An Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of the Southern California Current Circulation and Ecosystem Andy Moore, Emanuele DiLorenzo, Hernan Arango, Craig Lewis,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Regional and Coastal Circulation Modeling: California Current System Art Miller Scripps Institution of Oceanography ECOFOR Workshop Friday Harbor, WA September.
Advertisements

The Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System:
Characterization of Forecast Error using Singular Value Decomposition Andy Moore and Kevin Smith University of California Santa Cruz Hernan Arango Rutgers.
Assessing the Information Content and Impact of Observations on Ocean Circulation Estimates using 4D-Var Andy Moore Dept. of Ocean Sciences UC Santa Cruz.
Marine Ecosystems and Food Webs. Carbon Cycle Marine Biota Export Production.
Line Efficiency     Percentage Month Today’s Date
Potential Approaches Empirical downscaling: Ecosystem indicators for stock projection models are projected from IPCC global climate model simulations.
Working Group 4 Coastal Biogeochemistry Forum, June 23-25, 2004 K. Lindsay, G. McKinley, C. Nevison, K. Plattner, R. Seifert Can coastal ecosystems be.
A Simple Approach to Modeling Iron Limitation of Primary Production in the Gulf of Alaska A Simple Approach to Modeling Iron Limitation of Primary Production.
Prediction of Ocean Circulation in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea An application of the ROMS/TOMS Data Assimilation Models Hernan G. Arango (IMCS,
ROMS/TOMS Tangent Linear and Adjoint Models Andrew Moore, CU Hernan Arango, Rutgers U Arthur Miller, Bruce Cornuelle, Emanuele Di Lorenzo, Doug Neilson.
Low frequency variability of the CCS: effect of the El Nino. X. Capet, J McWilliams, A. Shchepetkin (UCLA) Eastern Pacific Ocean Conference 2004.
The ROMS TL and ADJ Models: Tools for Generalized Stability Analysis and Data Assimilation Hernan Arango, Rutgers U Emanuele Di Lorenzo, GIT Arthur Miller,
ROLE OF HEADLANDS IN LARVAL DISPERSAL Tim Chaffey, Satoshi Mitarai Preliminary results and research plan.
Multiple-scale Variability in the Southern California Bight Oceanic Current System Changming Charles Dong Institute of Geophysical and Planetary Physics,
COLLABORATORS: P. Estrade, S. Herbette, C. Lett, A. Peliz, C. Roy, B. Sow, C. Roy EDDY-DRIVEN DISPERSION IN COASTAL UPWELLING SYSTEMS California Canary.
A Forecasting system for the Southern California Current Emanuele Di Lorenzo Arthur Miller Bruce Cornuelle Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD.
MODULATING FACTORS OF THE CLIMATOLOGICAL VARIABILITY OF THE MEXICAN PACIFIC; MODEL AND DATA. ABSTRACT. Sea Surface Temperature and wind from the Comprehensive.
ROMS/TOMS TL and ADJ Models: Tools for Generalized Stability Analysis and Data Assimilation Andrew Moore, CU Hernan Arango, Rutgers U Arthur Miller, Bruce.
The Inverse Regional Ocean Modeling System: Development and Application to Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E., Moore, A., H.
Stratification on the Eastern Bering Sea Shelf, Revisited C. Ladd 1, G. Hunt 2, F. Mueter 3, C. Mordy 2, and P. Stabeno 1 1 Pacific Marine Environmental.
Numerical Simulation of an Upwelling Event in the Southern California Bight (SCB) Changming “Charles” Dong IGPP, UCLA Collaborators: J. McWilliams, M.
Weak and Strong Constraint 4DVAR in the R egional O cean M odeling S ystem ( ROMS ): Development and Applications Di Lorenzo, E. Georgia Institute of Technology.
