Fundamental Difference between Urban People Movement and Urban Goods Movement People Movement Largely single origin-destination Urban Goods Movement Largely.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Advertisements

Real-Time Travel Information in Turn-by-Turn Navigation: Past Present & Future Alain L. Kornhauser Professor, Operations Research & Financial Engineering.
Analysis, Characterization and Visualization of Freeway Traffic Data in Los Angeles Alain L. Kornhauser Professor, Operations Research & Financial Engineering.
Customer Service & Relationships. What is Customer Service? No easy way to define May view Customer Service in 3 ways – As an activity A task that is.
Uniform Motion Speed & Velocity.
GREATER NEW YORK A GREENER Travel Demand Modeling for analysis of Congestion Mitigation policies October 24, 2007.
Mobile Resource Manager v2. Core Pillars  Engine - High fuel costs, vehicle maintenance  Productivity - Customers expect increasing levels of service.
Tracking Bluetooth IDs To Measure Travel Time & Origin/Destination How does it work? What information does it give?
French cities’ urban freight surveys 1 st Scientific and Technical Workshop Bologna 05/11/2013 Presented by: Adrien Beziat, PhD, Paris, France.
Getting It From Here to There: Urban Truck Ports and the Coming Freight Crisis Stephen Viscelli NSF Postdoctoral Fellow Center on Wisconsin Strategy.
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Empirical Study of Urban Commercial Vehicle Tour Patterns in Texas Wei Zhou, Jane Lin University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Civil and Materials.
Speed and Stopping Distances
February 9, 2006TransNow Student Conference Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems Freeway Travel Time Messages.
TxDOT Project Developing Freight Highway Corridor Performance Measure Strategies in Texas.
Archived Data User Services (ADUS). ITS Produce Data The (sensor) data are used for to help take transportation management actions –Traffic control systems.
Engaging the Private Sector in Freight Planning An Executive Overview Presented by the Federal Highway Administration January 16, 2007 TX Border Partnership.
Princeton University Prospect Eleven Dec. 6, 2005 Towards Real-Time MinETA Routing Tuesday, December 6, 2005 RPI, Troy, NY Alain L. Kornhauser Professor,
The Off-Hour Deliveries NYC Project 1 José Holguín-Veras, William H. Hart Professor Director of the Center for Infrastructure, Transportation, and the.
Use of Truck GPS Data for Travel Model Improvements Talking Freight Seminar April 21, 2010.
Microsimulation for Rural and Exurban Regions: Lake County, California David Gerstle (presenting) & Zheng Wei Caliper Corporation.
East Link Operating Plan for Initiating Service on the East Side November 2014.
Stacey D. Hodge Office of Freight Mobility, New York City Department of Transportation 1 Off Hour Deliveries New York City Joseph Dack HDR Jeffrey Wojtowicz.
Network and Dynamic Segmentation Chapter 16. Introduction A network consists of connected linear features. Dynamic segmentation is a data model that is.
The London Congestion Charge. Facts Traffic speed in central London had fallen more that 20% since the 1960s (14.2 mph to 10mph) I n 1998 drivers in inner.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Project: Model Integration Options Greg Erhardt DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th,
2010 Travel Behavior Inventory Mn/DOT TDMCC- Jonathan Ehrlich October 14, 2010.
GPS Technology Tech Talk April, 2008 Chad Halvarson.
May 7, 2013 Yagnesh Jarmarwala Phani Jammalamadaka Michael Copeland Maneesh Mahlawat 14 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
The Off-Hours Delivery Project in New York City 1 José Holguín-Veras, William H. Hart Professor Director of the VREF Center of Excellence for Sustainable.
Transportation Infrastructure
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. TRB Applications Conference – Freight Committee May 7, 2013.
June 2005 Intelligent Transportation Systems 101 June 21, 2005.
Simulation Analysis of Truck Driver Scheduling Rules Eric C. Ervin Russell C. Harris J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. 615 J.B. Hunt Corporate Drive P.O. Box 130.
PierPASS & Operations as a Solution to Freight Congestion FHWA Talking Freight Seminar June 21, 2006 Bruce Wargo President & CEO, PierPASS Inc.
Methodology for the Use of Regional Planning Models to Assess Impact of Various Congestion Pricing Strategies Sub-network Extraction A sub-network focusing.
Traceability and Legal Metrology
Travel Speed Study of Urban Streets Using GPS &GIS Tom E. Sellsted City of Yakima, Washington Information Systems and Traffic.
NATMEC June 5, 2006 Comparative Analysis Of Various Travel Time Estimation Algorithms To Ground Truth Data Using Archived Data Christopher M. Monsere Research.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
2007 TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference – Daytona Beach, Florida Pseudo Dynamic Traffic Assignment A Duration Based Static Assignment.
1 Northeast Corridor - Overview Regional Plan Association Spring 2010.
Behavioral Micro-Simulation 1 Jose Holguin-Veras, Ph.D., P.E. William H. Hart Professor VREF’s Center of Excellence for Sustainable Urban Freight Systems.
On the Evaluation of Incentive Structures to Implement Off-Hour Deliveries 1 Felipe Aros-Vera Researcher Jose Holguin-Veras, Ph.D., P.E.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
January 23, 2006Transportation Research Board 85 th Annual Meeting Using Ground Truth Geospatial Data to Validate Advanced Traveler Information Systems.
Assessing the Marginal Cost of Congestion for Vehicle Fleets Using Passive GPS Data Nick Wood, TTI Randall Guensler, Georgia Tech Presented at the 13 th.
Customer Care offered by Medtronic UK and Ireland office open 9am -5pm Monday to Friday. –Dedicated team of 6 specialist –Highly trained team – contact.
Word Problems: Distance, rate and time Type A: Same – Direction of travel A train leaves a train station at 1 pm. It travels at an average rate.
ANALYSIS TOOL TO PROCESS PASSIVELY- COLLECTED GPS DATA FOR COMMERCIAL VEHICLE DEMAND MODELLING APPLICATIONS Bryce Sharman & Matthew Roorda University of.
Chapter 8: LOGISTICS Fundamentals of International Business Copyright © 2010 Thompson Educational Publishing, Inc
Calculating Speed/Velocity & Using Motion Graphs Chapter 9.2 & 1. 5 The meaning of miles per hour.
ATDM Analytical Methods for Urban Streets Urban Streets Subcommittee Meeting January 10, 2016 David Hale.
Atlantic Coast Operations Business Intelligence Mobility Project.
16th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference
Speed and Velocity.
CITI Bike Trip Data Analysis
April 27, 2016 You need paper & pencil NO Test on Friday! 
Using NPMRDS Data for System Performance
Big-time Implications of SmartDrivingCars (…Trucks & Buses)
Macroscopic Speed Characteristics
Gary Bennion Manager - Operational Tax Con-way Inc.
Welcome and Introduction
ACEC of Arizona & ADOT Liaison Todd A. Emery, PE
Big-time Implications of SmartDrivingCars (…Trucks & Buses)
TransCAD Vehicle Routing 2018/11/29.
A B A B C D C D A B A B C D C D A B A B C D C D A B A B C D C D
Rush-hour truck ban.
Welcome and Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Fundamental Difference between Urban People Movement and Urban Goods Movement People Movement Largely single origin-destination Urban Goods Movement Largely “tours” consisting of many linked and usually clustered customer trips covering a day’s work. To/From Cluster & Between Customers. Customer often specifies time window for service People Movement Largely single origin-destination Urban Goods Movement Largely “tours” consisting of many linked and usually clustered customer trips covering a day’s work. To/From Cluster & Between Customers. Customer often specifies time window for service Warehouse Customers

