LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish March 13, 2000.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
September 21, 2005Virgo Status – ESF Workshop1 Status of Virgo B. Mours.
Advertisements

CLIO Current Status of Japanese Detectors Daisuke Tatsumi National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
G R LIGO Laboratory1 Advanced LIGO Research and Development David Shoemaker LHO LSC 11 November 2003.
LIGO-G M First Generation Interferometers Barry Barish 30 Oct 2000 Workshop on Astrophysical Sources for Ground-Based Gravitational Wave Detectors.
Gravitational Waves Laser Interferometric Detectors
LIGO-G D Detector Installation and Commissioning Stan Whitcomb NSF Annual Review 30 April 2001 Caltech.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish 5 June 2000 Gravitational Waves: A Challenge to Theoretical Astrophysics Trieste, 5-9 June 2000.
Status of the LIGO Project
Barry Barish AIP Conference, Sydney Australia 11-July-02
rd ILIAS-GW annual general meeting 1 VIRGO Commissioning progress J. Marque (EGO)
LIGO Present and Future
LIGO-G M LIGO and Detection of Gravitational Waves Barry Barish 13 October 2000.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory LIGO
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO: Progress and Prospects Barry Barish 18 July 2000 COSPAR 2000 Fundamental Physics in Space.
LIGO-G M LIGO and Prospects for Detection of Gravitational Waves Barry Barish 1 November 2000.
LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO and Detection of Gravitational Waves Barry Barish 14 September 2000.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 14 June 2001 Caltech.
Status of LCGT and CLIO Masatake Ohashi (ICRR, The University of TOKYO) and LCGT, CLIO collaborators TAUP2007 Sendai, Japan 2007/9/12.
The GEO 600 Detector Andreas Freise for the GEO 600 Team Max-Planck-Institute for Gravitational Physics University of Hannover May 20, 2002.
LIGO- G M Status of LIGO David Shoemaker LISA Symposium 13 July 2004.
LIGO-G M Management of the LIGO Project Gary Sanders California Institute of Technology Presented to the Committee on Programs and Plans of the.
G M 1 Advanced LIGO Update David Shoemaker LSC/Virgo MIT July 2007.
LIGO-G Advanced LIGO Detector upgrade is planned for »Factor of 10 increase in distance probed (‘reach’) »Factor of 1000 increase in event.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
LIGO-G D The LIGO-I Gravitational-wave Detectors Stan Whitcomb CaJAGWR Seminar February 16, 2001.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
LIGO-G D “First Lock” for the LIGO Detectors 20 October 2000 LIGO Hanford Observatory Stan Whitcomb.
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
LIGO Commissioning Status
AIGO 2K Australia - Italy Workshop th October th October 2005 Pablo Barriga for AIGO group.
Nov 3, 2008 Detection System for AdV 1/8 Detection (DET) Subsystem for AdV  Main tasks and requirements for the subsystem  DC readout  Design for: the.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Detectors
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
The status of VIRGO Edwige Tournefier (LAPP-Annecy ) for the VIRGO Collaboration HEP2005, 21st- 27th July 2005 The VIRGO experiment and detection of.
Modeling of the Effects of Beam Fluctuations from LIGO’s Input Optics Nafis Jamal Shivanand Sanichiro Yoshida Biplab Bhawal LSC Conference Aug ’05 LIGO-G Z.
LIGO-G W LIGO Detector Commissioning Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Status of LIGO Andri M. Gretarsson Livingston Observatory LIGO-G L.
LIGO-G M LIGO Status Gary Sanders GWIC Meeting Perth July 2001.
Initial and Advanced LIGO Status Gregory Harry LIGO/MIT March 24, 2006 March 24, th Eastern Gravity Meeting G R.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
LIGO-G D Detector Installation and Commissioning Stan Whitcomb NSF Operations Review 26 February 2001 LIGO Hanford Observatory.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
LIGO-G M Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders LIGO Laboratory California Institute of Technology APS Meeting APR03, Philadelphia Gravitational-Wave.
LIGO-G M Catching the Waves with LIGO Barry Barish 26 Sept 01.
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
LIGO-G Z LIGO’s Thermal Noise Interferometer Progress and Status Eric D. Black, Kenneth G. Libbrecht, and Shanti Rao (Caltech) Seiji Kawamura.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
The Proposed Holographic Noise Experiment Rainer Weiss, MIT On behalf of the proposing group Fermi Lab Proposal Review November 3, 2009.
1 The status of VIRGO E. Tournefier LAPP(Annecy)-IN2P3-CNRS Journées SF2A, Strasbourg 27 juin – 1er juillet 2005 The VIRGO experiment The commissioning.
G R 2004 Plan Update LIGO Systems meeting 22 Jan 04 dhs.
Searches for Gravitational Waves Barry Barish Caltech IPA London – Aug 2014 “Merging Neutron Stars“ (Price & Rosswog)
Characterization of Advanced LIGO Core Optics
First Lessons from the Advanced LIGO Integration Testing
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
Installation and Commissioning Status Stan Whitcomb
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Status of the LIGO Detectors
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
LIGO Detector Commissioning
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
Squeezed Light Techniques for Gravitational Wave Detection
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Status and Plans Barry Barish March 13, 2000

