Assessing Peer Performance in PBL Groups: how technology can help Carolyn K. Manning Associate Professor Dept of Health, Nutrition & Exercise Sciences.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Course Design Materials designed with low reading levels but high interest level. More, shorter assignments (20min) Organized with checklists Quick easy.

Advertisements

Using Wikispaces for Collaborative Knowledge Construction in a Masters-Level Course Cheryl A. Stevens, Professor Recreation & Leisure Studies College of.

Developing an Outcomes Assessment Plan. Part One: Asking a Meaningful Question OA is not hard science as we are doing it. Data that you collect is only.

Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall

Clinical Evaluation Tools Copyright 2008 by The Health Alliance of MidAmerica LLC.

Student Evaluations. Introduction: Conducted: Qualtrics Survey Fall 2011 o Sample Size: 642 o FT Tenured: 158, FT Untenured: 59 o Adjunct: 190 o Students:

CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.

Bus 411 DAY 27. Timeline (tick-tock) May 1  Take home final available  Due May 3PM May 5  Team 2 Case 22 Yellow Roadway Corp.  Round four case.

Technology as a solution to implementing active-learning pedagogies... Ann C. Smith University of Maryland College Park MD PKAL 2003 Boulder Colorado.

Online Student Peer Reviews William J. Wolfe Professor of Computer Science California State University Channel Islands

GeoLearn learning and teaching innovations DIT 2007 PBL Uncovered The Hi’s and the Low’s GEOLEARN Dr. Audrey Martin, Dr. Eugene McGovern & Kevin Mooney.

MyUCDavis Course Management Tools CC-FIT11/8/2004.

Free Online Education Ranjeeth Thunga (973) USA India Updated: Feb Please share any & all feedback.

Online Student Peer Reviews William J. Wolfe Professor of Computer Science California State University Channel Islands

BUS 411 Day 15. Agenda Templates available in WebCT Assignment 5 will be at the end of the semester Mid-term exam Due Discussion on preparing Case Studies.

Online Course Observation. Objectives: 1.Articulate the steps of an online faculty observation 2.Explain the elements of the GRCC Online Course Observation.

Grading Group Projects Taryn Vian. Why do group projects? Increases student engagement through applied learning Allows us to give more complex assignments.

Writing and Sequencing Assignments Christopher J. Bilodeau, Ph.D. Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA, USA

How the assessment landscape is changing in the short and medium term Peter Taylor.

DESIGN AND ASSESSMENT OF A PEER-TUTORING PROGRAM FOR BASIC SKILLS DEVELOPMENT February 19, 2010.

EDUI 6701 Final Project. Objectives  Real world situation  Write a proposal to a curriculum committee in charge of training  Develop a new course –

Is PeerMark a useful tool for formative assessment of literature review? A trial in the School of Veterinary Science Duret, D & Durrani,

Review completed by: David Copeland Mary Leigh Sellers Randall (Luke) Young.

Implementing Active Learning Strategies in a Large Class Setting Travis White, Pharm.D., Assistant Professor Kristy Lucas, Pharm.D., Professor Pharmacy.

Assessing Tomorrow’s Leaders Today in an Integrated Reading and Writing Course NADE 2015 – Greenville, SC Kina Lara and Tina Willhoite San Jacinto College.

Individual Education Plan Overview Presented By: Pamela Cameron Fall 2014.

Focusing on Learning Instead of Teaching Collaborative learning Collaborative learning Individual and group quizzes Individual and group quizzes Teaching.

EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom

Sysoft eRFP Group Decision Support System. eRFP is flexible and productive Every RFP is different Agencies have somewhat different processes Procurement.

February 28, 2008The Teaching Center, Washington University The Teaching Citation Program & Creating a Teaching Portfolio Beth Fisher, Ph.D. Assistant.

Small Business Consulting Project Guidelines. 2 Milestones Conduct Phase I (Initial Client Interview) by Monday April 6th Complete Phase I (Description)

WebCT: Managing Students and Communicating FITC Staff.

Bus 411 DAY 23. ETS testing All junior and senior business majors should take the ETS business major test. It will be offered free of charge on Wednesday.

Richard Beinecke, Professor and Chair Suffolk University Institute for Public Service.

Session 5 Report Cards: Grades, Learning Skills & Comments.

Getting to Know UNO’s Course Evaluation Instrument and its Use in TABS Brian McKevitt Lisa Kelly-Vance Center for Faculty Excellence Sept. 10, 2015.

Using Collaboration in Performance Tasks. Background Collaboration in C.S. Principles ●Curriculum Framework ○ Computational Thinking Practice ○ Learning.

ISECON A New Perspective on Grading Laurie Werner Associate Professor of Computer and Information Technology Miami University.

Bus 411 DAY 24. Agenda Jet Blue Airways Student choose Last Case Send of 1 St and 2 nd choice Only received one teams I will choose if I do not.

Assessment Formats Charlotte Kotopoulous Regis University EDEL_450 Assessment of Learning.