Objective of Pilot Test Characterize Manhattan Goods Movement Congestion By Time-of-Day (ToD) – Key aspect is “expected travel time” by location by ToD – Use normalized concept of “Average Speed” by Activity: Access to/from Manhattan Travel between customers in Manhattan – Receivers tend to be “buyers” of the goods They substantially influence when the goods are delivered Implication: – Value pricing should be focused on the Receiver!! Place incentives on Receivers for off-peak receipts of goods! Place dis-incentives on Receivers for peak hour receipt of goods!

Quantifying ToD and Spatial Congestion Method: – Focused on using GPS to objectively measure the performance of the of the urban freight system – Gather frequent (~ every 5 seconds) GPS “Breadcrumb” data: ID, Position, Velocity, Date, Time – Analytically segregate customer stop activity from movement activity Must be done accurately: – Congestion can look like a customer stop – A customer stop can look like congestion

GPS Data System Zinc II WinMobile SmartPhone w T*Mobile cellular data com running CoPilot Live satNav software – Live updates every 5 seconds on web Easy data availability to research team, shipper and receiver – Backup data archived every second on SmartPhone – Ability to send stop list and messages to driver – Relatively inexpensive $300 hardware, $50 software, $40/month short term data plan

GPS Challenges in NY Met Area Worst “urban canyon” in US – Position can drift substantially (to parallel street) Severe congestion can look like drift – GPS is least accurate in speed and heading at low speeds No GPS in Tunnels Substantial scatter and noise in both position, speed and heading in: – GWB, especially lower level, – Under elevated transit and expressways

Preliminary Results from Two Carrier Baldor Specialty Foods New Deal Logistics (NDL)

Pilot Test: Remote Sensing of Off-Peak Deliveries: Baldor Specialty Preliminary Results 5 Trucks from Nov 1 through Dec 2, 2009 Alain L. Kornhauser Dec 4, 2009

Baldor Total (5 trucks) Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded Baldor Total (5 trucks) Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded <7mph >45 <7mph >45

<7mph >45 <7mph >45 Baldor Truck #1120 Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded Baldor Truck #1120 Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded