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Plans schedule 1996Construction Underway (mostly civil) 1997Facility Construction (vacuum system) 1998Interferometer Construction (complete facilities) 1999Construction Complete (interferometers in vacuum) 2000Detector Installation (commissioning subsystems) 2001 Commission Interferometers (first coincidences) 2002Sensitivity studies (initiate LIGOI Science Run) LIGO I data run (one year integrated data at h ~ ) 2005Begin LIGO II installation

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Sites Hanford Observatory Livingston Observatory

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Livingston Observatory

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Hanford Observatory

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Facilities Beam Tube Enclosure minimal enclosure reinforced concrete no services

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Beam Tube LIGO beam tube under construction in January ft spiral welded sections girth welded in portable clean room in the field

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO vacuum equipment

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Vacuum Chambers HAM Chambers BSC Chambers

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Seismic Isolation Constrained layer damped Springs

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Seismic Isolation Systems Progress »production and delivery of components almost complete »early quality problems have mostly disappeared »the coarse actuation system for the BSC seismic isolation systems has been installed and tested successfully in the LVEA at both Observatories »Hanford 2km & Livingston seismic isolation system installation has been completed, with the exception of the tidal compensation (fine actuation) system »Hanford 4km seismic isolation installation is ~75% complete HAM Door Removal (Hanford 4km)

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Seismic Isolation Systems Stack Installation Support Tube Installation Coarse Actuation System

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO I interferometer LIGO I configuration Science run begins in 2002

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Optics mirrors, coating and polishing All optics polished & coated »Microroughness within spec. (<10 ppm scatter) »Radius of curvature within spec.  R/R  5%) »Coating defects within spec. (pt. defects < 2 ppm, 10 optics tested) »Coating absorption within spec. (<1 ppm, 40 optics tested)

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Input Optics installation & commissioning l The 2km Input Optics subsystem installation has been completed »The Mode Cleaner routinely holds length servo-control lock for days »Mode cleaner parameters are close to design specs, including the length, cavity linewidth and visibility »Further characterization is underway

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Input Optics Hanford 2 km HAM9 Chamber HAM8 Chamber Pre-Stabilized Laser (PSL) Enclosure Mode Cleaner Tube Interferometer Sensing & Control ISC) Mode Cleaner Output Optics Table Right Beam Manifold Input Optics Section Control System Racks MMT3 Optical Lever PSL Electronics Racks

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Recycling Cavity Alignment COS Autocollimator Projected reticule pattern & PSL beam on target in front of MMT2 alignment of the mode match telescope to the recycling cavity was accomplished by aligning the PSL beam to the projected reticule pattern & then by retroreflection from the recycling mirror

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Recycling Cavity Alignment Adjusting the Fold Mirror Alignment

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Initial Alignment System Optical Levers Optical levers have been installed, aligned & are operational for all core optics in the 2km interferometer Input Test Mass Optical Lever Transmit & Receive modules visible with spool piece removed for input test mass alignment

