Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Current limits (95% C.L.): LEP direct searches m H > GeV Global fit to precision EW data (excludes direct search results) m H < 157 GeV Latest Tevatron.
Advertisements

Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon 1 B s Mixing at CDF Seminar at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Gavril Giurgiu Carnegie Mellon University August 16,
1 Rare Decays of B Hadrons at CDF Matthew Jones October 3, 2005.
ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.
Search for B s oscillations at D  Constraining the CKM matrix Large uncertainty Precise measurement of V td  properly constrain the CKM matrix yield.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Pakhlov Pavel (ITEP, Moscow) Why B physics is still interesting Belle detector Measurement of sin2  Rare B decays Future plans University of Lausanne.
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
First CDF II Results on B s Mixing Joseph Kroll (Penn) Franco Bedeschi (INFN-Pisa) for the CDF B s Mixing Group La Jolla, CA – site of CKM2005.
The new Silicon detector at RunIIb Tevatron II: the world’s highest energy collider What’s new?  Data will be collected from 5 to 15 fb -1 at  s=1.96.
Study of CP violation in B s →J/ψ ϕ decay G.Borissov Lancaster University, UK.
B Production and Decay at DØ Brad Abbott University of Oklahoma BEACH 2004 June 28-July 3.
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
Alexander Khanov 25 April 2003 DIS’03, St.Petersburg 1 Recent B Physics results from DØ The B Physics program in D Ø Run II Current analyses – First results.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
B c Results from CDF II Satyajit Behari (For the CDF Collab.) Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore,USA 23 rd Jul HEP2005 Europhysics Conference, Lisboa,
 Candidate events are selected by reconstructing a D, called a tag, in several hadronic modes  Then we reconstruct the semileptonic decay in the system.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Cano Ay, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, B mixing and flavor oscillations at DØ Cano Ay University Mainz for the DØ Collaboration 23 may.
DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso,April LHCb experiment sensitivity to CKM phases and New Physics from mixing and CP violation measurements in B decays LHCb.
Gavril Giurgiu, Carnegie Mellon, FCP Nashville B s Mixing at CDF Frontiers in Contemporary Physics Nashville, May Gavril Giurgiu – for CDF.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Beautiful B Physics at the Tevatron IOP HEPP half day meeting Results From the Tevatron Imperial College London, 21 September 2005 Rick Jesik Imperial.
1 Physics at the Tevatron Lecture III Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool CERN, May 15-19th 2006.
B physics and X(3872) production at DØ  Introduction  DØ-Detector  Results on B physics  Results on X(3872)  Summary Frank Lehner U Zurich DIS 2004,
03/19/2006 Md. Naimuddin 1 B s Mixing at the Tevatron Md. Naimuddin (on behalf of CDF and D0 collaboration) University of Delhi Recontres de Moriond 19.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
3/13/2005Sergey Burdin Moriond QCD1 Sergey Burdin (Fermilab) XXXXth Moriond QCD 3/13/05 Bs Mixing, Lifetime Difference and Rare Decays at Tevatron.
Sergey Burdin FNAL DØ Collaboration 8/12/2005 Chicago Flavor New Bs Mixing Result from DØ.
Emily Nurse W production and properties at CDF0. Emily Nurse W production and properties at CDF1 The electron and muon channels are used to measure W.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
Hot Topics at D0 David Buchholz (Northwestern Univ) On behalf of the DØ Collaboration.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
BNM Tsukuba (KEK) Sep Antonio Limosani KEK Slide 1 Antonio Limosani JSPS Fellow (KEK-IPNS JAPAN) BMN
Measurements of sin2  1 in processes at Belle CKM workshop at Nagoya 2006/12/13 Yu Nakahama (University of Tokyo) for the Belle Collaboration Analysis.
Recent b physics results from OPAL David Waller, Carleton University for the OPAL Collaboration EPS Conference HEP2003 Heavy Flavour Physics Session Aachen,
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
1 33 rd 33 rd International Conference in High Energy Physics (Jul 26 th – Aug 2 nd, Moscow, Russia) Tania Moulik (Kansas University) presented by Andrei.
RECENT RESULTS FROM THE TEVATRON AND LHC Suyong Choi Korea University.
B hadrons Tevatron By Eduard De La Cruz Burelo University of Michigan On behalf of the CDF and D0 collaborations Lancaster University UK, 2-8.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
1 Heavy Flavour Content of the Proton Motivation Experimental Techniques charm and beauty cross sections in DIS for the H1 & ZEUS Collaborations Paul Thompson.
E. Devetak - IOP 081 Anomalous – from tools to physics Erik Devetak Oxford - RAL IOP 2008 Lancaster‏ Anomalous coupling (Motivation – Theory)
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
Julia Thom, FNALEPS 2003 Aachen Rare Charm and B decays at CDF Julia Thom FNAL EPS 7/18/2003 Tevatron/CDF Experiment Decay Rate Ratios and CP Asymmetries.
Jeroen van Hunen (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity to  s and  Γ s at LHCb.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Kinematics of Top Decays in the Dilepton and the Lepton + Jets channels: Probing the Top Mass University of Athens - Physics Department Section of Nuclear.
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
Jessica Levêque Rencontres de Moriond QCD 2006 Page 1 Measurement of Top Quark Properties at the TeVatron Jessica Levêque University of Arizona on behalf.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
1 Physics at the Tevatron Lecture III Beate Heinemann University of California, Berkeley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory CERN Academic Training Lectures,
2010/09/01cpv from b factories to tevatron and lhcb1 Recent B Physics Results from CDF Tomonobu Tomura (University of Tsukuba)
7/7/06Jason Rieger BEACH 2006 Rare B Decays at the Tevatron Jason Rieger, Indiana University On behalf of the DØ and CDF collaborations BEACH 2006.
Semi-Leptonic B s Mixing at DØ Meghan Anzelc Northwestern University On Behalf of the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006.
B s Mixing Results for Semileptonic Decays at CDF Vivek Tiwari Carnegie Mellon University on behalf of the CDF Collaboration.
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
Investigation on CDF Top Physics Group Ye Li Graduate Student UW - Madison.
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Martin Heck, for the CDF II collaboration
B mixing and lifetimes at the Tevatron
Beauty 2005, Tania Moulik (KU)
University of Tsukuba, Japan Particle Physics Phenomenology,
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B mixing at DØ WIN 2005 Delphi, Greece Chris Barnes, Imperial College

WIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Outline Mixing phenomenology Tevatron DØ detector Flavour tagging B d cross-checks B s mixing and limit Prospects Summary

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Mixing Transition of neutral mesons between particle and antiparticles Mass eigenstates superpostion of flavour eigenstates An initial B 0 will oscillate in time between B 0 and B 0 _

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Motivation Why study mixing? In standard parameterisation unitarity approximated by Mixing constrains least known side of unitarity triangle Experimental limit SM predicts (incl exp) Some theoretical uncertainties cancel

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Experimental issues Need to tag initial flavour of B Tagging power εD 2 with efficiency ε and dilution Need excellent propertime resolution σ t – decay length and p resolution The average significance of a measurement is given by Experimentally useful to define asymmetry D = 2*purity – 1

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Setting limits Amplitude method Fit to data - free parameter Obtain as a function of Measurement of gives and otherwise At 95% CL sensitivity excluded Combine measurements from experiments

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ 460pb pb -1 Tevatron Only place in world to study B s mesons Tevatron performing well –Inst L reached ~1.2×10 32 cm/s 2 (1.5 – 3 ×10 32 cm/s 2 design) Total integrated L = 4-8 fb -1 in Tevatron Run II programme

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ DØ Detector Excellent coverage –Muon |η| < 2 –Tracking |η| < 3 Robust muon triggers All B physics events require muons Muon System Tracking System

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Samples 200 pb -1 20K D * + μ 92K D 0 + μ 85% B d, 15% B + 85% B +, 15% B d

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Samples 460 pb -1

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B reconstruction - Hadronic environment – large backgrounds