Baldor Truck #1120 Tour on 11/19/09 2:21:05 to 12:6:43 Segment Color-coded Baldor Truck #1120 Tour on 11/19/09 2:21:05 to 12:6:43 Segment Color-coded

Baldor Truck #1120 Tour on 11/19/09 2:21:05 to 12:6:43 Speed Color-coded Average Speed 8.5 mph Baldor Truck #1120 Tour on 11/19/09 2:21:05 to 12:6:43 Speed Color-coded Average Speed 8.5 mph <7mph >45 <7mph >45

Baldor (5 Trucks) Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded Baldor (5 Trucks) Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded <7mph >45 <7mph >45 1 st & last trip segment fr/to Hunts Point Connecticut: 33.4 mph Long Island: 13.6 mph New Jersey:24.2 mph Manhattan :13.6 mph 1 st & last trip segment fr/to Hunts Point Connecticut: 33.4 mph Long Island: 13.6 mph New Jersey:24.2 mph Manhattan :13.6 mph

Baldor Truck #931 Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded Baldor Truck #931 Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded <7mph >45 <7mph >45

<7mph >45 <7mph >45 Baldor Truck #1040 Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded Baldor Truck #1040 Nov 1 to Dec 2, 2009 Speed Color-coded

Pilot Test: Remote Sensing of Off-Peak Deliveries: New Deal Logistics Preliminary Results Initial use of 4 CoPilot | Live SmartPhones from Oct 2 through Oct 14, 2009 Alain L. Kornhauser Oct 19, 2009

NDL Total ; Speed Color-coded <7mph >45 <7mph >45

NDL2; Speed: <7mph >45 <7mph >45

NDL2; Speed: <7mph >45 <7mph >45

NDL2; Speed: <7mph >45 <7mph >45

NDL1; Speed:

NDL2; P&D Stops:

NDL2; Speed:

NDL2; P&D Stops: Kings Plaza

Tour Stop Segments Lincoln 8AM Oct 5, 2009

Device IDTrip #GPS Points # Date (m/d/yr) Start Time (h:m:s) End Time (h:m:s) Dist. (Miles) Av. Speed (MPH) Stop Duration (Hrs) NDL /05/098:10:169:30: eod <7mph >45 <7mph >45

Tour Stop Segments – Lincoln 8AM Oct 2, 2009

Device IDTrip #GPS Points # Date (m/d/yr) Start Time (h:m:s) End Time (h:m:s) Dist. (Miles) Av. Speed (MPH) Stop Duration (Hrs) NDL /02/097:56:278:42: <7mph >45 <7mph >45

Device IDTrip #GPS Points # Date (m/d/yr) Start Time (h:m:s) End Time (h:m:s) Dist. (Miles) Av. Speed (MPH) Stop Duration (Hrs) NDL143810/02/099:00:169:03: eod <7mph >45 <7mph >45

Tour Stop Segments – Lincoln 8AM - Wall St Oct 7, 2009

Device IDTrip #GPS Points # Date (m/d/yr) Start Time (h:m:s) End Time (h:m:s) Dist. (Miles) Av. Speed (MPH) Stop Duration (Hrs) NDL /07/098:17:018:53: <7mph >45 <7mph >45

Device IDTrip #GPS Points # Date (m/d/yr) Start Time (h:m:s) End Time (h:m:s) Dist. (Miles) Av. Speed (MPH) Stop Duration (Hrs) NDL /07/099:04:559:36: eod <7mph >45 <7mph >45

Tour Stop Segments – Lincoln 8PM Oct 7, 2009

Device IDTrip #GPS Points # Date (m/d/yr) Start Time (h:m:s) End Time (h:m:s) Dist. (Miles) Av. Speed (MPH) Stop Duration (Hrs) NDL /14/0920:15:1021:13:

Tour Stop Segments – Lincoln 5pm Oct 13, 2009

Device IDTrip #GPS Points # Date (m/d/yr) Start Time (h:m:s) End Time (h:m:s) Dist. (Miles) Av. Speed (MPH) Stop Duration (Hrs) NDL /13/0917:53:4519:25: eod

Tour Stop Segments – GWB – 7AM Oct 2, 2009

Device IDTrip #GPS Points # Date (m/d/yr) Start Time (h:m:s) End Time (h:m:s) Dist. (Miles) Av. Speed (MPH) Stop Duration (Hrs) NDL /02/096:53:228:05:

Average Stop–Stop Speeds (MPH) by Time-of- Day for Major Tour Segments Preliminary results from Pilot Test (Oct 2- Oct 14, 2009) Tour Stop Segment Type AM Peak (6am -9am) MidDay (9am - 3pm) PM Peak (3pm -7pm) Overnight (7pm – 6am) Jersey Depot – 1 st Stop in Manhattan 11.8NA Intra- Manhattan stop Stops Btwn Outer Boroughs NA NA Jersey Depot – Outer Boroughs NA Intra NJ Stops NA