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Commissioning Configurations Mode cleaner and Pre-Stabilized Laser Michelson interferometer 2km one-arm cavity At present, activity focussed on Hanford Observatory Mode cleaner locking imminent at Livingston

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Schematic of system

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Commissioning Pre-Stabilized Laser-Mode Cleaner Suspension characterization »actuation / diagonalization »sensitivity of local controls to stray Nd:YAG light »Qs of elements measured, Laser - Mode Cleaner control system shakedown Laser frequency noise measurement

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Wavefront sensing Mode Cleaner cavity l Alignment system function verified

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Michelson Interferometer Interference quality of recombined beams ( >0.99) Measurements of Qs of Test Masses

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M 2km Fabry-Perot cavity Includes all interferometer subsystems »many in definitive form; analog servo on cavity length for test configuration confirmation of initial alignment »~100 microrad errors; beams easily found in both arms ability to lock cavity improves with understanding 0 sec 12/1 flashes of light » 0.2 sec 12/9 » 2 min 1/14 » 60 sec 1/19 » 5 min 1/21 (and on a different arm) » 18 min 2/12 » 1.5 hrs 3/4 (temperature stabalize pre modecleaner)

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M 2km Fabry-Perot cavity models of environment » temperature changes on laser frequency » tidal forces changing baselines » seismometer/tilt correlations with microseismic peak mirror characterization » losses: ~6% dip, excess probably due to poor centering » scatter: appears to be better than requirements » figure 12/03 beam profile

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M 2km Fabry-Perot cavity 15 minute locked stretch

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Schedule commissioning and testing

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Significant Events

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO astrophysical sources LIGO I ( ) LIGO II (2007- ) Advanced LIGO

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Phase Noise splitting the fringe spectral sensitivity of MIT phase noise interferometer above 500 Hz shot noise limited near LIGO I goal additional features are from 60 Hz powerline harmonics, wire resonances (600 Hz), mount resonances, etc

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Noise Floor 40 m prototype d isplacement sensitivity in 40 m prototype. comparison to predicted contributions from various noise sources

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Detection Strategy Coincidences Two Sites - Three Interferometers »Single Interferometernon-gaussian level~50/hr »Hanford (Doubles) correlated rate (x1000)~1/day »Hanford + Livingston uncorrelated (x5000)<0.1/yr Data Recording (time series) »gravitational wave signal (0.2 MB/sec) »total data (16 MB/s) »on-line filters, diagnostics, data compression »off line data analysis, archive etc Signal Extraction »signal from noise (vetoes, noise analysis) »templates, wavelets, etc

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M LIGO Sites Hanford Observatory Livingston Observatory

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Interferometer Data 40 m Real interferometer data is UGLY!!! (Gliches - known and unknown) LOCKING RINGING NORMAL ROCKING

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M The Problem How much does real data degrade complicate the data analysis and degrade the sensitivity ?? Test with real data by setting an upper limit on galactic neutron star inspiral rate using 40 m data

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M “Clean up” data stream Effect of removing sinusoidal artifacts using multi-taper methods Non stationary noise Non gaussian tails

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Inspiral ‘Chirp’ Signal Template Waveforms “matched filtering” 687 filters 44.8 hrs of data 39.9 hrs arms locked 25.0 hrs good data sensitivity to our galaxy h ~ mHz -1/2 expected rate ~10 -6 /yr

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Detection Efficiency Simulated inspiral events provide end to end test of analysis and simulation code for reconstruction efficiency Errors in distance measurements from presence of noise are consistent with SNR fluctuations

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Setting a limit Upper limit on event rate can be determined from SNR of ‘loudest’ event Limit on rate: R < 0.5/hour with 90% CL  = 0.33 = detection efficiency An ideal detector would set a limit: R < 0.16/hour

LIGO-G9900XX-00-M Conclusions LIGO I construction complete LIGO I commissioning and testing ‘on track’ Interferometer characterization underway Data analysis schemes are being developed, including tests with 40 m data