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Flavour Tagging Need to determine b flavour at production Taggers developed Soft Lepton (SLT): ε = (5.0 ± 0.2) % Jet Charge (JetQ) Same side pion (SST) Combined JetQ + SST: ε = (68.3 ± 0.9) % Opposite side μ + SV tagging

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B d mixing Δm d = ± (stat) ± (sys) ps -1 World average = ± ps -1 SLT D 0 = ± JetQ+SST D + = ± JetQ+SST D 0 = ± difference in dilutions

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Flavour Tagging Opposite side combined μ+SV tagging Require muon with angular separation cosΔφ < 0.8 Use discriminating variables x i - combine using likelihood ratio –Charge of jet containing the muon –p T rel weighted muon charge –SV charge Look for SV in event (muon not included)

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Flavour Tagging Likelihood ratio For each variable x i, x > 0 tags initial B flavour as b quark Construct tagging variable d Where y is a product of ratios of probability density fns to give wrong and right tags PDFs determined from reconstructed B d →D * - μ + X data small decay lengths - minimal oscillations pdfs of variable x i for wrong and right tags |d| related to dilution for an event

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Dilution cross-check Opposite side tagging dilution should be same for all B species Cross-check performed on B d B u Dilutions consistent Use value of D = ± in B s mixing fits D = ± D = ± 0.015

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ B s mixing analysis

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Strategy One decay mode B s → D s μ X, D s → φ π, φ → KK Opposite side μ+SV tagging Binned asymmetry in Visible Proper Decay Length Minimise observed and expected values of asymmetry Inputs to fitting procedure –Sample composition MC –K factors (corrections for non-reconstructed particles) MC –Efficiencies MC –Dilution obtained from B d mixing –VPDL resolution MC/DATA

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Fit parameters DecaySample composition B s →D s μν20.6% B s →D * s μν57.2% B s →D * 0s μν1.4% B s →D * 1s μν2.9% B s →D s D s X11.3% B 0 →D s DX3.2% B - →D s DX3.4% Sample compositionEfficiency correction due to impact parameter cuts on tracks from D s cc estimated at ~ 3.5 ± 2.5 % VPDL (cm)

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ K-factors Correction factor to p T accounting for non-reconstructed particles Decay B s →D s μν0.878 B s →D * s μν0.857 B s →D * 0s μν0.829 B s →D * 1s μν0.817 B s →D s D s X0.738 B 0 →D s DX0.681 B - →D s DX0.687

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ VPDL resolution VPDL resolution parametrised with three Gaussians Track impact parameter errors tuned on data Correction dependent on number of vertex hits, location of hits, track polar angle and momentum Tuning results in one scale factor applied to all three Gaussians SF = Corrected resolution

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Systematics Uncertainty on input fit parameters contribute to systematic error Uncertainties in variables included –Dilution –Mass fits –Resolution –Sample composition –K-factor –ΔΓ –Efficiencies Each error added in quadrature

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Result  m s > 5.0 ps -1 at 95% CL No obvious oscillations

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Sensitivity Semileptonic channels

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Projections Include hadronic B s sample –Better proper decay time resolution in hadronics (no ) –Hadronic events at DØ triggered by opposite side muon Provides high efficiency tag (~1) Detector addition summer 2005: “Layer 0” Silicon detector ~25% gain in σ t Proposal to increase rate to tape from 50 to 100 Hz later in 2005 –Dedicated B-physics bandwidth –Lower trigger thresholds ~ factor 3 gain in statistics Expect to cover full SM range

Chris Barnes, Imperial CollegeWIN 2005 B mixing at DØ Summary Developed all tools to perform mixing measurement Flavour tagging demonstrated on B d → D * μ X Δm d = ± (stat) ± (sys) ps -1 Using 460 pb -1 peformed first B s mixing analysis at DØ Decay mode B s → D s μ X Δm s > 5.0 ps -1 at 95% CL Future Layer-0 and increased L3 bandwidth Improve tagging - electrons, more variables, possibly SST? Additional semileptonic modes Hadronic mode