Dale haidvogel Nested Modeling Studies on the Northeast U.S. Continental Shelves Dale B. Haidvogel John Wilkin, Katja Fennel, Hernan.
Sara Vieira Committee members: Dr. Peter Webster
Conclusions The quantitative dynamical fitting procedure has been tested successfully for CalCOFI hydrographic data by adjusting temperature and salinity.
1 Columbia River Estuary (CRE) The bioreactor model Tools to implement the bioreactor model in the CRE. An estuarine biogeochemical model for the Columbia.
ROMS 4D-Var: The Complete Story Andy Moore Ocean Sciences Department University of California Santa Cruz & Hernan Arango IMCS, Rutgers University.
Regional Air-Sea Interactions in Eastern Pacific 6th International RSM Workshop Palisades, New York July 11-15, th International RSM Workshop Palisades,
The I nverse R egional O cean M odeling S ystem Development and Application to Variational Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E.
Modeling the biological response to the eddy-resolved circulation in the California Current Arthur J. Miller SIO, La Jolla, CA John R. Moisan NASA.
Enhancing predictability of the Loop Current variability using Gulf of Mexico Hycom Matthieu Le Hénaff (1) Villy Kourafalou (1) Ashwanth Srinivasan (1)
OMSAP Public Meeting September 1999 Circulation and Water Properties in Massachusetts Bay Rocky Geyer Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution September 22,
Weak Constraint 4DVAR in the R egional O cean M odeling S ystem ( ROMS ): Development and application for a baroclinic coastal upwelling system Di Lorenzo,
Results of the US IOOS Testbed for Comparison of Hydrodynamic and Hypoxia Models of Chesapeake Bay Carl Friedrichs (VIMS) and the Estuarine Hypoxia Team.
Weak and Strong Constraint 4D variational data assimilation: Methods and Applications Di Lorenzo, E. Georgia Institute of Technology Arango, H. Rutgers.
Model Forced by: NCEP winds only Model Forced by: NCEP winds Local Surface Heat Flux Mean Advection of T’ CalCOFI Observations Coastal.
The I nverse R egional O cean M odeling S ystem Development and Application to Variational Data Assimilation of Coastal Mesoscale Eddies. Di Lorenzo, E.
Observations and Ocean State Estimation: Impact, Sensitivity and Predictability Andy Moore University of California Santa Cruz Hernan Arango Rutgers University.
Jerome Fiechter Ocean Sciences Department University of California, Santa Cruz ROMS Workshop, Grenoble, 6-8 October 2008 Seasonal and Interannual Ecosystem.
Primary production & DOM OUTLINE: What makes the PP levels too low? 1- run Boundary conditions not seen (nudging time) - Phytoplankton parameter:
Jan 2016 Solar Lunar Data.
Variation of tropical cyclone season in the western North Pacific
Mesoscale eddies and shelf-basin exchange in the western Arctic Ocean
The 6 steps of data collection:
Surface drifters in the southern Gulf of. California. (June )
Q1 Jan Feb Mar ENTER TEXT HERE Notes
Average Monthly Temperature and Rainfall
Wind-Driven Cross-Shelf Transport on a Shelf with Curvature
Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of the California Current Circulation and Ecosystem using the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) Andy Moore, Emanuele.
2017 Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Jan Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Electricity Cost and Use – FY 2016 and FY 2017
LT Ricardo Roman OC3570 March 7, 2006
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 PRODUCT ROADMAP TITLE Roadmap Tagline MILESTONE MILESTONE
Presentation transcript:

