Remor, Christian Hofert, Malgorzata Schelder, Miro Brajenovic, Heins Ruffner, Alejandro Merino, Karin Klein, Manuela Hudak, David Dickson, Tatjana Rudi, Volker Gnau, Angela Bauch, Sonja Bastuck, Bettina Huhse, Christina Leutwein, Marie-Anne Heurtier, Richard R. Copley, Angela Edelmann, Erich Querfurth, Vladimir Rybin, Gerard Drewes, Manfred Raida, Tewis Bouwmesster, Peer Bork, Bertrand Seraphin, Bernhard Kuster, Gitte Neubauer, and Giulio Superti-Furga (Nature 415. 2002) Anne-Claude Gavin et al.

Background Information Proteins rarely act alone Comprehensive protein interaction studies thus far: two-hybrid systems (ex vivo) protein chips (in vitro) GST pull-downs (in vivo) 3. Authors used tandem-affinity purification (TAP) and mass spectrometry Slide 2 At the biochemical level, proteins rarely act alone, but rather interact with one another, sometimes in complexes, to carry out specific cellular processes. Two hybrid systems: (+) pairwise/binary interactions between proteins; transient associations (-) characterization of protein complexes Protein chips: (-) it is in vitro TAP: The authors used a technique called tandem-affinity purification coupled with mass spectrometry in a large-scale approach to characterize multiprotein complexes in Saccharyomeces cerevisiae, the budding or baker’s yeast.

Rationale for Using TAP/MS Method Fast purification with high yield In vivo Over-expression of proteins not required Prior knowledge of protein complex not required Purified complex can be used in a variety of studies Slide 3 Allows for fast purification with high yield of protein complexes under native, physiological conditions; therefore, this is an in vivo approach. In addition, the proteins under study do not have to be overexpressed, in fact it is preferred to maintain the expression of the fusion, target protein at natural levels. This is because protein overexpression can result in nonspecific or unnatural protein interactions. Prior knowledge of complex composition and function is not necessary. Since the purification procedure is gentle, the purified complex can be used protein identification, functional, or structural studies.

The Tandem Affinity Purification Tag target protein target protein

TAP Purification Strategy

TAP Purification Strategy

TAP Purification Strategy

TAP Purification Strategy … in detail PCR of the TAP cassette Transformation of yeast cells (homologous recombination) Selection of positive clones Large-scale cultivation Cell lysis Tandem affinity purification One-dimensional SDS-PAGE MALDI-TOF protein identification Bioinformatic data interpretation

The Experiment Processed 1,739 genes (1,143 human orthologues) Purified 589 protein assemblies Annotated 232 multiprotein complexes (98 known, 134 new) Proposed new/additional cellular roles for 344 proteins (231 new) Identified 1,440 distinct gene products

The Experiment …cont’d 9% of the 232 TAP complexes had no new component 2-83 components per TAP complex Assigned cellular roles to complexes according to YPD and literature studies Nine functional categories Slide 10 Of all 232 TAP complexes, only 9% had no new component. The size of the TAP complexes ranged from 2-83 components, with an average of 12 components per complex. Assigned cellular roles to complexes by computing functional assignments of the individual components according to YPD and by literature searching.

Some Statistics

A Higher-Order Map http://yeast.cellzome.com Slide 12 After the individual proteins of the complexes have been identified, the authors want to study the relationships between complexes to understand the integration and coordination of cellular processes. This is a protein complex network, it provides a functional description of the eukaryotic proteome at a higher level of organization. The complexes are linked to each other if they share components. The cellular roles of the complexes are color coded. Dark blue = transcription, DNA maintenance, chromatin structure. Violet = intermediate and energy metabolism. The website has a software package that allows you to navigate through this proteome map at both the complex and protein levels. http://yeast.cellzome.com

Linked Complexes Slide 13 This is an example of a complex linked to two other complexes by virtue of shared components. This illustrates the relationship between the protein and complex levels of organization.

Results of the Experiment Orthologues tend to interact with orthologues (53% vs 31%) Essential genes tend to interact with essential genes (44% vs 17%) Existence of “orthologous proteome” for eukaryotes? Slide 14 Orthologous proteins tend to interact with complexes enriched with other orthologues (mean 53%). Nonorthologous proteins have a lower tendency for such interactions (31%). The same goes for the interaction of essential genes. This suggests the existence of an “orthologous proteome” that may represent core functions for the eukaryotic cell.

Some Faults of the TAP Method “Super” unstable protein complexes TAP tag may interfere with complex Transient interactions Low stoichiometric complexes Physiology-specific interactions Slide 15 The TAP method may not be able to detect complexes where proteins do not interact with sufficient stability. The TAP tag may interfere with complex formation or protein localization and function. This method may also fail to detect transient interactions, low stoichiometric complexes, and those interactions occurring in specific physiological states which exponential growing cells do not exhibit.

Conclusions This TAP/MS method is the largest analysis of protein complexes Allows efficient identification of low-abundance proteins Allows purification of very large complexes Can complement other biochemical techniques Lower-order maps and higher-order maps provide crucial information Slide 16 Lower-order maps and higher-order maps provide crucial information for drug discovery efforts and may aid in the choice and evaluation of drug targets.

Great Summer Reading Rigaut, G. et al. A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration. Nature Biotechnol. 17, 1030-1032 (1999). Puig, O. et al. The tandem affinity purification (tap) method: a general procedure of protien complex purification. Methods 24, 218-229 (2001).