Baye’s Rule and Medical Screening Tests. Baye’s Rule Baye’s Rule is used in medicine and epidemiology to calculate the probability that an individual.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Validity and Reliability of Analytical Tests. Analytical Tests include both: Screening Tests Diagnostic Tests.
Advertisements

GP 4001 Lecture Series Dealing with undifferentiated problems in primary care II.
Is it True? Evaluating Research about Diagnostic Tests
Module 6 “Normal Values”: How are Normal Reference Ranges Established?
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves
SLIDE 1 Confounding and Bias Aya Goto Nguyen Quang Vinh.
When Intuition Differs from Relative Frequency
What Happens to the Performance of a Diagnostic Test when the Disease Prevalence and the Cut-Point Change? Pathological scores Healthy scores Healthy population.
Azita Kheiltash Social Medicine Specialist Tehran University of Medical Sciences Diagnostic Tests Evaluation.
Ethical AND legal issues in GENETICS. objective 1- introduction. 2-major needs in study of ethics. 3-Ethical Principles in Medicine. 4-The Special Position.
Genetics and Primary Care
Diagnosing – Critical Activity HINF Medical Methodologies Session 7.
Tobias, 2005Econometrics 472 Down’s Syndrome Example.
Introduction to Biostatistics, Harvard Extension School © Scott Evans, Ph.D.1 Evaluation of Screening and Diagnostic Tests.
GerstmanChapter 41 Epidemiology Kept Simple Chapter 4 Screening for Disease.
ISP 121 Statistics That Deceive. Simpson’s Paradox It’s a well accepted rule of thumb that the larger the data set, the better Simpson’s Paradox demonstrates.
Conditional probability
(Medical) Diagnostic Testing. The situation Patient presents with symptoms, and is suspected of having some disease. Patient either has the disease or.
Screening Sherine Shawky, MD, Dr.PH Assistant Professor Public Health King Abdulaziz University College of Medicine
Random Thoughts 2012 (COMP 066) Jan-Michael Frahm Jared Heinly.
Information Mastery: A Practical Approach to Evidence-Based Care Course Directors: Allen Shaughnessy, PharmD, MMedEd David Slawson, MD Tufts Health Care.
First Trimester Screening
6 Probability Chapter6 p Operations on events and probability An event is the basic element to which probability can be applied. Notations Event:
Community Medicine. The association between low birth weight and maternal smoking during pregnancy can be studied by obtaining smoking histories from.
Statistics in Screening/Diagnosis
Sampling : Error and bias. Sampling definitions  Sampling universe  Sampling frame  Sampling unit  Basic sampling unit or elementary unit  Sampling.
Multiple Choice Questions for discussion
Module One: Introduction to the California Prenatal Screening Program
Statistics for Health Care Biostatistics. Phases of a Full Clinical Trial Phase I – the trial takes place after the development of a therapy and is designed.
Principles and Predictive Value of Screening. Objectives Discuss principles of screening Describe elements of screening tests Calculate sensitivity, specificity.
SCREENING Asst. Prof. Sumattna Glangkarn RN, MSc. (Epidemiology), PhD (Nursing studies)
Reliability of Screening Tests RELIABILITY: The extent to which the screening test will produce the same or very similar results each time it is administered.
Quiz 2 - Review. Descriptive Statistics Be able to interpret: -Box Plots and Histograms -Mean, Median, Standard Deviation, and Percentiles.
Prenatal Diagnosis of Congenital Malformations for Undergraduates
Task One – Data Collection Has an Ipod TOTALS YesNo Has been to the South Island Yes No TOTALS.
CHP400: Community Health Program-lI Mohamed M. B. Alnoor Muna M H Diab SCREENING.
MEASURES OF TEST ACCURACY AND ASSOCIATIONS DR ODIFE, U.B SR, EDM DIVISION.
Evidence-Based Medicine Diagnosis Component 2 / Unit 5 1 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0 /Fall 2010.
Computational Intelligence: Methods and Applications Lecture 16 Model evaluation and ROC Włodzisław Duch Dept. of Informatics, UMK Google: W Duch.
Screening and its Useful Tools Thomas Songer, PhD Basic Epidemiology South Asian Cardiovascular Research Methodology Workshop.
Diagnostic Tests Afshin Ostovar Bushehr University of Medical Sciences Bushehr, /7/20151.
/ 131 A. Sattar Khan*, Zekeriya Akturk*, Turan Set** Wonca Europe, September 2008, Istanbul How to value a diagnostic test in family practice * Center.
Positive Predictive Value and Negative Predictive Value
1 Wrap up SCREENING TESTS. 2 Screening test The basic tool of a screening program easy to use, rapid and inexpensive. 1.2.
Ethical AND legal issues in GENETICS. objective 1- introduction. 2-major needs in study of ethics. 3-Ethical Principles in Medicine. 4-The Special Position.
Diagnostic Tests Studies 87/3/2 “How to read a paper” workshop Kamran Yazdani, MD MPH.
Assist. Prof. Dr. Memet IŞIK Ataturk University Medical Faculty Department of Family Medicine Class 2:
Unit 15: Screening. Unit 15 Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Topic 6 Probability Modified from the notes of Professor A. Kuk P&G pp
Organization of statistical research. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and.
/ 101 Saudi Diploma in Family Medicine Center of Post Graduate Studies in Family Medicine EBM Diagnostic Tests Dr. Zekeriya Aktürk
1 DECISION MAKING Suppose your patient (from the Brazilian rainforest) has tested positive for a rare but serious disease. Treatment exists but is risky.
BIOSTATISTICS Lecture 2. The role of Biostatisticians Biostatisticians play essential roles in designing studies, analyzing data and creating methods.
Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests & ROC Curve Analysis PhD Özgür Tosun.
Diagnosis Examination(MMSE) in detecting dementia among elderly patients living in the community. Excel.
Diagnostic Likelihood Ratio Presented by Juan Wang.
© 2010 Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC. Chapter 12 Clinical Epidemiology.
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Receiver- Operator Characteristic Curves 10/10/2013.
Screening Tests: A Review. Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Critical Appraisal Course for Emergency Medicine Trainees Module 5 Evaluation of a Diagnostic Test.
Is suicide predictable? Paul St John-Smith Short Courses in Psychiatry 15/10/2008.
CHP400: Community Health Program-lI Mohamed M. B. Alnoor Muna M H Diab SCREENING.
Jeffrey A. Kuller, MD; Sean C. Blackwell, MD
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Clinical Epidemiology
How do we delay disease progress once it has started?
Diagnosis II Dr. Brent E. Faught, Ph.D. Assistant Professor
Refining Probability Test Informations Vahid Ashoorion MD. ,MSc,
Baye’s Rule and Medical Screening Tests
Figure 1. Table for calculating the accuracy of a diagnostic test.
Another Example Consider a very popular computer game played by millions of people all over the world. The average score of the game is known to be
Presentation transcript:

