Racial Disparities in the Child Welfare System Contact: Susan J. Wells Mary PfohlAlex Beutel Scotty DanielsIla Kamath Conducted by: African American Disparities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,
Race Matters: Synthesis of Research Findings Robert B. Hill, Ph. D. Disproportionality Teleconference May 24, 2005.
Research Findings from the Sacramento County Dependency Drug Court: Systems Changes and its Impact on Permanency Sharon M. Boles, Ph.D. Nancy K. Young,
Demographics of Foster Care: Comparative Perspectives and Implications Fred Wulczyn, Ph.D Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago International.
S.T.A.R.T. Cuyahoga County Department of Children and Family Services Sobriety Treatment and Recovery Teams.
How do Macon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Macon/Piatt Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement14833%
Health of Wisconsin: Report Card Grading Health Wisconsin’s grade for health is based on two ways of measuring health: 1) length of life and 2)
The Racial Geography of the Child Welfare System
Justice Griffith Maltreatment and Offending Trajectories: Identifying Pathways for Intervention Anna Stewart Michael Livingston Susan Dennison.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: 1. A Quick Tour of the Data 2. A Racial Equity Lens.
How do Coles County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Clark...Shelby Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement7136%
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
White Earth Indian Child Welfare Initiative 2010
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
How do Logan County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Logan, Mason and Menard Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Foster Care Reentry Going Beyond 12 Months of Follow-up Terry V. Shaw, MSW, PhD Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Social.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
Reunification for Siblings in Out-of-Home Care Using a Statistical Technique for Examining Non-independent Observations Presented by: Joseph Magruder,
CWLA:Racial Disproportionality in Child Welfare Minnesota’s Response May 24, 2005 Maxie Rockymore.
CHAPIN HALL Permanency, Disparity and Social Context Fred Wulczyn Chapin Hall, University of Chicago.
Vermilion County Action Team Laurie Krolikowski & Susan Werner.
Increasing Child Welfare Permanency Options: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment Program Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley.
Improving Permanency and Addressing Disproportionality and Disparity in Peoria County Prepared by the Center for Adoption Studies School of Social Work.
Reunification – Old and New Information Diana J. English PhD Child Welfare League of America May 30, 2007.
Permanency Enhancement Project Peoria, Illinois Jennifer La Fever Elizabeth Morgan Amy Roman
Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare in California: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Black/White and Black/Hispanic Racial Disparity in Child Welfare: Controlling.
Contra Costa County Disproportionality – Examples and Changes Ray Merritt; Dorothy Powell; Children and Family Services Research and Evaluation.
Child Protection and Educational Neglect: A Preliminary Study Curriculum Module Center for Advanced Studies in Child Welfare Funded in part by the Minnesota.
AB 636 Mental Health/CWS Partnership Sacramento, CA 3/17/06 Barbara Needell, MSW, PhD Center for Social Services Research University of California at Berkeley.
Cuyahoga County Strengthening Communities – Youth (SCY) Project: Findings & Implications for Juvenile Justice David L. Hussey, Ph.D. Associate Professor.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
1 Leading Efforts to Identify and Address Disparities: A Response to Disproportionality Joyce James: Associate Deputy Executive Commissioner, Center for.
CENTER FOR SOCIAL SERVICES RESEARCH School of Social Welfare, UC Berkeley Child Welfare: Ethnic/Racial Disproportionality and Disparity Barbara Needell,
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
The Child Welfare System An Introduction Child Welfare in Numbers Nationally, an estimated 896,000 children were determined to be victims of child abuse.
Sangamon County Action Team Sara Sanders Christy Cunningham Chrissy Gosteli.
Racial Disparities in Child Protective Services Principal Investigator: Susan J. Wells; Research Assistant: Margaret (Griesgraber) Skrypek Minnesota DHS.
The Hilltop Institute was formerly the Center for Health Program Development and Management. Emergency Room Use by Individuals with Disabilities Enrolled.
Youth Mental Health and Addiction Needs: One Community’s Answer Terry Johnson, MSW Senior Director of Services Senior Director of Services Deborah Ellison,
A POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS OF RACE AND POVERTY AS RISK FACTORS FOR MALTREATMENT Barbara Needell, PhD Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD Bryn King, MSW January.
University of Michigan1 Early Multidisciplinary Assessment Pilot Project Kathleen Coulborn Faller, Ph.D., A.C.S.W.
Hasbro Early Assessment Project University of Michigan1.
Collaborating with Courts to Reduce and Eliminate Disparities Nancy B. Miller, Director, Permanency Planning for Children Department, National Council.
Michigan’s Child Welfare System Why is Overrepresentation a Critical Issue?
Foster Care Re-entry Study A Hennepin County Project conducted in collaboration with the Minnesota Department of Human Services and the University of Minnesota.
Trends in Child Welfare Outcomes CA Blue Ribbon Commission May1, 2013 The Performance Indicators Project is a collaboration of the California Department.
Constructing Safety Indicators from Child Welfare Events and Trajectories Fred Wulczyn, Bridgette Lery Center for State Foster Care and Adoption Data Chapin.
Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.
NCADS Child Maltreatment 2000 Data about child abuse and neglect known to child protective Services (CPS) agencies in the United States in 2000.
Program Evaluation - Reunification of Foster Children with their Families: NYS Office of Children and Family Services, Division of Child Care Evelyn Jones,
Black Disproportionality 18.6% 5.9% = 3.15 Hispanic Disproportionality 50.2% 53.7% = 0.94 White Disproportionality 26.7% 28.7% = 0.93 Black vs. White.
The Institutional Analysis: A Qualitative Methodology for Examining Racial Disproportionality and Disparity The Institutional Analysis: A Qualitative Methodology.
A POPULATION-BASED ANALYSIS OF RACE/ETHNICITY, MATERNAL NATIVITY, AND SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AS RISK FACTORS FOR MALTREATMENT Emily Putnam-Hornstein, PhD.
Disproportionate Minority Contact in Connecticut’s Juvenile Justice System  A presentation to the  Commission on Racial & Ethnic Disparity in the Criminal.
Increasing Permanency Options in Child Welfare: The Kinship Guardianship Assistance Payment (Kin-GAP) Program Daniel Webster Joseph Magruder University.
Establishing Case Typologies in Foster Care Susan J. Wells, Margaret Skrypek & Kimberly Ford A project conducted by the Gamble-Skogmo Chair in Child Welfare.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
BackgroundBackground ObjectivesObjectives MethodsMethods Study Design 1E-06 One of the biggest challenges for the Child Welfare System is sustaining successful.
Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.
APHA 135 th Annual Meeting – Scientific Session Disparity in Access to Perinatal Tertiary Care in a Regionalized System Gary L. Loy, MD, MPH, Maternal-Fetal.
Health of Wisconsin: Report Card 2016
Presentation transcript:

Racial Disparities in the Child Welfare System Contact: Susan J. Wells Mary PfohlAlex Beutel Scotty DanielsIla Kamath Conducted by: African American Disparities Committee, Minnesota Department of Human Services and University of Minnesota Case Study Analysis by the University of Minnesota

Question Guiding the Project Through a case study, can we better identify the mechanisms that lead to racial disproportionality and disparity?

Matched Case Study Goal: 103 Pairs Matched on Age group (0-5 and 6-11) Reason for referral - type of neglect Gender County

Assessment Outcome Percent Concordance for Matched Pairs: Opened for Case Management Services During Assessment N= % No Yes African American Child of the Pair Total NoYes Caucasian Child of the Pair Total McNemar level of significance p =.362 Not significant finding

Case Management Outcome 1 Matched Pairs McNemar Level of Significance p = 1.0 Not significant Percent Concordance for Matched Pairs: Child Placed in Case Management Services

Case Management Outcome 3 Matched Pairs N= % No Yes African American Child of Pair Total NoYes Caucasian Child Of Pair Total McNemar Level of Significance p = 1.0 Not significant finding Percent Concordance for Matched Pairs: Case Closed in Case Management

Reunification Outcome 1 Comparison of All Cases N=46* % African American Caucasian Race of Child Total NoYes Court Order for Reunification Services Not Needed Total Fisher's Exact Level of Significance p =.650 Not Significant finding Court Order Indicated Reunification Services Not Necessary by Race *One case missing.

Reunification Outcome 2 Comparison of All Cases Discharged from Reunification Placement by Race % % N=40* % African American Caucasian Race of Child Total NoYes Discharge from Reunification Placement Total Fisher's Level of Significance p =.534 Not significant finding * 6 cases had court order that reunification not necessary and one case missing.

Multivariate Analysis Using information about several case descriptors at once, what predicts more severe intervention? That is, was the case referred for Reunification Services at any time during the intervention process? (Does not included cases that were in placement initially but when home right away.)

*Intensiveness of intervention is placement out of home long enough to require reunification services. BetaStd. Error Statistical Significance Odds for More Intensive Intervention Caucasian :1 Age of the Child :1 for every year younger History of Maltreatment :1 Mom Drug Problem.03.67n.s.- Mom Financial Problem n.s.- African American * Age :1 for every year older up to 11 years of age African American * Mom Drug Problem :1 Caucasian * Mom Financial Problem :1 Example of Model Predicting Intensiveness of Intervention

Percent Referred for Placement (in Which Referral for Reunification Services was Made) by Age

Summary Some case characteristics may lead to differential treatment by race. In some studies, when all available variables are taken into account for the larger population, the differences appear to cancel each other out.

Racial Disparities in Minnesota May be concentrated at the front end and back end of services (reporting, substantiation, placement in assessment, and overall length of time in care) Disproportionality may also occur due to the distribution of selected case characteristics in the larger population