360 Feedback A Tool For Improving Individual And Organizational Effectiveness.

An Assessment For Learning. A rubric is a scoring tool that lists the criteria for a piece of work, or “what counts” and clearly defines gradations of.

Evaluating Student Presentations Speaking Intensive Workshop.

Presented to GETSI by Ellen Iverson, SERC, Carleton College Developed as InTeGrate talk by David Steer Department of Geosciences The University of Akron.

Identifying Assessments

Bus 411 DAY 25. Agenda Course Evaluations AirTran Airways Student choice of Last Case  Team 1 Home Depot  Team 2 Harrah's T  Team 3 Liz Claiborne Team.

What is Micro-teaching Lesson Study (MLS)?. Lesson study, microteaching, and MLS  MLS was developed by combining elements of lesson study and microteaching.

TAILORING EPORTFOLIOS FOR A PROFESSIONAL AUDIENCE Veena Chattaraman Department of Consumer and Design Sciences (CADS) College of Human Sciences, Auburn.

1 Assessment of Asynchronous Discussions within Online Courses David Wicks Assistant Professor Director of Instructional Technology Services Seattle Pacific.

Assessment Means. Learning Outcome Participates will create assessment processes that demonstrate student learning outcomes are being met.

ASSESSMENT and EVALUATION (seeing through the jargon and figuring out how to use the tools)

Building Resources for Teaching Computer Architecture Through Peer Review Edward F. Gehringer Dept. of Electrical & Computer Engineering Dept. of Computer.

BSU E-Learning and PBL Project WP 2: Training of Trainers Mona Dahms, Henrik Bregnhøj Denmark.

Inés Alonso-García Hervé Didiot-Cook Astrid Kuellmann-Lee Peter Wren Language Level Assessments using WebCT Quizzes.

Creating Assessments that Engage Students & Staff Professor Jon Green.

Assessment in HuskyCT Janet Jordan Manager, Instructional Resource Center.

 Spring 2014 MCED 3430 Kelly Chaney.  Shared Group Grade o The group submits one product and all group members receive the same grade, regardless of.

OT 460 Week One Fall  Evaluation Process:  What client wants and needs to do  Determination of what the client can do and has done  Identify.

Using Rubrics for Assessing Individual and/or Group Participation Marie Krbavac June 4, 2015.

Clinical Evaluation Tools

ENG 121 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com

Center for Teaching & Assessment of Learning

Student Assessment and Evaluation

Assessments TAP 1- Strand 5.

Criminal Investigation Program School of Science, Health, and CJ Fall 2015 Assessment Report

Foodborne Illness Response Strategies

How to Present a Case Study

Designing Your Performance Task Assessment

Student Assessment and Evaluation

Presentation transcript:

Assessing Peer Performance in PBL Groups: how technology can help Carolyn K. Manning Associate Professor Dept of Health, Nutrition & Exercise Sciences University of Delaware Newark, Delaware USA

Objectives 1.Describe strengths & weaknesses of an online peer evaluation tool 2.Implement an online peer evaluation tool in your teaching activities

Questions for the audience 1.How many of you include peer evaluation in your course requirements? 2. Do you use this model:  Mid-semester give numerical score/grade & comments award points toward final grade  End of semester award points toward final grade

3.What has been your experience with peer evaluations? ?Paper form ?Time  Feedback: calculations, compiling comments ?Quality Questions for the audience

A peer evaluation process needs to be: Easy for students to do in a meaningful & confidential manner Easy for the instructor to provide feedback in a confidential manner Timely

Peer evaluation process: Paper form 3 sections (see handout) –Evaluation scale & Criteria for evaluation –Individual: group member names & numerical scores supporting comments specific strength –Group: strength weakness & strategy to overcome

Paper form Advantages 1.Easy to implement (instructor) 2.Somewhat easy for students to complete

Paper form Disadvantages 1.Lots of paper to collect & keep track of (instructor & student) 2.Time consuming (instructor) due to manual: tabulations & compilations of comments 3.Quality of evaluations: Comments (limited space, superficial) Inflated numeric scores

Peer evaluation process: Online form Information Resource Consultant III: John Hall “Quiz” tool in WebCT (see handout)

Online form Sections: –Individual performance letter grade comments: –strength and/or weakness specific to research & writing skills –Group performance strength weakness & strategy

Online form (see handout)

Online form Advantages 1.Quality (see handout) –No space restrictions for comments 2.Easy for students –Time spent 3.Easy to track student participation 4.Printed summary reports (see handout)

Online form Disadvantages 1.Evaluation criteria not listed 2.Instructor time –Printing reports (~1 hour 5 min for 42 students in 9 PBL groups) –Compiling comments & grade into written feedback for each student (see handout)

Comments? Questions?

What I learned Online form facilitates the peer evaluation process –More depth by students in supporting comments –Printed individual feedback for each student

How can you have an online peer evaluation form? PBL WebCT Quiz Generator (see handout) –Download : –Need IT help