Baye’s Rule and Medical Screening Tests

Baye’s Rule Baye’s Rule is used in medicine and epidemiology to calculate the probability that an individual has a disease, given that they test positive on a screening test. Baye’s Rule is used in medicine and epidemiology to calculate the probability that an individual has a disease, given that they test positive on a screening test. Example: Down syndrome is a variable combination of congenital malformations caused by trisomy 21. It is the most commonly recognized genetic cause of mental retardation, with an estimated prevalence of 9.2 cases per 10,000 live births in the United States. Because of the morbidity associated with Down syndrome, screening and diagnostic testing for this condition are offered as optional components of prenatal care. Example: Down syndrome is a variable combination of congenital malformations caused by trisomy 21. It is the most commonly recognized genetic cause of mental retardation, with an estimated prevalence of 9.2 cases per 10,000 live births in the United States. Because of the morbidity associated with Down syndrome, screening and diagnostic testing for this condition are offered as optional components of prenatal care. Many studies have been conducted looking at the effectiveness of screening methods used to identify “likely” Down syndrome cases. Many studies have been conducted looking at the effectiveness of screening methods used to identify “likely” Down syndrome cases.

Study of “Triple Test” Effectiveness The results of a study looking at the effectiveness of the “triple-test” are presented below: The results of a study looking at the effectiveness of the “triple-test” are presented below: How well does the triple-test perform? How well does the triple-test perform?

The General Situation Patient presents with symptoms, and is suspected of having some disease. Patient either has the disease or does not have the disease. Patient presents with symptoms, and is suspected of having some disease. Patient either has the disease or does not have the disease. Physician performs a diagnostic test to assist in making a diagnosis. Physician performs a diagnostic test to assist in making a diagnosis. Test result is either positive (diseased) or negative (healthy). Test result is either positive (diseased) or negative (healthy).

The General Situation Test Result True Disease Status Diseased (+) Healthy (-) Diseased (+)Correct False Negative Healthy (-) False Positive Correct

Definitions False Positive: Healthy person incorrectly receives a positive (diseased) test result. False Positive: Healthy person incorrectly receives a positive (diseased) test result. False Negative: Diseased person incorrectly receives a negative (healthy) test result. False Negative: Diseased person incorrectly receives a negative (healthy) test result.

Goal Minimize chance (probability) of false positive and false negative test results. Minimize chance (probability) of false positive and false negative test results. Or, equivalently, maximize probability of correct results. Or, equivalently, maximize probability of correct results.