An Adjoint Sensitivity Analysis of the Southern California Current Circulation and Ecosystem Andy Moore, Emanuele DiLorenzo, Hernan Arango, Craig Lewis, Zack Powell, Arthur Miller, Bruce Cornuelle

Outline  Motivation  Model configuration and circulation  Sensitivity and the adjoint  Indices of interest  Examples of sensitivities  Seasonal variations  Summary

Motivation  The California Current System is controlled by a number of different regimes (i.e. upwelling, instability, topographic control).  Sensitivity analysis can help to unravel this complex system.  Test hypotheses about other potentially important processes (i.e. stochastic forcing).  Sensitivity analysis is also an important precursor for data assimilation and predictability analysis.

The ROMS SCB Domain 7-20km resolution; forced by NCEP climatological winds and surface fluxes. ROMS has been used before in the CCS and validated by others (Marchesiello et al, 2003; Powell et al, 2005). Outer domain: 20km res, 20 levels. Inner domain: 7-20km res, 20 levels. Derives boundary conditions from the outer domain.

A 4-Component Nitrogen-Based Trophic Model N Dissolved Nitrogen (Nitrate) D Particulate Nitrogen (Detritus) P Phototrophic Phytoplankton Z Herbivorous (macro) Zooplankton Constant SWR N uptake by photosynthetic growth of P (Michaelis-Menten) Excretion and metabolism Linear Mortality of Z at constant rate Linear Mortality of P at constant rate Sinking 5 m day -1 Grazing on P by Z (saturating) Remineralization of D at constant rate A variant of the NPZD model of Powell et al. (2005)

Seasonal Circulation April October

Mesoscale Eddy Variability ROMS AVHRR

Ecosystem Circulation Surface P April Average

Adjoint Approach to Sensitivity  We must first define “sensitivity.”  Consider the model state vector:  Consider a function or index,, defined in terms of space and/or time integrals of.  Small changes in will lead to changes in where:  We will define sensitivity as etc.

Sensitivity Analysis  Consider a function  Clearly  But  So

Validity of the TL Assumption  TL assumption valid for ~30 days for perts that grow to an amplitude of: |SST|~ C |SST|~ C |v|~0.2 m/s |v|~0.2 m/s These are lower bounds! These are lower bounds!

Seasonal Circulation Index Regions J SST J KE J 90

Indices For, “Eady Index” An index of baroclinic instability

Indices For,

What Physical Processes are likely to Influence J? Advection Q, P-E+R Advection Instability Long Rossby Waves Short Rossby Waves Coastally Trapped Waves & Tides Turbulence/ wave breaking Note: All processes indicated can be significantly influenced by stochastic forcing.

A 4-Component Nitrogen-Based Trophic Model N Dissolved Nitrogen (Nitrate) D Particulate Nitrogen (Detritus) P Phototrophic Phytoplankton Z Herbivorous Zooplankton Constant SWR N uptake by photosynthetic growth of P “Sloppy feeding” and excretion Linear Mortality of Z at constant rate Linear Mortality of P at constant rate Sinking 5 m day -1 Grazing on P by Z Remineralization of D at constant rate A variant of the NPZD model of Powell et al. (2005)

Physical Circulation Sensitivities

The Signature of Advection in Day 5 Day 10Day 15 Day 20Day 25Day 30

Seasonal Variations in Sensitivities I The change in over the target area required to yield one change in for. The change in Q over the target area required to yield one change in for. The change in v over the target area required to yield one change in for. Low sensitivity High sensitivity

Seasonal Variations in Sensitivities II The change in over the target area required to yield one change in for. The change in over the target area required to yield one change in for. Low sensitivity High sensitivity

Seasonal Variations in Sensitivities III The change in Q over the target area required to yield one change in for. The change in v over the target area required to yield one change in for. Low sensitivity High sensitivity < 0.01

Interdependencies: Sensitivity of KE to Baroclinic Instability Change in required to yield a one change in when varying only v for. Recall that Low sensitivity High sensitivity Log scale

Summary for Physical Circulation  SST anomaly in coastal upwelling regions equally sensitive to variations in and Q, with v a close second.  Highest (Lowest) sensitivity in Fall (Spring)  KE anomaly most sensitive to variations in and baroclinicity.  Highest (Lowest) sensitivity Summer/Fall (Winter/Spring).

