If attention moves in quantal jumps how can the mouse get his cheese? David Crundall Rm 315.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intervention Ideas Based on Characteristics
Advertisements

Attributes of Attention: David Crundall Rm 315 Is attention spatial or object based?
Attributes of Attention: David Crundall Rm 315 Quantal or analogue? Spatial or object-based? "attention can be likened to a spotlight that enhances the.
Selective Visual Attention: Feature Integration Theory PS2009/10 Lecture 9.
Refraction and Lenses AP Physics B.
PHOTOGRAPHY. There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~Ansel Adams.
STM and Encoding Objective – to describe how encoding works in the STM.
Human (ERP and imaging) and monkey (cell recording) data together 1. Modality specific extrastriate cortex is modulated by attention (V4, IT, MT). 2. V1.
Chapter 6: Visual Attention. Overview of Questions Why do we pay attention to some parts of a scene but not to others? Do we have to pay attention to.
Chapter 3 Attention and Performance
Read this article for Friday next week [1]Chelazzi L, Miller EK, Duncan J, Desimone R. A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature.
Eye Movements of Younger and Older Drivers Professor: Liu Student: Ruby.
Psych 216: Movement Attention. What is attention? There is too much information available in the world to process it all. Demonstration: change-detection.
Saccadic eye movements cause compression of time as well as space Concetta Morrone, Ross & Burr.
Chapter 6: Visual Attention. Scanning a Scene Visual scanning – looking from place to place –Fixation –Saccadic eye movement Overt attention involves.
Working Memory: The Feature Model Presented by: Umer Fareed.
Visual attention reveals changing color in moving objects James E. Hoffman and Scott McLean University of Delaware.
Features and Objects in Visual Processing
The visual system Martha Nari Havenith MPI for Brain Research Aug. 5th 2008 FIAS Summer School.
Visual Search: finding a single item in a cluttered visual scene.
Use a pen on the test. The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing Victor A.F. Lamme and Pieter R. Roelfsema.
Upcoming Stuff: Finish attention lectures this week No class Tuesday next week – What should you do instead? Start memory Thursday next week – Read Oliver.
Pre-attentive Visual Processing: What does Attention do? What don’t we need it for?
An attempt to integrate theories of object- based attention and space-based attention.
Motion and Ambiguity Russ DuBois. Ambiguity = the possibility to interpret a stimulus in two or more ways Q: Can motion play a part in our interpretation.
Next Week Memory: Articles by Loftus and Sacks (following week article by Vokey)
Upcoming: Read Expt 1 in Brooks for Tuesday Read Loftus and Sacks For Thursday Read Vokey Thursday the 6th Idea Journals Due on the 6th! The textbook Cognition.
Visual search: Who cares?
Attention II Selective Attention & Visual Search.
Features and Object in Visual Processing. The Waterfall Illusion.
Attention II Theories of Attention Visual Search.
A.F. Lamme and Pieter R. Roelfsema
Features and Object in Visual Processing. The Waterfall Illusion.
Read article by Anne Treisman. Reflexive Orienting Attention can be automatically “summoned” to a location at which an important event has occurred: –Loud.
How the Camera Works ( both film and digital )
Studying Visual Attention with the Visual Search Paradigm Marc Pomplun Department of Computer Science University of Massachusetts at Boston
FACTORS THAT AFFECT PERCEPTION
1 Perception and VR MONT 104S, Fall 2008 Session 13 Visual Attention.
Vygotsky The zone of proximal development. The ZPD This was a term used by Vygotsky to refer to the distance between what a child can achieve alone, and.
Vision: change, lightness, acuity
Searching the truth: Visual search for abstract, well-learned objects Denis Cousineau, Université de Montréal This talk will be available at
Studying Memory Encoding with fMRI Event-related vs. Blocked Designs Aneta Kielar.
Reicher (1969): Word Superiority Effect Dr. Timothy Bender Psychology Department Missouri State University Springfield, MO
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 36 Attention and Change Blindness (why you shouldn't text while driving)
Visual Thinking and the Objects of Visual Attention Colin Ware University of New Hampshire.
The effects of working memory load on negative priming in an N-back task Ewald Neumann Brain-Inspired Cognitive Systems (BICS) July, 2010.
The Effects of Feedback on Targeting with Multiple Moving Targets David Mould and Carl Gutwin.
Intro to Camera Settings. These are the three main ingredients to expose a photograph: ISO sensitivity, shutter speed and lens aperture.
Glossary of Photographic Terms and Concepts. Aperture (aka f-stop): the opening in a lens. The bigger the opening, the more light will be allowed in through.
LOGO Change blindness in the absence of a visual disruption Professor: Liu Student: Ruby.
Intensity discrimination is the process of distinguishing one stimulus intensity from another Intensity Discrimination.
Eye Movements and Working Memory Marc Pomplun Department of Computer Science University of Massachusetts at Boston Homepage:
Cognitive approaches: Information processing, with the computer as a model.
Stephen Harding. Academic Programme Coordinator. Diploma in Addiction Studies. Maynooth University.
Selective Attention
1 Computational Vision CSCI 363, Fall 2012 Lecture 32 Biological Heading, Color.
PROPERTIES OF WAVES FREQUENCY & WAVE SPEED. REVIEW A wave is a disturbance that transfers energy from place to place. In science, energy is defined as.
What are they? Where have you seen them? What do they do?
Parallel or serial, fast or slow, Testing theories of WMC
the role of figural context & attention in masking
David Berman Queen Mary College University of London
Brain States: Top-Down Influences in Sensory Processing
Investigating the Attentional Blink With Predicted Targets
Perception We have previously examined the sensory processes by which stimuli are encoded. Now we will examine the ultimate purpose of sensory information.
Same - Different Analysis
Volume 75, Issue 1, Pages (July 2012)
A Dedicated Binding Mechanism for the Visual Control of Movement
Brain States: Top-Down Influences in Sensory Processing
Human vision: function
Learning Sensorimotor Contingencies
Presentation transcript:

If attention moves in quantal jumps how can the mouse get his cheese? David Crundall Rm 315

? A B C

? A B C

If attention jumps from one place to another, rather than moves in an analogue fashion, then how do we perform this task? Jolicoeur et al. (1986, 1991) tested participants’ abilities to perform a simplified version of this task. Two convoluted lines were presented with one of them passing through the point of fixation. The task was to say whether two targets fell on the same line or fell on different lines. The first target was always presented at the point of fixation.

A typical stimulus used in Jolicoeur’s studies: All of the second target locations fall on the circumference of an invisible circle, ensuring that all second targets are the same distance from the first target in Euclidean space.

+

The line tracer slows down for hair-pin bends: (Jolicoeur, Ullman & Mackay, 1991)

The proximity of distracter lines affects how fast the line tracer can travel (Jolicoeur, Ullman & Mackay, 1991)

The line-tracing process appears to be automatic: Line/gapStrip/gap Curve/gap Curve/curve

Pringle and Egeth (1988) Results for response times to targets on the same curve:

So what mechanism underlies the line tracer? 1.A Pixel by Pixel operator? 2.A Bi-partite operator? 3. A Zoom Lens operator? 40% variance 44% variance 75% variance

To summarise: There appears to be a serial analogue movement of attention that traces lines. It is sensitive to curvature It is affected by the proximity of distracter curves It appears to be automatic rather than under strategic control

Scholte, Spekreijse & Roeflsema (2001): Does attention parse all curves pre-attentively? Or does attention strategically jump along the line to points of ambiguity (i.e. can a quantal movement of attention still account for line tracing)? Or does attention just trace the target line?

Findings from Scholte et al (2001) The lines are not pre-attentively parsed, as the crossovers should not increase RTs and colours should be reported equally as well from both lines. Attention traces the whole line and does not jump from one point to another, otherwise the colours on the target line should have been reported as poorly as those on the distracter line. There is leakage when lines cross, with attention leaking into the distracter line. Conclusion? Is it an analogue movement of attention, or is it something else entirely, related to object-based perception…

Most theories of visual perception assume a pre-attentive stage that initially parses a scene into candidate objects or proto-objects on the basic of Gestalt groupings of features (Bayliss, 1998; Rensink, 2000) Curvature and collinearity can be processed in parallel (Fahrl, 1991; Field, Hayes, & Hess, 1993) The line tracing operator is therefore too slow to provide any valuable input into the processing of natural scenes (Boucart, Delord, & Giersch,1994) Does the line tracing operator have a real role to play in parsing objects?

Gestalt grouping does not occur if attention is directed else where (Ben-Av, Sagi, & Braun, 1992) Some researchers now suggest that attention needs to spread across a visual scene to segregate objects (Roelfsema, Lamme, & Spekreijse, 2000) Scholte et al. (2001) have suggested that there are in fact two levels of object parsing: Base grouping Incremental grouping – a spread of attention through the line rather than an analogue movement But...

Houtkamp, Spekreijse, & Roelfsema (2003) did the same experiment but the colours appeared at varying SOAs after the lines appeared.

So is “line tracing” really “object parsing”? Attention doesn’t move like an analogue spotlight but spreads through the object instead.

Or does it? Houtkamp et al.’s secondary task may have led subjects to adopt certain strategies that favoured reporting the colours. Ideally we need a single task that can distinguish between spreading or moving attention ms Short or long SOA 100 ms 2000 ms

Conclusions Attention automatically moves along a line in order to reach a second target. Is this a special example of analogue movement? Or is it a spread of attention? Is line tracing used in real life, or is it a special case that can only be seen in the laboratory? Could it still be part of the object parsing process?