Accuracy of Tests in Development Sensitivity: probability that a person who truly has the disease correctly receives a positive test result. Sensitivity: probability that a person who truly has the disease correctly receives a positive test result. Specificity: probability that a person who is truly healthy correctly receives a negative test result. Specificity: probability that a person who is truly healthy correctly receives a negative test result.

Triple-Test Performance How does the triple-test perform using these measures? 87/118 = /118 = /4072 = /4072 =.0499

Test Result  What ? Now suppose you are have just been given the news the results of the “triple test” are positive for Down syndrome. Now suppose you are have just been given the news the results of the “triple test” are positive for Down syndrome. What do you want to know now? What do you want to know now? You probably would like to know what the probability that your unborn child actually has Down syndrome. You probably would like to know what the probability that your unborn child actually has Down syndrome.

Accuracy of Tests in Use Positive predictive value: probability that a person who has a positive test result really has the disease. Positive predictive value: probability that a person who has a positive test result really has the disease. Negative predictive value: probability that a person who has a negative test result really is healthy. Negative predictive value: probability that a person who has a negative test result really is healthy. To find these we use Baye’s Rule to “reverse the conditioning”. To find these we use Baye’s Rule to “reverse the conditioning”.

Case-Control Nature of Study Generally these studies are case-control in nature, meaning that the disease is not random! Generally these studies are case-control in nature, meaning that the disease is not random! We specifically choose individuals with the disease to perform the screening test on, therefore we cannot talk about or calculate P(D + ) or P(D - ) using our results. We specifically choose individuals with the disease to perform the screening test on, therefore we cannot talk about or calculate P(D + ) or P(D - ) using our results. To find these we use Baye’s Rule to “reverse the conditioning”. To find these we use Baye’s Rule to “reverse the conditioning”.

Baye’s Rule This requires prior knowledge about the probability of having the disease, P(D + ), and hence the probability of not having the disease, P(D - ). This probability is called the positive predictive value (PPV) of the triple-test.

Negative Predictive Value This also requires prior knowledge of the probabilities of having and not having the disease.

Example: PPV for Triple-Test Prior knowledge about Down’s Syndrome suggests P(D+) = Prior knowledge about Down’s Syndrome suggests P(D+) = or roughly 1 in 1,000 (i.e. P(D+) =.001). or roughly 1 in 1,000 (i.e. P(D+) =.001). We also now from our earlier work that… We also now from our earlier work that… P(T + |D + ) =.7373 P(T - |D + ) =.2627 P(T - |D - ) =.9501 P(T + |D - )=.0499

Comparing to Prior Probability In the absence of any test result the probability of having a child with Down’s Syndrome is P(D + ) = In the absence of any test result the probability of having a child with Down’s Syndrome is P(D + ) = Given a positive test result we have Given a positive test result we have P(D + |T + ) =.0134 P(D + |T + ) =.0134 Comparing these two probabilities in the form of a ratio we find.0134/ = Comparing these two probabilities in the form of a ratio we find.0134/ = When we look at in practical terms however there is still only a 1.34% chance that the unborn child has Down’s Syndrome. When we look at in practical terms however there is still only a 1.34% chance that the unborn child has Down’s Syndrome.

Example: NPV for Triple-Test Prior knowledge about Down’s Syndrome suggests P(D-) = Prior knowledge about Down’s Syndrome suggests P(D-) = or roughly 999 in 1,000 (i.e. P(D-) =.999). or roughly 999 in 1,000 (i.e. P(D-) =.999). We also now from our earlier work that… We also now from our earlier work that… P(T + |D + ) =.7373 P(T - |D + ) =.2627 P(T - |D - ) =.9501 P(T + |D - )=.0499

Comparing to Prior Probability In the absence of any test result the probability of NOT having a child with Down’s Syndrome is P(D - ) = In the absence of any test result the probability of NOT having a child with Down’s Syndrome is P(D - ) = Given a negative test result we have Given a negative test result we have P(D - |T - ) = P(D - |T - ) = Comparing these two probabilities in the form of a ratio we find.99975/ = Comparing these two probabilities in the form of a ratio we find.99975/ = When we look at in practical terms the probability only increases by when we have a negative test result. When we look at in practical terms the probability only increases by when we have a negative test result.

Questions to Think About What do you think of the “Triple-Test” for Down’s Syndrome? What do you think of the “Triple-Test” for Down’s Syndrome? Would you advocate having it administered to all women during their first trimester of pregnancy? Would you advocate having it administered to all women during their first trimester of pregnancy? Would you have it done if you were pregnant? Would you have it done if you were pregnant?