Biological Circulation Sensitivities

Adjoint Sensitivity for Ecosystem Model Oct: on day 1 Mar: on day 1 Jul: on day 1

Seasonal Variations in Sensitivities I Change in required to yield a one change in for. Note the log-scale! Low sensitivity High sensitivity Log scale

Seasonal Variations in Sensitivity II The change in N over the target area required to yield one change in for. The change in P over the target area required to yield one change in for. The change in Z over the target area required to yield one change in for. Low sensitivity High sensitivity

Summary of Biological Circulation  For all NPZD-based indices, variations in are found to be important.  Variations in NPZD equally important (internal interactions important).  NPZD concentrations strongly influenced by the physical environment.  Highest (Lowest) sensitivities in Spring/Summer (Fall/Winter).  Extraordinary sensitivities during some Spring periods suggestive of linear instability (i.e. we are perhaps the TL assumption a little too far!).

Other Ongoing Applications  Intra-Americas Sea  Monterey Bay

Intra-Americas Sea

Seasonal Sensitivity Dependence, J J 2 SST (K) V (m s -1 ) (N m -2 ) (N m -2 ) (m) (m) Q (W m -2 ) Jan (1.1) Feb (0.8) Mar (0.6) Apr (0.8) May (0.7) Jun (0.9) Jul (0.7) Aug (0.7) Sep (1.0) Oct (1.1) Nov (0.9) Dec (0.6) Mean (0.8) Basic State Mn 10~1~0.1~0.2~100 Rank22132 Rank based on percentage of basic state mean

Seasonal Sensitivity Dependence, J 4 (N) Rank based on percentage of basic state mean NO 3 (mmol Nm -3 ) P (mmol Nm -3 ) Z (mmol Nm -3 ) D (mmol Nm -3 ) (N m -2 ) (N m -2 ) V (m s -1 ) Jan X Feb X Mar X Apr X May X Jun X Jul X Aug X Sep X Oct X Nov X Dec X Mean X Basic State ~10~10~10~1~0.1~1 Rank111212

Seasonal Sensitivity Dependence, J 4 (P) Rank based on percentage of basic state mean NO 3 (mmol Nm -3 ) P (mmol Nm -3 ) Z (mmol Nm -3 ) D (mmol Nm -3 ) (N m -2 ) (N m -2 ) V (m s -1 ) Jan X Feb X Mar X Apr X May X Jun X Jul X Aug X Sep X Oct X Nov X Dec X Mean X Basic State ~10~10~10~1~0.1~1 Rank111321

Seasonal Sensitivity Dependence, J 4 (Z) Rank based on percentage of basic state mean NO 3 (mmol Nm -3 ) P (mmol Nm -3 ) Z (mmol Nm -3 ) D (mmol Nm -3 ) (N m -2 ) (N m -2 ) V (m s -1 ) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Mean Basic State ~10~10~10~1~0.1~1 Rank222312

Seasonal Sensitivity Dependence, J 4 (D) Rank based on percentage of basic state mean NO 3 (mmol Nm -3 ) P (mmol Nm -3 ) Z (mmol Nm -3 ) D (mmol Nm -3 ) (N m -2 ) (N m -2 ) V (m s -1 ) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Mean Basic State ~10~10~10~1~0.1~1 Rank323412

The Adjoint Operator  Consider  Perturbations in given by:  Sensitivity given by:  is the adjoint of ROMS.  The adjoint provides the Green’s functions for -functions at all points in space-time.

Validity of Tangent Linear Assumption TLM and NLM perturbed by first 10 energy SVs. (|SST|~0.5-1C; ~6cm at day 30)

Summary for CalCOFI Line90 Indices, J 4  Most thru least sensitive: N, P, Z, D  N: (1) N,P,Z, wind; (2) D,V  P: (1) N,P,Z,V; (2) wind; (3) D  Z: (1) wind; (2) N,P,Z,V; (3) D  D: (1) wind; (2) P,V; (3) N,Z; (4) D  N,P,Z,D: Extraordinary sensitivity in April  N,P,Z,D: Lowest sensitivity typically during fall and winter.

A Reminder…