1 What do we want to know? Measure the SUSY masses/parameters 4 Independent Variables  M=10.6 GeV.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
R-parity conserving SUSY studies with jets and E T Miss Alexander Richards, UCL 1.
Advertisements

Let X 1, X 2,..., X n be a set of independent random variables having a common distribution, and let E[ X i ] = . then, with probability 1 Strong law.
Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC1 Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University Measurement of Relic Density at the LHC.
Simple Linear Regression
Intro to neutralino dark matter Pearl Sandick University of Minnesota.
Neutralino Dark Matter in Light Higgs Boson Scenario Masaki Asano (ICRR, University of Tokyo) Collaborator S. Matsumoto (Toyama Univ.) M. Senami (Kyoto.
Relic Density at the LHC B. Dutta In Collaboration With: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D.Toback Phys.Lett.B639:46,2006, hep-ph/
PANIC 2008 November, 2008 Searches using Photons and/or Jets at CDF David Toback, Texas A&M University 1 David Toback Texas A&M University For the CDF.
Measurement of Dark Matter Content at the LHC Bhaskar Dutta Collaborators: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D. Toback Texas A&M University.
June 8, 2007LPC Early CMS Physics1 Relic Density in MET+Jets+Taus Sample at the LHC Teruki Kamon Texas A&M University [1] Physics Case in MET+Jets+Taus.
1 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory The 13th Annual International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of the Fundamental Interactions Durham, 2005.
Dark Matter at the LHC Bhaskar Dutta Texas A&M University
1 the LHC Jet & MET Searches Adam Avakian PY898 - Special Topics in LHC Physics 3/23/2009.
Jan 17, 2007 Measuring Mass Difference using soft τ P T Slope 1 Measuring Mass Difference at LHC using soft τ P T Slope Alfredo Gurrola in collaboration.
June 8, 2007DSU 2007, Minnesota Relic Density at the LHC B. Dutta In Collaboration With: R. Arnowitt, A. Gurrola, T. Kamon, A. Krislock, D. Toback Phys.
Descriptive statistics Experiment  Data  Sample Statistics Experiment  Data  Sample Statistics Sample mean Sample mean Sample variance Sample variance.
March 25, 2009Probing SUGRA Models at the LHC1 Teruki Kamon and Bhaskar Dutta (full list of collaborators in the next page) on (1) Coannihilation, (2)
12/17/07 Cosmological Connection at the LHC: Stau Neutralino Coannihilation Case1 Cosmological Connection at the LHC : Stau Neutralino Co-annhilation Case.
6/28/2015S. Stark1 Scan of the supersymmetric parameter space within mSUGRA Luisa Sabrina Stark Schneebeli, IPP ETH Zurich.
New Physics at the LHC/ILC B-L Workshop, LBNL September, 2007 Sally Dawson (BNL)
EuroGDR, 13 th December 2003 Dan Tovey CERN, 18/03/2004 G. Bélanger 1 Uncertainties in the relic density calculations in mSUGRA B. Allanach, G. Bélanger,
Supersymmetry Without Prejudice 第二部分 KITPC 2008 C.F. Berger, J. Gainer, JLH, T. Rizzo Coming soon to an ArXiv near you.
Inference for Regression Simple Linear Regression IPS Chapter 10.1 © 2009 W.H. Freeman and Company.
Neutralino Dark Matter in Light Higgs Boson Scenario (LHS) The scenario is consistent with  particle physics experiments Particle mass b → sγ Bs →μ +
SUSY fits: Implications of LHC data on Constrained SUSY Models Albert De Roeck on behalf of the Mastercode collaboration Exp O. Buchmueller, R. Cavanaugh,
ATLAS Dan Tovey 1 Measurement of the LSP Mass Dan Tovey University of Sheffield On Behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Martin White – Cambridge ATLAS UK ATLAS Physics Meeting, May 2004.
AP STATISTICS LESSON 14 – 1 ( DAY 1 ) INFERENCE ABOUT THE MODEL.
: An alternative representation of level of significance. - normal distribution applies. - α level of significance (e.g. 5% in two tails) determines the.
December 3rd, 2009 Search for Gluinos and Squarks in events with missing transverse momentum DIS 2013: XXI. International workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering.
22 December 2006Masters Defense Texas A&M University1 Adam Aurisano In Collaboration with Richard Arnowitt, Bhaskar Dutta, Teruki Kamon, Nikolay Kolev*,
Neutralino relic density in the CPVMSSM and the ILC G. Bélanger LAPTH G. B, O. Kittel, S. Kraml, H. Martyn, A. Pukhov, hep-ph/ , Phys.Rev.D Motivation.
Overview of Supersymmetry and Dark Matter
Statistical Inference Drawing conclusions (“to infer”) about a population based upon data from a sample. Drawing conclusions (“to infer”) about a population.
SUSY Studies with ATLAS Experiment 2006 Texas Section of the APS Joint Fall Meeting October 5-7, 2006 Arlington, Texas Nurcan Ozturk University of Texas.
Supersymmetry Basics: Lecture II J. HewettSSI 2012 J. Hewett.
Jonathan Nistor Purdue University 1.  A symmetry relating elementary particles together in pairs whose respective spins differ by half a unit  superpartners.
WIN 05, Delphi, Greece, June 2005Filip Moortgat, CERN WIN 05 Inclusive signatures: discovery, fast but not unambiguous Exclusive final states & long term.
STAU CLIC Ilkay Turk Cakir Turkish Atomic Energy Authority with co-authors O. Cakir, J. Ellis, Z. Kirca with the contributions from A. De Roeck,
SPS5 SUSY STUDIES AT ATLAS Iris Borjanovic Institute of Physics, Belgrade.
Dark Matter in SUGRA Models with Universal and Nonuniversal Gaugino Masses D. P. Roy Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education Tata Institute of Fundamental.
Global Analysis, Combination & Complementarity The vision: explore 10 TeV scale directly (100 TeV pp) + indirectly (e + e - )
Interpreting a CMS lljjP T Excess With the Golden Cascade of the MSSM October 1st, 2014 Journal Club Ben Allanach, Are R. Raklev, and Anders Kvellestad.
AOD Analysis of the DC2 Coannihilation Model Sample Davide Costanzo Nov 5 th 2004 V. 3.0.
Higgs Recoil Mass Measurement and ZH Cross Section Tim Barklow, Awatif Belymam SLAC Feb 24, 2009.
Jieun Kim ( CMS Collaboration ) APCTP 2012 LHC Physics Workshop at Korea (Aug. 7-9, 2012) 1.
Phenomenlogical Aspects of Mirage Mediation Yeong Gyun Kim (Sejong U. & KAIST) Neutralino Dark Matter in Mirage Mediation (thermal relic density, direct.
Inference about the slope parameter and correlation
AP Statistics Chapter 14 Section 1.
Dark Matter in SUGRA Models and the LHC
Complementarity between FCC-ee and FCC-hh Searches for BSM Physics
Dark Matter Phenomenology of the GUT-less CMSSM
Focus-Point studies at LHC
Simple Linear Regression - Introduction
Sparticle reconstruction at benchmark points
Supersymmetric Particle Reconstructions at CMS
SUSY post LHC-8: what’s excluded, what’s not
MSSM4G: MOTIVATIONS AND ALLOWED REGIONS
STAT 5372: Experimental Statistics
Sparticle reconstruction at benchmark points
A novel technique for gluino and squark mass measurements in mSUGRA SUSY Christopher S. Rogan.
Phenomenology of SUSY Models with Non-universal Sfermions
ATLAS SUSY Outputs & Interpretation
Simple Linear Regression
Fine-tuning in the models with non-universal gaugino masses
Institute of Theoretical Physics, CAS
Particle Physics and Cosmology in the Co-Annihilation Region
How Heavy can Neutralino Dark Matter be?
Inclusive Measurements as an mSUGRA Signal with ATLAS
Inference Concepts 1-Sample Z-Tests.
Presentation transcript:

1 What do we want to know? Measure the SUSY masses/parameters 4 Independent Variables  M=10.6 GeV

2 Observable 1 Slope of P T distribution is largely unaffected by Gluino Mass

3 Observable 2 Clean peak Even for low  M

4 Observable 3 Peak value depends on squark mass

5 4 Variables and 4 Unknowns 1.Number of events 2.Slope of the P T distribution of the softest  3.The peak of the M  distribution 4.The peak of the M j  distribution  Equivalent  Measurements Make Simultaneous Measurements Measure Parameters and Test Universality

6 Measure  M and the Gluino Mass The slope of the P T distribution of the  ’s only depends on the  M The event rate depends on both the Gluino mass and  M Can make a simultaneous measurement An important measurement without Universality assumptions! Results for ~300 events (10 fb -1 depending on the Analysis) Assuming the Universality Constraints Improves the Measurement } ~15 GeV or ~2% } ~ 0.5 GeV or ~5%

7 Infer m 0 and m 1/2 M 0 (GeV) M 1/2 (GeV) |  ~ 3 GeV or  ~2%  | |  ~ 7 GeV  | or  ~3% Assuming Universality

8 Do we live in a world with Universal Couplings? |  ~5%  | |  ~ 10%  |

9 Cosmology Measurements No Universality Assumptions 4 Observables and 4 Unknowns With Universality Assumptions 4 Observables and 2 Unknowns Small  M measurement  Confidence we are in the co-annihilation region  LSP is the Dark Matter